Forwarded from Madyson Marquette Her News ™️©️
♥️ There was a moment when Moses had the nerve to ask God what his name is.
God was gracious enough to answer, and the name he gave is recorded in the original Hebrew as YHWH.
Over time we’ve arbitrarily added an “a” and an “e” in there to get YaHWeH, presumably because we have a preference for vowels.
But scholars and rabis have noted that the letters YHWH represent breathing sounds, or aspirated consonants. When pronounced without intervening vowels, it actually sounds like breathing. YH (inhale): WH (exhale).
So a baby’s 👶🏻 first cry, his first breath, speaks the name of God. A deep sigh calls His name – or a groan or gasp that is too heavy for mere words.
Even an atheist would speak His name unaware that their very breathe is giving constant acknowledgment to God.
Likewise, a person leaves this earth with their last breath, when God’s name is no longer filing their lungs.
So when I can’t utter anything else, is my cry calling out His name?
Being alive means I speak His name constantly. Is it heard the loudest when I’m the quietest?
In sadness, we breathe heavy sighs. In joy, our lungs feel almost like they will burst.
In fear we hold our breath and have to be told to breathe slowly to help us calm down. When we’re about to do something hard, we take a deep breath to find our courage.
When I think about it, breathing is giving him praise. Even in the hardest moments!
This is so beautiful and fills me with emotion every time I grasp the thought. God chose to give himself a name that we can’t help but speak every moment we’re alive.
All of us, always, everywhere. Waking, sleeping, breathing, with the name of God on our lips. ~ anonymous
(Posted by tina)
God was gracious enough to answer, and the name he gave is recorded in the original Hebrew as YHWH.
Over time we’ve arbitrarily added an “a” and an “e” in there to get YaHWeH, presumably because we have a preference for vowels.
But scholars and rabis have noted that the letters YHWH represent breathing sounds, or aspirated consonants. When pronounced without intervening vowels, it actually sounds like breathing. YH (inhale): WH (exhale).
So a baby’s 👶🏻 first cry, his first breath, speaks the name of God. A deep sigh calls His name – or a groan or gasp that is too heavy for mere words.
Even an atheist would speak His name unaware that their very breathe is giving constant acknowledgment to God.
Likewise, a person leaves this earth with their last breath, when God’s name is no longer filing their lungs.
So when I can’t utter anything else, is my cry calling out His name?
Being alive means I speak His name constantly. Is it heard the loudest when I’m the quietest?
In sadness, we breathe heavy sighs. In joy, our lungs feel almost like they will burst.
In fear we hold our breath and have to be told to breathe slowly to help us calm down. When we’re about to do something hard, we take a deep breath to find our courage.
When I think about it, breathing is giving him praise. Even in the hardest moments!
This is so beautiful and fills me with emotion every time I grasp the thought. God chose to give himself a name that we can’t help but speak every moment we’re alive.
All of us, always, everywhere. Waking, sleeping, breathing, with the name of God on our lips. ~ anonymous
(Posted by tina)
❤4👍3
Forwarded from YumNaturals Emporium Amandha Vollmer (Amandha Vollmer)
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/open-letter-to-dr-mercola-january-17-2022/
"You need to do your due diligence, find and share the “missing” scientific proof of viruses, or retract your blog, apologize to your readers, and get on the right side of history. You’ve had 2 years already to figure this out.
Hopefully the public will soon tire of relying on “experts” and simply read the ridiculous “virus isolation” studies for themselves. When that happens, this pseudoscience (which is really too generous a word) is finished forever."
"You need to do your due diligence, find and share the “missing” scientific proof of viruses, or retract your blog, apologize to your readers, and get on the right side of history. You’ve had 2 years already to figure this out.
Hopefully the public will soon tire of relying on “experts” and simply read the ridiculous “virus isolation” studies for themselves. When that happens, this pseudoscience (which is really too generous a word) is finished forever."
Forwarded from Lee Merritt MD: FreedomDoc1
Ergo one of the problem with mandates…science often is corrupted or corrected
Forwarded from Cognitive Dissonance
Forwarded from Igson Negrin
The government of the United States and the National Institutes of Health are participating in a scientific fraud related to covid-19.
https://t.me/igsonnegrin/664
On the website https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, a fabrication process is carried out on a daily basis, which is strictly forbidden in science. The website describes the existence of the complete genomes of the alleged "Sars-Cov-2" on a daily basis.
