Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Megyn Kelly ERUPTS as a Washington prosecutor suggests the teenage girl s*xually assaulted by a trans wrestler may have only felt “the sensation” of being penetrated.
“This is BULLSH*T!”
Megyn plays the video and reads the prosecutor’s memo out loud, and it gets worse with every sentence:
MEMO: "As someone who has no history with wrestling, I was unaware that touching in the area of genitals and buttocks is somewhat common, including the sensation that an opponent may be penetrating genitals."
KELLY: "The sensation that one is penetrating genitals? I'm sorry, but women know if their genitals are getting penetrated or not. What the f*ck is this?"
MEMO: "This practice or sensation is common enough to have a nickname in the wrestling community… 'oil checking' in wrestling circles."
MEMO: "The referee who presided over the match appears to have said that while nothing stood out to him during the match, after watching the video of the match, he could not say that the suspect's hand placement was, quote, 'anything out of the ordinary'… sometimes in the course of a match… you grab what you can grab. 'That's something that happens in almost every match.'"
KELLY: "You get fingers up your vag*na in almost every match? F*cking bullsh*t. This is bullsh*t. I smell fucking woke administrators who are trying to cover for a trans athlete."
ADDED CONTEXT: The victim, a 15-year-old girl, alleges her trans opponent pressed fingers into her vag*na during a December 2025 girls wrestling match in Puyallup, Washington. The sheriff's office referred the case to prosecutors as third-degree r@pe.
Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Mary Robnett refused to charge the trans athlete, admitting there was "no doubt" the girl didn't want the penetration to occur but citing a consent defense for contact in organized sports.
The principal and athletic coordinator of the victim's school have been criminally charged for waiting 53 days to report the incident.
Full Episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKqobdQa-ks
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
“This is BULLSH*T!”
Megyn plays the video and reads the prosecutor’s memo out loud, and it gets worse with every sentence:
MEMO: "As someone who has no history with wrestling, I was unaware that touching in the area of genitals and buttocks is somewhat common, including the sensation that an opponent may be penetrating genitals."
KELLY: "The sensation that one is penetrating genitals? I'm sorry, but women know if their genitals are getting penetrated or not. What the f*ck is this?"
MEMO: "This practice or sensation is common enough to have a nickname in the wrestling community… 'oil checking' in wrestling circles."
MEMO: "The referee who presided over the match appears to have said that while nothing stood out to him during the match, after watching the video of the match, he could not say that the suspect's hand placement was, quote, 'anything out of the ordinary'… sometimes in the course of a match… you grab what you can grab. 'That's something that happens in almost every match.'"
KELLY: "You get fingers up your vag*na in almost every match? F*cking bullsh*t. This is bullsh*t. I smell fucking woke administrators who are trying to cover for a trans athlete."
ADDED CONTEXT: The victim, a 15-year-old girl, alleges her trans opponent pressed fingers into her vag*na during a December 2025 girls wrestling match in Puyallup, Washington. The sheriff's office referred the case to prosecutors as third-degree r@pe.
Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney Mary Robnett refused to charge the trans athlete, admitting there was "no doubt" the girl didn't want the penetration to occur but citing a consent defense for contact in organized sports.
The principal and athletic coordinator of the victim's school have been criminally charged for waiting 53 days to report the incident.
Full Episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKqobdQa-ks
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🤬302😈76❤50🙏14😡9😱8👍7🔥6👀5🤡4🤣2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Jen Psaki admits on MSNBC that Democratic Party leadership used to “SELECT” the nominees, and nobody was allowed to say it out loud until now.
PSAKI: “We both remember well when party leadership really selected the nominees.”
“Now, you would never say it that way exactly, but they would. Now we can [say it]. We’re free!”
“They really did, because they would put money behind it. They would endorse. And now it looks very much like party leaders are not picking the nominees.”
“In fact, party leaders pushing nominees is a negative.”
The party that claimed to represent “democracy” never trusted its own voters to pick their nominees.
Now, Psaki laughs: “We're free!”
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
PSAKI: “We both remember well when party leadership really selected the nominees.”
“Now, you would never say it that way exactly, but they would. Now we can [say it]. We’re free!”
“They really did, because they would put money behind it. They would endorse. And now it looks very much like party leaders are not picking the nominees.”
“In fact, party leaders pushing nominees is a negative.”
The party that claimed to represent “democracy” never trusted its own voters to pick their nominees.
Now, Psaki laughs: “We're free!”
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
💯134🤮112👀42🤡22💩21😈21❤17😁13🙏3👍2🤬1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Chris Matthews lists everything the DSA believes on MSNBC, then calls it CRAP.
Even he can't stomach what's happening to his own party.
MATTHEWS: "We're going to get rid of ICE. Not just ICE. We're going to get rid of the border. We're not going to have a border anymore. We're not going to effectively control people entering and leaving the country... We're going to get rid of prisons. We're going to get rid of the Pentagon."
"Well, what happens when your hostages are your former diplomats — like what happened with President Carter? People take your diplomats hostage. What do you do then? You need an army. You don't like to have an army, but you do need to have one."
"AOC... came out and said, 'We're just a big tent party.'"
“Well, the problem with the big tent defense is every Democrat has to defend all this CRAP coming from the left. They've got to say, 'I believe in all this CRAZY STUFF, and that makes me a Democrat.' You've got to say, 'No, no, I'm not a member of the DSA, and here's why,' and make it very clear."
Chris Matthews spent more than 50 years in Democratic politics and liberal media.
He joins James Carville on the list of longtime liberals who don't even recognize their party anymore.
Gallup found last August that 66% of Democrats view socialism positively. Just 42% view capitalism positively.
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Even he can't stomach what's happening to his own party.
MATTHEWS: "We're going to get rid of ICE. Not just ICE. We're going to get rid of the border. We're not going to have a border anymore. We're not going to effectively control people entering and leaving the country... We're going to get rid of prisons. We're going to get rid of the Pentagon."
"Well, what happens when your hostages are your former diplomats — like what happened with President Carter? People take your diplomats hostage. What do you do then? You need an army. You don't like to have an army, but you do need to have one."
