昨天放鞭炮的原来是便衣，演这一出戏，无非是想表达：中国人民对中共很支持，但中共很克制。
不过演砸了 pic.twitter.com/c0YGryYEB0— 新闻/真话 (@TuCaoFakeNews) July 25, 2020
July 26, 2020 at 07:34AM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/Scswga
Before Next
不过演砸了 pic.twitter.com/c0YGryYEB0— 新闻/真话 (@TuCaoFakeNews) July 25, 2020
July 26, 2020 at 07:34AM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/Scswga
Before Next
Infos beyond the wall
I’ll echo the questions ringing in the hearts and minds of Americans from here in California to my home state of Kansas and beyond: 从加利福尼亚这里到我的故乡堪萨斯州以至更远的地方，美国人心灵和脑海中萦绕着这些问题，我也要重复它们： What do the American people have to show now 50 years on from engagement…
Now, before I seem too eager to tear down President Nixon’s legacy, I want to be clear that he did what he believed was best for the American people at the time, and he may well have been right.
在我好像急于要破坏尼克松总统的遗产之前，我希望明确表示，他做的是他当时相信对美国人民最为有利的事情，而且他可能是对的。
He was a brilliant student of China, a fierce cold warrior, and a tremendous admirer of the Chinese people, just as I think we all are.
他是一位出色的中国研究者、强悍的冷战勇士，而且是中国人民的仰慕者——我想我们大家都是。
He deserves enormous credit for realizing that China was too important to be ignored, even when the nation was weakened because of its own self-inflicted communist brutality.
必须要充分肯定的是，他认识到中国实在太重要了，不能被忽视，即使当时的中国因为自我施加的共产暴政而处在被削弱的状态。
In 1967, in a very famous Foreign Affairs article, Nixon explained his future strategy. Here’s what he said:
He said,
1967年，尼克松在《外交事务》杂志上发表的一篇非常著名的文章中解释了他的未来战略。这是他说的话，他说：“长远来看，我们根本无法承受永远让中国留在国际大家庭之外……除非中国改变，世界不会安全。因此，在我们对事件所能影响的范围内，我们的目标应为引导改变。”
And I think that’s the key phrase from the entire article: “to induce change.”
我认为这是整篇文章的关键词：“引导改变”。
So, with that historic trip to Beijing, President Nixon kicked off our engagement strategy. He nobly sought a freer and safer world, and he hoped that the Chinese Communist Party would return that commitment.
因此，尼克松总统历史性的北京之行，开启了我们的接触战略。他崇高地寻求一个更为自由、更为安全的世界。他希望中国共产党会对那个承诺做出回报。
As time went on, American policymakers increasingly presumed that as China became more prosperous, it would open up, it would become freer at home, and indeed present less of a threat abroad, it’d be friendlier. It all seemed, I am sure, so inevitable.
随着时间的推移，美国决策者日益假定，随着中国变得更为繁荣，它会开放，对内会变得更为自由，而且对外不那么具有威胁性，更为友好。我敢肯定，一切似乎都显得如此的势在难免。
But that age of inevitability is over. The kind of engagement we have been pursuing has not brought the kind of change inside of China that President Nixon had hoped to induce.
然而，势在难免的时代结束了。我们一直在追寻的那种接触政策没有在中国境内带来尼克松总统所希望引导的那种改变。
The truth is that our policies – and those of other free nations – resurrected China’s failing economy, only to see Beijing bite the international hands that were feeding it.
事实是，我们的政策，还有其它自由国家的政策，重振了中国失败的经济，看到的却是北京反咬喂食给它的国际之手。
We opened our arms to Chinese citizens, only to see the Chinese Communist Party exploit our free and open society. China sent propagandists into our press conferences, our research centers, our high-schools, our colleges, and even into our PTA meetings
我们向中国公民张开了双臂，换来的却是中共利用我们自由与开放的社会。中国派出宣传手进入我们的记者会、我们的研究中心、我们的高中和大学，甚至进入我们家长教师协会的会议。
We marginalized our friends in Taiwan, which later blossomed into a vigorous democracy.
We gave the Chinese Communist Party and the regime itself special economic treatment, only to see the CCP insist on silence over its human rights abuses as the price of admission for Western companies entering China.
