⁣There’s no quicker way to kill NATO than for Europe to think it can go its own way in Ukraine.

There’s also no better way to secure a Russian victory.

For once I support you.

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

⁣Correction:

According to Russian President Vladimir Putin, the United States attacked Russia using Ukraine as a proxy.

If Russia fails to respond, NATO will be emboldened.

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

IS THE WEST'S UKRAINE GAMBLE LEADING US TO NUCLEAR WAR? IDF ON THE BRINK IN LEBANON
Interview for Dialogue Works

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

THE UNITED STATES HAS ATTACKED RUSSIA
Interview for Patrick Lancaster

These strikes can only happen with U.S. involvement in targeting. This makes the U.S. an active participant in the war. By Russian standards, this is an act of war.

Such actions escalate the conflict to dangerous levels,and potentially triggering a broader war.

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

ASK THE INSPECTOR EP. 212 Highlight

▫️Why Matt Gaetz Matters

The FBI are the bad guys

See the FULL EPISODE HERE

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

⁣▫️Cancel the Sentinel ICBM.
▫️Reduce Minuteman 3 to 100 operational missiles armed with conventional warheads for prompt global strike.
▫️Cancel B-21 Raider program.
▫️Maintain the Columbia class missile submarine project, but reduce from 12 to 10.
▫️Eliminate B-61 bombs from inventory.

Of course, to save the $500 billion here, you’ll have to invest $100 million in arms control.

With effective arms control, we can save an additional $1-2 trillion dollars over the course of the next decade.

And make the world a safer place for us all.

Contact me for details.

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

THE USA ATTACKED – HOW WILL RUSSIA REACT?
Interview for Gegenpol

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

HAS WORLD WAR III JUST STARTED?
Interview for Gary Grass

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

⁣And yet most Americans do not understand the stupidity of Buchanan’s statement.

Russia isn’t doing “an exchange.”

Russia will obliterate the United States.

The fact that we will have a few Ohio class submarines hanging out in the ocean afterwards is meaningless.

Because the country they are defending will no longer exist.

We need to fundamentally rethink our approach to nuclear weapons and nuclear war.

You can’t claim to deter nuclear conflict if you pretend you can somehow survive a nuclear war.

It’s time to inject arms control back into the national lexicon.

Before it is too late.

What say you, Donald J. Trump?

Elon Musk? Robert F. Kennedy Jr?

Donald Trump Jr? Tulsi Gabbard?

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

RUSSIA HAS UNVEILED A NEW WEAPON SYSTEM AS A WARNING TO UKRAINE AND THE WEST

Russia has apparently launched a single RS-26 Rubezh road mobile missile against a target in Dnipro, Ukraine (Dnipropetrovsk).

According to Ukrainian authorities, the missile struck an unnamed industrial enterprise.

Dnipro is home to the Pivdenmash (former Yuzhmash) missile production facility.

Analysis of imagery of the attack indicates the RS-26 carried six independent warheads, each in turn deploying several submunitions.
This warhead package is exclusively for conventional attack.

Russia had not been previously assessed to outfit the RS-26 with a warhead of this design.

By unveiling the conventionally armed RS-26, Russia is changing the qualitative nature of the conflict, something promised by President Vladimir Putin.

Ukraine and its Western allies must now evaluate the destructive potential of this weapon, and understand that Russia can deliver this warhead to any target in Ukraine or Europe knowing there is no defense against it.

The RS-26 is produced in Votkinsk. It is assessed that the production of the RS-26, which was halted in 2017, was resumed this past summer. With production rates estimated at 6-8 missiles per month, Russia could have accumulated an arsenal of between 30-40 RS-26 missiles. Although described as an intercontinental ballistic missile, the RS-26’s range actually depends on the warhead package. If armed with a single warhead, it can exceed the 5,000 kilometer threshold used to differentiate between intermediate and intercontinental range missiles. The RS-26 did not go into serial production because of this ambiguity; at the time, Russia was a signatory to the INF treaty, which prohibited intermediate range missiles.

It is assessed that the six warhead conventional warhead package used against Dnipro would have made the RS-26 used fall into the intermediate range for classification.

Donald Trump withdrew from the INF treaty in 2019.

If the United States had remained in the treaty, this version of the RS-26 would not have been available for use by Russia.

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

As America and the West comes to grips over the fact that Russia has launched an ICBM-capable missile in combat for the first time in history, we all might want to take some time contemplating how we got to this point, and we might find a path that leads us away from the inevitability of nuclear war with Russia.

Fortunately, there is a book that does just that: Disarmament in the Time of Perestroika.

This is a history/memoir that details the story of the implementation of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, and the role I played in setting up and operating a monitoring site outside the Soviet missile factory in Votkinsk.

The United States has walked away from arms control over the course of the last three decades; Donald Trump withdrew from the INF Treaty in 2019.

We faced a very dangerous situation in the 1980’s, with a nuclear arms race leading the US and Soviets on a path toward inevitable nuclear war.

The INF treaty saved us, and the world, from such a fate.
Arms control conducted in the spirit of the INF treaty could save us once again.

Read my book to learn this critical history, and to learn about the importance and potential of arms control when it comes to the present state of affairs between the US and Russia.

And just to highlight the connection of the present to the past—Votkinsk produced the SS-20 intermediate range missile that was eliminated under the INF treaty. It also produces the RS-26 intermediate range missile used by Russia against Ukraine.

To buy the book CLICK HERE

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

⁣NATO JUST ATTACKED RUSSIA, PUTIN'S GLOVES ARE OFF — IS WW3 NEXT?
Interview for Danny Haiphong

Live Stream Scheduled for November 21, 2024 at 1:00pm ET

We discuss Russia firing an ICBM into Ukraine in response to Biden approving long range missile strikes deep into Russia, Ukraine’s first ATACMS strike on the Bryansk region, the UK following US lead with approval of storm shadow strikes into Russia, Russia updating its nuclear doctrine and whether WW3 is on the way after these reckless escalations.

Watch on YouTube CLICK HERE

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

BIDEN TEAM GOES FULL PSYCHO!
Interview for Garland Nixon

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

Correction: The missile used by Russia was not the RS-26, but rather a previously unknown medium range missile known as the Oreshnik (Hazel).

A medium range missile is generally characterized as having a range of between 1,000 and 3,000 kilometers.

The range from Kapustin Yar to Dnipro is around 800 kilometers.

Vladimir Putin indicated that this missile could be used to strike targets throughout Europe.

Not much is known about the Oreshnik.

However, the Ukrainian government has reported that an RS-26 had been observed at Kapustin Yar prior to the launch, implying that they had access to satellite imagery.

As such, one can speculate that the Oreshnik physically resembles the RS-26, meaning that it uses a six-axle mobile launcher and is fired from a launch canister mounted on the launcher.

If this is the case, the Oreshnik may be a modification of the Rubezh, implying that it is a product of the Nadiradzhe/Votkinsk missile production team.

However, everything is speculation pending more definitive information.

US officials described the Oreshnik as an “experimental” system, implying that they were aware of its existence.

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate

RUSSIA FIRES FIRST ICBM IN COMBAT FOR THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY
Interview for Judging Freedom

@ScottRitter | Substack | Donate