Gabbard lays out ‘overwhelming evidence’ of Obama coup plot against the orange messiah.

In a stunning turn of events that will reverberate across the Empire’s collapsing halls of deceit, DNI Tulsi Gabbard has lit the fuse on what may be the most explosive release of declassified material in modern U.S. history. Epstein would take the cake, but his ghost remains locked away.

The headline? Obama’s inner circle waged an intel coup against a sitting president, Donald J. Trump. And they did it not with tanks or guns, but with paper trails, doctored assessments, and a weaponized narrative known now to the world as Russiagate.

Gabbard, flanked by over 100 pages of freshly unredacted emails, memos, and high-level communiques, laid bare the rot that metastasized at the heart of the Obama WH. The documents, no longer speculative, detail a deliberate plot to override the actual intelligence which concluded Russia had neither the “intent nor capability” to interfere in the 2016 election. Instead, those findings were buried like political corpses in the Potomac, replaced by a tailor-made psyop that changed the course of US history.

“This was not intelligence gathering,” Gabbard declared. “It was narrative building.”

And build it they did. Brick by brick. Agency by agency. Until the entire U.S. media-political machine was roaring about Kremlin hackers and Putin’s supposed election puppet. What went unreported, intentionally, is that a CIA-led President’s Daily Brief dated December 8, 2016 explicitly stated that Russia did not impact the election. That report, born from the collective consensus of the CIA, NSA, FBI, and DHS, was shelved. Why? “New guidance,” the emails say.

That same day, the Situation Room became the stage for a high-level political theatre: James Clapper, John Brennan, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, Loretta Lynch. Every familiar ghost of the Obama intelligence cabal was there. Within hours, the original assessment was incinerated, replaced with a fresh version, a creative writing exercise that leaned heavily on the discredited Steele Dossier, that British-born Frankenstein of Clinton-funded fiction.

And so Russiagate was born. Not as intelligence. As treason.

Gabbard, now firmly in the driver’s seat as DNI, has done what no other has dared: expose the architects of a silent coup. She’s referred the evidence to the DOJ and is calling for criminal investigations into the likes of Brennan and Comey.

“No matter how powerful, every person involved must be brought to justice,” she said. “Our nation’s integrity depends on accountability.”

This isn’t just a reckoning, it’s a rupture. A controlled demolition of the sacred lie that has justified sanctions, seizures, and the severing of U.S.–Russia diplomacy. It’s also the final indictment of a neoliberal order addicted to war, to deception, to the kind of moral rot that wraps itself in democratic flags while conducting covert info warfare against its own people.

Gabbard didn’t mince words. “This intelligence was weaponized,” she said. “It was used as a justification for endless smears, for sanctions from Congress, and for covert investigations.”

And with that, the post-2016 matrix is falling apart. The curtain is pulled back. The actors are exposed.

But still.... let’s not pretend the stagecraft is gone.

While Tulsi drops dossiers like thunderbolts, the orange messiah of Mar-a-Lago is hiding in his bunker, praying the Epstein files don’t grow legs and start walking toward his golf course. The empire might be throwing Brennan and Obama to the wolves, but only to protect the rest of the rotten scaffolding. What we’re watching may be the truth, but it’s also a ritual cleansing. Burn a few effigies. Satisfy the crowd. And make sure no one asks what Trump knew… and when. In the shadow of every exposed lie, another one hides. That’s the architecture of American narrative warfare.

And yet, the cracks are growing. BRICS knows. The Global South knows. The illusion is fracturing. Not even Epstein’s ghost can be silenced forever.

- Gerry Nolan

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

◾️Highly recommend you dive into this channel Follow The Islander for more than just news: they deliver sharp geopolitical analysis and investigative reports you won't find anywhere else. The Islander transcends mere multipolarity and challenging the MSM narrative; it's about championing a just peace. Join!

◾️ Follow:
The Islander

◾️Highly recommend you dive into this channel Follow The Islander for more than just news: they deliver sharp geopolitical analysis and investigative reports you won't find anywhere else. The Islander transcends mere multipolarity and challenging the MSM narrative; it's about championing a just peace. Join!

◾️ Follow:
The Islander

Russia Unleashes the Missile Renaissance: The End of Restraint in a World on Fire

Moscow has finally dropped the gloves. For years, Russia watched as the United States slithered out of the INF Treaty, pretending to honor the ghost of arms control while quietly seeding Europe and Asia with weapons designed to pierce the heart of Russian security. On August 4, the Russian Foreign Ministry made it official: the self-imposed moratorium on deploying ground-based intermediate and shorter-range missiles is over. The era of polite waiting is finished. A new missile age—Russian-made, Russian-led, is here.