我们给予中国共产党及其政权本身
Ambassador O’Brien ticked off a few examples just the other day: Marriott, American Airlines, Delta, United all removed references to Taiwan from their corporate websites, so as not to anger Beijing.
就在前些天，奥布莱恩大使提出了几个例子：万豪、美国航空、达美和美联航都从它们的公司网站上删除了提到台湾的地方，以免触怒北京。
In Hollywood, not too far from here – the epicenter of American creative freedom, and self-appointed arbiters of social justice – self-censors even the most mildly unfavorable reference to China.
离此不远的好莱坞——这个美国创意自由的中心和自封的社会公正的仲裁者，对哪怕是中国稍微不利的说法都实行自我审查。
Before Next
在我好像急于要破坏尼克松总统的遗产之前，我希望明确表示，他做的是他当时相信对美国人民最为有利的事情，而且他可能是对的。
He was a brilliant student of China, a fierce cold warrior, and a tremendous admirer of the Chinese people, just as I think we all are.
他是一位出色的中国研究者、强悍的冷战勇士，而且是中国人民的仰慕者——我想我们大家都是。
He deserves enormous credit for realizing that China was too important to be ignored, even when the nation was weakened because of its own self-inflicted communist brutality.
必须要充分肯定的是，他认识到中国实在太重要了，不能被忽视，即使当时的中国因为自我施加的共产暴政而处在被削弱的状态。
In 1967, in a very famous Foreign Affairs article, Nixon explained his future strategy. Here’s what he said:
He said,
“Taking the long view, we simply cannot afford to leave China forever outside of the family of nations…The world cannot be safe until China changes. Thus, our aim – to the extent we can, we must influence events. Our goal should be to induce change.”1967年，尼克松在《外交事务》杂志上发表的一篇非常著名的文章中解释了他的未来战略。这是他说的话，他说：“长远来看，我们根本无法承受永远让中国留在国际大家庭之外……除非中国改变，世界不会安全。因此，在我们对事件所能影响的范围内，我们的目标应为引导改变。”
And I think that’s the key phrase from the entire article: “to induce change.”
我认为这是整篇文章的关键词：“引导改变”。
So, with that historic trip to Beijing, President Nixon kicked off our engagement strategy. He nobly sought a freer and safer world, and he hoped that the Chinese Communist Party would return that commitment.
因此，尼克松总统历史性的北京之行，开启了我们的接触战略。他崇高地寻求一个更为自由、更为安全的世界。他希望中国共产党会对那个承诺做出回报。
As time went on, American policymakers increasingly presumed that as China became more prosperous, it would open up, it would become freer at home, and indeed present less of a threat abroad, it’d be friendlier. It all seemed, I am sure, so inevitable.
随着时间的推移，美国决策者日益假定，随着中国变得更为繁荣，它会开放，对内会变得更为自由，而且对外不那么具有威胁性，更为友好。我敢肯定，一切似乎都显得如此的势在难免。
But that age of inevitability is over. The kind of engagement we have been pursuing has not brought the kind of change inside of China that President Nixon had hoped to induce.
然而，势在难免的时代结束了。我们一直在追寻的那种接触政策没有在中国境内带来尼克松总统所希望引导的那种改变。
The truth is that our policies – and those of other free nations – resurrected China’s failing economy, only to see Beijing bite the international hands that were feeding it.
事实是，我们的政策，还有其它自由国家的政策，重振了中国失败的经济，看到的却是北京反咬喂食给它的国际之手。
We opened our arms to Chinese citizens, only to see the Chinese Communist Party exploit our free and open society. China sent propagandists into our press conferences, our research centers, our high-schools, our colleges, and even into our PTA meetings
我们向中国公民张开了双臂，换来的却是中共利用我们自由与开放的社会。中国派出宣传手进入我们的记者会、我们的研究中心、我们的高中和大学，甚至进入我们家长教师协会的会议。
We marginalized our friends in Taiwan, which later blossomed into a vigorous democracy.
我们把我们在台湾的朋友边缘化，台湾后来成长为一个生机勃勃的民主（楷模）。We gave the Chinese Communist Party and the regime itself special economic treatment, only to see the CCP insist on silence over its human rights abuses as the price of admission for Western companies entering China.
