S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Feb. 23, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2025905895855813100
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5218
Feb. 23, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2025905895855813100
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5218
I've been quiet for a while. There's a reason for that.
I've been negotiating a publishing contract.
The book is called The Discipline of Greatness: The Architecture of Excellence.
It will be available later this year.
Here's what it is and why it exists. 🧵
For the last several years I've been building something in the background — not a product, not a platform.
A book. A serious one.
About why most lives are wasted not by catastrophe but by drift. And what the alternative actually looks like when you stop decorating and start building.
The thesis is simple:
A human life is a project that must be built, not drifted through. Excellence is not a luxury for the gifted. It is a moral obligation for anyone capable of thought and effort.
Most "self-help" tells you you're already enough. This book disagrees.
The book draws on three traditions that refuse to flatter weakness:
— Aristotle's account of virtue and proper form
— Peterson's ethic of responsibility in chaos
— Rand's defence of rational achievement as moral duty
Together, they form a spine that doesn't bend for excuses.
At the centre of the book is a tool I call the Ledger.
Not a journal. Not a mood tracker. Not a gratitude list.
A disciplined record of standards and actions. What "excellent" means in each domain of your life — and what you actually did today.
A standing audit of your own life.
The Ledger forces the question most people spend decades avoiding:
"In this domain, over this span of time, what would non-trivial excellence look like — and what actions would be required today to make it probable rather than merely possible?"
The book covers twelve chapters across the architecture of a serious life:
The making of the self. Habit as engine of virtue. The Ledger system. Internal elitism. Strength before peace. Ordering your world. Ruthless honesty. Discipline as aesthetic.
The Hard Thing every day. The courage to stand alone. Making yourself useful. And living under your own final judgment.
Each chapter follows the same structure: narrative scene, philosophical framework, cultural diagnosis, practical protocol, and exercises.
This isn't motivational fluff.
There are no celebrity case studies. No "believe in yourself" slogans. No promises that life can remain as it is with a few clever tweaks.
It's a manual for people who are tired of drifting and ready to treat their life as something worth building properly.
Why now?
Because the self-improvement industry is drowning in softness. "Honour your energy." "Trust the universe." "You're already enough."
Meanwhile, standards decay, people drift, and the phrase "doing my best" substitutes for ever actually defining what "best" would look like.
I escaped poverty through education — not through affirmations, not through "manifesting," not through waiting for permission.
Through discipline, structure, and the refusal to accept that the circumstances I was born into defined what I could become.
This book is the framework behind that.
The Discipline of Greatness: The Architecture of Excellence will be available late 2026 / early 2027.
More details on the Ledger system, the 30-Day Architecture Challenge, and pre-order information coming soon.
The book stops. The work doesn't. 🏗️
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Feb. 23, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2025905895855813100
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5218
I've been negotiating a publishing contract.
The book is called The Discipline of Greatness: The Architecture of Excellence.
It will be available later this year.
Here's what it is and why it exists. 🧵
For the last several years I've been building something in the background — not a product, not a platform.
A book. A serious one.
About why most lives are wasted not by catastrophe but by drift. And what the alternative actually looks like when you stop decorating and start building.
The thesis is simple:
A human life is a project that must be built, not drifted through. Excellence is not a luxury for the gifted. It is a moral obligation for anyone capable of thought and effort.
Most "self-help" tells you you're already enough. This book disagrees.
The book draws on three traditions that refuse to flatter weakness:
— Aristotle's account of virtue and proper form
— Peterson's ethic of responsibility in chaos
— Rand's defence of rational achievement as moral duty
Together, they form a spine that doesn't bend for excuses.
At the centre of the book is a tool I call the Ledger.
Not a journal. Not a mood tracker. Not a gratitude list.
A disciplined record of standards and actions. What "excellent" means in each domain of your life — and what you actually did today.
A standing audit of your own life.
The Ledger forces the question most people spend decades avoiding:
"In this domain, over this span of time, what would non-trivial excellence look like — and what actions would be required today to make it probable rather than merely possible?"
The book covers twelve chapters across the architecture of a serious life:
The making of the self. Habit as engine of virtue. The Ledger system. Internal elitism. Strength before peace. Ordering your world. Ruthless honesty. Discipline as aesthetic.
The Hard Thing every day. The courage to stand alone. Making yourself useful. And living under your own final judgment.
Each chapter follows the same structure: narrative scene, philosophical framework, cultural diagnosis, practical protocol, and exercises.
This isn't motivational fluff.
There are no celebrity case studies. No "believe in yourself" slogans. No promises that life can remain as it is with a few clever tweaks.
It's a manual for people who are tired of drifting and ready to treat their life as something worth building properly.
Why now?
Because the self-improvement industry is drowning in softness. "Honour your energy." "Trust the universe." "You're already enough."
Meanwhile, standards decay, people drift, and the phrase "doing my best" substitutes for ever actually defining what "best" would look like.
I escaped poverty through education — not through affirmations, not through "manifesting," not through waiting for permission.
Through discipline, structure, and the refusal to accept that the circumstances I was born into defined what I could become.
This book is the framework behind that.
The Discipline of Greatness: The Architecture of Excellence will be available late 2026 / early 2027.
More details on the Ledger system, the 30-Day Architecture Challenge, and pre-order information coming soon.
The book stops. The work doesn't. 🏗️
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Feb. 23, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2025905895855813100
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5218
He estado en silencio por un tiempo. Hay una razón para ello.
He estado negociando un contrato de publicación.
El libro se llama La Disciplina de la Grandeza: La Arquitectura de la Excelencia.
Estará disponible a finales de este año.
Esto es lo que es y por qué existe. 🧵
Durante los últimos años he estado construyendo algo en segundo plano: no un producto ni una plataforma.
Un libro. Uno serio.
Acerca de por qué la mayoría de las vidas se desperdician no por catástrofes, sino por la deriva. Y cómo se ve realmente la alternativa cuando dejas de decorar y empiezas a construir.
La tesis es simple:
Una vida humana es un proyecto que debe construirse, no dejarse llevar. La excelencia no es un lujo para los superdotados. Es una obligación moral para cualquiera capaz de pensar y esforzarse.
La mayoría de los libros de "autoayuda" te dicen que ya eres suficiente. Este libro no está de acuerdo.
El libro se basa en tres tradiciones que se niegan a halagar la debilidad:
— La explicación aristotélica de la virtud y la forma apropiada
— La ética de Peterson sobre la responsabilidad en el caos
— La defensa de Rand del logro racional como deber moral
Juntas, forman una columna vertebral que no se doblega ante las excusas.