This was no rash decision. Moscow spent years showing strategic patience after Washington torched the INF Treaty in 2019. Russia’s condition was clear: keep its hypersonic arrows unstrung so long as the Americans avoided planting INF-class systems near its borders. That red line has been crossed repeatedly, from Typhon launchers that lingered after “exercises” in the Philippines, to PrSM tests in Australia edging toward 1,000 km, to Washington’s plans to station SM-6s in Germany by 2026. NATO’s missile footprint has grown like a slow cancer. Russia’s message now is blunt: enough.

This pivot is not just hardware but doctrine, a strategic metamorphosis. Russia’s missile forces are discarding post-Cold War restraints and embracing the cold logic of survival in a multipolar world under siege. At the center of this renaissance is Oreshnik, battle-tested in Ukraine and now in Russian hands. Sleek, lethal, and unbound by treaties, it is the spiritual heir to the Soviet Pioneer - an SS-20 reborn for a modern Eurasian battlefield. Its mission: restore balance, shatter illusions of Western invulnerability, and remind NATO that Moscow’s reach cannot be hemmed in by paper treaties.

Oreshnik is only the beginning. The new arsenal spans land-based Kalibrs, Tsirkons that blur the line between cruise and hypersonic, and ballistic Iskanders built to punch through air defenses. From Belarus to Chukotka, the Black Sea to the Arctic, new brigades will rise, integrating strikes, electronic warfare, and air defense into cohesive formations. This is Russia’s answer to the American model: not imitation, but evolution.

For Europe, the echoes of history are deafening. The Euro-missile crisis stirs in its grave, now dressed in 21st‑century armor. Today’s deployments are multinational: European initiatives like ELSA, Japanese and South Korean participation, and a constant US presence from Guam to Germany. This isn’t deterrence; it’s provocation cloaked as “security.” And that posture has invited Russia’s response.

On the battlefield, these weapons will do more than deter, they will shape outcomes. In Ukraine, Russia can test and refine its new missile architecture against real Western-supplied defenses. Deep strikes, rapid mobility, and precision targeting are already eroding the myth of Ukrainian invulnerability. Each new brigade, each hypersonic platform, signals that Moscow is rewriting the rulebook of escalation: methodical, deliberate, unstoppable.

The West may feign shock, but this was inevitable. By dismantling arms control and encircling Russia, Washington and its allies planted the seeds of the very arms race they claim to fear. Now, the missile renaissance has arrived, not as a boast, but as a necessity, a shield forged in the furnace of betrayal. Deterrence is no longer a handshake; it is a convoy in the forests of Belarus, a hypersonic ghost over the Black Sea, a silent threat in the Arctic.

The polite age of moratoriums is over. Russia has entered the era of action. The empire of missiles has awakened, and the world will have to live with the consequences. You have the Empire of Chaos to thank.

– Gerry Nolan

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

US Includes ALL "Petroleum Products" in Russian Oil Tariffs

P. Diddy checking the label on his baby OIL...

@RiseGS

THE GREAT CAPITULATION: Washington Comes Crawling to Moscow

The empire blinked. After years of scorched earth proxy warfare, billions of dollars funneled into the furnace of a crumbling Ukrainian state, and endless sermons from the altar of NATO exceptionalism, Washington has finally, and quietly, extended an acceptable offer to Moscow. That word, “acceptable,” calmly spoken by Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov, is no mere diplomatic footnote. It is the tolling of the bell: an admission that the West, after years of bluff, bluster, and bloodshed, is now the party seeking terms. Seemingly ready to capitulate to Russia's terms. This day is inevitable, whether it comes now or DC opts for more humiliation.

Let’s dispense with illusions. The Kremlin has never budged from its core demands — demands rooted not in ideology, but in existential survival: recognition of Russia’s new territories, now enshrined in its constitution; a neutral, demilitarized Ukraine; and, above all, the end of NATO encroachment on its borders. These weren’t suggestions. They were lines drawn in steel. And yet now, suddenly, we hear that the United States — through its special envoy Steve Witkoff — has made an offer that Russia is “ready to consider.” That’s not peace through strength. That’s capitulation through exhaustion.

Ushakov, ever the seasoned diplomat, described the meeting as “business-like and constructive.” But behind the decorum lies a profound geopolitical shift. For the Kremlin to even entertain the American proposal, it must already carry implicit recognition of Russia’s victories, on the battlefield, in the economic trenches, and across the shifting sands of the multipolar world. This isn’t a negotiation between equals. It’s a long-overdue adjustment of reality by an empire that no longer controls the narrative, the battlefield, or the future.

Steve Witkoff’s presence in Moscow is itself telling. A real estate magnate turned diplomatic courier, he lacks the baggage of Blinken, the desperation of Sullivan, or the arrogance of Nuland. His role is clear: to deliver a message, not to posture. To seek a path forward, not from a position of strength, but from the debris of strategic defeat. The same Washington that once sought to fracture Russia is now tiptoeing toward reconciliation, not with triumph, but with terms dictated by Moscow’s resilience.

