Forwarded from Anthony Khallouf @ausvstheagenda
High Court ruling document:
https://www.hcourt.gov.au/sites/default/files/eresources/2026-06-04/HCA/White%20Australia%20Party%20v%20Cth%20%5B2026%5D%20HCASJ%2017.pdf
https://www.hcourt.gov.au/sites/default/files/eresources/2026-06-04/HCA/White%20Australia%20Party%20v%20Cth%20%5B2026%5D%20HCASJ%2017.pdf
π€¬19β€3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββmdtlion - π¨BREAKING NEWS: Victoria Officially Crowned Car Theft Capital of Australiaβ’
MELBOURNE β In a stunning triumph for equity and inclusion, Comrade Allanβs Marxist progressive regime has delivered a record 32,000 stolen vehicles and $243 million in insurance payouts.
Thanks to their visionary weak bail laws and laughably soft youth crime policies, repeat offenders are back on the streets faster than ever⦠helping Victoria achieve what the other states can only dream of: more stolen cars than the rest of Australia combined.
Perfectly complemented by Federal Laborβs Import-the-Third-World-become-the-Third-Worldβ’ mass migration masterplan, this is cultural enrichment at its finest.
Next up: free key-cloning devices with every welfare payment.
Because nothing strengthens a society like turning car parks into community redistribution hubs.
Thanks Labor π«Ά
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
MELBOURNE β In a stunning triumph for equity and inclusion, Comrade Allanβs Marxist progressive regime has delivered a record 32,000 stolen vehicles and $243 million in insurance payouts.
Thanks to their visionary weak bail laws and laughably soft youth crime policies, repeat offenders are back on the streets faster than ever⦠helping Victoria achieve what the other states can only dream of: more stolen cars than the rest of Australia combined.
Perfectly complemented by Federal Laborβs Import-the-Third-World-become-the-Third-Worldβ’ mass migration masterplan, this is cultural enrichment at its finest.
Next up: free key-cloning devices with every welfare payment.
Because nothing strengthens a society like turning car parks into community redistribution hubs.
Thanks Labor π«Ά
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π€―20π3β€2π2
Forwarded from Tom Sewell
The application for High Court injunction has been dismissed.
The Chief Justice determined that the plaintiff doesn't need the protection. The decision relied heavily on a previous judgement of Castlemaine Tooheys vs South Australia, which implies that the validity of the legislation should be given the benefit of the doubt until the full hearing in September, and that the strength or weakness of our case is irrelevant to receiving the injunction.
The Chief Justice determined that the purpose of the injunction is not to give the applicants immunity from the law, the purpose of the injunction is to prevent irrevocable harm to the plaintiff. The Commonwealth asserted that there was no current prosecution against the plaintiff and therefore no permanent harm. When asked yesterday by the Chief Justice as to whether any prosecution had taken place.
The Commonwealth replied: "there is as yet no specific threat by the defendants (The Commonwealth) to take action against the plaintiffs (White Australia)".
The Chief Justice asked again: "no specific threat, or no intention?".
The Commonwealth replied: "no I cant put it like that, I don't have instructions to put it like that, one such step might be investigation into crimes".
The Chief Justice asked further: "There's been no prosecution commenced?".
The Commonwealth replied: "I am not aware of any prosecutions by offices who are not party to this proceeding" ... "the ideology and rhetoric of White Australia, is seen to inspire individuals for violence" ... "in the absence of real harm to the plaintiffs, other than the harm of the law, there's nothing that in refusing the injunction would harm the plaintiffs, however granting the injunction could bring harm".
The Chief Justice remained neutral today as to whether there was any real or perceived harm to the community by dismissing the injunction.
In summary, the Injunction was dismissed because there was insufficient evidence of irrevocable harm against the plaintiffs if the injunction was not to be granted. The communist party received the injunction from Justice Dixon because the commonwealth threatened to take possession of the Australian Communist parties property, and that no such threat had been made by the commonwealth against The White Australia Party.
