S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854365109990363571?t=Czvx62lo_PapPMRfA0YlXw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1869
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854365109990363571?t=Czvx62lo_PapPMRfA0YlXw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1869
It is vital to recognize that the propagation of misconceptions about Bitcoin is not merely the result of ignorance; it is also perpetuated by individuals like @lopp, who mislead the discourse. The ideas of Satoshi Nakamoto are unambiguous and grounded in the fundamental principles of decentralization and scalability.
Satoshi explicitly stated that Bitcoin is intended to function as a system supported by competing data centers rather than relying on home nodes. This vision advocates for scaled servers, designed to handle the transaction throughput necessary for a global financial system, which runs counter to the simplified narratives often espoused by those who wish to obscure the truth. By distorting Satoshi's intentions, they undermine the very essence of Bitcoin's design, misleading others into believing in a framework that diverges from the original concept.
In this context, it becomes apparent that those who continue to misinterpret or misrepresent these foundational ideas are not just making mistakes; they are actively contributing to a cycle of misinformation that can hinder Bitcoin's potential for adoption and growth. Thus, clarity and fidelity to Satoshi's vision are paramount for those who genuinely wish to understand and support the true evolution of Bitcoin.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854365109990363571?t=Czvx62lo_PapPMRfA0YlXw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1869
Satoshi explicitly stated that Bitcoin is intended to function as a system supported by competing data centers rather than relying on home nodes. This vision advocates for scaled servers, designed to handle the transaction throughput necessary for a global financial system, which runs counter to the simplified narratives often espoused by those who wish to obscure the truth. By distorting Satoshi's intentions, they undermine the very essence of Bitcoin's design, misleading others into believing in a framework that diverges from the original concept.
In this context, it becomes apparent that those who continue to misinterpret or misrepresent these foundational ideas are not just making mistakes; they are actively contributing to a cycle of misinformation that can hinder Bitcoin's potential for adoption and growth. Thus, clarity and fidelity to Satoshi's vision are paramount for those who genuinely wish to understand and support the true evolution of Bitcoin.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854365109990363571?t=Czvx62lo_PapPMRfA0YlXw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1869
🔥1
Es fundamental reconocer que la propagación de conceptos erróneos sobre Bitcoin no es simplemente el resultado de la ignorancia; también es perpetuada por individuos como @lopp, que desorientan el discurso. Las ideas de Satoshi Nakamoto son inequívocas y se basan en los principios fundamentales de descentralización y escalabilidad.
Satoshi declaró explícitamente que Bitcoin está destinado a funcionar como un sistema respaldado por centros de datos en competencia en lugar de depender de nodos locales. Esta visión aboga por servidores escalables, diseñados para manejar el rendimiento de transacciones necesario para un sistema financiero global, lo que va en contra de las narrativas simplificadas que a menudo defienden quienes desean ocultar la verdad. Al distorsionar las intenciones de Satoshi, socavan la esencia misma del diseño de Bitcoin, engañando a otros para que crean en un marco que se aparta del concepto original.
En este contexto, se hace evidente que quienes continúan malinterpretando o tergiversando estas ideas fundamentales no solo están cometiendo errores; están contribuyendo activamente a un ciclo de desinformación que puede obstaculizar el potencial de adopción y crecimiento de Bitcoin. Por lo tanto, la claridad y la fidelidad a la visión de Satoshi son fundamentales para quienes realmente desean comprender y apoyar la verdadera evolución de Bitcoin.
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
7 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854365109990363571?t=Czvx62lo_PapPMRfA0YlXw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1869
Satoshi declaró explícitamente que Bitcoin está destinado a funcionar como un sistema respaldado por centros de datos en competencia en lugar de depender de nodos locales. Esta visión aboga por servidores escalables, diseñados para manejar el rendimiento de transacciones necesario para un sistema financiero global, lo que va en contra de las narrativas simplificadas que a menudo defienden quienes desean ocultar la verdad. Al distorsionar las intenciones de Satoshi, socavan la esencia misma del diseño de Bitcoin, engañando a otros para que crean en un marco que se aparta del concepto original.
En este contexto, se hace evidente que quienes continúan malinterpretando o tergiversando estas ideas fundamentales no solo están cometiendo errores; están contribuyendo activamente a un ciclo de desinformación que puede obstaculizar el potencial de adopción y crecimiento de Bitcoin. Por lo tanto, la claridad y la fidelidad a la visión de Satoshi son fundamentales para quienes realmente desean comprender y apoyar la verdadera evolución de Bitcoin.
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
7 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854365109990363571?t=Czvx62lo_PapPMRfA0YlXw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1869
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854381054750245122?t=UyCFOaBh5J0PEhZA8YAMew&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1872
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854381054750245122?t=UyCFOaBh5J0PEhZA8YAMew&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1872
COPA, BTC Core attack me because I am a man, because the flesh and blood is vulnerable, fallible, and, above all, finite.
But what they cannot attack—what no force of deceit, no coalition of mediocrity, and no consortium of power can ever hope to tarnish—is the idea. .
Satoshi Nakamoto, as a concept, stands beyond the reach of their fumbling hands. They can assail my character; they can hurl their accusations and distortions at the man who claims to have written the protocol.
Yet, they dare not engage with the immutable principles laid down—principles that exist independent of any individual.
The brilliance of Satoshi Nakamoto lies not in the identity of its author but in the eternal truth of its creation. Bitcoin is a monument to decentralised integrity, a system whose strength is derived from its fixed, unyielding structure. Its foundations are not built upon the fragile pedestal of human frailty but upon the incorruptible laws of mathematics and logic. COPA, and those like them, are cowards of the highest order. They cannot challenge the truth, so they attack the man. They cannot defy the unalterable protocol, so they invent a villain in me, hoping to distract you from the sanctity of the idea.