En el centro del libro se encuentra una herramienta que llamo el Libro Mayor.
No es un diario. No es un registro del estado de ánimo. No es una lista de gratitud.
Un registro disciplinado de estándares y acciones. Qué significa "excelente" en cada ámbito de tu vida y qué hiciste realmente hoy.
Una auditoría permanente de tu propia vida.
El Libro Mayor plantea la pregunta que la mayoría de la gente pasa décadas evitando:
"En este ámbito, durante este lapso de tiempo, ¿cómo sería la excelencia no trivial y qué acciones se requerirían hoy para hacerla probable en lugar de simplemente posible?"
El libro abarca doce capítulos que abarcan la arquitectura de una vida seria:
La construcción del yo. El hábito como motor de la virtud. El sistema del Libro Mayor. Elitismo interno. Fuerza antes que paz. Ordenando tu mundo. Honestidad implacable. Disciplina como estética.
Lo difícil de cada día. El coraje de ser independiente. Hacerte útil. Y vivir bajo tu propio juicio final.
Cada capítulo sigue la misma estructura: escena narrativa, marco filosófico, diagnóstico cultural, protocolo práctico y ejercicios.
Esto no es pura motivación superficial.
No hay estudios de casos de famosos. No hay eslóganes de "cree en ti mismo". No hay promesas de que la vida puede seguir como está con algunos ajustes ingeniosos.
Es un manual para quienes están cansados de ir a la deriva y listos para tratar su vida como algo que vale la pena construir con propiedad.
¿Por qué ahora?
Porque la industria de la superación personal se está ahogando en la debilidad. "Honra tu energía". "Confía en el universo". "Ya eres suficiente".
Mientras tanto, los estándares decaen, la gente va a la deriva, y la frase "hacerlo lo mejor posible" sustituye la definición de lo que sería "mejor".
Escapé de la pobreza gracias a la educación, no a las afirmaciones, ni a la "manifestación", ni a la espera de permiso.
A través de la disciplina, la estructura y la negativa a aceptar que las circunstancias en las que nací definieron lo que podía llegar a ser.
Este libro es el marco que lo sustenta.
La Disciplina de la Grandeza: La Arquitectura de la Excelencia estará disponible a finales de 2026 o principios de 2027.
Próximamente, más detalles sobre el sistema Ledger, el Desafío de Arquitectura de 30 Días e información para reservar.
El libro termina. El trabajo no. 🏗️
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
23 de febrero de 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2025905895855813100
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5218
He estado negociando un contrato de publicación.
El libro se llama La Disciplina de la Grandeza: La Arquitectura de la Excelencia.
Estará disponible a finales de este año.
Esto es lo que es y por qué existe. 🧵
Durante los últimos años he estado construyendo algo en segundo plano: no un producto ni una plataforma.
Un libro. Uno serio.
Acerca de por qué la mayoría de las vidas se desperdician no por catástrofes, sino por la deriva. Y cómo se ve realmente la alternativa cuando dejas de decorar y empiezas a construir.
La tesis es simple:
Una vida humana es un proyecto que debe construirse, no dejarse llevar. La excelencia no es un lujo para los superdotados. Es una obligación moral para cualquiera capaz de pensar y esforzarse.
La mayoría de los libros de "autoayuda" te dicen que ya eres suficiente. Este libro no está de acuerdo.
El libro se basa en tres tradiciones que se niegan a halagar la debilidad:
— La explicación aristotélica de la virtud y la forma apropiada
— La ética de Peterson sobre la responsabilidad en el caos
— La defensa de Rand del logro racional como deber moral
Juntas, forman una columna vertebral que no se doblega ante las excusas.
En el centro del libro se encuentra una herramienta que llamo el Libro Mayor.
No es un diario. No es un registro del estado de ánimo. No es una lista de gratitud.
Un registro disciplinado de estándares y acciones. Qué significa "excelente" en cada ámbito de tu vida y qué hiciste realmente hoy.
Una auditoría permanente de tu propia vida.
El Libro Mayor plantea la pregunta que la mayoría de la gente pasa décadas evitando:
"En este ámbito, durante este lapso de tiempo, ¿cómo sería la excelencia no trivial y qué acciones se requerirían hoy para hacerla probable en lugar de simplemente posible?"
El libro abarca doce capítulos que abarcan la arquitectura de una vida seria:
La construcción del yo. El hábito como motor de la virtud. El sistema del Libro Mayor. Elitismo interno. Fuerza antes que paz. Ordenando tu mundo. Honestidad implacable. Disciplina como estética.
Lo difícil de cada día. El coraje de ser independiente. Hacerte útil. Y vivir bajo tu propio juicio final.
Cada capítulo sigue la misma estructura: escena narrativa, marco filosófico, diagnóstico cultural, protocolo práctico y ejercicios.
Esto no es pura motivación superficial.
No hay estudios de casos de famosos. No hay eslóganes de "cree en ti mismo". No hay promesas de que la vida puede seguir como está con algunos ajustes ingeniosos.
Es un manual para quienes están cansados de ir a la deriva y listos para tratar su vida como algo que vale la pena construir con propiedad.
¿Por qué ahora?
Porque la industria de la superación personal se está ahogando en la debilidad. "Honra tu energía". "Confía en el universo". "Ya eres suficiente".
Mientras tanto, los estándares decaen, la gente va a la deriva, y la frase "hacerlo lo mejor posible" sustituye la definición de lo que sería "mejor".
Escapé de la pobreza gracias a la educación, no a las afirmaciones, ni a la "manifestación", ni a la espera de permiso.
A través de la disciplina, la estructura y la negativa a aceptar que las circunstancias en las que nací definieron lo que podía llegar a ser.
Este libro es el marco que lo sustenta.
La Disciplina de la Grandeza: La Arquitectura de la Excelencia estará disponible a finales de 2026 o principios de 2027.
Próximamente, más detalles sobre el sistema Ledger, el Desafío de Arquitectura de 30 Días e información para reservar.
El libro termina. El trabajo no. 🏗️
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
23 de febrero de 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2025905895855813100
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5218
X (formerly Twitter)
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) (@CsTominaga) on X
I've been quiet for a while. There's a reason for that.
I've been negotiating a publishing contract.
The book is called The Discipline of Greatness: The Architecture of Excellence.
It will be available later this year.
Here's what it is and why it exists.…
I've been negotiating a publishing contract.
The book is called The Discipline of Greatness: The Architecture of Excellence.