The Commonwealth suggested that in the event that The White Australia Party was successful at the full hearing in September, that they could reconstitute without any harm and therefore any harm to the incorporation is reversable. The Justice does not outright express that the harm to the Party by the commonwealth would be "irrevocable and irreparable", and instead referred the The White Australia Party to a lower court, seeking injunction to Registrar of Incorporated Associations under s 135(1) of the Victorian Act.
The injunction was dismissed on the grounds in part because the Commonwealth has not currently threatened to prosecute Officers of the White Australia Party, nor has the Commonwealth threatened to take assets off the Party or its Officers - which distinguishes it from the Australian Communist Party injunction which was successful.
The commonwealth were unsuccessful in their application for costs.
The Chief Justice determined clearly in paragraph 25 of his decision that the Plaintiff could continue engaging legal advice for the purpose of prosecuting the Commonwealth on behalf of The White Australia Party.
"25 To be added for completeness is that there is no suggestion, on the part of
the plaintiffs or on the part of the defendants, that the practical operation of Pt 5.3B
is to prevent the Party or Mr Sewell from continuing to engage and instruct its legal
representatives to prosecute this proceeding to its conclusion.35"
I will seek legal advice as to whether this includes further fundraising for the purpose of engaging in legal representation.
The full hearing will commence mid September to determine the validity of the Hate Crimes Legislation and therefore the Constitutional right for the White Australia Party to exist and contest elections.
The Chief Justice determined that the plaintiff doesn't need the protection. The decision relied heavily on a previous judgement of Castlemaine Tooheys vs South Australia, which implies that the validity of the legislation should be given the benefit of the doubt until the full hearing in September, and that the strength or weakness of our case is irrelevant to receiving the injunction.
The Chief Justice determined that the purpose of the injunction is not to give the applicants immunity from the law, the purpose of the injunction is to prevent irrevocable harm to the plaintiff. The Commonwealth asserted that there was no current prosecution against the plaintiff and therefore no permanent harm. When asked yesterday by the Chief Justice as to whether any prosecution had taken place.
The Commonwealth replied: "there is as yet no specific threat by the defendants (The Commonwealth) to take action against the plaintiffs (White Australia)".
The Chief Justice asked again: "no specific threat, or no intention?".
The Commonwealth replied: "no I cant put it like that, I don't have instructions to put it like that, one such step might be investigation into crimes".
The Chief Justice asked further: "There's been no prosecution commenced?".
The Commonwealth replied: "I am not aware of any prosecutions by offices who are not party to this proceeding" ... "the ideology and rhetoric of White Australia, is seen to inspire individuals for violence" ... "in the absence of real harm to the plaintiffs, other than the harm of the law, there's nothing that in refusing the injunction would harm the plaintiffs, however granting the injunction could bring harm".
The Chief Justice remained neutral today as to whether there was any real or perceived harm to the community by dismissing the injunction.
In summary, the Injunction was dismissed because there was insufficient evidence of irrevocable harm against the plaintiffs if the injunction was not to be granted. The communist party received the injunction from Justice Dixon because the commonwealth threatened to take possession of the Australian Communist parties property, and that no such threat had been made by the commonwealth against The White Australia Party.
The Commonwealth suggested that in the event that The White Australia Party was successful at the full hearing in September, that they could reconstitute without any harm and therefore any harm to the incorporation is reversable. The Justice does not outright express that the harm to the Party by the commonwealth would be "irrevocable and irreparable", and instead referred the The White Australia Party to a lower court, seeking injunction to Registrar of Incorporated Associations under s 135(1) of the Victorian Act.
The injunction was dismissed on the grounds in part because the Commonwealth has not currently threatened to prosecute Officers of the White Australia Party, nor has the Commonwealth threatened to take assets off the Party or its Officers - which distinguishes it from the Australian Communist Party injunction which was successful.
The commonwealth were unsuccessful in their application for costs.