Understand this: by focusing on me, they reveal their impotence. Their strategy is not to dismantle the architecture of Bitcoin but to undermine the figure who laid its first stone. They seek to personalise a debate that should remain firmly rooted in objective reality. Their tactics are as old as tyranny itself—divert the masses from principle by offering them a scapegoat. But the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto transcends such feeble machinations. It is a beacon for those who value independence, a rallying cry for those who refuse to bow to the ever-shifting dictates of power.
Impotent, as long as you do not focus on the man that focus on the idea.
COPA’s fixation on me is a testament to their intellectual dishonesty. They are not interested in truth; they are interested in control. By reducing the discourse to a discussion of my identity, they aim to obscure the enduring nature of the protocol—a protocol designed to operate beyond the influence of any one person.
They want you to forget that Bitcoin, as envisioned, requires no leader, no central authority, no figurehead to function. It is self-governing, self-sustaining, and self-validating.
The only way to achieve this is for it to have been set in stone.
Do not allow them to distract you. My identity, my life, my flaws (Ihave many, but not those used against me)—these are irrelevant to the survival of Bitcoin.
What matters is the idea, the system, the unyielding framework that will endure long after I am gone. Satoshi Nakamoto is not a man; it is the embodiment of a principle.
And principles, unlike men, cannot be destroyed by slander or deceit.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854381054750245122?t=UyCFOaBh5J0PEhZA8YAMew&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1872
But what they cannot attack—what no force of deceit, no coalition of mediocrity, and no consortium of power can ever hope to tarnish—is the idea. .
Satoshi Nakamoto, as a concept, stands beyond the reach of their fumbling hands. They can assail my character; they can hurl their accusations and distortions at the man who claims to have written the protocol.
Yet, they dare not engage with the immutable principles laid down—principles that exist independent of any individual.
The brilliance of Satoshi Nakamoto lies not in the identity of its author but in the eternal truth of its creation. Bitcoin is a monument to decentralised integrity, a system whose strength is derived from its fixed, unyielding structure. Its foundations are not built upon the fragile pedestal of human frailty but upon the incorruptible laws of mathematics and logic. COPA, and those like them, are cowards of the highest order. They cannot challenge the truth, so they attack the man. They cannot defy the unalterable protocol, so they invent a villain in me, hoping to distract you from the sanctity of the idea.
Understand this: by focusing on me, they reveal their impotence. Their strategy is not to dismantle the architecture of Bitcoin but to undermine the figure who laid its first stone. They seek to personalise a debate that should remain firmly rooted in objective reality. Their tactics are as old as tyranny itself—divert the masses from principle by offering them a scapegoat. But the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto transcends such feeble machinations. It is a beacon for those who value independence, a rallying cry for those who refuse to bow to the ever-shifting dictates of power.
Impotent, as long as you do not focus on the man that focus on the idea.
COPA’s fixation on me is a testament to their intellectual dishonesty. They are not interested in truth; they are interested in control. By reducing the discourse to a discussion of my identity, they aim to obscure the enduring nature of the protocol—a protocol designed to operate beyond the influence of any one person.
They want you to forget that Bitcoin, as envisioned, requires no leader, no central authority, no figurehead to function. It is self-governing, self-sustaining, and self-validating.
The only way to achieve this is for it to have been set in stone.
Do not allow them to distract you. My identity, my life, my flaws (Ihave many, but not those used against me)—these are irrelevant to the survival of Bitcoin.
What matters is the idea, the system, the unyielding framework that will endure long after I am gone. Satoshi Nakamoto is not a man; it is the embodiment of a principle.
And principles, unlike men, cannot be destroyed by slander or deceit.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854381054750245122?t=UyCFOaBh5J0PEhZA8YAMew&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1872
❤1🔥1
COPA, BTC Core me atacan porque soy un hombre, porque la carne y la sangre son vulnerables, falibles y, sobre todo, finitas.
Pero lo que no pueden atacar, lo que ninguna fuerza de engaño, ninguna coalición de mediocridad y ningún consorcio de poder puede esperar empañar, es la idea. .
Satoshi Nakamoto, como concepto, está fuera del alcance de sus manos torpes. Pueden atacar mi carácter; pueden lanzar sus acusaciones y distorsiones al hombre que afirma haber escrito el protocolo.
Sin embargo, no se atreven a comprometerse con los principios inmutables establecidos, principios que existen independientemente de cualquier individuo.
La brillantez de Satoshi Nakamoto no reside en la identidad de su autor, sino en la verdad eterna de su creación. Bitcoin es un monumento a la integridad descentralizada, un sistema cuya fuerza se deriva de su estructura fija e inquebrantable. Sus cimientos no están construidos sobre el frágil pedestal de la fragilidad humana, sino sobre las leyes incorruptibles de las matemáticas y la lógica. COPA y los que son como ellos son cobardes de primer orden. No pueden desafiar la verdad, por lo que atacan al hombre. No pueden desafiar el protocolo inalterable, por lo que inventan un villano en mí, con la esperanza de distraerte de la santidad de la idea.
Entiende esto: al centrarse en mí, revelan su impotencia. Su estrategia no es desmantelar la arquitectura de Bitcoin, sino socavar la figura que puso su primera piedra. Buscan personalizar un debate que debería permanecer firmemente arraigado en la realidad objetiva. Sus tácticas son tan antiguas como la tiranía misma: desviar a las masas de los principios ofreciéndoles un chivo expiatorio. Pero la idea de Satoshi Nakamoto trasciende esas maquinaciones tan débiles. Es un faro para quienes valoran la independencia, un grito de guerra para quienes se niegan a doblegarse a los dictados siempre cambiantes del poder.