我们给予中国共产党及其政权本身
特殊的经济待遇，看到的却是中共坚持要求在其践踏人权的问题上保持沉默，把这作为允许西方公司进入中国的代价。Ambassador O’Brien ticked off a few examples just the other day: Marriott, American Airlines, Delta, United all removed references to Taiwan from their corporate websites, so as not to anger Beijing.
就在前些天，奥布莱恩大使提出了几个例子：万豪、美国航空、达美和美联航都从它们的公司网站上删除了提到台湾的地方，以免触怒北京。
In Hollywood, not too far from here – the epicenter of American creative freedom, and self-appointed arbiters of social justice – self-censors even the most mildly unfavorable reference to China.
离此不远的好莱坞——这个美国创意自由的中心和自封的社会公正的仲裁者，对哪怕是中国稍微不利的说法都实行自我审查。
Before Next
Infos beyond the wall
I’ll echo the questions ringing in the hearts and minds of Americans from here in California to my home state of Kansas and beyond: 从加利福尼亚这里到我的故乡堪萨斯州以至更远的地方，美国人心灵和脑海中萦绕着这些问题，我也要重复它们： What do the American people have to show now 50 years on from engagement…
This corporate acquiescence to the CCP happens all over the world, too.
企业界对中共的默默接受在全世界各地都在发生。
And how has this corporate fealty worked? Is its flattery rewarded? I’ll give you a quote from the speech that General Barr gave, Attorney General Barr. In a speech last week, he said that “The ultimate ambition of China’s rulers isn’t to trade with the United States. It is to raid the United States.”
企业界的这种效忠效果如何？这种奉承得到了回报吗？我来引用司法部长巴尔上星期的演说中的一句话，他说：“中国统治者的终极企图不是与美国进行贸易。它是抢掠美国。”
China ripped off our prized intellectual property and trade secrets, causing millions of jobs[1] all across America.
中国窃取我们珍视的知识产权和商业秘密，使美国各地损失了数以百万计的就业岗位。
It sucked supply chains away from America, and then added a widget made of slave labor.
它从美国吸走了供应链，然后加上了奴工器具。
It made the world’s key waterways less safe for international commerce.
它使世界的关键水道对国际商贸不那么安全了。
President Nixon once said he feared he had created a “Frankenstein” by opening the world to the CCP, and here we are.
尼克松总统曾说，担心，他把这个世界向中共开放，创造了一个“怪物弗兰肯斯坦”。而这就是我们所处的局面。
彭沛奥 演讲 中文翻译
Before Next
企业界对中共的默默接受在全世界各地都在发生。
And how has this corporate fealty worked? Is its flattery rewarded? I’ll give you a quote from the speech that General Barr gave, Attorney General Barr. In a speech last week, he said that “The ultimate ambition of China’s rulers isn’t to trade with the United States. It is to raid the United States.”
企业界的这种效忠效果如何？这种奉承得到了回报吗？我来引用司法部长巴尔上星期的演说中的一句话，他说：“中国统治者的终极企图不是与美国进行贸易。它是抢掠美国。”
China ripped off our prized intellectual property and trade secrets, causing millions of jobs[1] all across America.
中国窃取我们珍视的知识产权和商业秘密，使美国各地损失了数以百万计的就业岗位。
It sucked supply chains away from America, and then added a widget made of slave labor.
它从美国吸走了供应链，然后加上了奴工器具。
It made the world’s key waterways less safe for international commerce.
它使世界的关键水道对国际商贸不那么安全了。
President Nixon once said he feared he had created a “Frankenstein” by opening the world to the CCP, and here we are.
尼克松总统曾说，担心，他把这个世界向中共开放，创造了一个“怪物弗兰肯斯坦”。而这就是我们所处的局面。
彭沛奥 演讲 中文翻译
Before Next
We marginalized our friends in Taiwan, which later blossomed into a vigorous democracy.
We gave the Chinese Communist Party and the regime itself special economic treatment, only to see the CCP insist on silence over its human rights abuses as the price of admission for Western companies entering China.