It will be available later this year.
Here's what it is and why it exists.…
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Mar. 3, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2028658165697617976
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5221
Mar. 3, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2028658165697617976
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5221
While we are on the subject of doing things properly rather than theatrically, I will also be loading an ASIC paper this week.
There is a preprint ready on an HBM-backed hardware state engine designed specifically for UTXO-based transaction verification. The objective is not cosmetic optimisation. It is architectural removal of latency at the state layer. The current UTXO crop and compare-and-swap path sits at roughly 1680 microseconds in conventional pipelines. The design I am outlining moves that down into the nanosecond domain — approximately a 94.4% reduction.
That is not a software tweak. It is a structural relocation of state handling into hardware.
The approach uses high-bandwidth memory tightly coupled to a purpose-built verification engine, implemented as a direct card inside a standard machine. Four such cards in parallel materially accelerate validation throughput, and they do so deterministically. This is not speculative scaling; it is engineering.
The paper will be split properly. The primary publication will detail the architecture, the circuit diagrams, the state transition pathways, and the verification flow so that the design can be reconstructed independently. The online appendix will include the RTL pseudocode, data path components, and listings in sufficient depth for implementation. Nothing hand-waved. Nothing implied.
It will be released in full. Anyone who wishes to build it may do so.
If we are serious about scaling transaction systems, then we stop chanting about abstraction layers and begin reducing latency where it actually exists — in memory access, state resolution, and deterministic hardware paths. This is simply that, written down.
It appears that even the most youthful of one’s intellectual indiscretions eventually return, impeccably dressed and demanding a formal introduction to society. A dissertation composed some twenty-two years ago—written, I confess, with the earnest severity of a man convinced that footnotes are a moral obligation—has now been summoned back into the light. De Gruyter, with commendable seriousness, has extended the courtesy of a publishing agreement, and the work is to re-emerge as a peer-reviewed monograph.
Time, of course, is the sternest of editors. A manuscript that has survived two decades deserves not embalming but refinement. There will be revisions—measured, judicious, and sufficiently modern to acknowledge that the author has aged at least as much as the arguments. The bones remain sound; only the attire requires adjustment.
For those who have not encountered the work—whether by neglect, misfortune, or an absence from my lectures over the years—it shall soon be available in a more permanent and dignified form. What was once confined to seminar rooms and industrious students will now sit upon shelves, quietly awaiting scrutiny. One can only hope it behaves better in print than it did in its youth.
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Mar. 3, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2028658165697617976
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5221
There is a preprint ready on an HBM-backed hardware state engine designed specifically for UTXO-based transaction verification. The objective is not cosmetic optimisation. It is architectural removal of latency at the state layer. The current UTXO crop and compare-and-swap path sits at roughly 1680 microseconds in conventional pipelines. The design I am outlining moves that down into the nanosecond domain — approximately a 94.4% reduction.
That is not a software tweak. It is a structural relocation of state handling into hardware.
The approach uses high-bandwidth memory tightly coupled to a purpose-built verification engine, implemented as a direct card inside a standard machine. Four such cards in parallel materially accelerate validation throughput, and they do so deterministically. This is not speculative scaling; it is engineering.
The paper will be split properly. The primary publication will detail the architecture, the circuit diagrams, the state transition pathways, and the verification flow so that the design can be reconstructed independently. The online appendix will include the RTL pseudocode, data path components, and listings in sufficient depth for implementation. Nothing hand-waved. Nothing implied.
It will be released in full. Anyone who wishes to build it may do so.
If we are serious about scaling transaction systems, then we stop chanting about abstraction layers and begin reducing latency where it actually exists — in memory access, state resolution, and deterministic hardware paths. This is simply that, written down.
It appears that even the most youthful of one’s intellectual indiscretions eventually return, impeccably dressed and demanding a formal introduction to society. A dissertation composed some twenty-two years ago—written, I confess, with the earnest severity of a man convinced that footnotes are a moral obligation—has now been summoned back into the light. De Gruyter, with commendable seriousness, has extended the courtesy of a publishing agreement, and the work is to re-emerge as a peer-reviewed monograph.
Time, of course, is the sternest of editors. A manuscript that has survived two decades deserves not embalming but refinement. There will be revisions—measured, judicious, and sufficiently modern to acknowledge that the author has aged at least as much as the arguments. The bones remain sound; only the attire requires adjustment.
For those who have not encountered the work—whether by neglect, misfortune, or an absence from my lectures over the years—it shall soon be available in a more permanent and dignified form. What was once confined to seminar rooms and industrious students will now sit upon shelves, quietly awaiting scrutiny. One can only hope it behaves better in print than it did in its youth.
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Mar. 3, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2028658165697617976
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5221
Ya que hablamos de hacer las cosas correctamente en lugar de teatralmente, también publicaré un artículo sobre ASIC esta semana.
Hay una preimpresión lista sobre un motor de estado de hardware respaldado por HBM, diseñado específicamente para la verificación de transacciones basada en UTXO. El objetivo no es una optimización superficial, sino la eliminación arquitectónica de la latencia en la capa de estado. La ruta actual de recorte y comparación e intercambio de UTXO se sitúa en aproximadamente 1680 microsegundos en las canalizaciones convencionales. El diseño que estoy describiendo reduce esa latencia al dominio de los nanosegundos, una reducción aproximada del 94,4 %.
Esto no es una modificación de software, sino una reubicación estructural de la gestión de estados en hardware.
El enfoque utiliza una memoria de alto ancho de banda estrechamente acoplada a un motor de verificación diseñado específicamente, implementado como una tarjeta directa dentro de una máquina estándar. Cuatro de estas tarjetas en paralelo aceleran considerablemente el rendimiento de la validación, y lo hacen de forma determinista. Esto no es un escalamiento especulativo; es ingeniería.
El artículo se dividirá adecuadamente. La publicación principal detallará la arquitectura, los diagramas de circuitos, las rutas de transición de estados y el flujo de verificación para que el diseño pueda reconstruirse de forma independiente. El apéndice en línea incluirá el pseudocódigo RTL, los componentes de la ruta de datos y listados con la profundidad suficiente para su implementación. Nada improvisado. Nada implícito.
Se publicará completo. Cualquiera que desee construirlo puede hacerlo.
Si nos tomamos en serio el escalado de los sistemas transaccionales, entonces dejemos de hablar de capas de abstracción y comencemos a reducir la latencia donde realmente existe: en el acceso a memoria, la resolución de estados y las rutas de hardware deterministas. Esto es simplemente eso, escrito.