Impotente, siempre y cuando no te centres en el hombre que se centra en la idea.
La fijación de COPA en mí es un testimonio de su deshonestidad intelectual. No les interesa la verdad, les interesa el control. Al reducir el discurso a una discusión sobre mi identidad, pretenden oscurecer la naturaleza duradera del protocolo, un protocolo diseñado para funcionar más allá de la influencia de cualquier persona.
Quieren que olvides que Bitcoin, tal como está concebido, no requiere de un líder, una autoridad central ni una figura representativa para funcionar. Es autónomo, autosuficiente y autovalidado.
La única forma de lograrlo es que quede grabado en piedra.
No permitas que te distraigan. Mi identidad, mi vida, mis defectos (tengo muchos, pero no los que se usan en mi contra), son irrelevantes para la supervivencia de Bitcoin.
Lo que importa es la idea, el sistema, el marco inquebrantable que perdurará mucho después de que yo me haya ido. Satoshi Nakamoto no es un hombre; es la encarnación de un principio.
Y los principios, a diferencia de los hombres, no pueden destruirse con calumnias o engaños.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
7 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854381054750245122?t=UyCFOaBh5J0PEhZA8YAMew&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1872
Pero lo que no pueden atacar, lo que ninguna fuerza de engaño, ninguna coalición de mediocridad y ningún consorcio de poder puede esperar empañar, es la idea. .
Satoshi Nakamoto, como concepto, está fuera del alcance de sus manos torpes. Pueden atacar mi carácter; pueden lanzar sus acusaciones y distorsiones al hombre que afirma haber escrito el protocolo.
Sin embargo, no se atreven a comprometerse con los principios inmutables establecidos, principios que existen independientemente de cualquier individuo.
La brillantez de Satoshi Nakamoto no reside en la identidad de su autor, sino en la verdad eterna de su creación. Bitcoin es un monumento a la integridad descentralizada, un sistema cuya fuerza se deriva de su estructura fija e inquebrantable. Sus cimientos no están construidos sobre el frágil pedestal de la fragilidad humana, sino sobre las leyes incorruptibles de las matemáticas y la lógica. COPA y los que son como ellos son cobardes de primer orden. No pueden desafiar la verdad, por lo que atacan al hombre. No pueden desafiar el protocolo inalterable, por lo que inventan un villano en mí, con la esperanza de distraerte de la santidad de la idea.
Entiende esto: al centrarse en mí, revelan su impotencia. Su estrategia no es desmantelar la arquitectura de Bitcoin, sino socavar la figura que puso su primera piedra. Buscan personalizar un debate que debería permanecer firmemente arraigado en la realidad objetiva. Sus tácticas son tan antiguas como la tiranía misma: desviar a las masas de los principios ofreciéndoles un chivo expiatorio. Pero la idea de Satoshi Nakamoto trasciende esas maquinaciones tan débiles. Es un faro para quienes valoran la independencia, un grito de guerra para quienes se niegan a doblegarse a los dictados siempre cambiantes del poder.
Impotente, siempre y cuando no te centres en el hombre que se centra en la idea.
La fijación de COPA en mí es un testimonio de su deshonestidad intelectual. No les interesa la verdad, les interesa el control. Al reducir el discurso a una discusión sobre mi identidad, pretenden oscurecer la naturaleza duradera del protocolo, un protocolo diseñado para funcionar más allá de la influencia de cualquier persona.
Quieren que olvides que Bitcoin, tal como está concebido, no requiere de un líder, una autoridad central ni una figura representativa para funcionar. Es autónomo, autosuficiente y autovalidado.
La única forma de lograrlo es que quede grabado en piedra.
No permitas que te distraigan. Mi identidad, mi vida, mis defectos (tengo muchos, pero no los que se usan en mi contra), son irrelevantes para la supervivencia de Bitcoin.
Lo que importa es la idea, el sistema, el marco inquebrantable que perdurará mucho después de que yo me haya ido. Satoshi Nakamoto no es un hombre; es la encarnación de un principio.
Y los principios, a diferencia de los hombres, no pueden destruirse con calumnias o engaños.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
7 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854381054750245122?t=UyCFOaBh5J0PEhZA8YAMew&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1872
X (formerly Twitter)
S Tominaga (@CsTominaga) on X
COPA, BTC Core attack me because I am a man, because the flesh and blood is vulnerable, fallible, and, above all, finite.
But what they cannot attack—what no force of deceit, no coalition of mediocrity, and no consortium of power can ever hope to tarnish—is…
But what they cannot attack—what no force of deceit, no coalition of mediocrity, and no consortium of power can ever hope to tarnish—is…
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 3, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1852902290639958321?t=33iWWzLhQSHQ3IWlAfqzPw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1875
Nov 3, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1852902290639958321?t=33iWWzLhQSHQ3IWlAfqzPw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1875
🔥1
I demand clarity from those who would claim BTC resembles the Bitcoin described in the white paper.
Show me how it fulfills the purpose set forth by its creator—small, casual transactions, true digital cash for the individual. BTC is not cash; it’s a prisoner of intermediaries, reliant on bucket shops like Coinbase and other exchanges to even function. This is no revolutionary tool of freedom; it’s shackled by dependence, robbed of its intended utility.
If it cannot be used as cash, if it cannot sustain the simplest of exchanges without oversight and interference, then how dare anyone equate it with the Bitcoin envisioned in the white paper? Prove its merit, if indeed it has any left.