The Chief Justice determined clearly in paragraph 25 of his decision that the Plaintiff could continue engaging legal advice for the purpose of prosecuting the Commonwealth on behalf of The White Australia Party.
"25 To be added for completeness is that there is no suggestion, on the part of
the plaintiffs or on the part of the defendants, that the practical operation of Pt 5.3B
is to prevent the Party or Mr Sewell from continuing to engage and instruct its legal
representatives to prosecute this proceeding to its conclusion.35"
I will seek legal advice as to whether this includes further fundraising for the purpose of engaging in legal representation.
The full hearing will commence mid September to determine the validity of the Hate Crimes Legislation and therefore the Constitutional right for the White Australia Party to exist and contest elections.
π€¬9π€·ββ3β€2π€¨2π1π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββRyan Dally - #BREAKING Jacob Hersant speaks to the waiting media after he was convicted and fined for booing a "welcome to country" on Anzac Day last year.
Anzac Day belongs to our veterans, not political activists pushing a "Welcome to Countryβ.
Jacob Hersant is right to stand up against this.
Booing a political ritual on our most sacred day of remembrance shouldn't be a crime.
We must stop letting being politically correct overshadow the memory and sacrifice of the Anzacs.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
Anzac Day belongs to our veterans, not political activists pushing a "Welcome to Countryβ.
Jacob Hersant is right to stand up against this.
Booing a political ritual on our most sacred day of remembrance shouldn't be a crime.
We must stop letting being politically correct overshadow the memory and sacrifice of the Anzacs.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π―63β‘10β€4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββMickamious - Australiaβs media is only now reporting on the death of Henry Nowak.
They reported about George Floyd within hours, but because Henry is white, his life will never be worth the same in their eyes compared to that of George Floyd.
Remember that.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
They reported about George Floyd within hours, but because Henry is white, his life will never be worth the same in their eyes compared to that of George Floyd.
Remember that.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π―56β€1π’1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββSyrian Girl - π¨Heartbreaking. Henry Nowakβs sister has posted a video of their bond as siblings. Being accused of racism is a death sentence now if you are white.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π’54β€11π€¬3π2π€―1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββTucker Carlson - Whites are dying. Itβs not an accident and the only crime is noticing.
Featuring: Frank Wright.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
Featuring: Frank Wright.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π―38π€ͺ2β€1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββChampionship Rounds - President Donald Trump says he might keep the UFC Claw structure on the White House lawn permanently π
"The Eiffel Tower was supposed to be taken down immediately, and then they said we sort of like it, let's leave it up longer.
We're building something in front of the White House, it's quite attractive to a lot of people. I'm looking at it and maybe we'll never ever take it down."
X Link
Sure, like everyone in the world would travel to the USA just to see a giant structure resembling a fisher price baby activity toy!
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
"The Eiffel Tower was supposed to be taken down immediately, and then they said we sort of like it, let's leave it up longer.
We're building something in front of the White House, it's quite attractive to a lot of people. I'm looking at it and maybe we'll never ever take it down."
X Link
Sure, like everyone in the world would travel to the USA just to see a giant structure resembling a fisher price baby activity toy!
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π€ͺ10π€¨8β€2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββDefiant Ghost - Theo Von unloaded on Americaβs relationship with Israel, no script, no filter.
βI do have a lot of uncomfort about Americaβs relationship with Israelβ¦ It just feels like a satanic regime at this point.β
Then he went deeper:
βIt feels like heβs just been compromised by Israel, by this dark government over thereβ¦ Itβs f*cking baffling. And itβs sick.β
Theo continued: βI don't believe the Israeli leaders have any intention to stop that or they have any care for the American people.β
βIf we don't speak up now our children won't have the chance to speak upβ¦either by law or worse.β
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
βI do have a lot of uncomfort about Americaβs relationship with Israelβ¦ It just feels like a satanic regime at this point.β
Then he went deeper:
βIt feels like heβs just been compromised by Israel, by this dark government over thereβ¦ Itβs f*cking baffling. And itβs sick.β
Theo continued: βI don't believe the Israeli leaders have any intention to stop that or they have any care for the American people.β
βIf we don't speak up now our children won't have the chance to speak upβ¦either by law or worse.β
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π23π13π―5β€4π1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββTMZ - π Rep. Thomas Massie reveals to @hicharliecotton that he and Marjorie Taylor Green have a Republican takeover plan.