"AOC... came out and said, 'We're just a big tent party.'"
“Well, the problem with the big tent defense is every Democrat has to defend all this CRAP coming from the left. They've got to say, 'I believe in all this CRAZY STUFF, and that makes me a Democrat.' You've got to say, 'No, no, I'm not a member of the DSA, and here's why,' and make it very clear."
Chris Matthews spent more than 50 years in Democratic politics and liberal media.
He joins James Carville on the list of longtime liberals who don't even recognize their party anymore.
Gallup found last August that 66% of Democrats view socialism positively. Just 42% view capitalism positively.
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🔥156😁59👀39❤24🙏13🤬12👏7🤯6🤡6😈3🖕1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. James Thorp says the surge in severe birth defects and placental abnormalities after the COVID shots rolled out was unfathomable.
He personally saw the horrors in his own OB-GYN practice.
Dr. Thorp says one “well-known” hospital had EIGHT babies in the neonatal ICU suffering from the same rare, life-threatening birth defect at the same time.
He ran the numbers on this happening by chance, and the odds were 1 in 10 trillion.
THORP: "I saw a significant increase in fetal malformations of virtually every organ system."
"There literally were cystic hygromas (a fluid-filled sac in the head or neck), cardiac malformations, diaphragmatic hernias."
“Diaphragmatic hernias are very rare malformations. And I won’t mention which hospital, but there was a hospital that’s well known to me and to you. At one point in time, the neonatal intensive care unit had eight infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
"Now, you can run the numbers on that... but it’s one in several trillion—10 trillion."
"I saw severe placental abnormalities that I’ve documented and published."
“Severe growth restriction, blood clots in the mother and in the fetus. Seizure-like activity in the fetus, in mothers as well. There were multiple thrombotic events, both in the fetus and in the mother."
“Premature labor and delivery, premature death in the babies that were born. Increased risk of death."
"Substantial increase in babies that went... to the neonatal intensive care nursery."
ADDED CONTEXT: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a life-threatening birth defect where a hole in the baby’s diaphragm allows abdominal organs to move into the chest, crowding the developing lungs and causing severe breathing problems.
It occurs in approximately 1 in 3,030 U.S. births and generally requires intensive neonatal care followed by surgery, per the CDC.
Dr. Thorp says one hospital had eight cases of this rare birth defect present at the same time.
Full Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNlZLA64yuA
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
He personally saw the horrors in his own OB-GYN practice.
Dr. Thorp says one “well-known” hospital had EIGHT babies in the neonatal ICU suffering from the same rare, life-threatening birth defect at the same time.
He ran the numbers on this happening by chance, and the odds were 1 in 10 trillion.
THORP: "I saw a significant increase in fetal malformations of virtually every organ system."
"There literally were cystic hygromas (a fluid-filled sac in the head or neck), cardiac malformations, diaphragmatic hernias."
“Diaphragmatic hernias are very rare malformations. And I won’t mention which hospital, but there was a hospital that’s well known to me and to you. At one point in time, the neonatal intensive care unit had eight infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia."
"Now, you can run the numbers on that... but it’s one in several trillion—10 trillion."
"I saw severe placental abnormalities that I’ve documented and published."
“Severe growth restriction, blood clots in the mother and in the fetus. Seizure-like activity in the fetus, in mothers as well. There were multiple thrombotic events, both in the fetus and in the mother."
“Premature labor and delivery, premature death in the babies that were born. Increased risk of death."
"Substantial increase in babies that went... to the neonatal intensive care nursery."
ADDED CONTEXT: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a life-threatening birth defect where a hole in the baby’s diaphragm allows abdominal organs to move into the chest, crowding the developing lungs and causing severe breathing problems.
It occurs in approximately 1 in 3,030 U.S. births and generally requires intensive neonatal care followed by surgery, per the CDC.
Dr. Thorp says one hospital had eight cases of this rare birth defect present at the same time.
Full Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNlZLA64yuA
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🤬261😈105❤23🔥12😭10😱9🙏9😡3😁2🤡1🦄1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Rosie O’Donnell reveals she got the pronoun “they” tattooed on her wrist for her nonbinary daughter, thinking she’d be touched. She didn’t give “two shits.”
Rosie got the tattoo because she kept calling her daughter “she” when her daughter wanted to be called “they.”
The tattoo was supposed to be a reminder to use “they/them” pronouns.
But while telling the story, Rosie still can't get the pronouns right. 😂
AMY POEHLER: "Can you tell us where the title Common Knowledge comes from? 'Cause I love this."
ROSIE: "This is a true story. So she — they, they. And it's a they/them."
POEHLER: "Yep."
ROSIE: "That's the pronouns that they choose. But it's very hard, honey."
POEHLER: "I know. And I love that you're constantly correcting in real time, like we all do. It's really beautiful. And it really matters to them."
ROSIE: "And I know it matters to them. And so when they [my daughter] first told me that it was they/them, I tried my best, but I kept saying 'she.' And so they wrote on a cardboard paper 'they,' and then they would hold it up above their head every time I said she, like John Cusack in Say Anything with the boombox, just staring at me, you know?"
ROSIE: "And so I took her to my cousin's tattoo shop with the 'they' in her handwriting, and I had it tattooed on my wrist so that I would never forget, that it would remind me. And I thought she'd be very touched, and she didn't give two shits."
[Amy Poehler bursts into laughter]
ROSIE: "She could not care less! And I just said she. I just did it again in the 'they' story. I messed it up. But, yeah."
Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5kQw31iynk
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Rosie got the tattoo because she kept calling her daughter “she” when her daughter wanted to be called “they.”
The tattoo was supposed to be a reminder to use “they/them” pronouns.
But while telling the story, Rosie still can't get the pronouns right. 😂
AMY POEHLER: "Can you tell us where the title Common Knowledge comes from? 'Cause I love this."
ROSIE: "This is a true story. So she — they, they. And it's a they/them."
POEHLER: "Yep."
ROSIE: "That's the pronouns that they choose. But it's very hard, honey."
POEHLER: "I know. And I love that you're constantly correcting in real time, like we all do. It's really beautiful. And it really matters to them."