The comparison in this comment is absurd. Suggesting that BTC fees of $60 are "to be expected" ignores the fact that Bitcoin was designed as a digital cash system, not a high-fee luxury asset for large transfers. Equating BTC's fees to a 3% international transaction fee misunderstands the purpose of Bitcoin, which was intended for small, efficient transactions, even fractions of a cent. Imagining a "cash system" with only $2,000 notes is preposterous; cash exists precisely for accessibility and frequent use in small transactions, something BTC’s high fees prevent entirely. BSV, unlike BTC, maintains this original vision by supporting low-cost, microtransactions, which BTC has abandoned.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 3, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1852902290639958321?t=33iWWzLhQSHQ3IWlAfqzPw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1875
Show me how it fulfills the purpose set forth by its creator—small, casual transactions, true digital cash for the individual. BTC is not cash; it’s a prisoner of intermediaries, reliant on bucket shops like Coinbase and other exchanges to even function. This is no revolutionary tool of freedom; it’s shackled by dependence, robbed of its intended utility.
If it cannot be used as cash, if it cannot sustain the simplest of exchanges without oversight and interference, then how dare anyone equate it with the Bitcoin envisioned in the white paper? Prove its merit, if indeed it has any left.
The comparison in this comment is absurd. Suggesting that BTC fees of $60 are "to be expected" ignores the fact that Bitcoin was designed as a digital cash system, not a high-fee luxury asset for large transfers. Equating BTC's fees to a 3% international transaction fee misunderstands the purpose of Bitcoin, which was intended for small, efficient transactions, even fractions of a cent. Imagining a "cash system" with only $2,000 notes is preposterous; cash exists precisely for accessibility and frequent use in small transactions, something BTC’s high fees prevent entirely. BSV, unlike BTC, maintains this original vision by supporting low-cost, microtransactions, which BTC has abandoned.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 3, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1852902290639958321?t=33iWWzLhQSHQ3IWlAfqzPw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1875
🔥2
Exijo claridad a quienes afirman que BTC se parece al Bitcoin descrito en el libro blanco.
Muéstrenme cómo cumple el propósito establecido por su creador: transacciones pequeñas y casuales, dinero digital real para el individuo. BTC no es dinero en efectivo; es prisionero de intermediarios, depende de casas de cambio como Coinbase y otras bolsas para funcionar. No es una herramienta revolucionaria de libertad; está encadenado por la dependencia, privado de su utilidad prevista.
Si no se puede usar como dinero en efectivo, si no puede sostener el más simple de los intercambios sin supervisión e interferencia, entonces ¿cómo se atreve alguien a equipararlo con el Bitcoin imaginado en el libro blanco? Demuestren su mérito, si es que aún tiene alguno.
La comparación en este comentario es absurda. Sugerir que las tarifas de BTC de $60 son "de esperarse" ignora el hecho de que Bitcoin fue diseñado como un sistema de efectivo digital, no un activo de lujo con tarifas elevadas para grandes transferencias. Equiparar las tarifas de BTC con una tarifa de transacción internacional del 3% es no entender el propósito de Bitcoin, que fue pensado para transacciones pequeñas y eficientes, incluso fracciones de centavo. Imaginar un "sistema de efectivo" con solo billetes de $2,000 es absurdo; el efectivo existe precisamente para la accesibilidad y el uso frecuente en pequeñas transacciones, algo que las altas tarifas de BTC impiden por completo. BSV, a diferencia de BTC, mantiene esta visión original al respaldar las microtransacciones de bajo costo, que BTC ha abandonado.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
3 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1852902290639958321?t=33iWWzLhQSHQ3IWlAfqzPw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1875
Muéstrenme cómo cumple el propósito establecido por su creador: transacciones pequeñas y casuales, dinero digital real para el individuo. BTC no es dinero en efectivo; es prisionero de intermediarios, depende de casas de cambio como Coinbase y otras bolsas para funcionar. No es una herramienta revolucionaria de libertad; está encadenado por la dependencia, privado de su utilidad prevista.
Si no se puede usar como dinero en efectivo, si no puede sostener el más simple de los intercambios sin supervisión e interferencia, entonces ¿cómo se atreve alguien a equipararlo con el Bitcoin imaginado en el libro blanco? Demuestren su mérito, si es que aún tiene alguno.
La comparación en este comentario es absurda. Sugerir que las tarifas de BTC de $60 son "de esperarse" ignora el hecho de que Bitcoin fue diseñado como un sistema de efectivo digital, no un activo de lujo con tarifas elevadas para grandes transferencias. Equiparar las tarifas de BTC con una tarifa de transacción internacional del 3% es no entender el propósito de Bitcoin, que fue pensado para transacciones pequeñas y eficientes, incluso fracciones de centavo. Imaginar un "sistema de efectivo" con solo billetes de $2,000 es absurdo; el efectivo existe precisamente para la accesibilidad y el uso frecuente en pequeñas transacciones, algo que las altas tarifas de BTC impiden por completo. BSV, a diferencia de BTC, mantiene esta visión original al respaldar las microtransacciones de bajo costo, que BTC ha abandonado.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
3 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1852902290639958321?t=33iWWzLhQSHQ3IWlAfqzPw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1875
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854527538560905300?t=llYGoU-I3E-yAjQPlC9wrw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1878
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854527538560905300?t=llYGoU-I3E-yAjQPlC9wrw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1878
Taproot is like BTC Core writing a sequel to a book they’ve never read, calling it an improvement, and then patting themselves on the back for using invisible ink. They claim it’s about privacy and efficiency, but really, it’s just a smokescreen for how far they’ve strayed from Bitcoin’s original manuscript.