Parece que incluso las indiscreciones intelectuales más jóvenes eventualmente regresan, impecablemente vestidas y exigiendo una presentación formal a la sociedad. Una disertación escrita hace unos veintidós años —escrita, lo confieso, con la severidad de un hombre convencido de que las notas a pie de página son una obligación moral— ahora ha sido convocada de nuevo a la luz. De Gruyter, con encomiable seriedad, ha concedido la cortesía de un acuerdo editorial, y la obra resurgirá como una monografía revisada por pares.
El tiempo, por supuesto, es el más severo de los editores. Un manuscrito que ha sobrevivido dos décadas no merece ser embalsamado, sino refinado. Habrá revisiones: mesuradas, juiciosas y lo suficientemente modernas como para reconocer que el autor ha envejecido al menos tanto como los argumentos. La estructura permanece sólida; solo la vestimenta requiere ajustes.
Para quienes no hayan tenido acceso a la obra —ya sea por negligencia, infortunio o ausencia de mis conferencias a lo largo de los años—, pronto estará disponible en una forma más permanente y digna. Lo que antes estaba confinado a las salas de seminarios y a los estudiantes diligentes ahora reposará en los estantes, esperando tranquilamente su escrutinio. Solo cabe esperar que se comporte mejor en la imprenta que en su juventud.
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
3 de marzo de 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2028658165697617976
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5221
Hay una preimpresión lista sobre un motor de estado de hardware respaldado por HBM, diseñado específicamente para la verificación de transacciones basada en UTXO. El objetivo no es una optimización superficial, sino la eliminación arquitectónica de la latencia en la capa de estado. La ruta actual de recorte y comparación e intercambio de UTXO se sitúa en aproximadamente 1680 microsegundos en las canalizaciones convencionales. El diseño que estoy describiendo reduce esa latencia al dominio de los nanosegundos, una reducción aproximada del 94,4 %.
Esto no es una modificación de software, sino una reubicación estructural de la gestión de estados en hardware.
El enfoque utiliza una memoria de alto ancho de banda estrechamente acoplada a un motor de verificación diseñado específicamente, implementado como una tarjeta directa dentro de una máquina estándar. Cuatro de estas tarjetas en paralelo aceleran considerablemente el rendimiento de la validación, y lo hacen de forma determinista. Esto no es un escalamiento especulativo; es ingeniería.
El artículo se dividirá adecuadamente. La publicación principal detallará la arquitectura, los diagramas de circuitos, las rutas de transición de estados y el flujo de verificación para que el diseño pueda reconstruirse de forma independiente. El apéndice en línea incluirá el pseudocódigo RTL, los componentes de la ruta de datos y listados con la profundidad suficiente para su implementación. Nada improvisado. Nada implícito.
Se publicará completo. Cualquiera que desee construirlo puede hacerlo.
Si nos tomamos en serio el escalado de los sistemas transaccionales, entonces dejemos de hablar de capas de abstracción y comencemos a reducir la latencia donde realmente existe: en el acceso a memoria, la resolución de estados y las rutas de hardware deterministas. Esto es simplemente eso, escrito.
Parece que incluso las indiscreciones intelectuales más jóvenes eventualmente regresan, impecablemente vestidas y exigiendo una presentación formal a la sociedad. Una disertación escrita hace unos veintidós años —escrita, lo confieso, con la severidad de un hombre convencido de que las notas a pie de página son una obligación moral— ahora ha sido convocada de nuevo a la luz. De Gruyter, con encomiable seriedad, ha concedido la cortesía de un acuerdo editorial, y la obra resurgirá como una monografía revisada por pares.
El tiempo, por supuesto, es el más severo de los editores. Un manuscrito que ha sobrevivido dos décadas no merece ser embalsamado, sino refinado. Habrá revisiones: mesuradas, juiciosas y lo suficientemente modernas como para reconocer que el autor ha envejecido al menos tanto como los argumentos. La estructura permanece sólida; solo la vestimenta requiere ajustes.
Para quienes no hayan tenido acceso a la obra —ya sea por negligencia, infortunio o ausencia de mis conferencias a lo largo de los años—, pronto estará disponible en una forma más permanente y digna. Lo que antes estaba confinado a las salas de seminarios y a los estudiantes diligentes ahora reposará en los estantes, esperando tranquilamente su escrutinio. Solo cabe esperar que se comporte mejor en la imprenta que en su juventud.
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
3 de marzo de 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2028658165697617976
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5221
X (formerly Twitter)
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) (@CsTominaga) on X
While we are on the subject of doing things properly rather than theatrically, I will also be loading an ASIC paper this week.
There is a preprint ready on an HBM-backed hardware state engine designed specifically for UTXO-based transaction verification.…
There is a preprint ready on an HBM-backed hardware state engine designed specifically for UTXO-based transaction verification.…
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Mar. 9, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2030917121367232938
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5224
Mar. 9, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2030917121367232938
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5224
$629,469.95 USD.
The costs per 24 hours of a billion tps 2 node test for teranode.
Let us hope the existing test is sufficiently robust.
The math of 1 billion transactions per second on Bitcoin SV represents the ultimate realization of the network’s unbounded scaling vision. To run a node at this level with a 200-day pruning window, you are operating a high-performance data engine that successfully writes 250 gigabytes to disk every single second. This setup transforms the node into a planetary-scale industrial utility, processing a staggering 21.6 petabytes of data every 24 hours. By maintaining a rolling 200-day retention period, the infrastructure manages a massive 4.32 exabyte data lake, proving that the network can handle the entire digital footprint of a modern machine-to-machine economy.
Operating this infrastructure like AWS in 2026 demonstrates the sheer economic power of the BSV ecosystem. While high-performance storage capable of these sustained write speeds carries a daily cost of roughly with long term storage. $11.5 million dollars, the utility provided is unprecedented.
Combined with half a million dollars daily for compute clusters to handle real-time signature validation and a million dollars for networking, the total daily investment of 13.1 million dollars supports a network with virtually unlimited capacity. This equates to a yearly infrastructure spend of $4.77 billion dollars to maintain a single, world-class backbone 10% node.
To sustain this throughput, the system utilizes a bonded distributed 2 terabit per second data pipe, effectively leveraging the full potential of Tier-1 cloud provider backbones. This moves BSV into a league of its own, where the blockchain functions as a hyper-scale industrial rail for global commerce. At 1 billion TPS, even the smallest fractional transaction fees generate trillions in annual revenue, making the billion-dollar infrastructure costs an incredibly efficient trade-off for the level of global utility and data integrity being delivered. You aren't just running a node; you are powering the foundational ledger for the future of global data.