ROSIE: "And I know it matters to them. And so when they [my daughter] first told me that it was they/them, I tried my best, but I kept saying 'she.' And so they wrote on a cardboard paper 'they,' and then they would hold it up above their head every time I said she, like John Cusack in Say Anything with the boombox, just staring at me, you know?"
ROSIE: "And so I took her to my cousin's tattoo shop with the 'they' in her handwriting, and I had it tattooed on my wrist so that I would never forget, that it would remind me. And I thought she'd be very touched, and she didn't give two shits."
[Amy Poehler bursts into laughter]
ROSIE: "She could not care less! And I just said she. I just did it again in the 'they' story. I messed it up. But, yeah."
Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5kQw31iynk
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🤡236💩141🤣61❤33🖕19🤮11😈11👀5😁2🤔1🆒1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
19-year-old dad blows Dave Ramsey away when he reveals he makes over $10,000/month pressure washing homes completely alone.
"You're incredible! Way to go. Very proud of you! ... Somebody taught you how to work, young man. And I'm proud of whoever that was."
SKYLER: "I am 19 years old. I have an 8-month-old daughter and a fiancée. I'm making about 10 to 11,000 a month consistently for the last 8 months."
RAMSEY: "Doing what?"
SKYLER: "Pressure washing and exterior window cleaning."
RAMSEY: "Wow! By yourself?"
SKYLER: "Yes, sir, fully by myself. I thought about hiring technicians. I'm trying to go as long as I can without hiring people."
RAMSEY: "With your business, you are kicking butt because you are not afraid of hard work, and you're showing up on time, and you're pricing yourself reasonably. I know all of this because you're making freakin' 120 — $130,000 a year as a pressure washer by your freaking self. You're incredible! Way to go. Very proud of you!"
SKYLER: "It's not easy."
RAMSEY: "You just get it. Somebody taught you how to work, young man. And I'm proud of whoever that was."
Mike Rowe has long preached the idea that you can earn more money going to trade school and working blue-collar jobs than you ever would with a college degree.
This young man is proof. He’s making over $120,000 a year pressure washing homes and “kicking butt.”
He’s only 19, and he’s already out-earning most people who are twice his age.
Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LYAvZth0mc
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
"You're incredible! Way to go. Very proud of you! ... Somebody taught you how to work, young man. And I'm proud of whoever that was."
SKYLER: "I am 19 years old. I have an 8-month-old daughter and a fiancée. I'm making about 10 to 11,000 a month consistently for the last 8 months."
RAMSEY: "Doing what?"
SKYLER: "Pressure washing and exterior window cleaning."
RAMSEY: "Wow! By yourself?"
SKYLER: "Yes, sir, fully by myself. I thought about hiring technicians. I'm trying to go as long as I can without hiring people."
RAMSEY: "With your business, you are kicking butt because you are not afraid of hard work, and you're showing up on time, and you're pricing yourself reasonably. I know all of this because you're making freakin' 120 — $130,000 a year as a pressure washer by your freaking self. You're incredible! Way to go. Very proud of you!"
SKYLER: "It's not easy."
RAMSEY: "You just get it. Somebody taught you how to work, young man. And I'm proud of whoever that was."
Mike Rowe has long preached the idea that you can earn more money going to trade school and working blue-collar jobs than you ever would with a college degree.
This young man is proof. He’s making over $120,000 a year pressure washing homes and “kicking butt.”
He’s only 19, and he’s already out-earning most people who are twice his age.
Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6LYAvZth0mc
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
👏342❤87🔥33👍11💩4👀3🤔2🤡1🤣1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Joe Rogan and Joe DeRosa discover that Honeymooners creator Jackie Gleason walked away from $7,000,000 left on his contract in 1956 because he didn’t want to “cheapen” the show.
That's about $83,000,000 in today’s money, or $1,000,000 per episode.
ROGAN: “There’s only one season?”
DEROSA: "He did 39 episodes. And he was like, 'We did it. It's done.' Nobody does that now. They were like, 'You have to do more of these.' And he's like, 'Nope, we did it. We're good. We have nothing left to say.'"
ROGAN: "Really?"
DEROSA: "Yeah. And then they did reunion shows and shit. But, like, that was it. That's wild!"
DEROSA: "Look at this. He had $7 million left in his contract in 1956, which is crazy money. [Gleason said], 'The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.'"
ROGAN: "Wow."
DEROSA: "I mean, that is baller shit back then. Like, that is not something people were doing back then."
ROGAN: "Or he just got lazy because he had so much money."
JAMIE: "CBS was gonna give him a three-year contract for what would have been $132 million today. He was going to get close to like a million dollars an episode."
ROGAN: "A million an episode back then?"
JAMIE: "No, no, no. [In today's dollars]."
DEROSA: "When Seinfeld... announced they were all going to get a million an episode, I remember that was like groundbreaking... This guy was offered the equivalent of that back in '56 and said, 'Nah, I'm good.'"
In December 1954, Gleason signed a three-year, $11,000,000 deal with Buick and CBS, the largest contract in television history at the time. The deal called for two seasons with an option for a third, but he stopped after one, leaving roughly $7,000,000 on the table.
Gleason said: “The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.”
Full Episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCH-R3L6QTc
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
That's about $83,000,000 in today’s money, or $1,000,000 per episode.
ROGAN: “There’s only one season?”
DEROSA: "He did 39 episodes. And he was like, 'We did it. It's done.' Nobody does that now. They were like, 'You have to do more of these.' And he's like, 'Nope, we did it. We're good. We have nothing left to say.'"
ROGAN: "Really?"
DEROSA: "Yeah. And then they did reunion shows and shit. But, like, that was it. That's wild!"
DEROSA: "Look at this. He had $7 million left in his contract in 1956, which is crazy money. [Gleason said], 'The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.'"
ROGAN: "Wow."
DEROSA: "I mean, that is baller shit back then. Like, that is not something people were doing back then."
ROGAN: "Or he just got lazy because he had so much money."
JAMIE: "CBS was gonna give him a three-year contract for what would have been $132 million today. He was going to get close to like a million dollars an episode."
