🇩🇪 The head of the Brandenburg Ministry of Internal Affairs, Michael Stübgen, refuses to pay civil benefits to capable Ukrainians who fled to Germany, and in general considers the payment of benefits to Ukrainian refugees to be erroneous.

🇺🇸🤡🇺🇦🤡 The Biden administration is working to lift the de facto ban on the stationing of US military contractors in Ukraine - CNN, citing US officials

They want to make a decision to help the Ukrainian Armed Forces maintain and repair weapons systems provided by the United States.

“We have not made any decisions, and any discussion of this issue is premature,” said one of the administration representatives.

❗️It is also reported that the new policy has not yet received final approval from Biden.

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

1/2
According to the already established tradition, the publication of the Financial Times from yesterday with accusations against the Serbs was taken over by Russian information sources. No one tried to understand what Vučić actually said - why would they, when the topic is suitable for good publicity.

The big online means of information, which Srpski Vestnik writes about, has already reached the bottom in terms of analytics and argumentation. In addition to reminding readers of the use of Serbian rockets during the recent attack on Belgorod (a detailed examination of the markings on the missiles then showed that they were not of Serbian origin), they feed us analogies with Armenia, Estonia and Latvia and suggest that they relate to the fraternal Serbian people we see it as "prostitution, not love". With such "friends", enemies are not needed, they say.

Taking into account the past of the lady responsible for the editorial policy of such texts, as well as her talent to turn publications in the desired direction (she once successfully did this in a media holding that was abolished last year), I do not expect from this "big online means of information" no analytics or even an attempt at objective reporting. I also advise you to carefully choose sources of information, avoiding such sensationalists.

But let's deal with the issue of Serbian weapons, which the whole world is looking for in Ukraine, in order. I looked at the original Financial Times post. Journalists indeed quote the words of Vučić that Serbia exports its ammunition within the framework of the signed contracts (not to Ukraine, but in general) and, using the opportunity, increases production and volume of sales (spoiler: it will increase them even more).

"It is part of our economic revival and it is important for us," explains Vučić. From this, the Financial Times magically draws a conclusion: Serbia is secretly increasing its ammunition deliveries in order to strengthen the defense of Ukraine.

Of course, there is no sensation in Vučić's words. A year ago, he told the same Financial Times: "Could it be happening? I have no doubt that it is possible. I am not stupid. I know that some of the weapons may end up in Ukraine. What is the alternative for us? Shouldn't we produce? Shouldn't we sell?"

"Serbia produces and sells ammunition." We have many defense industry factories. When you produce ammunition, it always ends up somewhere on the battlefield or in a world crisis zone. They don't buy ammunition to decorate a shoe. You know, they use it in war to kill people," explained Vučić many times.

These seem to be perfectly logical things. But, again and again, such "sensations" are picked up by the Russian media and bloggers with strong views. And then, in discussions on the Internet, users who do not have much intelligence start clamoring about "brothers-traitors", sometimes reaching a peak with calls for a nuclear attack on Belgrade. Maybe we should turn on our brains and think, who does all this suit?

Friends, I'm tired of repeating myself. Yes, Serbian companies produce and export ammunition to foreign customers. Yes, through subcontractors, their production can really end up in the Ukrainian conflict zone. According to insider information, some local influential people are even involved (this is the Balkans, people).

❗️ But there are no official deliveries of weapons from Serbia to Ukraine (which, after all, is also confirmed by the FT source). And if there were, it could significantly change the course of the conflict. Dozens of large weapons factories with fairly developed production remained on the territory of the former Yugoslavia. Imagine for a moment the consequences of reformatting their capacities for the needs of the Ukrainian army, as was done in the countries of Eastern Europe.

2/2
This is precisely what can lead to a rapid deterioration of relations between Russia and Serbia, which is the goal of such campaigns, manipulations and informational activities. And sooner or later, it will happen if the "experts and analysts" don't stop using this topic for their 30 silver coins.

For Russian Empire in the East and United Serbien Lands on the Balkans.
Brothers and Sisters we already share our Blood in the Fight against the Gomoriths. And soon we will spill our fair part in the Fight.
Victory will be ours!!!


https://T.me/ZChroniclesSMO

Retired US Army officer, veteran of four wars Daniel Davis on X - about the attack with American weapons on Sevastopol:  "Putin is well-known for his careful, calculated responses, and patience. But his patience has a limit, and I fear this may be the breaking point. If there is a strike in response, and Americans are killed, the chance of escalation will rise dramatically for war between us.

All of this is because we continue, recklessly, calling Putin‘s Bluff, openly supporting actions that kill Russian troops, and attack Russian territory with our weapons or ammunition, acting as though he’ll never respond, or that if he does, it can be contained. For all these risks, there is no commensurate benefit, or even potential improvement in the Ukraine side. It’s all risk and no reward. I fear we are about to find out we are wrong on virtually every point…"

🇺🇸 🇷🇺💶 The White House said there is “absolutely no consensus” in the G7 on what to do with the bulk of Russia’s frozen assets.

🎙Subscribe @TheIslanderNews

❗️What the White House means is, ‘there’s no consensus’ as the Europeans are holding the majority of Russia’s assets and despite the Europeans being retarded - even they realise stealing Russia’s assets means the total collapse of the European banking system.