🤡 Biden ‘showed respect’ to a veteran by touching his face with his fist at an event commemorating the 80th anniversary of the Allied landing in Normandy.

👍 Boost us! | Subscribe to @geopolitics_live

Yesterday, for the first time, the President of Russia allowed for the possibility of supplying our weapons to those regions that are at war with countries supplying arms to former Ukraine (or more precisely, using those weapons against our country). In other words, [the possibility of supplying our weapons] to those who are in conflict with America and NATO countries.

This is a significant shift in our foreign policy. Because the way the Yanks and their European lapdogs think is as follows: we have the right to transfer any weapons to former Ukraine (i.e., to the enemy of Russia), but no other countries can help Russia itself. In other words, we will destroy you [Russia] by all means possible, but no one dares to supply weapons/technology/other assets to Russia for self-defense.

Now let the USA and their allies experience the direct use of Russian arms by third parties. These parties or regions are deliberately not named, but they could be anyone who considers Yankee-land and its allies their enemies. Regardless of their political beliefs and international recognition. Their enemy is the USA, which means they are our friends.

And let the use of Russian weapons by the yet unnamed 'regions' be as destructive as possible to their and our enemies. And let the 'sensitive targets of the states supplying weapons to Kiev' burn in hellfire. Burn along with those who control them.

And we will rejoice in their successful strikes with our weapons against our common enemies!

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense

👮‍♂️ ICYMI: UK Paratroopers Recreating D-Day Landings for Anniversary are Forced to Immediately Go Through French Passport Control

Another Brexit “benefit” to add to the list! 🤡

@RiseGS

🇷🇺🇷🇺 The Governor of the Zaporozhye region Yevgeny Balitsky on the creation of a new federal district of Novorossiya.

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

🇺🇦Using advanced Western technologies, Ukrainian engineers have managed to equip the capital's subway with a water pumping mechanism with the effect of water discharge

The device exactly copies the famous Gullfoss waterfall and is installed at Olimpiyskaya station

The novelty is designed to attract tourists to Kiev and increase the investment attractiveness of the Ukrainian capital.

Join Slavyangrad chat. Your opinion matters.
https://t.me/+U_EDAcaO-HFjNzEx

@Slavyangrad | Andrei 👋

"Bakhmut meat grinder" and "Volchansk cemetery of the AFU": causes, similarities and consequences

Since the beginning of the full-scale conflict, the AFU began to use the tactic of urban fighting to contain the advance of Russian troops: Severodonetsk and Lisichansk, Artemovsk (Bakhmut) and Avdeevka, now Chasov Yar and Volchansk....

Turning cities (large population centers) into "forts" is a tactic that was first proposed by the British and then supported by the U.S. and other NATO countries.

It is extremely convenient for the West:

1. saving money on weapons and heavy equipment (the main resource is Ukrainians, and no one is going to spare them)
2. urban battles inevitably lead to the destruction of infrastructure, which puts an additional burden on the Russian economy
3. the more Ukrainians die, the more destroyed cities will be, the bigger the "wound" between brotherly nations will be.

In addition, the West and the Kiev regime are trying to use this tactic in media terms: "demonization" of Russia through photos of destroyed cities, convincing the West and its own population that the fighting is for specific cities, not abstract square kilometers for U.S. citizens.

Also, after the loss of populated areas, Kiev propaganda declares that it has left ruins, and later announces its counter-offensive, naming the abandoned cities, not again conventional territories.

This is exactly what happened with Artemovsk, the capture of which was part of the Kiev regime's plans last year.

The key difference between the "Bakhmut meat grinder" and Volchansk, which the fascists themselves already call "the graveyard of the AFU", is the active use by Russian troops of high-explosive aerial bombs and all types of artillery, which significantly reduces casualties among the personnel.

No matter how much Ukrainian propagandists claim that the front in Kharkov region has stabilized, the fact remains that obituaries about fascists from the "elite" units of the AFU are published every day, mobilized Ukrainian soldiers surrender every day (comparable to 2022), and in the Donbass, the liberation of the territories of the DNR and LNR is taking place meter by meter every day.

North Wind

Join Slavyangrad chat. Your opinion matters.
https://t.me/+U_EDAcaO-HFjNzEx

@Slavyangrad | Andrei 👋

Arming the Zelensky regime: Find out which countries are top donors

During a meeting with heads of international news agencies on the sidelines of the 2024 St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that Moscow has the right to provide weapons to the regions from where strikes will be launched against “sensitive facilities” of those countries who deliver weapons to Ukraine, Let’s see which countries are currently arming the Kiev regime.

The Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank, compiled data on the top donors of weapons and equipment to Ukraine from February 2022 to February 2024. Here is a list of the top ten countries based on this information.

▪️The US - $46.2 billion
▪️Germany - $10.7 billion
▪️The UK - $5.7 billion
▪️Denmark - $5.2 billion
▪️The Netherlands - $4.1 billion
▪️Poland - $3.2 billion
▪️Sweden - $2.9 billion
▪️France - $2.9 billion
▪️Canada - $2.1 billion
▪️Finland - $1.9 billion

The Russian Investigative Committee earlier mentioned a total of 13 countries that currently provide Ukraine with heavy weapons, guided missiles, shells, and drones. Aside from the US, the UK, Poland, Germany, France and Canada,and Scandinavia the list includes:

▪️Australia - $880 million
▪️Croatia - $196 million
▪️The Czech Republic - $1.8 billion
▪️Portugal - $137 million
▪️Romania - $3.38 million
▪️South Korea - $394 million
▪️Turkiye - $65 million

(figures - based on information from open sources - are related to a period between 2022 and 2023)

Then-Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, for his part, said late last year that shortly after the onset of Moscow’s special military operation, a total of 54 countries announced the deliveries of weapons eato the Zelensky regime. “In reality, however, Kiev receives arms and equipment from 15 countries,” Shoigu added without elaborating.

If you want to find out what long-range weapons, Ukraine possesses, check out this information.

👍 Boost us! | Subscribe to @geopolitics_live

Which country supplies Ukraine with heavy weaponry the most?

The Czech Republic gave Kiev almost 60% of its heavy weapons stockpiles for the war with Russia. Norway contributed 53% while Germany contributed a quarter.

Also in the top ten are Denmark with 39%, the Netherlands with 38% and the UK with 24%.

Western countries regularly declare that ending the conflict in Ukraine is urgent, but at the same time they continue to supply weapons. Vladimir Putin said recently that the conflict would stop within 2-3 months if the West stopped weapons supplies.

👍 Boost us! | Subscribe to @geopolitics_live