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Mar. 9, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2030917121367232938
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5224
The costs per 24 hours of a billion tps 2 node test for teranode.
Let us hope the existing test is sufficiently robust.
The math of 1 billion transactions per second on Bitcoin SV represents the ultimate realization of the network’s unbounded scaling vision. To run a node at this level with a 200-day pruning window, you are operating a high-performance data engine that successfully writes 250 gigabytes to disk every single second. This setup transforms the node into a planetary-scale industrial utility, processing a staggering 21.6 petabytes of data every 24 hours. By maintaining a rolling 200-day retention period, the infrastructure manages a massive 4.32 exabyte data lake, proving that the network can handle the entire digital footprint of a modern machine-to-machine economy.
Operating this infrastructure like AWS in 2026 demonstrates the sheer economic power of the BSV ecosystem. While high-performance storage capable of these sustained write speeds carries a daily cost of roughly with long term storage. $11.5 million dollars, the utility provided is unprecedented.
Combined with half a million dollars daily for compute clusters to handle real-time signature validation and a million dollars for networking, the total daily investment of 13.1 million dollars supports a network with virtually unlimited capacity. This equates to a yearly infrastructure spend of $4.77 billion dollars to maintain a single, world-class backbone 10% node.
To sustain this throughput, the system utilizes a bonded distributed 2 terabit per second data pipe, effectively leveraging the full potential of Tier-1 cloud provider backbones. This moves BSV into a league of its own, where the blockchain functions as a hyper-scale industrial rail for global commerce. At 1 billion TPS, even the smallest fractional transaction fees generate trillions in annual revenue, making the billion-dollar infrastructure costs an incredibly efficient trade-off for the level of global utility and data integrity being delivered. You aren't just running a node; you are powering the foundational ledger for the future of global data.
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Mar. 9, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2030917121367232938
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5224
🔥1
$629,469.95 USD.
Costo por 24 horas de una prueba de mil millones de tps en dos nodos para teranode.
Esperemos que la prueba actual sea lo suficientemente robusta.
El cálculo de mil millones de transacciones por segundo en Bitcoin SV representa la materialización definitiva de la visión de escalabilidad ilimitada de la red. Para ejecutar un nodo a este nivel con una ventana de poda de 200 días, se opera un motor de datos de alto rendimiento que escribe con éxito 250 gigabytes en disco cada segundo. Esta configuración transforma el nodo en una utilidad industrial a escala planetaria, procesando la asombrosa cantidad de 21.6 petabytes de datos cada 24 horas. Al mantener un período de retención continuo de 200 días, la infraestructura gestiona un enorme lago de datos de 4.32 exabytes, lo que demuestra que la red puede gestionar toda la huella digital de una economía moderna de máquina a máquina.
Operar esta infraestructura como AWS en 2026 demuestra el enorme potencial económico del ecosistema BSV. Si bien el almacenamiento de alto rendimiento capaz de alcanzar estas velocidades de escritura sostenidas conlleva un coste diario de aproximadamente 11,5 millones de dólares (con el almacenamiento a largo plazo), la utilidad que ofrece no tiene precedentes.
Combinando con medio millón de dólares diarios para clústeres de cómputo que gestionan la validación de firmas en tiempo real y un millón de dólares para redes, la inversión diaria total de 13,1 millones de dólares sustenta una red con capacidad prácticamente ilimitada. Esto equivale a un gasto anual en infraestructura de 4770 millones de dólares para mantener un único nodo de red troncal de clase mundial con un 10 % de capacidad.
Para mantener este rendimiento, el sistema utiliza un canal de datos distribuido enlazado de 2 terabits por segundo, aprovechando eficazmente todo el potencial de las redes troncales de proveedores de nube de nivel 1. Esto sitúa a BSV en un nivel único, donde la cadena de bloques funciona como una vía industrial a gran escala para el comercio global. Con mil millones de TPS, incluso las comisiones fraccionarias por transacción más pequeñas generan billones de dólares en ingresos anuales, lo que convierte los costos de infraestructura de mil millones de dólares en una compensación increíblemente eficiente para el nivel de utilidad global e integridad de datos que se ofrece. No solo se está ejecutando un nodo; se está impulsando el libro de contabilidad fundamental para el futuro de los datos globales.
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
9 de marzo de 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2030917121367232938
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5224
Costo por 24 horas de una prueba de mil millones de tps en dos nodos para teranode.
Esperemos que la prueba actual sea lo suficientemente robusta.
El cálculo de mil millones de transacciones por segundo en Bitcoin SV representa la materialización definitiva de la visión de escalabilidad ilimitada de la red. Para ejecutar un nodo a este nivel con una ventana de poda de 200 días, se opera un motor de datos de alto rendimiento que escribe con éxito 250 gigabytes en disco cada segundo. Esta configuración transforma el nodo en una utilidad industrial a escala planetaria, procesando la asombrosa cantidad de 21.6 petabytes de datos cada 24 horas. Al mantener un período de retención continuo de 200 días, la infraestructura gestiona un enorme lago de datos de 4.32 exabytes, lo que demuestra que la red puede gestionar toda la huella digital de una economía moderna de máquina a máquina.
Operar esta infraestructura como AWS en 2026 demuestra el enorme potencial económico del ecosistema BSV. Si bien el almacenamiento de alto rendimiento capaz de alcanzar estas velocidades de escritura sostenidas conlleva un coste diario de aproximadamente 11,5 millones de dólares (con el almacenamiento a largo plazo), la utilidad que ofrece no tiene precedentes.
Combinando con medio millón de dólares diarios para clústeres de cómputo que gestionan la validación de firmas en tiempo real y un millón de dólares para redes, la inversión diaria total de 13,1 millones de dólares sustenta una red con capacidad prácticamente ilimitada. Esto equivale a un gasto anual en infraestructura de 4770 millones de dólares para mantener un único nodo de red troncal de clase mundial con un 10 % de capacidad.
Para mantener este rendimiento, el sistema utiliza un canal de datos distribuido enlazado de 2 terabits por segundo, aprovechando eficazmente todo el potencial de las redes troncales de proveedores de nube de nivel 1. Esto sitúa a BSV en un nivel único, donde la cadena de bloques funciona como una vía industrial a gran escala para el comercio global. Con mil millones de TPS, incluso las comisiones fraccionarias por transacción más pequeñas generan billones de dólares en ingresos anuales, lo que convierte los costos de infraestructura de mil millones de dólares en una compensación increíblemente eficiente para el nivel de utilidad global e integridad de datos que se ofrece. No solo se está ejecutando un nodo; se está impulsando el libro de contabilidad fundamental para el futuro de los datos globales.