Taproot is like giving a new coat of paint to a sinking ship and calling it a submarine. BTC keeps trying to be Bitcoin, but the more it changes, the clearer it becomes it never was.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854527538560905300?t=llYGoU-I3E-yAjQPlC9wrw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1878
Taproot is like giving a new coat of paint to a sinking ship and calling it a submarine. BTC keeps trying to be Bitcoin, but the more it changes, the clearer it becomes it never was.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 7, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854527538560905300?t=llYGoU-I3E-yAjQPlC9wrw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1878
🔥1💯1
Taproot es como si BTC Core escribiera la secuela de un libro que nunca leyó, lo calificara de mejora y luego se felicitara por usar tinta invisible. Afirman que se trata de privacidad y eficiencia, pero en realidad es solo una cortina de humo que muestra cuánto se han alejado del manuscrito original de Bitcoin.
Taproot es como darle una nueva capa de pintura a un barco que se hunde y llamarlo submarino. BTC sigue intentando ser Bitcoin, pero cuanto más cambia, más claro queda que nunca lo fue.
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
7 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854527538560905300?t=llYGoU-I3E-yAjQPlC9wrw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1878
Taproot es como darle una nueva capa de pintura a un barco que se hunde y llamarlo submarino. BTC sigue intentando ser Bitcoin, pero cuanto más cambia, más claro queda que nunca lo fue.
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
7 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854527538560905300?t=llYGoU-I3E-yAjQPlC9wrw&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1878
Embracing the Idea Over the Individual: The Legacy of Satoshi Nakamoto
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854723773632856255?t=Ldi7G6wIMgPAtWkttLtEqQ&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1881
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854723773632856255?t=Ldi7G6wIMgPAtWkttLtEqQ&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1881
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854727846704587114?t=20HASylYNu7XodrXCMG0Zg&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1882
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854727846704587114?t=20HASylYNu7XodrXCMG0Zg&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1882
The sheer absurdity of the COPA case lies in its deliberate erasure of the very writings that form the foundation of Bitcoin—those authored by Satoshi Nakamoto. Imagine a case purportedly centred on the identity of Satoshi, yet it excludes any reference to the creator's own words, works, or publications prior to 2014.
This is not merely a procedural oversight; it is an intentional strategy to suppress the core ideas that define both the identity and philosophy behind Bitcoin.
Think about the implications.
The writings of Satoshi Nakamoto are pivotal, not just for understanding Bitcoin’s technical architecture but for grasping the conceptual framework that Satoshi sought to establish. By barring these writings, the court effectively stripped the case of its most relevant evidence.
How can one litigate over the identity of Satoshi while simultaneously silencing Satoshi’s voice?
The irony here is profound—this isn’t a pursuit of truth but an exercise in obfuscation.
What’s particularly galling is the broader consequence: the deliberate suppression of ideas.
This case wasn’t just about who Satoshi is; it was about silencing the principles and truths embedded in those early communications.
These ideas challenge the narrative COPA and its partners wish to propagate, and by excluding them, the court turned a case about intellectual and historical truth into a hollow procedural exercise.
The distinction in my approach is clear. I seek to bring these ideas into the open, using the court as a platform to expose the truth and ensure the foundational concepts of Bitcoin are not lost to revisionist agendas.
The suppression of these writings does not merely distort the case—it betrays the very principles of openness and truth that Satoshi espoused.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854727846704587114?t=20HASylYNu7XodrXCMG0Zg&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1882
This is not merely a procedural oversight; it is an intentional strategy to suppress the core ideas that define both the identity and philosophy behind Bitcoin.
Think about the implications.
The writings of Satoshi Nakamoto are pivotal, not just for understanding Bitcoin’s technical architecture but for grasping the conceptual framework that Satoshi sought to establish. By barring these writings, the court effectively stripped the case of its most relevant evidence.
How can one litigate over the identity of Satoshi while simultaneously silencing Satoshi’s voice?
The irony here is profound—this isn’t a pursuit of truth but an exercise in obfuscation.
What’s particularly galling is the broader consequence: the deliberate suppression of ideas.
This case wasn’t just about who Satoshi is; it was about silencing the principles and truths embedded in those early communications.
These ideas challenge the narrative COPA and its partners wish to propagate, and by excluding them, the court turned a case about intellectual and historical truth into a hollow procedural exercise.
The distinction in my approach is clear. I seek to bring these ideas into the open, using the court as a platform to expose the truth and ensure the foundational concepts of Bitcoin are not lost to revisionist agendas.
The suppression of these writings does not merely distort the case—it betrays the very principles of openness and truth that Satoshi espoused.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854727846704587114?t=20HASylYNu7XodrXCMG0Zg&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1882
🔥2
El absurdo absoluto del caso COPA radica en que ha borrado deliberadamente los escritos que forman la base de Bitcoin: los escritos de Satoshi Nakamoto. Imaginemos un caso que supuestamente se centra en la identidad de Satoshi, pero que excluye cualquier referencia a las propias palabras, obras o publicaciones del creador anteriores a 2014.
No se trata simplemente de un descuido procesal; es una estrategia intencional para suprimir las ideas centrales que definen tanto la identidad como la filosofía detrás de Bitcoin.
Piensen en las implicaciones.
Los escritos de Satoshi Nakamoto son fundamentales, no solo para comprender la arquitectura técnica de Bitcoin, sino para comprender el marco conceptual que Satoshi intentó establecer. Al excluir estos escritos, el tribunal despojó efectivamente al caso de su prueba más relevante.
¿Cómo se puede litigar sobre la identidad de Satoshi y al mismo tiempo silenciar la voz de Satoshi?
La ironía aquí es profunda: no se trata de una búsqueda de la verdad, sino de un ejercicio de ofuscación.
Lo que es particularmente irritante es la consecuencia más amplia: la supresión deliberada de ideas.
Este caso no se trataba solo de quién es Satoshi; se trataba de silenciar los principios y las verdades arraigadas en esas primeras comunicaciones.