X Link
Great attempt at the Aussie accent there Thomas !
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
X Link
Great attempt at the Aussie accent there Thomas !
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π30β€3π€ͺ3π1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββAnglo - Some incredible detective work by the Australian media here. I would have never put two and two together. π
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π18π7π₯΄3π€ͺ2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββRyan Dally - MP Kevin Hogan blasts PM Anthony Albanese in Parliament for destroying Australia's risk reward economic model.
Hogan's critique is razor sharp, the government has systematically inverted incentives for private enterprise.
Historically, risking capital meant keeping the return.
Now, the framework forces a parasitic transfer of wealth βYou take the risk and the Albanese Government gets the rewardβ Hogan argued.
Hogan then rages that this isn't just failed policy, it's a calculated βunforgivable" deception of the Australian electorate.
Hard to argue.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
Hogan's critique is razor sharp, the government has systematically inverted incentives for private enterprise.
Historically, risking capital meant keeping the return.
Now, the framework forces a parasitic transfer of wealth βYou take the risk and the Albanese Government gets the rewardβ Hogan argued.
Hogan then rages that this isn't just failed policy, it's a calculated βunforgivable" deception of the Australian electorate.
Hard to argue.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π₯34π―12π2
It can be revealed that more than 50,000 non Australian citizens have used a Albanese Government backed pathway into the housing market.
50,000 non Australian imports, hailing from countries such as India, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan and Sri Lanka are now dipping into our tax money to buy themselves a home.
How is this even legal?
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
50,000 non Australian imports, hailing from countries such as India, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan and Sri Lanka are now dipping into our tax money to buy themselves a home.
How is this even legal?
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π€¬66π11π€¨1
Fresh in, another round of βemergency donationsβ being requested by the Australian Labor Party.
Apparently $72 million isnβt enough to fend off One Nation that they have to beg under the premise of βraising $10,000 TODAY!β
These clowns are off the rails unhinged.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
Apparently $72 million isnβt enough to fend off One Nation that they have to beg under the premise of βraising $10,000 TODAY!β
These clowns are off the rails unhinged.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π26π22π―4π€ͺ3β€1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββKonstantin Kisin - Henry Nowak: How Anti-Racism Gave You Racism.
Elon Musk - Well said
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
Elon Musk - Well said
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π―19β€2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ββPiers Morgan Uncensored - "Abolish the police? That's an extraordinary thing to say!"
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π―16π₯1π€―1π€ͺ1
Let's examine some of the polling data as it relates to migration to Australia.
45% of Australians think migration is "generally negative" for the country (Essential April 2026).
79% of Australians want net migration at a level of 100k per year or less, including 75% of migrants (Fox & Hedgehog March 2026).
60% of Australians say there are "too many migrants in Australia", including 59% of migrants (Fox & Hedgehog March 2026). This view is also held by a majority of non-citizens who have an opinion on the issue either way.
Policymakers have made an absolute mess.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
45% of Australians think migration is "generally negative" for the country (Essential April 2026).
79% of Australians want net migration at a level of 100k per year or less, including 75% of migrants (Fox & Hedgehog March 2026).
60% of Australians say there are "too many migrants in Australia", including 59% of migrants (Fox & Hedgehog March 2026). This view is also held by a majority of non-citizens who have an opinion on the issue either way.
Policymakers have made an absolute mess.
X Link
π¦πΊ@RealLandDownUnder
π16β€3π2