S. Tominaga, también conocido como CSW
9 de marzo de 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2030917121367232938
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5224
X (formerly Twitter)
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) (@CsTominaga) on X
$629,469.95 USD.
The costs per 24 hours of a billion tps 2 node test for teranode.
Let us hope the existing test is sufficiently robust.
The costs per 24 hours of a billion tps 2 node test for teranode.
Let us hope the existing test is sufficiently robust.
1-s2.0-S0165176526001345-main.pdf
551.9 KB
Sunk capital and repeated interaction in Nakamoto consensus☆
Author Craig S. Wright
Economics Letters
Volume 263,
May 2026,
112940
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176526001345
https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271682/1-s2.0-S0165176525X00161/1-s2.0-S0165176526001345/main.pdf?
Author Craig S. Wright
Economics Letters
Volume 263,
May 2026,
112940
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176526001345
https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271682/1-s2.0-S0165176525X00161/1-s2.0-S0165176526001345/main.pdf?
Capital Hundido e Interacción Repetida en el Consenso Nakamoto
(Audio 15 min)
Este artículo académico de Craig S. Wright cuestiona un modelo económico previo que describe al sistema de consenso de Nakamoto como un proceso sin memoria. El autor argumenta que el protocolo original de Bitcoin sí posee una estructura temporal histórica debido a reglas técnicas, como el periodo de maduración de recompensas y el ajuste de dificultad. Estas funciones, junto con la inversión de capital fijo en hardware especializado, crean desincentivos financieros para posibles atacantes que no fueron considerados anteriormente. Al resaltar que la seudonimia permite repercusiones legales y que los mineros tienen activos en riesgo, el texto sostiene que la seguridad de la red es más robusta de lo que sugieren las teorías puramente matemáticas. En resumen, Wright demuestra que el coste de confianza no escala linealmente con el valor protegido cuando se integran las realidades operativas del sistema.
Fuente
Sunk capital and repeated interaction in Nakamoto consensus☆
Author Craig S. Wright
Economics Letters
Volume 263,
May 2026,
112940
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176526001345
https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271682/1-s2.0-S0165176525X00161/1-s2.0-S0165176526001345/main.pdf
Cuaderno
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/7d291c81-f92a-4b62-832c-ef8907b078b2?authuser=7
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5237
(Audio 15 min)
Este artículo académico de Craig S. Wright cuestiona un modelo económico previo que describe al sistema de consenso de Nakamoto como un proceso sin memoria. El autor argumenta que el protocolo original de Bitcoin sí posee una estructura temporal histórica debido a reglas técnicas, como el periodo de maduración de recompensas y el ajuste de dificultad. Estas funciones, junto con la inversión de capital fijo en hardware especializado, crean desincentivos financieros para posibles atacantes que no fueron considerados anteriormente. Al resaltar que la seudonimia permite repercusiones legales y que los mineros tienen activos en riesgo, el texto sostiene que la seguridad de la red es más robusta de lo que sugieren las teorías puramente matemáticas. En resumen, Wright demuestra que el coste de confianza no escala linealmente con el valor protegido cuando se integran las realidades operativas del sistema.
Fuente
Sunk capital and repeated interaction in Nakamoto consensus☆
Author Craig S. Wright
Economics Letters
Volume 263,
May 2026,
112940
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176526001345
https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271682/1-s2.0-S0165176525X00161/1-s2.0-S0165176526001345/main.pdf
Cuaderno
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/7d291c81-f92a-4b62-832c-ef8907b078b2?authuser=7
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5237
Audio
Capital Hundido e Interacción Repetida en el Consenso Nakamoto
(Audio 15 min)
Este artículo académico de Craig S. Wright cuestiona un modelo económico previo que describe al sistema de consenso de Nakamoto como un proceso sin memoria. El autor argumenta que el protocolo original de Bitcoin sí posee una estructura temporal histórica debido a reglas técnicas, como el periodo de maduración de recompensas y el ajuste de dificultad. Estas funciones, junto con la inversión de capital fijo en hardware especializado, crean desincentivos financieros....
Fuente
Sunk capital and repeated interaction in Nakamoto consensus☆
Author Craig S. Wright
Economics Letters
Volume 263,
May 2026,
112940
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176526001345
https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271682/1-s2.0-S0165176525X00161/1-s2.0-S0165176526001345/main.pdf
Cuaderno
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/7d291c81-f92a-4b62-832c-ef8907b078b2?authuser=7
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5237
(Audio 15 min)
Este artículo académico de Craig S. Wright cuestiona un modelo económico previo que describe al sistema de consenso de Nakamoto como un proceso sin memoria. El autor argumenta que el protocolo original de Bitcoin sí posee una estructura temporal histórica debido a reglas técnicas, como el periodo de maduración de recompensas y el ajuste de dificultad. Estas funciones, junto con la inversión de capital fijo en hardware especializado, crean desincentivos financieros....
Fuente
Sunk capital and repeated interaction in Nakamoto consensus☆
Author Craig S. Wright
Economics Letters
Volume 263,
May 2026,
112940
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176526001345
https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/271682/1-s2.0-S0165176525X00161/1-s2.0-S0165176526001345/main.pdf
Cuaderno
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/7d291c81-f92a-4b62-832c-ef8907b078b2?authuser=7
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5237
The Executive as Legislature: Constitutional Structure and the Second Trump Administration's Systematic Displacement of Congressional Authority.
Mar 15, 2026
The Constitutional Observer
https://the-constitutional-observer.ghost.io/the-executive-as-legislature-constitutional-structure-and-the-second-trump-administrations-systematic-displacement-of-congressional-authority/
Mar 15, 2026
The Constitutional Observer
https://the-constitutional-observer.ghost.io/the-executive-as-legislature-constitutional-structure-and-the-second-trump-administrations-systematic-displacement-of-congressional-authority/
The Constitutional Observer
The Executive as Legislature: Constitutional Structure and the Second Trump Administration's Systematic Displacement of Congressional…
How executive orders, impoundment, and institutional demolition are rewriting the separation of powers without amending the Constitution
By Dr Craig Wright
Constitutional crises do not always announce themselves. They sometimes arrive as administrative…
By Dr Craig Wright
Constitutional crises do not always announce themselves. They sometimes arrive as administrative…
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2041004880089989155
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
Apr. 6, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2041004880089989155
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
After more than thirty years of work, we are still celebrating logical qubits that endure for microseconds and pretending this is the foothill before a mountain already half climbed. It is not. It is a laboratory curiosity being dressed up as industrial inevitability. If one wishes to extrapolate honestly rather than ceremonially, then the answer is brutal: a quantum computer with roughly a thousand logical qubits, fully integrated, operating reliably for a month, is not twenty years away, or even fifty in any serious sense. On the present trajectory, it is a century or more away, and quite possibly never.