ROGAN: "A million an episode back then?"
JAMIE: "No, no, no. [In today's dollars]."
DEROSA: "When Seinfeld... announced they were all going to get a million an episode, I remember that was like groundbreaking... This guy was offered the equivalent of that back in '56 and said, 'Nah, I'm good.'"
In December 1954, Gleason signed a three-year, $11,000,000 deal with Buick and CBS, the largest contract in television history at the time. The deal called for two seasons with an option for a third, but he stopped after one, leaving roughly $7,000,000 on the table.
Gleason said: “The excellence of the material could not be maintained. I had too much fondness for the show to cheapen it.”
Full Episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCH-R3L6QTc
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
❤175👀32🤯17🙏12🏆12👌5👍3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Joe Rogan gets raw and reveals he could feel the brain damage happening in real time before he left fighting for stand-up.
He'd lie in bed at night with his head "throbbing" and noticed his friends at the gym were getting "slower."
He also saw their personalities "change."
After 6 years of fighting and "a lot" of shots to the head, Rogan realized: "I'm doing this for free. There's no money in this. I'm not making any money. I gotta get out before I become that guy at the gym."
ROGAN: "I was also getting brain damage, and I was very aware of that. I would lie in bed at night after sparring, and my head would be ringing, just throbbing. Just boom, boom, boom, boom."
DEROSA: "Jesus Christ."
ROGAN: "I was like, I'm doing this for free. There's no money in this. I'm not making any money."
DEROSA: "Holy shit!"
ROGAN: "Yeah. I was sparring a lot, especially kickboxing sparring. I was getting hit a lot. It was a lot of, like, kickboxing wars. And it was just not worth it. And I was realizing, like, I gotta get out before I become that guy at the gym, because there were some guys that I had met, and then I'd watch them deteriorate a little during the time that I knew them and I was training with them."
ROGAN: "I watched their personalities change. I watched them get, like, slower. Like, I could see their movement was compromised because they got brain damage. They'd been knocked out a few times. And I was realizing, like, oh, this is a real problem. And no one seems to be thinking about it. Everyone's, like, pretending it doesn't exist because they just want to be a tough guy."
ROGAN: "I was also realizing there's no future in this. I'm not going to ever have any money. I'm always going to be poor. I'm always going to be, like, wondering where my next paycheck coming from. There's no money in this. And there was no UFC back then. And I got talked into doing stand-up by my friends. That's literally how it started."
Rogan went on to launch The Joe Rogan Experience in 2009, and it has been the #1 podcast in the world for over a decade. His current Spotify deal is reportedly worth up to $250,000,000.
It's safe to say he now knows where his next paycheck is coming from.
Full Episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCH-R3L6QTc
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
He'd lie in bed at night with his head "throbbing" and noticed his friends at the gym were getting "slower."
He also saw their personalities "change."
After 6 years of fighting and "a lot" of shots to the head, Rogan realized: "I'm doing this for free. There's no money in this. I'm not making any money. I gotta get out before I become that guy at the gym."
ROGAN: "I was also getting brain damage, and I was very aware of that. I would lie in bed at night after sparring, and my head would be ringing, just throbbing. Just boom, boom, boom, boom."
DEROSA: "Jesus Christ."
ROGAN: "I was like, I'm doing this for free. There's no money in this. I'm not making any money."
DEROSA: "Holy shit!"
ROGAN: "Yeah. I was sparring a lot, especially kickboxing sparring. I was getting hit a lot. It was a lot of, like, kickboxing wars. And it was just not worth it. And I was realizing, like, I gotta get out before I become that guy at the gym, because there were some guys that I had met, and then I'd watch them deteriorate a little during the time that I knew them and I was training with them."
ROGAN: "I watched their personalities change. I watched them get, like, slower. Like, I could see their movement was compromised because they got brain damage. They'd been knocked out a few times. And I was realizing, like, oh, this is a real problem. And no one seems to be thinking about it. Everyone's, like, pretending it doesn't exist because they just want to be a tough guy."
ROGAN: "I was also realizing there's no future in this. I'm not going to ever have any money. I'm always going to be poor. I'm always going to be, like, wondering where my next paycheck coming from. There's no money in this. And there was no UFC back then. And I got talked into doing stand-up by my friends. That's literally how it started."
Rogan went on to launch The Joe Rogan Experience in 2009, and it has been the #1 podcast in the world for over a decade. His current Spotify deal is reportedly worth up to $250,000,000.
It's safe to say he now knows where his next paycheck is coming from.
Full Episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCH-R3L6QTc
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🔥108👍44❤42👀12😁4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Stephen A. Smith drops a blunt reality check on Indiana Fever Coach Stephanie White.
SMITH: "There are folks in Indiana at a home game BOOING YOU! You ain’t the road team. You’re the home team... and they’re booing YOU!"
"Sophie Cunningham and Caitlin Clark can speak up for you all they want to... but that’s not going to be enough.
"[You say] ‘We will go high. Love, grace, humility will win.’ And then you tell everybody to ‘go to hell.’ You think that’s going to work for you, Coach White?"
“How are you the head coach... and you didn’t see the play? ... It’s your job to... watch the game. How did you not see the play?!”
When asked about Dijonai Carrington clotheslining Sophie Cunningham in the face, Coach White claimed: "I didn't see the play in real time. I went straight to a press conference. I thought the play got called right. Thankfully, Sophie's okay. Was it egregious? Absolutely. When you have a chance to watch that over and over and over on replay, you can see that. I didn't have that in real time."
Pictures are now surfacing online and contradicting that statement, because she was staring straight at Dijonai Carrington and Sophie Cunningham when the vicious foul happened.
Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9YcRPt5C-c
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
SMITH: "There are folks in Indiana at a home game BOOING YOU! You ain’t the road team. You’re the home team... and they’re booing YOU!"
"Sophie Cunningham and Caitlin Clark can speak up for you all they want to... but that’s not going to be enough.
"[You say] ‘We will go high. Love, grace, humility will win.’ And then you tell everybody to ‘go to hell.’ You think that’s going to work for you, Coach White?"