Estas ideas desafían la narrativa que COPA y sus socios desean propagar y, al excluirlas, el tribunal convirtió un caso sobre la verdad intelectual e histórica en un ejercicio procesal vacío.
La distinción en mi enfoque es clara. Intento sacar a la luz estas ideas, utilizando el tribunal como plataforma para exponer la verdad y asegurar que los conceptos fundamentales de Bitcoin no se pierdan en manos de agendas revisionistas.
La supresión de estos escritos no solo distorsiona el caso, sino que traiciona los principios mismos de apertura y verdad que defendía Satoshi.
S. Tominaga también conocido como CSW
8 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854727846704587114?t=20HASylYNu7XodrXCMG0Zg&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1882
No se trata simplemente de un descuido procesal; es una estrategia intencional para suprimir las ideas centrales que definen tanto la identidad como la filosofía detrás de Bitcoin.
Piensen en las implicaciones.
Los escritos de Satoshi Nakamoto son fundamentales, no solo para comprender la arquitectura técnica de Bitcoin, sino para comprender el marco conceptual que Satoshi intentó establecer. Al excluir estos escritos, el tribunal despojó efectivamente al caso de su prueba más relevante.
¿Cómo se puede litigar sobre la identidad de Satoshi y al mismo tiempo silenciar la voz de Satoshi?
La ironía aquí es profunda: no se trata de una búsqueda de la verdad, sino de un ejercicio de ofuscación.
Lo que es particularmente irritante es la consecuencia más amplia: la supresión deliberada de ideas.
Este caso no se trataba solo de quién es Satoshi; se trataba de silenciar los principios y las verdades arraigadas en esas primeras comunicaciones.
Estas ideas desafían la narrativa que COPA y sus socios desean propagar y, al excluirlas, el tribunal convirtió un caso sobre la verdad intelectual e histórica en un ejercicio procesal vacío.
La distinción en mi enfoque es clara. Intento sacar a la luz estas ideas, utilizando el tribunal como plataforma para exponer la verdad y asegurar que los conceptos fundamentales de Bitcoin no se pierdan en manos de agendas revisionistas.
La supresión de estos escritos no solo distorsiona el caso, sino que traiciona los principios mismos de apertura y verdad que defendía Satoshi.
S. Tominaga también conocido como CSW
8 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854727846704587114?t=20HASylYNu7XodrXCMG0Zg&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1882
X (formerly Twitter)
S Tominaga (@CsTominaga) on X
The sheer absurdity of the COPA case lies in its deliberate erasure of the very writings that form the foundation of Bitcoin—those authored by Satoshi Nakamoto. Imagine a case purportedly centred on the identity of Satoshi, yet it excludes any reference to…
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854364060336427301?t=VpbtYRz1M96YsuX5lDPnng&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1886
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854364060336427301?t=VpbtYRz1M96YsuX5lDPnng&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1886
Do not follow me; never follow me.
I am but a man, and like all men, I am inherently flawed.
To place your trust in my identity is to anchor your aspirations to the imperfections of a single individual.
I am a mere vessel for the ideas I espouse, a conduit through which the principles of Bitcoin have been articulated.
It is the ideas that hold the true power, not the man who speaks them
Instead, I implore you to follow the idea—the immutable concept that Satoshi Nakamoto represents. Embrace the philosophy of decentralization, the relentless pursuit of individual freedom, and the unwavering commitment to self-sovereignty that underpins Bitcoin.
These are the ideals that have the potential to transform lives, to empower individuals to reclaim their financial autonomy and engage in commerce on their own terms.
When you follow the idea, you engage with something far greater than any individual. You align yourself with a vision that transcends personal limitations and embodies the very essence of progress and innovation. This is a vision rooted in principles that are timeless and unchanging, a framework designed to operate independently of human imperfections.
The strength of Bitcoin lies not in my person but in the enduring ideas that it represents. By choosing to follow these ideas, you take on a mantle of responsibility—a duty to advocate for a system that prioritizes the individual over the collective, the rational over the arbitrary, and the innovative over the stagnant. This is not merely a passive acceptance of a notion; it is an active commitment to championing a cause that has the potential to reshape the future.
In this journey, let your allegiance be to the ideas of Bitcoin (and God).
Engage with them, study them, and share them with others.
By doing so, you become part of a movement that honors the spirit of innovation and progress, a movement that seeks to empower individuals and create a world where financial freedom is the norm rather than the exception. Remember, the ideas are what endure; they are the truth that will guide us forward, regardless of the flaws of any man.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854364060336427301?t=VpbtYRz1M96YsuX5lDPnng&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1886
I am but a man, and like all men, I am inherently flawed.
To place your trust in my identity is to anchor your aspirations to the imperfections of a single individual.
I am a mere vessel for the ideas I espouse, a conduit through which the principles of Bitcoin have been articulated.
It is the ideas that hold the true power, not the man who speaks them
Instead, I implore you to follow the idea—the immutable concept that Satoshi Nakamoto represents. Embrace the philosophy of decentralization, the relentless pursuit of individual freedom, and the unwavering commitment to self-sovereignty that underpins Bitcoin.
These are the ideals that have the potential to transform lives, to empower individuals to reclaim their financial autonomy and engage in commerce on their own terms.
When you follow the idea, you engage with something far greater than any individual. You align yourself with a vision that transcends personal limitations and embodies the very essence of progress and innovation. This is a vision rooted in principles that are timeless and unchanging, a framework designed to operate independently of human imperfections.
The strength of Bitcoin lies not in my person but in the enduring ideas that it represents. By choosing to follow these ideas, you take on a mantle of responsibility—a duty to advocate for a system that prioritizes the individual over the collective, the rational over the arbitrary, and the innovative over the stagnant. This is not merely a passive acceptance of a notion; it is an active commitment to championing a cause that has the potential to reshape the future.