我们给予中国共产党及其政权本身
转者语:
彭沛奥这段话说明美国政界已经全面
美国
Before Next
我们把我们在台湾的朋友边缘化，台湾后来成长为一个生机勃勃的民主（楷模）。We gave the Chinese Communist Party and the regime itself special economic treatment, only to see the CCP insist on silence over its human rights abuses as the price of admission for Western companies entering China.
我们给予中国共产党及其政权本身
特殊的经济待遇，看到的却是中共坚持要求在其践踏人权的问题上保持沉默，把这作为允许西方公司进入中国的代价。转者语:
彭沛奥这段话说明美国政界已经全面
对比、回顾、反思了对台、对华政策差异及其不合理结果反差。美国
会纠正以前的错误策略，加大力度对台湾社会的支持与对中国的不轨行为纠正。Before Next
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
对牛弹琴，不是牛笨，是人愚。
狗仗人势，不是狗狂，是主恶。
所以，
看问题别看表象，
而要抓住它的本质！ https://t.co/MnbhL5blKi
https://twitter.com/2mmbPkM00IJwIUV/status/1287016841919905794
转者语:
以牛代指中共有点委屈牛，
据我了解牛确实能听懂音乐
Before Next
狗仗人势，不是狗狂，是主恶。
所以，
看问题别看表象，
而要抓住它的本质！ https://t.co/MnbhL5blKi
https://twitter.com/2mmbPkM00IJwIUV/status/1287016841919905794
转者语:
以牛代指中共有点委屈牛，
据我了解牛确实能听懂音乐
Before Next
@HuPing1 这其实是毫无悬念的事情。以前拜登公开反对川普视中国为敌，说中国是美国的朋友。路透社昨天的消息说了，为此采访拜登竞选团队，竞选团队说得很清楚：拜登主张与中国接触——即彭佩奥要终结的“尼克松以来的盲目对华接触”。
本人希望川普连任的理由不在这，在于美国的未来，有美国未来，才有世界未来。
https://twitter.com/HeQinglian/status/1287119580339621888
Before Next
本人希望川普连任的理由不在这，在于美国的未来，有美国未来，才有世界未来。
https://twitter.com/HeQinglian/status/1287119580339621888
Before Next
Twitter
He Qinglian
@HuPing1 这其实是毫无悬念的事情。以前拜登公开反对川普视中国为敌，说中国是美国的朋友。路透社昨天的消息说了，为此采访拜登竞选团队，竞选团队说得很清楚：拜登主张与中国接触——即彭佩奥要终结的“尼克松以来的盲目对华接触”。 本人希望川普连任的理由不在这，在于美国的未来，有美国未来，才有世界未来。
J (@JuniorJupiterC) 已推文：现在的大陆20代青年甚至30～40代青壮年很少有人知道，上世纪80年代城市儿童意外死亡案例中坠入工地石灰池被煮熟是仅次于交通事故、医疗注射事故、一氧化碳中毒、食物中毒、触电的第六大死因。话说那个时代随便打一针抗生素致死、致痴呆、失聪都是家常便饭的事。80年代出生正常活下来的城市人真不容易。 https://twitter.com/JuniorJupiterC/status/1287045906831794176?s=20
Before Next
Before Next
Twitter
J
现在的大陆20代青年甚至30～40代青壮年很少有人知道，上世纪80年代城市儿童意外死亡案例中坠入工地石灰池被煮熟是仅次于交通事故、医疗注射事故、一氧化碳中毒、食物中毒、触电的第六大死因。话说那个时代随便打一针抗生素致死、致痴呆、失聪都是家常便饭的事。80年代出生正常活下来的城市人真不容易。
俄罗斯不给中共提供导弹
中共说原因让人很暖心
要中共说真话，比登天还难
死到临头还嘴硬！ https://t.co/XtezA2bK2A
https://twitter.com/Emi2020JP/status/1287189618878603264
Before Next
中共说原因让人很暖心
要中共说真话，比登天还难
死到临头还嘴硬！ https://t.co/XtezA2bK2A
https://twitter.com/Emi2020JP/status/1287189618878603264
Before Next
两年前目标是防止贸易战升级，之后是变成防止产业链脱钩，完了防止新冷战。现在最重要战略目标是避免军事冲突。 https://t.co/23LDqia7VP
https://twitter.com/caolei1/status/1287189692144787456
Before Next
https://twitter.com/caolei1/status/1287189692144787456
Before Next
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
上甘岭战役，美军死400多人，志愿军亡7万多人，1比175。美军打扫战场的录像传回美国国内，民众骂美军是屠夫，说这不是战争，而是屠杀，开始游行反战示威，促成和谈。战争结束，美军共死两万多人，举国哀悼；志愿军伤亡百万，举国欢庆。。。转自微友 https://t.co/ptb5e8DVyx
