❗️US backed kidnapping, torture and murder in Afghanistan - The New York Times

"Dozens assembled in the mud square to listen as Abdul Raziq, one of America’s most important partners in the war against the Taliban, stood before the crowd, gesturing at two prisoners he had brought along to make his point. But to countless Afghan civilians under his reign, Raziq was something else entirely: America’s monster," the publication notes.

The New York Times reports in its investigation that it was with US connivance and support that he carried out murder and torture, with people often going missing. This led to greater local support for the Taliban.

t.me/ukraine_watch

🇪🇺 🇷🇺 EU's decision to use income from Russian assets to help Ukraine is expropriation, Kremlin says

Russia will continue assessing the consequences of the EU's decision and its response, presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

On Tuesday, the Council of the EU said that it had officially approved the decision that will allow income from frozen Russian sovereign assets to be used to provide military assistance to Ukraine.

On Wednesday, the EU published a detailed decision on frozen Russian assets as part of the package of economic sanctions against Moscow, which is effective starting May 23.

Subscribe to @sputnik_africa

🔸 TikTok | Sputnik Africa | Boost us on Telegram 🔸

🐀 🇬🇪 GEORGIA SMELLS A RAT - MPs call out the fact that the West is attempting to turn Georgia into Ukraine.

Foreign forces will not be able to turn Georgia into a second Ukraine... we need peace, says Kakha Kaladze (speaking in video) Secretary General of the ruling Georgian Dream party.

Reminder that the ruling party in the Parliament is at odds with the Georgian President over the Bill, that seeks to name things as they are - companies who receive foreign funding are Foreign Agents.

Boost us here! @IntelRepublic

Follow me @irishmaninrussia

https://thecradle.co/articles/raisi-led-the-charge-for-russia-iran-chinas-new-world-order

The heli mystery will remain a mystery - investigation pending.

What matter is the key takeaway:

Post-Raisi, the Russia-China-Iran multipolar strategic partnership remains THE way ahead.

Forgive me for going on about the King's portrait, but it is quite remarkable (and not in a good way).

Let's just add some context here about Charles. As well as King he is also head of the Church of England. But what else can we say about him?

1) WEF, globalist and woke. He is one of the front line globalist actors, including the LGBT agenda, environmentalism and urbanism. Is depopulation part of his agenda? Not publicly, but it would certainly be a necessary result of his ideas.
In any case, firmly onboard with the Great Reset.

2) Trinity College, Cambridge. Charles attended Trinity College which has always been the spiritual home of Satanism and the occult in Britain, Aleister Crowley being the most famous of the Trinity occultists.
To that we would add that recently during a sermon in the chapel of Trinity College it was speculated that Jesus Christ was transgender. The sermon was defended by the Dean of Trinity College, who said that he personally believes that the assumption that Christ was transgender was legitimate.
We see the normalisation of the unholy and unchristian.

3) Ecumenism. Charles, head of the CoE, is a strong backer of ecumenist ideas, that the different branches of Christianity must come together. Not surprisingly, ecumenism is also a key plank in the Satanist "roadmap".
Soon after his coronation, Charles held a meeting with Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew in Buckingham Palace. The meeting was also attended by the Greek Ambassador in London, the British Ambassador in Athens, as well as representatives of the Patriarchate of Constantinople in the United Kingdom. According to Bartholomew, he discussed issues of mutual interest with His Majesty.
As well, the House of Battenberg (Mountbatten) has close ties to Greek Orthodoxy.
And at the insistence of Charles, and with the blessing of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the oil used in the coronation was consecrated The Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, the first time this was not done in Canterbury. Minor point or heavily symbolic?

There have always been rumours about certain unholy practices amongst the British ruling elite and the Royal Family which brings us back to the clearly unholy painting.

Has Charles come out of the closet, as it were, in terms of his, let's call them, religious beliefs? He has authorised an official portrait where he is bathed in what can only be described as the fires of hell?

And to judge by the look on his face, quite at home and content in those hell fires.

Follow @MadTParty on Telegram | 𝕏