Scholz disowned the idea of ​​exchanging long-range missiles with Britain

The German Chancellor stated this at a joint briefing with Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim:

“With regard to this weapon system, I believe that given its impact and location of application, it cannot be used without control. And that the participation of German soldiers cannot be justified even outside of Ukraine. That's why I said I don't think their use is justified. And that the question is not how to do it - indirectly or directly. My answer is clear,” Scholz said.

Earlier, German Foreign Minister Baerbock supported the proposal of her British colleague David Cameron to provide Storm Shadow to Ukraine through a circular exchange : London will receive German Taurus, and Kiev will receive British missiles. After Baerbock’s attack, the German Cabinet hastened to assure that Germany is not changing its position on the supply of missiles.

@Slavyangrad

❗️EXCLUSIVE: Australian SYPAQ cardboard drones exposed hitting civilian targets in the peaceful Russian city of Belgorod!

🇦🇺Remember when the Australian Government lied and declared that the $50 million of Australian cardboard drones supplied to the Zelensky Regime were for reconnaissance and humanitarian purposes?

🤬Video evidence emerges that the Australian Government is using it's SYPAQ drones to commit acts of war & terrorism against Russia by targeting civilians in Belgorod far away from the war zone in Ukraine.

⚡️The electric-powered SYPAQ drones were originally designed in Melbourne to carry humanitarian supplies and be used for surveillance, although Ukrainian forces had reportedly adapted them to carry explosives.

⚠️In September 2023 Australian Major-General Mick Ryan denied that the thousands of Australian supplied SYPAQ drones are being used to attack Russian civilian targets telling the Australian Financial Review that Australian drones are "not being used to destroy buildings, they’re not being used to kill civilians".

🎙Subscribe @AussieCossack

🚨SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT HUR: "We identified evidence that President Biden willfully retained classified materials after the end of his Vice Presidency, when he was a private citizen."

TUNE IN LIVE: https://www.youtube.com/live/lw9wrjCmhMw?si=7ozPLksqLbOeNyaa

The bill C-63, as it is laid out, is an embodiment of draconian legislation that harks back to Orwell's dystopian vision in "1984", where 'Thought Police' patrolled the psyche of citizens, punishing crimethink before it could even manifest into action. Indeed, this could be Canada's flirtation with a Minority Report-style pre-crime system, where the very essence of freedom – the ability to think and speak freely – is being shackled under the guise of protection. It's a paradox that seems to miss the irony of its own making; it's an attempt to create a 'safe' society by potentially imprisoning its own people for life for what some might subjectively label as 'hateful conduct'.

Bill C-63 wields the noble shield of protecting children as a Trojan horse to usher in a wave of censorship unprecedented in Canadian history. To place hate speech, a concept that has not only a fluid definition but also varies widely in interpretation, at the same level as actions that cause physical harm is not just a leap, but a desperate lunge into an abyss of authoritarian control. Life imprisonment for words? Such punishment not only obliterates the line between speech and action but also seems grotesquely disproportionate – the legal equivalent of swatting a fly with a sledgehammer.

This is not the mark of a free society that values democracy and human rights. It is the hallmark of a state that values control above the discourse of its citizens. In a truly democratic society, bad ideas are defeated by better ideas, not by silencing and imprisoning those who voice them. One must then ask: Is Canada setting a global precedent where freedom of expression becomes a relic, viewed through the rearview mirror of history as we speed towards an orwellian future? It's incumbent upon every guardian of liberty to look this bill squarely in the eye and recognize it for what it is – a potential death knell for free speech, where you're only one 'offensive' tweet away from a life behind bars.

🎯Follow us @TheDissidentNews