The reason is elementary, though one must speak it slowly for the benefit of the professionally optimistic. A microsecond is not a small month. It is not an early month. It is not a month with promise. It is millions upon millions of times smaller than the thing being promised, and that is before one even begins to account for the fact that a useful machine would not merely sit there existing, but would have to compute, correct errors, route signals, survive interference, maintain coherence, and do so across not one logical qubit but a thousand of them. That means the problem is not additive. It is multiplicative. Every component must work, every layer must hold, every correction cycle must continue, and every failure mode must be suppressed, not in one toy device but across an integrated machine of monstrous complexity.
This is where the fraudulence of the public narrative becomes obvious. We are invited to imagine a smooth curve of progress from primitive demonstration to world-changing machine, as though the remaining distance were just more of the same. But it is not more of the same. It is an entirely different class of achievement. Keeping one fragile logical qubit alive in a controlled experiment for a trivial span is one thing. Building a system with a thousand logical qubits, which in practice implies vast physical overhead, with all the control electronics, cooling, fabrication precision, connectivity, synchronisation, and fault tolerance required to run continuously for a month, is something else altogether. It is the difference between making a paper aeroplane glide across a room and declaring commercial intercontinental aviation to be imminent.
So if thirty years has brought us here, then what does extrapolation actually say? It says the remaining task is not another neat thirty-year block, because the last thirty years did not solve the hard part. They merely established how far away the hard part still is. A charitable estimate gives a century. A more honest one gives several. A rational one admits that many technologies never cross the gulf between experimental novelty and practical civilisation-scale utility. They simply become grant-eating monuments to human overstatement.
That is why the correct estimate is not merely “a long time.” It is that there is no visible engineering path from microsecond-scale logical demonstrations to month-long, thousand-logical-qubit computation that fits within any normal strategic horizon. Not a decade. Not two. Not five. On present evidence, the sensible answer is a hundred years or more, if ever, because the gap is not one of enthusiasm, but of orders of magnitude, and arithmetic has a tiresome habit of refusing to be bullied by marketing.
1/3
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2041004880089989155
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
The reason is elementary, though one must speak it slowly for the benefit of the professionally optimistic. A microsecond is not a small month. It is not an early month. It is not a month with promise. It is millions upon millions of times smaller than the thing being promised, and that is before one even begins to account for the fact that a useful machine would not merely sit there existing, but would have to compute, correct errors, route signals, survive interference, maintain coherence, and do so across not one logical qubit but a thousand of them. That means the problem is not additive. It is multiplicative. Every component must work, every layer must hold, every correction cycle must continue, and every failure mode must be suppressed, not in one toy device but across an integrated machine of monstrous complexity.
This is where the fraudulence of the public narrative becomes obvious. We are invited to imagine a smooth curve of progress from primitive demonstration to world-changing machine, as though the remaining distance were just more of the same. But it is not more of the same. It is an entirely different class of achievement. Keeping one fragile logical qubit alive in a controlled experiment for a trivial span is one thing. Building a system with a thousand logical qubits, which in practice implies vast physical overhead, with all the control electronics, cooling, fabrication precision, connectivity, synchronisation, and fault tolerance required to run continuously for a month, is something else altogether. It is the difference between making a paper aeroplane glide across a room and declaring commercial intercontinental aviation to be imminent.
So if thirty years has brought us here, then what does extrapolation actually say? It says the remaining task is not another neat thirty-year block, because the last thirty years did not solve the hard part. They merely established how far away the hard part still is. A charitable estimate gives a century. A more honest one gives several. A rational one admits that many technologies never cross the gulf between experimental novelty and practical civilisation-scale utility. They simply become grant-eating monuments to human overstatement.
That is why the correct estimate is not merely “a long time.” It is that there is no visible engineering path from microsecond-scale logical demonstrations to month-long, thousand-logical-qubit computation that fits within any normal strategic horizon. Not a decade. Not two. Not five. On present evidence, the sensible answer is a hundred years or more, if ever, because the gap is not one of enthusiasm, but of orders of magnitude, and arithmetic has a tiresome habit of refusing to be bullied by marketing.
1/3
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2041004880089989155
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
Post-quantum cryptography is being sold as an inevitable upgrade, but that framing collapses the moment the underlying premise is examined.
The entire migration rests on a speculative threat model: that large-scale quantum computers capable of breaking elliptic-curve systems will exist.
Remove that assumption—treat it for what it currently is, an unproven and persistently unrealized claim—and the logic reverses completely. In a classical world, which is the only world that actually exists in operational cryptography today, systems like ECDSA remain smaller, faster, more efficient, and more deeply scrutinized than any of the post-quantum constructions being standardised. The new schemes are not an incremental improvement; they are bulkier, more complex, and far less mature. They expand key sizes, inflate signatures, increase bandwidth, and introduce new implementation surfaces. That is not an upgrade in any meaningful engineering sense—it is a trade-off made solely to hedge against a hypothetical.
If this were a genuine market-driven decision, it would not be happening at this pace or in this manner. No rational system designer, absent an immediate and demonstrable threat, voluntarily replaces a well-understood, efficient mechanism with one that is heavier, newer, and less battle-tested.
Migration at scale is costly, risky, and disruptive. In every other domain of engineering, such a shift would require overwhelming empirical justification. Here, the justification is anticipatory. That alone explains why the transition is not emerging organically from industry demand but is instead being driven top-down through standards bodies, procurement frameworks, and compliance regimes.
The language used—“future-proofing,” “harvest now, decrypt later,” “quantum readiness”—is not evidence; it is policy positioning.
That raises the obvious question: why the pressure?
Governments do not move entire cryptographic ecosystems without motive. One explanation is institutional risk management—no agency wants to be accused, in hindsight, of having ignored a theoretical vulnerability. Another is strategic control: standardisation creates alignment, and alignment creates leverage over infrastructure, vendors, and certification pipelines. By defining what is “approved,” governments effectively determine what is deployable in regulated environments. That is not conspiracy; it is how standards power works. But the consequence is that the decision is no longer purely technical. It becomes administrative, and once embedded into compliance requirements, it becomes unavoidable regardless of whether the underlying technical case is compelling.
