🍆Dive, Dive, Dive: British Royal Navy Sub Captain Dismissed for Making Sex Video While in Command of Nuclear Missiles

The captain shared the explicit footage with a junior sailor on the Vanguard-class vessel sub, armed with ‘Trident Two’ nuclear missiles. (The Sun)

The officer was kicked out of the Royal Navy after top brass saw the x-rated footage.

The incident comes amid other recent controversies involving the Royal Navy - after a different submarine captain allegedly put his genitals in a female sub-lieutenant's pocket.

@RiseGS

⚡️ The situation in the Kursk region is difficult, with 28 settlements under enemy control, the deputy governor said at a meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Regional authorities do not know the fate of about 2,000 people in the 28 settlements under the enemy's control, the official stressed.

As of today, 121,000 residents have left the border region.

👍 Boost us! | Subscribe to @geopolitics_live

“The Myth of Female Unelectability”

The problem isn’t electability—it’s the gaping void of actual leadership and innovative ideas. Let’s cut through the nonsense: HRC and Kamala are the epitome of what happens when mediocrity meets hubris and corruption. They’re not struggling because they’re women; they’re struggling because they’ve got nothing to offer except empty rhetoric, horrendous track records and a smug sense of entitlement.

People aren’t fooled by identity politics—they want results, vision, and competence, not hollow symbols propped up by a desperate party clinging to power. These two are the very reason voters are turning away, craving authenticity over AI generated, manufactured consent. The real myth here is that Kamala and Hillary were ever fit to lead.

Join Slavyangrad chat. Your opinion matters.
https://t.me/+U_EDAcaO-HFjNzEx

@Slavyangrad | Gerry Nolan 👋

The Ukrainian incursion into the Kursk region has attracted significant attention in the mainstream media, with assessments and opinions varying somewhat. However, there is one point of consensus: this operation is exceedingly risky for both Ukrainian troops and citizens.

For instance, in the article titled “Invading Russia is Zelensky’s riskiest decision yet,”The Sunday Times observes, “Kiev is evidently prepared to risk valuable soldiers and equipment to make some sort of stand here.”

The operation is so recklessly dangerous that it took everyone by surprise—except, of course, the Americans (and possibly the Brits). They were not only aware but almost certainly orchestrated the entire plan. The fact that Ukrainian forces entering Russian territory are equipped with GPS-guided ATACMS systems leaves little doubt about American involvement.

It is also evident that Zelensky personally pushed for this operation. As The Sunday Times notes, “President Zelensky’s personal fingerprints are all over it.”

Moreover, the potential upside of this operation is minimal at best. As The Times continues, “At a maximum, Ukrainian forces around Kursk might hope to extend their reach as far as occupying the nuclear power plant.” However, given the current situation, capturing the Kursk power plant is simply not within Ukraine’s grasp.

So why, despite the overwhelming risks and limited potential benefits, did the Americans and Zelensky proceed with this operation? If you were faced with a highly unlikely chance of finding a treasure at the bottom of a cliff, but the odds of breaking your neck were near certain, would you jump? Of course not.

Why, you ask? The answer is clear and cruel: neither the Americans nor Zelensky care about the Ukrainian casualties. Ukrainians are not their kin. Let them jump!

One can hope that ordinary Ukrainians grasp this tragic reality. Sadly, powerful psychological operations will prevent them from seeing the truth...

📱 InfoDefenseENGLISH
📱 InfoDefense