“How are you the head coach... and you didn’t see the play? ... It’s your job to... watch the game. How did you not see the play?!”
When asked about Dijonai Carrington clotheslining Sophie Cunningham in the face, Coach White claimed: "I didn't see the play in real time. I went straight to a press conference. I thought the play got called right. Thankfully, Sophie's okay. Was it egregious? Absolutely. When you have a chance to watch that over and over and over on replay, you can see that. I didn't have that in real time."
Pictures are now surfacing online and contradicting that statement, because she was staring straight at Dijonai Carrington and Sophie Cunningham when the vicious foul happened.
Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9YcRPt5C-c
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🤬267🔥67❤34🤡10🤣8👍5🙊2🤔1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Stephen A. Smith showers Marco Rubio with praise: says he’s “the real deal,” and his credentials are “PRETTY FREAKING IMPECCABLE.”
High marks for JD Vance and Gov. DeSantis, too.
SMITH: “JD Vance knows how to handle himself in front of a camera. He's younger, he's sharp, he's articulate. Marco Rubio has been a longtime senator, is the Secretary of State, Director of National Security, whose credentials are pretty freaking impeccable."
“Both of them articulate themselves very well. In Rubio's case, he's bilingual, of Cuban descent, and that ain't gonna hurt him.”
“There's hope on the horizon once Trump leaves office... On the REPUBLICAN side. Say what you want about DeSantis, he's an executive. I got some issues with him... But I got news for you... I don't hear too many people complaining about the state of Florida. And I ain't gonna be no hypocrite. I MOVED THERE.”
“Rubio, his nationals, his foreign policy experience, being the Secretary of State for this country, very articulate, knows how to deal with combativeness, bilingual, got an Hispanic populace out there that respects the hell out of him.”
“I think Rubio is the real deal. I think Rubio is the real deal. I think Governor DeSantis is the real deal. These are formidable candidates that will stand in front of any Democrat believing they can eat them alive!”
“Do you think Kamala Harris or AOC can deal with them?”
“Gavin Newsom can argue against anybody. Sounds smooth as hell right up until a minute you look at California... and all of a sudden you change your mind.”
These are not the words of a Republican. This is coming from a Kamala Harris voter who later admitted he “regrets” his decision.
And if Democrats keep going the route of the communist DSA, they’re going to lose people like Stephen A. Smith for good before 2028.
Full Comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7bHSoUQgfI
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
High marks for JD Vance and Gov. DeSantis, too.
SMITH: “JD Vance knows how to handle himself in front of a camera. He's younger, he's sharp, he's articulate. Marco Rubio has been a longtime senator, is the Secretary of State, Director of National Security, whose credentials are pretty freaking impeccable."
“Both of them articulate themselves very well. In Rubio's case, he's bilingual, of Cuban descent, and that ain't gonna hurt him.”
“There's hope on the horizon once Trump leaves office... On the REPUBLICAN side. Say what you want about DeSantis, he's an executive. I got some issues with him... But I got news for you... I don't hear too many people complaining about the state of Florida. And I ain't gonna be no hypocrite. I MOVED THERE.”
“Rubio, his nationals, his foreign policy experience, being the Secretary of State for this country, very articulate, knows how to deal with combativeness, bilingual, got an Hispanic populace out there that respects the hell out of him.”
“I think Rubio is the real deal. I think Rubio is the real deal. I think Governor DeSantis is the real deal. These are formidable candidates that will stand in front of any Democrat believing they can eat them alive!”
“Do you think Kamala Harris or AOC can deal with them?”
“Gavin Newsom can argue against anybody. Sounds smooth as hell right up until a minute you look at California... and all of a sudden you change your mind.”
These are not the words of a Republican. This is coming from a Kamala Harris voter who later admitted he “regrets” his decision.
And if Democrats keep going the route of the communist DSA, they’re going to lose people like Stephen A. Smith for good before 2028.
Full Comments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7bHSoUQgfI
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
💯279🙏53❤43🤣12🖕7🔥4🤡4🤔3🤮2👎1😈1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CNN goes off the rails after TWO panelists flat-out accuse ICE agents of murdering American citizens.
Scott Jennings refuses to let it slide. Even the host had to step in and push back.
SARAH MATTHEWS: “There weren’t murders of American citizens in our streets, and [Obama] was able to do... immigration enforcement.”
JENNINGS: “What murders are you talking about?”
MATTHEWS: “Talking about Renee Good. Alex Pretti.”
JENNINGS: “Have there been convicted murderers in these cases?”
MATTHEWS: “I have seen the video evidence which shows a very—”
JENNINGS: “So just for the record, you're flat-out calling him a murderer? Is that what you’re saying?”
MATTHEWS: “I’m saying that they look like they murdered those people in cold blood in broad daylight.”
JENNINGS: “They murdered her, is that right?”
MATTHEWS: “Hey, I’ll say it. It looked like those agents murdered those innocent American citizens.”
JENNINGS: “Barack Obama was able to deport millions upon millions of people. The difference is now the Democratic Party has changed. Back then, I guess they were fine with it. Today, they instruct people to go interfere with federal law.”
BAKARI SELLERS: “That’s not actually true.”
JENNINGS: “They train activists to do it!”
SELLERS: “The culture of ICE has changed exponentially."
JENNINGS: "You mean the culture of enforcing the law?!"
SELLERS: "When you’re talking about Pretti, and you’re talking about Renee Good, were they murdered? The answer is yes. The fact is, they were murdered in the street... That officer escalated the situation. That’s what that was. That’s not protecting yourself.”
HOST: “Just a reminder that those escalations are still under investigation.”
JENNINGS: “Oh, wait. They’re not murderers? Is that what you’re saying, Lulu?”
GARCIA-NAVARRO: “I’m, I’m saying that…”
JENNINGS: “I’ve got a bunch of people here that have already passed judgment.”
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Scott Jennings refuses to let it slide. Even the host had to step in and push back.
SARAH MATTHEWS: “There weren’t murders of American citizens in our streets, and [Obama] was able to do... immigration enforcement.”
