Forwarded from Let's Fix Stuff
Major update of 2020 Election Fraud evidence completed today. Over 240 items in list and growing...and that's just Michigan. Please share far and wide. Need to ensure justice in 2020 Election before setting our sights on the 2022 Election. 2020 won't matter until we do. https://letsfixstuff.org/2021/03/michigan-election-fraud-affidavits/
👍1
Forwarded from Techno_Fog
If you guys have any questions on the Ghislaine Maxwell case or any Epstein related questions I’ll do my best to answer on Substack.
Just ask a question in the Substack comments section.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-ghislane-maxwell-case/comments
Just ask a question in the Substack comments section.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-ghislane-maxwell-case/comments
Substack
The Ghislaine Maxwell Case
And the ongoing(?) investigations of Epstein's co-conspirators
👍1
For the real update of election cases and their current status--what the media will not tell you-- see this list by physicist John Droz and those who have been working with him to get to the Truth. http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm
The #FakeNews is lying to everyone about our filings in the Dominion case. My position has not changed. We will be taking them to the mat. Sidney
Forwarded from Lin Wood
A review of this Epoch Times article on Sidney Powell’s motion to dismiss the Dominion lawsuit will clarify propaganda media misrepresentations of the motion.
By the way, Dominion’s lawyer, Tom Clare, also represents Bill Gates.
Just sayin.’
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/sidney-powell-seeks-to-dismiss-dominions-1-3-billion-lawsuit_3744810.html
By the way, Dominion’s lawyer, Tom Clare, also represents Bill Gates.
Just sayin.’
https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/sidney-powell-seeks-to-dismiss-dominions-1-3-billion-lawsuit_3744810.html
The Epoch Times
Sidney Powell Seeks to Dismiss Dominion’s $1.3 Billion Lawsuit
Attorney Sidney Powell, who filed third-party lawsuits to aid former President Donald Trump in his post-election legal fight, ...
Forwarded from Patrick M. Byrne
Republican-Controlled Wisconsin Assembly Authorizes Investigation of 2020 Presidential Election
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/republican-controlled-wisconsin-assembly-authorizes-investigation-2020-presidential-election/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/03/republican-controlled-wisconsin-assembly-authorizes-investigation-2020-presidential-election/
The Gateway Pundit
JUST IN: Republican-Controlled Wisconsin Assembly Authorizes Investigation of 2020 Presidential Election | The Gateway Pundit |…
The Republican-controlled Wisconsin state assembly on Tuesday passed a resolution to authorize an investigation into the 2020 presidential election.
👍2
Forwarded from Patrick M. Byrne
RESPONSE TO THE FAKE NEWS ATTACKS ON SIDNEY POWELL
FREE SPEECH
- This defamation lawsuit is yet another attempt to silence critics and citizens who want to investigate voter fraud. The statements Dominion claims are defamatory are actually protected speech under the First Amendment because they deal with matters of public concern, i.e., election integrity. The Fake News media and their allies are spinning meritless claims because their arguments have neither the facts nor the law needed to hold up in a courtroom.
- The statements complained of are also protected because Dominion is a public figure and must prove that Ms. Powell acted with malice. This is impossible, as Ms. Powell’s lawyer has explained, because Ms. Powell’s statements were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence. She presented this evidence for all to see in four court filings and on her website.
FAKE NEWS
- Contrary to what the Fake News is pushing, Sidney did NOT claim in court that ‘no reasonable person would believe her claims’. The press is using twisted legalese and manipulating the legal standard to confuse the issue, as they have done before in other high-profile cases. Ms. Powell’s statements were legal opinions that she stands behind, as they were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence.
- Dominion claims that the evidence Ms. Powell relied upon to assert her claims concerning the lack of election integrity is incredible and not believable. Ms. Powell responded by pointing out that her assertions were her legal opinions based on the evidence she presented to four different courts. Accordingly, her statements are not subject to challenge under defamation law.
FREE SPEECH
- This defamation lawsuit is yet another attempt to silence critics and citizens who want to investigate voter fraud. The statements Dominion claims are defamatory are actually protected speech under the First Amendment because they deal with matters of public concern, i.e., election integrity. The Fake News media and their allies are spinning meritless claims because their arguments have neither the facts nor the law needed to hold up in a courtroom.
- The statements complained of are also protected because Dominion is a public figure and must prove that Ms. Powell acted with malice. This is impossible, as Ms. Powell’s lawyer has explained, because Ms. Powell’s statements were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence. She presented this evidence for all to see in four court filings and on her website.
FAKE NEWS
- Contrary to what the Fake News is pushing, Sidney did NOT claim in court that ‘no reasonable person would believe her claims’. The press is using twisted legalese and manipulating the legal standard to confuse the issue, as they have done before in other high-profile cases. Ms. Powell’s statements were legal opinions that she stands behind, as they were based on sworn affidavits, declarations, expert reports and documentary evidence.
- Dominion claims that the evidence Ms. Powell relied upon to assert her claims concerning the lack of election integrity is incredible and not believable. Ms. Powell responded by pointing out that her assertions were her legal opinions based on the evidence she presented to four different courts. Accordingly, her statements are not subject to challenge under defamation law.
Forwarded from Patrick M. Byrne
Hey folks. I hear the fake news about Sidney today got people down. Ignore it. Just some legal finepoints that the MSM wants to spin to their own advantage. Sidney is fully geared up for this fight. And we are coming off the canvas in a big way. Sit tight.