https://twitter.com/2mmbPkM00IJwIUV/status/1286897335801221122
Before Next
https://twitter.com/2mmbPkM00IJwIUV/status/1286897335801221122
Before Next
Day 56. Last night six DHS law enforcement officers were injured in Portland. To be clear, criminals assaulted FEDERAL officers on FEDERAL property…and the city of Portland did nothing. pic.twitter.com/lzPPBl060y— Acting Secretary Chad Wolf (@DHS_Wolf) July 25, 2020
July 26, 2020 at 08:54PM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
Before Next
July 26, 2020 at 08:54PM
via Twitter https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
Before Next
X (formerly Twitter)
Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) on X
45th & 47th President of the United States of America🇺🇸
刘晓原 (@liu_xiaoyuan) 已推文：什么是暴政？
英国启蒙思想家、“自由主义之父”、《政府论》作者约翰·洛克给出了特别明了的定义：
“统治者无论怎样正当的资格，如果不以法律而以他的意志为准则，如果他的命令和行动不以保护他的人民的财产而以满足他自己的野心、私愤、贪欲和任何其他不正当的情欲为目的，那就是暴政。” https://t.co/3bbynQGDrJ https://twitter.com/liu_xiaoyuan/status/1287377171451797505?s=20
Before Next
英国启蒙思想家、“自由主义之父”、《政府论》作者约翰·洛克给出了特别明了的定义：
“统治者无论怎样正当的资格，如果不以法律而以他的意志为准则，如果他的命令和行动不以保护他的人民的财产而以满足他自己的野心、私愤、贪欲和任何其他不正当的情欲为目的，那就是暴政。” https://t.co/3bbynQGDrJ https://twitter.com/liu_xiaoyuan/status/1287377171451797505?s=20
Before Next
Twitter
刘晓原
什么是暴政？ 英国启蒙思想家、“自由主义之父”、《政府论》作者约翰·洛克给出了特别明了的定义： “统治者无论怎样正当的资格，如果不以法律而以他的意志为准则，如果他的命令和行动不以保护他的人民的财产而以满足他自己的野心、私愤、贪欲和任何其他不正当的情欲为目的，那就是暴政。”
ELIJAH RIOT (@ElijahSchaffer) 已推文：Desperate Portland business owners plead with rioters to stop destroying their livelihood
Even though it’s just a simple paper sign, you can hear the desperation from these small restaurant owners
Mayor @tedwheeler has abandoned the tax payers and law abiding citizens https://t.co/eyzfHkKIQj https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1287143805511065600?s=20
Before Next
Even though it’s just a simple paper sign, you can hear the desperation from these small restaurant owners
Mayor @tedwheeler has abandoned the tax payers and law abiding citizens https://t.co/eyzfHkKIQj https://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1287143805511065600?s=20
Before Next
Daoye XP（稲葉 希平） (@Daoye0512) 已推文：@Junk_XiJinping 我家附近的军工厂，因为和平太久一直都是半死不活的状态，而有了众国师对中美关系的不断斡旋，今年炮弹生产指标足足提升了60%，从11万发涨到17万发，建议国师们加大力度。军工厂全体职工的薪水全指望你们了。 https://twitter.com/Daoye0512/status/1287373123084521472?s=20
Before Next
Before Next
Twitter
Daoye XP（稲葉 希平）
@Junk_XiJinping 我家附近的军工厂，因为和平太久一直都是半死不活的状态，而有了众国师对中美关系的不断斡旋，今年炮弹生产指标足足提升了60%，从11万发涨到17万发，建议国师们加大力度。军工厂全体职工的薪水全指望你们了。