JENNINGS: “What murders are you talking about?”
MATTHEWS: “Talking about Renee Good. Alex Pretti.”
JENNINGS: “Have there been convicted murderers in these cases?”
MATTHEWS: “I have seen the video evidence which shows a very—”
JENNINGS: “So just for the record, you're flat-out calling him a murderer? Is that what you’re saying?”
MATTHEWS: “I’m saying that they look like they murdered those people in cold blood in broad daylight.”
JENNINGS: “They murdered her, is that right?”
MATTHEWS: “Hey, I’ll say it. It looked like those agents murdered those innocent American citizens.”
JENNINGS: “Barack Obama was able to deport millions upon millions of people. The difference is now the Democratic Party has changed. Back then, I guess they were fine with it. Today, they instruct people to go interfere with federal law.”
BAKARI SELLERS: “That’s not actually true.”
JENNINGS: “They train activists to do it!”
SELLERS: “The culture of ICE has changed exponentially."
JENNINGS: "You mean the culture of enforcing the law?!"
SELLERS: "When you’re talking about Pretti, and you’re talking about Renee Good, were they murdered? The answer is yes. The fact is, they were murdered in the street... That officer escalated the situation. That’s what that was. That’s not protecting yourself.”
HOST: “Just a reminder that those escalations are still under investigation.”
JENNINGS: “Oh, wait. They’re not murderers? Is that what you’re saying, Lulu?”
GARCIA-NAVARRO: “I’m, I’m saying that…”
JENNINGS: “I’ve got a bunch of people here that have already passed judgment.”
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🔥199❤43🙏23🤡12😁10👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin admits the lawsuit to stop Trump from selling early access to his Truth Social posts is probably doomed.
Moments earlier, Anderson Cooper framed it as a scandal. Then Toobin had to tell him there’s no real case here.
COOPER: “President Trump is now being sued over selling early access to his Truth Social posts. And yes, this is one more thing the President of the United States is selling.”
[Sits down with Jeffrey Toobin to discuss]
COOPER: “It never occurred to me you could monetize an early truth.”
TOOBIN: “And you can see why people want to buy it, because, you know, like, just on the Iran war, he keeps announcing, you know, 'We’re in a truce. We’re not in a truce.' All of which affects the price of oil. And that especially for high frequency traders, you can make a great deal of money.”
COOPER: “Right. And if your company didn’t have access to this, you’re at a disadvantage compared to others.”
TOOBIN: “Absolutely. But the thing is, as with so much that the president has done, it’s not clear that it’s within the reach of the law. These two plaintiffs, it’s not clear to me that they would have even standing to bring this case.”
COOPER: “They say it’s violating their rights.”
TOOBIN: “Well, yeah, but the fact is these Truth Social posts are public ultimately. So the legal question is, does the fact that other people have early access to it violate these plaintiffs’ rights?"
“I think that’s going to be a tough case to make.”
ADDED CONTEXT: The plaintiffs in this case, Freedom of the Press Foundation and The Intercept, argue Trump charging for instant access to his posts violates their First and Fifth Amendment rights.
But even longtime liberal Jeffrey Toobin doesn't think they have standing to bring the case at all, saying it's a “tough case to make” that Trump is actually violating their rights.
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Moments earlier, Anderson Cooper framed it as a scandal. Then Toobin had to tell him there’s no real case here.
COOPER: “President Trump is now being sued over selling early access to his Truth Social posts. And yes, this is one more thing the President of the United States is selling.”
[Sits down with Jeffrey Toobin to discuss]
COOPER: “It never occurred to me you could monetize an early truth.”
TOOBIN: “And you can see why people want to buy it, because, you know, like, just on the Iran war, he keeps announcing, you know, 'We’re in a truce. We’re not in a truce.' All of which affects the price of oil. And that especially for high frequency traders, you can make a great deal of money.”
COOPER: “Right. And if your company didn’t have access to this, you’re at a disadvantage compared to others.”
TOOBIN: “Absolutely. But the thing is, as with so much that the president has done, it’s not clear that it’s within the reach of the law. These two plaintiffs, it’s not clear to me that they would have even standing to bring this case.”
COOPER: “They say it’s violating their rights.”
TOOBIN: “Well, yeah, but the fact is these Truth Social posts are public ultimately. So the legal question is, does the fact that other people have early access to it violate these plaintiffs’ rights?"
“I think that’s going to be a tough case to make.”
ADDED CONTEXT: The plaintiffs in this case, Freedom of the Press Foundation and The Intercept, argue Trump charging for instant access to his posts violates their First and Fifth Amendment rights.
But even longtime liberal Jeffrey Toobin doesn't think they have standing to bring the case at all, saying it's a “tough case to make” that Trump is actually violating their rights.
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🙏82❤43😁43👀15🤡14👍3🔥3🥴1
“It Sounds Like a Wild Conspiracy Theory”: Jeffrey Tucker Reveals the Real Reason for the Lockdowns, School Closures, and Masking
“It sounds crazy until you hear it from people who were there on the ground…”
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/it-sounds-like-a-wild-conspiracy
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
“It sounds crazy until you hear it from people who were there on the ground…”
https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/it-sounds-like-a-wild-conspiracy
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Vigilantfox
“It Sounds Like a Wild Conspiracy Theory”: Jeffrey Tucker Reveals the Real Reason for the Lockdowns, School Closures, and Masking
“It sounds crazy until you hear it from people who were there on the ground…”
💯161👍33😈16👀14❤8😡6🙏4⚡2💩1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Joe Scarborough admits on MSNBC that Joe Biden was “letting in SO MANY illegal immigrants” and concedes Trump actually closed the southern border. Nobody cornered him. Nobody pressed him. He said it unprompted, on his own show, while trying to criticize Trump:
SCARBOROUGH: “They should know when to take the victory. They could have been campaigning on closed southern border this whole time!"
"You're never going to get the [deportation] numbers that Joe Biden had, right?"
"You're not going to get those numbers because Joe Biden and his administration were letting in so many illegal immigrants. It was very easy to sweep up 5,000 right on the border and send them back.”