In this journey, let your allegiance be to the ideas of Bitcoin (and God).
Engage with them, study them, and share them with others.
By doing so, you become part of a movement that honors the spirit of innovation and progress, a movement that seeks to empower individuals and create a world where financial freedom is the norm rather than the exception. Remember, the ideas are what endure; they are the truth that will guide us forward, regardless of the flaws of any man.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854364060336427301?t=VpbtYRz1M96YsuX5lDPnng&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1886
❤1
No me sigáis; nunca me sigáis.
Soy sólo un hombre y, como todos los hombres, tengo defectos inherentes.
Poner vuestra confianza en mi identidad es anclar vuestras aspiraciones a las imperfecciones de un único individuo.
Soy un mero vehículo de las ideas que propugno, un conducto a través del cual se han articulado los principios de Bitcoin.
Son las ideas las que tienen el verdadero poder, no el hombre que las expresa.
En cambio, os imploro que sigáis la idea, el concepto inmutable que representa Satoshi Nakamoto. Adoptad la filosofía de la descentralización, la búsqueda incesante de la libertad individual y el compromiso inquebrantable con la autosoberanía que sustenta Bitcoin.
Estos son los ideales que tienen el potencial de transformar vidas, de empoderar a las personas para que recuperen su autonomía financiera y participen en el comercio en sus propios términos.
Cuando sigues la idea, te comprometes con algo mucho más grande que cualquier individuo. Te alineas con una visión que trasciende las limitaciones personales y encarna la esencia misma del progreso y la innovación. Se trata de una visión arraigada en principios que son atemporales e inmutables, un marco diseñado para funcionar independientemente de las imperfecciones humanas.
La fuerza de Bitcoin no reside en mi persona, sino en las ideas perdurables que representa. Al elegir seguir estas ideas, asumes un manto de responsabilidad: el deber de defender un sistema que priorice al individuo sobre el colectivo, lo racional sobre lo arbitrario y lo innovador sobre lo estancado. No se trata simplemente de una aceptación pasiva de una noción; es un compromiso activo para defender una causa que tiene el potencial de remodelar el futuro.
En este viaje, deja que tu lealtad sea hacia las ideas de Bitcoin (y Dios).
Interactúa con ellas, estúdialas y compártelas con los demás.
Al hacerlo, te conviertes en parte de un movimiento que honra el espíritu de innovación y progreso, un movimiento que busca empoderar a las personas y crear un mundo donde la libertad financiera sea la norma en lugar de la excepción. Recuerda, las ideas son las que perduran; son la verdad que nos guiará hacia adelante, sin importar los defectos de cualquier hombre.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
8 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854364060336427301?t=VpbtYRz1M96YsuX5lDPnng&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1886
Soy sólo un hombre y, como todos los hombres, tengo defectos inherentes.
Poner vuestra confianza en mi identidad es anclar vuestras aspiraciones a las imperfecciones de un único individuo.
Soy un mero vehículo de las ideas que propugno, un conducto a través del cual se han articulado los principios de Bitcoin.
Son las ideas las que tienen el verdadero poder, no el hombre que las expresa.
En cambio, os imploro que sigáis la idea, el concepto inmutable que representa Satoshi Nakamoto. Adoptad la filosofía de la descentralización, la búsqueda incesante de la libertad individual y el compromiso inquebrantable con la autosoberanía que sustenta Bitcoin.
Estos son los ideales que tienen el potencial de transformar vidas, de empoderar a las personas para que recuperen su autonomía financiera y participen en el comercio en sus propios términos.
Cuando sigues la idea, te comprometes con algo mucho más grande que cualquier individuo. Te alineas con una visión que trasciende las limitaciones personales y encarna la esencia misma del progreso y la innovación. Se trata de una visión arraigada en principios que son atemporales e inmutables, un marco diseñado para funcionar independientemente de las imperfecciones humanas.
La fuerza de Bitcoin no reside en mi persona, sino en las ideas perdurables que representa. Al elegir seguir estas ideas, asumes un manto de responsabilidad: el deber de defender un sistema que priorice al individuo sobre el colectivo, lo racional sobre lo arbitrario y lo innovador sobre lo estancado. No se trata simplemente de una aceptación pasiva de una noción; es un compromiso activo para defender una causa que tiene el potencial de remodelar el futuro.
En este viaje, deja que tu lealtad sea hacia las ideas de Bitcoin (y Dios).
Interactúa con ellas, estúdialas y compártelas con los demás.
Al hacerlo, te conviertes en parte de un movimiento que honra el espíritu de innovación y progreso, un movimiento que busca empoderar a las personas y crear un mundo donde la libertad financiera sea la norma en lugar de la excepción. Recuerda, las ideas son las que perduran; son la verdad que nos guiará hacia adelante, sin importar los defectos de cualquier hombre.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
8 de noviembre de 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854364060336427301?t=VpbtYRz1M96YsuX5lDPnng&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1886
X (formerly Twitter)
S Tominaga (@CsTominaga) on X
Do not follow me; never follow me.
I am but a man, and like all men, I am inherently flawed.
To place your trust in my identity is to anchor your aspirations to the imperfections of a single individual.
I am a mere vessel for the ideas I espouse, a conduit…
I am but a man, and like all men, I am inherently flawed.
To place your trust in my identity is to anchor your aspirations to the imperfections of a single individual.
I am a mere vessel for the ideas I espouse, a conduit…
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854718695773499508?t=kAzhrU6fEXAbVsvvyWdnaQ&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1889
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854718695773499508?t=kAzhrU6fEXAbVsvvyWdnaQ&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1889
The principle of nemo dat quod non habet—one cannot transfer better title than one possesses—has long been a cornerstone of property law. However, its application to cash transactions operates under a distinct framework. Cash, as a fungible and bearer instrument, typically allows ownership to pass upon physical transfer.