The nucleic acid sequence is known to represent one continous order of nucleotides.
Virologists sequence short fragments daily in their experiments. Most often according to the "artic" protocol with dirty "PCR" with 35 cycles, and then these short sequences are falsely presented as alleged complete genomes.
This means that virologists report the results of experiments they did not conduct! This is an enormous scientific fraud!
The first scientific publication with the reference "Sars-Cov-2" (MN908947.3) is an example of a scientific fraud. Sequencing of short fragments (Illumina platform) was performed in the experiment, but the existence of a genome sequence of about 30,000 nucleotides was reported:
1. implemented: "a meta-transcriptomic library was constructed for pair-end (150-bp reads) sequencing using an Illumina MiniSeq"
2. not conducted but described: "and its whole genome sequence (29,903 nt)"
- "on the basis of the nucleotide sequences of the whole-genome sequence"
- "the whole-genome sequence of WHCV"
- "which covered almost the whole virus genome"
* / the "whole" does not exist, logically, "almost the whole" does not exist either.
- "Extended Data Fig. 5 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of the nucleotide sequences of the whole genome"
Supplementary tables 1-8:
- "designed based on the whole genome of WHCV (MN908947.3)"
- "Primers for entire genome amplification"
GenBank: MN908947.3:
- "Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome"
So, this is not about the existence of a complete genome, but about the existence of a complete construct, and the construct is not a reality. It is especially alarming that almost all virologists in the world observe their results in relation to the reference construct MN908947, which means that almost all virologists are involved in scientific fraud.
It is also shocking and very disturbing that virologists are avoiding the standard method for determining genome length - gel electrophoresis.
I publicly call on the United States and all scientists in the world to publicly reject virology as a science and to remove all virological publications ("viruses" in humans) from the public eye because they are contrary to common sense, violate basic scientific principles and are directed against science.
https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus
Regards,
Igson Negrin
https://t.me/igsonnegrin/664
On the website https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, a fabrication process is carried out on a daily basis, which is strictly forbidden in science. The website describes the existence of the complete genomes of the alleged "Sars-Cov-2" on a daily basis.
The nucleic acid sequence is known to represent one continous order of nucleotides.
Virologists sequence short fragments daily in their experiments. Most often according to the "artic" protocol with dirty "PCR" with 35 cycles, and then these short sequences are falsely presented as alleged complete genomes.
This means that virologists report the results of experiments they did not conduct! This is an enormous scientific fraud!
The first scientific publication with the reference "Sars-Cov-2" (MN908947.3) is an example of a scientific fraud. Sequencing of short fragments (Illumina platform) was performed in the experiment, but the existence of a genome sequence of about 30,000 nucleotides was reported:
1. implemented: "a meta-transcriptomic library was constructed for pair-end (150-bp reads) sequencing using an Illumina MiniSeq"
2. not conducted but described: "and its whole genome sequence (29,903 nt)"
- "on the basis of the nucleotide sequences of the whole-genome sequence"
- "the whole-genome sequence of WHCV"
- "which covered almost the whole virus genome"
* / the "whole" does not exist, logically, "almost the whole" does not exist either.
- "Extended Data Fig. 5 Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of the nucleotide sequences of the whole genome"
Supplementary tables 1-8:
- "designed based on the whole genome of WHCV (MN908947.3)"
- "Primers for entire genome amplification"
GenBank: MN908947.3:
- "Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome"
So, this is not about the existence of a complete genome, but about the existence of a complete construct, and the construct is not a reality. It is especially alarming that almost all virologists in the world observe their results in relation to the reference construct MN908947, which means that almost all virologists are involved in scientific fraud.
It is also shocking and very disturbing that virologists are avoiding the standard method for determining genome length - gel electrophoresis.
I publicly call on the United States and all scientists in the world to publicly reject virology as a science and to remove all virological publications ("viruses" in humans) from the public eye because they are contrary to common sense, violate basic scientific principles and are directed against science.
https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus
Regards,
Igson Negrin
Telegram
Igson Negrin
👍2