It's always strange when MSNBC accidentally tells the truth while trying to dunk on Trump.
Border crossings are down 95% from the Biden era.
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
SCARBOROUGH: “They should know when to take the victory. They could have been campaigning on closed southern border this whole time!"
"You're never going to get the [deportation] numbers that Joe Biden had, right?"
"You're not going to get those numbers because Joe Biden and his administration were letting in so many illegal immigrants. It was very easy to sweep up 5,000 right on the border and send them back.”
It's always strange when MSNBC accidentally tells the truth while trying to dunk on Trump.
Border crossings are down 95% from the Biden era.
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🤣239❤34😁27🤯9🙏8🤡7💯7👍5🤔1🤮1🥱1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ben Shapiro says he's invited JD Vance on his show “many times,” but can never get him on.
He thinks he knows exactly why that is.
PBD: "Have you ever sat down with him at Daily Wire?"
SHAPIRO: "The last time I talked with the vice president was at Charlie's memorial. We've invited many times. He's been on with a bunch of our other hosts. I don't know if it's reticence, or if it's just failure of scheduling, but we've invited him on many times."
PBD: "So you would like to have him on?"
SHAPIRO: "Of course!"
PBD: "And he's not done it yet?"
Shapiro: "No."
PBD: "Why do you think?"
Shapiro: “I mean, perhaps he suspects that I might ask him a tough question or two about his friend.”
PBD: "Interesting. Interesting."
Despite growing pressure to disavow Tucker Carlson, JD Vance refuses to break with him. He says, “I am not going to get into the business of throwing friends under the bus.”
Full Segment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_PF9Hh8Nc8&t=309s
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
He thinks he knows exactly why that is.
PBD: "Have you ever sat down with him at Daily Wire?"
SHAPIRO: "The last time I talked with the vice president was at Charlie's memorial. We've invited many times. He's been on with a bunch of our other hosts. I don't know if it's reticence, or if it's just failure of scheduling, but we've invited him on many times."
PBD: "So you would like to have him on?"
SHAPIRO: "Of course!"
PBD: "And he's not done it yet?"
Shapiro: "No."
PBD: "Why do you think?"
Shapiro: “I mean, perhaps he suspects that I might ask him a tough question or two about his friend.”
PBD: "Interesting. Interesting."
Despite growing pressure to disavow Tucker Carlson, JD Vance refuses to break with him. He says, “I am not going to get into the business of throwing friends under the bus.”
Full Segment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_PF9Hh8Nc8&t=309s
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🤔122🙏44❤35🤡25👍14🖕8😁7👀5❤🔥1🥰1🗿1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Andrew Wilson shares never-before-seen messages revealing Charlie Kirk warned his security team he was "somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me," just one day before his assassination.
WILSON: "On September 9th, Charlie's security team wrote to him: 'Yes, law enforcement has been fully supportive and agreed to a security plan and posture. Tomorrow's event will be covered by both my team and the campus PD. If additional support is required, patrol units will be available. I have 11 on site.'"
"Charlie responded with this: 'Okay, great. Remind them that they are there for one person's security only, because I'm somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me.' That was a message sent September 9th."
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
WILSON: "On September 9th, Charlie's security team wrote to him: 'Yes, law enforcement has been fully supportive and agreed to a security plan and posture. Tomorrow's event will be covered by both my team and the campus PD. If additional support is required, patrol units will be available. I have 11 on site.'"
"Charlie responded with this: 'Okay, great. Remind them that they are there for one person's security only, because I'm somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me.' That was a message sent September 9th."
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
😢227🙏56👀23❤19💩19🤯7😈7💯3🔥2🥰2😁2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CANDACE: "You're talking about how Israel got into the conversation. It was because immediately after Charlie died, one of the first things we saw was this push to make us all think and remember how much he loved Israel."
"It's because the prime minister of Israel, who's fighting like a 27-front war, felt that he needed to come do a little mini tour and, strangely, to state that 'I did not kill Charlie Kirk' when nobody was having that thought that I can remember."
"Nobody was going, 'I wonder if Bibi Netanyahu killed Charlie Kirk.' And then we had a round of influencers who lied and said Charlie was not changing on Israel."
ADDED CONTEXT: Days before his September 10 assassination, Charlie told a private group chat he had just lost a $2 million-a-year Jewish donor over his refusal to cancel Tucker Carlson, writing that "Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes," that he would not be bullied, and that the pressure left him "no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause."
Turning Point USA later confirmed the texts, released by Candace, were authentic.
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
"It's because the prime minister of Israel, who's fighting like a 27-front war, felt that he needed to come do a little mini tour and, strangely, to state that 'I did not kill Charlie Kirk' when nobody was having that thought that I can remember."
"Nobody was going, 'I wonder if Bibi Netanyahu killed Charlie Kirk.' And then we had a round of influencers who lied and said Charlie was not changing on Israel."
ADDED CONTEXT: Days before his September 10 assassination, Charlie told a private group chat he had just lost a $2 million-a-year Jewish donor over his refusal to cancel Tucker Carlson, writing that "Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes," that he would not be bullied, and that the pressure left him "no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause."
Turning Point USA later confirmed the texts, released by Candace, were authentic.
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
👀101❤46👍27🤡18👎17🤯11🥱10🙏9💯7💔3😁1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
PBD: "Just out of curiosity, are you between zero to 100 — what is the likelihood that you think Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk and killed him?"
WILSON: "Based on the evidence right now, I don't know. I'd say 75, 85 percent."
PBD: "Candace?"
CANDACE: "Zero percent."
PBD: "Zero percent?"
CANDACE: "I'm at zero. So with what we've seen in terms of the evidence, I'm at zero percent."
PBD: "So not only, you know, that maybe somebody was behind him as a patsy influencing him — you're not even saying that he didn't even shoot Charlie Kirk, right?"
CANDACE: "I would — if you said, 'Was he involved that day?' As I have consistently said on my platform, I would say yes, he was. I don't know what role he played. But as the shooter? Zero percent."
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
WILSON: "Based on the evidence right now, I don't know. I'd say 75, 85 percent."
PBD: "Candace?"