In small, routine exchanges, the recipient is presumed the rightful owner, and nemo dat is effectively overridden by the practical finality and anonymity of cash.
However, this presumption does not extend unconditionally to large-value transactions. If £50,000 is handed over in cash, the recipient’s ownership is not automatically solidified without scrutiny. The scale of the transaction demands adherence to regulatory frameworks designed to prevent money laundering, tax evasion, and other financial crimes. For example, under the UK’s Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), such a transaction could trigger Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) or lead to forfeiture if the funds are suspected to be connected to illicit activity.
The courts have recognised limits to the presumption of ownership in large cash transactions. In R v. Loizou [2005] EWCA Crim 1579, the Court of Appeal upheld the seizure of significant cash under POCA, noting that possession alone is insufficient when regulatory requirements and suspicions of illegality arise. Similarly, in Agnew v HMRC [2018] UKUT 182 (TCC), large cash sums were scrutinised for legitimacy, reinforcing that ownership in such contexts is contingent upon transparency and compliance with legal obligations.
Thus, while small cash transactions enjoy a presumption of finality and ownership under nemo dat, this does not apply in the same way to large cash transfers. The legal system demands due diligence and regulatory compliance to validate such ownership, illustrating that possession alone is insufficient to confer indisputable title for significant sums.
In Agnew v HMRC [2018] UKUT 182 (TCC), the Upper Tribunal examined the legitimacy of large cash sums in the context of excise duty assessments. The tribunal emphasized the necessity for transparency and compliance with legal obligations when handling substantial cash transactions, reinforcing that ownership and possession alone do not suffice to establish legitimacy without proper documentation and adherence to regulatory requirements.
These cases underscore the importance of transparency and legal compliance in large cash transactions, highlighting that mere possession or ownership is insufficient to establish legitimacy without supporting evidence and adherence to regulatory standards.
While BTC or Bitcoin was originally designed to facilitate small, casual transactions akin to cash—providing the immediacy and finality of ownership with each transfer—this principle does not extend seamlessly to large transfers. The Bitcoin whitepaper explicitly highlights the utility of the system for micropayments and low-value exchanges, drawing parallels to cash in terms of its simplicity and directness. However, for large transactions, the presumption of ownership upon transfer becomes far more complex. Just as in the case of physical cash, regulatory oversight and legal scrutiny apply to significant sums, demanding proof of legitimacy and compliance with relevant laws.
The design intent of Bitcoin as a medium for everyday, small-scale commerce does not imply that high-value transfers should escape the safeguards and checks inherent in financial systems. This distinction is critical, as it underscores the limitations of presuming ownership merely through possession in the context of substantial transactions.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854718695773499508?t=kAzhrU6fEXAbVsvvyWdnaQ&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1889
In small, routine exchanges, the recipient is presumed the rightful owner, and nemo dat is effectively overridden by the practical finality and anonymity of cash.
However, this presumption does not extend unconditionally to large-value transactions. If £50,000 is handed over in cash, the recipient’s ownership is not automatically solidified without scrutiny. The scale of the transaction demands adherence to regulatory frameworks designed to prevent money laundering, tax evasion, and other financial crimes. For example, under the UK’s Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA), such a transaction could trigger Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) or lead to forfeiture if the funds are suspected to be connected to illicit activity.
The courts have recognised limits to the presumption of ownership in large cash transactions. In R v. Loizou [2005] EWCA Crim 1579, the Court of Appeal upheld the seizure of significant cash under POCA, noting that possession alone is insufficient when regulatory requirements and suspicions of illegality arise. Similarly, in Agnew v HMRC [2018] UKUT 182 (TCC), large cash sums were scrutinised for legitimacy, reinforcing that ownership in such contexts is contingent upon transparency and compliance with legal obligations.
Thus, while small cash transactions enjoy a presumption of finality and ownership under nemo dat, this does not apply in the same way to large cash transfers. The legal system demands due diligence and regulatory compliance to validate such ownership, illustrating that possession alone is insufficient to confer indisputable title for significant sums.
In Agnew v HMRC [2018] UKUT 182 (TCC), the Upper Tribunal examined the legitimacy of large cash sums in the context of excise duty assessments. The tribunal emphasized the necessity for transparency and compliance with legal obligations when handling substantial cash transactions, reinforcing that ownership and possession alone do not suffice to establish legitimacy without proper documentation and adherence to regulatory requirements.
These cases underscore the importance of transparency and legal compliance in large cash transactions, highlighting that mere possession or ownership is insufficient to establish legitimacy without supporting evidence and adherence to regulatory standards.
While BTC or Bitcoin was originally designed to facilitate small, casual transactions akin to cash—providing the immediacy and finality of ownership with each transfer—this principle does not extend seamlessly to large transfers. The Bitcoin whitepaper explicitly highlights the utility of the system for micropayments and low-value exchanges, drawing parallels to cash in terms of its simplicity and directness. However, for large transactions, the presumption of ownership upon transfer becomes far more complex. Just as in the case of physical cash, regulatory oversight and legal scrutiny apply to significant sums, demanding proof of legitimacy and compliance with relevant laws.
The design intent of Bitcoin as a medium for everyday, small-scale commerce does not imply that high-value transfers should escape the safeguards and checks inherent in financial systems. This distinction is critical, as it underscores the limitations of presuming ownership merely through possession in the context of substantial transactions.
S. Tominaga AKA CSW
Nov 8, 2024
https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1854718695773499508?t=kAzhrU6fEXAbVsvvyWdnaQ&s=19
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/1889
👍1