The result is a form of technological path dependence.
Once large institutions begin migrating—especially under mandate—the rest of the ecosystem follows, not because the new systems are better in a classical sense, but because compatibility and certification demand it. At that point, the question of whether the premise was sound becomes secondary. The system has already been redirected. What is being presented as a forward-looking security upgrade is, in practice, a shift toward heavier cryptographic machinery justified by a threat that has not materialised, with costs that are immediate and measurable. In that context, describing the transition as being “railroaded” is not rhetorical excess; it is a recognition that the driver is policy inertia rather than demonstrated necessity.
2/3
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2040994859318939943
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
The entire migration rests on a speculative threat model: that large-scale quantum computers capable of breaking elliptic-curve systems will exist.
Remove that assumption—treat it for what it currently is, an unproven and persistently unrealized claim—and the logic reverses completely. In a classical world, which is the only world that actually exists in operational cryptography today, systems like ECDSA remain smaller, faster, more efficient, and more deeply scrutinized than any of the post-quantum constructions being standardised. The new schemes are not an incremental improvement; they are bulkier, more complex, and far less mature. They expand key sizes, inflate signatures, increase bandwidth, and introduce new implementation surfaces. That is not an upgrade in any meaningful engineering sense—it is a trade-off made solely to hedge against a hypothetical.
If this were a genuine market-driven decision, it would not be happening at this pace or in this manner. No rational system designer, absent an immediate and demonstrable threat, voluntarily replaces a well-understood, efficient mechanism with one that is heavier, newer, and less battle-tested.
Migration at scale is costly, risky, and disruptive. In every other domain of engineering, such a shift would require overwhelming empirical justification. Here, the justification is anticipatory. That alone explains why the transition is not emerging organically from industry demand but is instead being driven top-down through standards bodies, procurement frameworks, and compliance regimes.
The language used—“future-proofing,” “harvest now, decrypt later,” “quantum readiness”—is not evidence; it is policy positioning.
That raises the obvious question: why the pressure?
Governments do not move entire cryptographic ecosystems without motive. One explanation is institutional risk management—no agency wants to be accused, in hindsight, of having ignored a theoretical vulnerability. Another is strategic control: standardisation creates alignment, and alignment creates leverage over infrastructure, vendors, and certification pipelines. By defining what is “approved,” governments effectively determine what is deployable in regulated environments. That is not conspiracy; it is how standards power works. But the consequence is that the decision is no longer purely technical. It becomes administrative, and once embedded into compliance requirements, it becomes unavoidable regardless of whether the underlying technical case is compelling.
The result is a form of technological path dependence.
Once large institutions begin migrating—especially under mandate—the rest of the ecosystem follows, not because the new systems are better in a classical sense, but because compatibility and certification demand it. At that point, the question of whether the premise was sound becomes secondary. The system has already been redirected. What is being presented as a forward-looking security upgrade is, in practice, a shift toward heavier cryptographic machinery justified by a threat that has not materialised, with costs that are immediate and measurable. In that context, describing the transition as being “railroaded” is not rhetorical excess; it is a recognition that the driver is policy inertia rather than demonstrated necessity.
2/3
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2040994859318939943
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
Naturally, no one in their right mind would ever suspect a government of acting against the public’s interest in security or privacy. The very notion is absurd. Governments have, throughout history, shown an unwavering commitment to ensuring that individuals remain entirely beyond their reach—secure, private, and utterly free from oversight. One can scarcely recall a single instance where authorities preferred access over opacity, or influence over independence.
It follows, then, that any push toward new cryptographic systems must be motivated solely by a noble desire to make us more secure, to protect our communications in ways that even they themselves could never penetrate. The idea that a government might favour standards it can shape, influence, or quietly understand better than others is, of course, unthinkable. This is simply the natural order of things: a world in which power consistently restrains itself, and privacy is not merely tolerated but enthusiastically preserved.
@thecoastguy
3/3
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2040994859318939943
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
It follows, then, that any push toward new cryptographic systems must be motivated solely by a noble desire to make us more secure, to protect our communications in ways that even they themselves could never penetrate. The idea that a government might favour standards it can shape, influence, or quietly understand better than others is, of course, unthinkable. This is simply the natural order of things: a world in which power consistently restrains itself, and privacy is not merely tolerated but enthusiastically preserved.
@thecoastguy
3/3
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://x.com/i/status/2040994859318939943
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
Audio
El Espejismo Cuántico y la Trampa de la Ciberseguridad.
(Audio 27:33 min)
Craig Wright sostiene que el desarrollo de una computación cuántica útil es un mito publicitario, pues estamos a siglos de distancia de alcanzar la estabilidad necesaria para superar a la tecnología actual. El autor critica la transición hacia la criptografía post-cuántica, argumentando que estas nuevas medidas son ineficientes y pesadas en comparación con sistemas probados como ECDSA. Según el texto, este cambio no responde a una necesidad técnica real, sino a una imposición burocrática diseñada para ejercer control estratégico sobre la infraestructura digital. Finalmente, utiliza el sarcasmo para sugerir que los gobiernos promueven estos estándares para debilitar la privacidad ciudadana bajo el disfraz de una falsa seguridad futura. De este modo,..
Fuente
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
Cuaderno
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/49e9683f-4619-41c0-ac6e-549552d4b32e
(Audio 27:33 min)
Craig Wright sostiene que el desarrollo de una computación cuántica útil es un mito publicitario, pues estamos a siglos de distancia de alcanzar la estabilidad necesaria para superar a la tecnología actual. El autor critica la transición hacia la criptografía post-cuántica, argumentando que estas nuevas medidas son ineficientes y pesadas en comparación con sistemas probados como ECDSA. Según el texto, este cambio no responde a una necesidad técnica real, sino a una imposición burocrática diseñada para ejercer control estratégico sobre la infraestructura digital. Finalmente, utiliza el sarcasmo para sugerir que los gobiernos promueven estos estándares para debilitar la privacidad ciudadana bajo el disfraz de una falsa seguridad futura. De este modo,..
Fuente
S. Tominaga, AKA CSW
Apr. 6, 2026
https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5241
Cuaderno
https://notebooklm.google.com/notebook/49e9683f-4619-41c0-ac6e-549552d4b32e