CANDACE: "Zero percent."
PBD: "Zero percent?"
CANDACE: "I'm at zero. So with what we've seen in terms of the evidence, I'm at zero percent."
PBD: "So not only, you know, that maybe somebody was behind him as a patsy influencing him — you're not even saying that he didn't even shoot Charlie Kirk, right?"
CANDACE: "I would — if you said, 'Was he involved that day?' As I have consistently said on my platform, I would say yes, he was. I don't know what role he played. But as the shooter? Zero percent."
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🔥91💩54🤡40👀36❤24👏21🙏10🤮5🥰4😁2🤯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Candace Owens calls for a fact-check on whether Tyler Robinson ever said he'd be seen on security footage at UVU.
The fact-check arrives. She reads Robinson's words out loud, and Wilson embraces the moment with a big "OOF!"
CANDACE: "Okay, so let's address those multitude of evidences. The first one, we're working on a fact check on, because I do not ever remember him texting that, 'That's me in the staircase.'"
WILSON: "I didn't say that. What I said is that he texted over, 'You'll be able to see me in footage at UVU' — and I'm paraphrasing, but that's what he said."
CANDACE: "Yeah, could we get a fact check on that?"
PBD: "If you want to pull it up. You said you have the text? If we can put that up on the screen. Thank you."
CANDACE: "'It was me. Look at the pictures from the surveillance footage. It was me.'"
WILSON: "Oof!"
CANDACE: "It's not an 'oof.' I said I didn't remember this, and I'm happy to have a fact check on that. I didn't call for the fact check saying you're wrong. I literally said, 'I don't remember that from the texts.'"
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
The fact-check arrives. She reads Robinson's words out loud, and Wilson embraces the moment with a big "OOF!"
CANDACE: "Okay, so let's address those multitude of evidences. The first one, we're working on a fact check on, because I do not ever remember him texting that, 'That's me in the staircase.'"
WILSON: "I didn't say that. What I said is that he texted over, 'You'll be able to see me in footage at UVU' — and I'm paraphrasing, but that's what he said."
CANDACE: "Yeah, could we get a fact check on that?"
PBD: "If you want to pull it up. You said you have the text? If we can put that up on the screen. Thank you."
CANDACE: "'It was me. Look at the pictures from the surveillance footage. It was me.'"
WILSON: "Oof!"
CANDACE: "It's not an 'oof.' I said I didn't remember this, and I'm happy to have a fact check on that. I didn't call for the fact check saying you're wrong. I literally said, 'I don't remember that from the texts.'"
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🤡78❤38😁22👀15🔥7🤣7🙏6🤷♂5💩3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Andrew Wilson asks Candace Owens point-blank: “Do you have any positive evidence whatsoever that Israel killed Charlie Kirk?”
Candace says she can’t claim Israel pulled the trigger, but walks through why she believes there could be “an Israeli angle.”
WILSON: “Do you have any positive evidence whatsoever that Israel killed Charlie Kirk?”
CANDACE: "Well, I couldn't say Israel was on the ground and shot and killed Charlie Kirk. I would say that there are various things that we're trying to establish, one being a motive."
WILSON: "But do you have positive evidence?"
CANDACE: "Charlie's perspectives were changing on Israel..."
WILSON: "Other than intuition... do you have any real evidence Israel was involved in killing Charlie Kirk?"
CANDACE: "Joe Kent, who I think would have the right to assert it, noted that there were 12 Israeli cell phones on the ground that day. I think most people would like to probe that. Now, it could be maybe they were students. But we'd like to probe that narrative, because what we've seen — the Israeli prime minister kind of denying that he did it, which wasn't really necessary, he was quite busy. The phone call that happened, which no one wants to discuss, in the Hamptons — I think it was around August 5th or 6th. And again, the almost desperate lies about Charlie shifting opinion on Israel lead us to believe that there could be an Israeli angle in this. But we cannot say for certainty that Israel called the shots."
WILSON: "So you say there's no positive evidence."
CANDACE: "What we've said on our show is what we've said, which is: this feels like a conspiracy building. There's no reason to lie about these things, and yet people are lying. Bibi ain't acting right. The Hamptons thing was weird. And the way they tried to shove the Israel narrative down our throat immediately — I mean, the day he died, posting a picture of him with an American and Israeli AI'd photo on the president's feed — doesn't feel right."
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
Candace says she can’t claim Israel pulled the trigger, but walks through why she believes there could be “an Israeli angle.”
WILSON: “Do you have any positive evidence whatsoever that Israel killed Charlie Kirk?”
CANDACE: "Well, I couldn't say Israel was on the ground and shot and killed Charlie Kirk. I would say that there are various things that we're trying to establish, one being a motive."
WILSON: "But do you have positive evidence?"
CANDACE: "Charlie's perspectives were changing on Israel..."
WILSON: "Other than intuition... do you have any real evidence Israel was involved in killing Charlie Kirk?"
CANDACE: "Joe Kent, who I think would have the right to assert it, noted that there were 12 Israeli cell phones on the ground that day. I think most people would like to probe that. Now, it could be maybe they were students. But we'd like to probe that narrative, because what we've seen — the Israeli prime minister kind of denying that he did it, which wasn't really necessary, he was quite busy. The phone call that happened, which no one wants to discuss, in the Hamptons — I think it was around August 5th or 6th. And again, the almost desperate lies about Charlie shifting opinion on Israel lead us to believe that there could be an Israeli angle in this. But we cannot say for certainty that Israel called the shots."
WILSON: "So you say there's no positive evidence."
CANDACE: "What we've said on our show is what we've said, which is: this feels like a conspiracy building. There's no reason to lie about these things, and yet people are lying. Bibi ain't acting right. The Hamptons thing was weird. And the way they tried to shove the Israel narrative down our throat immediately — I mean, the day he died, posting a picture of him with an American and Israeli AI'd photo on the president's feed — doesn't feel right."
@RealCandaceO | @paleochristcon | @PBDsPodcast
Watch the live debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPhCKwJ6ye8
Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com
🤡98❤55😁25🙏12👀11👏10👍7💩7🔥3🫡1