Words of wisdom from Mr. Scavino 🇺🇸🦅

Attorney Thomas Renz reveals what multiple DoD whistleblowers have provided on the safety of the vaccines

These numbers are mind blowing!

@ChiefNerd

SHARE

Meanwhile in Illinois: After-School Satan Club Is Now in Session, Now There’s a Bumper Sticker All Parents Want


https://www.mandatory.com/fun/1584906-meanwhile-in-illinois-after-school-satan-club-is-now-in-session-now-theres-a-bumper-sticker-all-parents-want

Subscribe to Rocky News:
https://t.me/rockynews

Sydney 2000 Olympic hero dies at age 51
https://wwos.nine.com.au/olympics/olympic-gymnastics-champion-szilveszter-csollany-dies-after-covid19--infection/5dd8d712-256a-4208-89cf-cdd6c82f6cf1

Anyone got a copy of Article 6 Section 3 of the NUREMBERG CODE under the War Crimes Act?

Article 6: Section 3
In no case should a
collective
agreement or the consent of
a
community leader or any other
authority, substitute for an
individuals informed consent.
Leaders should be aware that
mandating masks on the citizens
of
a nation and preventing
their access to food,
healthcare, transport or
education if they don't comply
is
a
war crime. Masks
or any
other medical intervention mus
remain voluntary.

Yes

Same goes with Vaccines.
And an excuse of i was just following orders under the Nuremberg Code is not excepted.

The right to avoid the imposition of human experimentation is fundamentally rooted in the Nuremberg Code of 1947. has been ratified by the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and further codified in the US. Code of Federal Regulations. In addition to the US regarding itself as bound by these provisions, these principles were adopted by the FDA in its regulations requiring the informed consent of human subjects for medical research. It is unlawful to conduct medical research even in the case of an emergency unless steps are taken to secure informed consent of all participants.

DEUTSCH

 | 

LOGIN

 

INTERNATIONAL DIALOGUE

PARTICIPATING & NETWORKING

LEARNING ONLINE

ABOUT US



HOME › LEARNING ONLINE › ARTICLE ›

ONLINE MODULE: THE HOLOCAUST AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Doc. 6: The Nuremberg Code

CASE STUDY 4: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – THE DOCTORS' TRIAL IN NUREMBERG

ABOUT

SOURCES

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. 

The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.