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s comment that “we’re certainly closer [to peace] today than we were yesterday” lands with the weight of a man trying to save face before a collapsing edifice. The empire’s managers are now forced to reckon with what much of the world has already understood: Russia has weathered the sanctions, outmaneuvered the hybrid war, and emerged more sovereign than ever. The ruble lives. Russian arms production is at record levels. And the Global South no longer fears breaking ranks with the Western order.

What looms next is a potential summit between President Putin and Donald Trump, hinted to be hosted in the UAE — the wannabe Geneva of multipolar diplomacy. This is no coincidence. Trump, despite his chaos, was the last American president to treat Putin as a peer, not a caricature. A meeting in neutral territory would symbolize the final burial of Western exceptionalism and the emergence of a new diplomatic rhythm: one that flows through Moscow, Abu Dhabi, Astana, and Beijing, not Brussels and Washington.

This moment isn’t about peace in the naive Western sense. It’s about recalibration. The West is perhaps learning, too late — that it can no longer dictate terms to civilizations older, more patient, and more rooted than its own. Russia’s war was never about Ukraine alone. It was about ending an era. And with the words “acceptable offer,” Moscow has signaled that the era of Western impunity is over. The empire came to talk. Moscow listened, because it had already won.

- Gerry Nolan

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

Donate - Support Our Work

The Death Sentence Doctrine: Netanyahu’s Final Solution for Gaza’s Captives

In a stunning display of strategic nihilism, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has greenlit the full military occupation of Gaza, knowing full well, as his own generals have warned, that this move may seal the fate of the remaining captives. Not as collateral damage, but as bargaining chips sacrificed to save Bibi himself by prolonging Gaza’s suffering.

This is not conjecture. This is now doctrine.

Per IDF sources including Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir, full reoccupation would all but ensure the death of the hostages. 50 captives remain. Perhaps 20 are still breathing. Warnings were issued. Assessments logged. And yet, Bibi's war cabinet, a grotesque theatre of ethno-nationalist delusion, rubber-stamped “complete conquest.”

Translation: the hostages are as good as dead. And Netanyahu knows it.

He simply doesn’t care.

The goal isn’t liberation. It’s liquidation — of every remaining obstacle to the Greater Israel project. The hostages? Human shields, but not for Hamas — for Netanyahu, shielding corruption charges, collapsing political capital, and his genocidal legacy.

So when journalist Max Blumenthal calls it a “death sentence,” it’s not flair. It’s fact. The military warned this could kill the hostages, and Netanyahu ordered it anyway.

If any other state did this? We’d call it a war crime. In the Zionist lexicon, it’s just called Friday.

This was no last-ditch move. It was premeditated. Netanyahu’s fascist flank, Ben Gvir, Smotrich, have long pushed for this outcome: total erasure of Gaza, its people, and yes, its inconvenient hostages. Smotrich even dreamed aloud of turning Gaza into a “resort town” for settlers. Ethnic cleansing with beachfront views.

Let that grotesque vision settle in.

Some in the IDF tried to resist. Zamir warned it would lead to an unwinnable insurgency, regional escalation, and here’s the kicker — “ensure hostage casualties.” Netanyahu’s reply? “If this does not suit you, resign.”

That’s not civilian oversight. That’s authoritarian contempt. That’s how policy becomes pogrom.

Meanwhile, the West, that self-proclaimed choir of human rights — mutters concern while continuing arms shipments. Germany, with historical trauma leaking from every pore, dares to call Gaza comparisons to the Holocaust “inflammatory” even as its government sponsors the blockade, bombs, and bullets raining down on children. Washington calls it “Israel’s right to defend itself” — a chilling euphemism for genocide.

But the world sees now. The veil is shredded. This is the most sophisticated genocide ever televised — algorithmically boosted, sanitized, normalized.

2025 will be remembered not just as the year Gaza bled in HD, but the year Tel Aviv stopped pretending. The mask is off. The playbook once whispered is now declared: “Full occupation.” “Final solution.”

Yes — final solution.

And still, hostages remain. Some alive, barely. Israel knows where many are held. They could be saved. But saving lives was never the goal. Winning the narrative is.

A dead hostage doesn’t speak. A grieving family can be silenced. A military failure can be spun into tragic necessity, when all life is just leverage.

Because in Netanyahu’s Zionism, not even his own people are safe from sacrifice.

So yes, this is a death sentence, signed by Netanyahu, co-signed by his war cabinet, and delivered to a captive population on the edge of annihilation. The hostages were condemned not by Hamas, but by the very government that claims to represent them.

This is not defense. This is desecration. This is the Zionist state eating its own, all for the illusion of strategic victory and the cementing of historical myth.

Gerry Nolan

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews