"It is impossible to describe the history of the banking empire and its power over humanity without including the Rothschild dynasty. Even though some rabid ”realists” automatically want to label anyone who so much as mentions the Rothschilds as anti-Semitic, it should be quite clear to anyone who has followed my articles from the beginning that I consider all forms of racism to be foolish. With that said, let us continue the story of the oligarchs.

Having previously been a reasonably prosperous antiques dealer, Mayer Amschel Rothschild had, by 1797, become one of the wealthiest men in Frankfurt. In 1770, he married the daughter of a court banker, which provided him with invaluable connections within the upper levels of the financial world. The couple had ten children, and the sons—Amschel, Salomon, Nathan, Carl, and James—were carefully trained by their father in the world of business."

https://www.vaken.se/how-the-oligarchs-deceive-the-masses-part-3/

Before the Rothschilds took over the crown, the great banking family in England was Baring Brothers & Co. At the time of his death in 1810, Francis Baring was known as Europe’s foremost merchant. How had he become so wealthy? Professor David Landes provides the answer in his book Dynasties: by financing wars. In Europe, the Barings were known by the nickname ”The Sixth Great Power,” and they were able to influence—and even determine—the fate of entire nations, Professor Landes explains. A tradition that has continued into modern times.

Since the establishment of the private note-issuing bank, the Banque de France, in 1800, financial power in France had rested in the hands of approximately ten to twelve Protestant banking families, led by Mirabaud, Hottinger, Mallet, and Neuflize. Historian Professor Carroll Quigley writes in his monumental work Tragedy and Hope that all of these families were deeply involved in the agitations that led up to the French Revolution and that by 1811 they had moved into opposition.

https://www.vaken.se/how-the-oligarchs-deceive-the-masses-part-4/

France’s defeat in the war against Prussia in 1870, together with the capture of Napoleon III, led the French to proclaim a republic. The gap between rich and poor had been widening for years, socialists came to power, and chaos prevailed during the so-called Paris Commune of 1871. When consulted by a client, Rothschild is said to have remarked:

”Buy when there’s blood in the streets.”

https://www.vaken.se/how-the-oligarchs-deceive-the-masses-part-5/

"The European colonial powers had been carving up the African continent throughout the nineteenth century. The French, Belgians, and especially the British did their utmost to seize both land and resources, while at the same time destroying many of the traditions that Africans had followed for centuries. Belgium’s King Leopold II, who administered the Congo, systematically exploited the region for its valuable resources. All protests were brutally suppressed, and between 1885 and 1912, an estimated more than ten million people were killed.

The British appetite for land and natural resources also affected the Boers, the farmers and craftsmen from the Netherlands and France who had emigrated to South Africa in the seventeenth century and considered themselves superior to the Black population. After decades of British rule and wars with indigenous peoples, things appeared to settle down. However, when large quantities of gold and diamonds were discovered during the 1870s and 1880s, the region was flooded by British fortune-seekers. The Boer people once again stood in the way of British ambitions, and between 1880 and 1881 war broke out. The Boers defended themselves skillfully and secured a measure of self-government."

https://www.vaken.se/how-the-oligarchs-deceive-the-masses-part-6/

"Professor Quigley revealed in the book Tragedy and Hope that Rhodes’s secret society and its American branch exercised much of their influence through five American newspapers: the New York Times, the New York Herald Tribune, the Christian Science Monitor, The Boston Evening (Transcript), and the Washington Post. He also noted that the editor of the Christian Science Monitor served as the principal correspondent for the Round Table.

The latter refers to Rhodes’s Round Table groups—that is, the outer organizations that worked to implement the plans of the inner circle. Professor Quigley further wrote:

”There grew up in the twentieth century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into the universities, the press, and foreign policy. In England, the Round Table Group was its center, while in the United States it was J.P. Morgan & Company.”"

https://www.vaken.se/how-the-oligarchs-deceive-the-masses-part-7/

"When one reads the writings of the elite themselves, one is often surprised by how remarkably straightforward they can be about their plans. These works tend to be rather dry reading for the average person and are generally not intended for anyone other than the elitists and their subordinates. For those of us who study politics behind the scenes, however, they are worth their weight in gold, as they sometimes provide some of the clearest evidence that a relatively small group of power-hungry and greedy elites has governed—and continues to govern—the world.

In his 1913 book The New Freedom, President Woodrow Wilson wrote a number of interesting observations about politics, economics, and society. He also spoke candidly about who really held power, and it was certainly not the elected politicians. This may seem ironic, considering that Wilson himself was the president who, on December 23 of that same year, signed the Federal Reserve Act, which would later become one of the elite’s most important tools in their exploitation of the world’s people."

https://www.vaken.se/how-the-oligarchs-deceive-the-masses-part-8-

During the television broadcast from Fort Worth, just three hours before the assassination of President Kennedy, viewers could hear reporter Ed Herlihy say:

”As long as the Secret Service can keep the crowd away from the President, they have a good chance of protecting him. But once he moves into the crowd, they are almost incapable of protecting him.”

Then something interesting happened.

After a pause of a few seconds, the reporter suddenly began reading from a script and recounting how President William McKinley was assassinated at the Pan-American Exposition in Buffalo on September 6, 1901, after being shot twice.
The assassin was described as a lone, mentally disturbed anarchist named Leon Frank Czolgosz.

Only a few hours after the Fort Worth broadcast in Dallas in 1963, news broke that President Kennedy had been killed by two gunshots. Shortly thereafter, it was announced that the culprit was a lone, deranged communist named Lee Harvey Oswald—referred to by some as Leon.

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-president-kennedy-part-2/

After the failed 1961 invasion attempt of Cuba by U.S.-backed Cuban exiles, Kennedy discussed the Bay of Pigs incident with a Supreme Court justice named William O. Douglas. “That episode burned him,” Douglas later said:

“He had experienced the extraordinary power these groups possessed, the various kinds of covert influence that the CIA and the Pentagon exerted over civilian policy, and I think it raised a fear in his mind: Could Jack Kennedy, President of the United States, ever be strong enough to truly control these two powerful institutions? I believe it had a profound effect … it shook him deeply!”

Although Kennedy was upset by what had happened, he fully understood the danger of the situation and the importance of keeping a cool head.

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-president-kennedy-part-3/

At a press conference at Parkland Hospital after Kennedy had been pronounced dead, one of the reporters asked Dr. Malcolm Perry to describe the wound in Kennedy’s throat:
“Doctor, describe the entry wound. You believe it came from the front, in the throat?”

Dr. Perry replied:
“The wound appeared to be an entry wound on the front of the throat, yes, that is correct.”
One of the journalists who interviewed Perry was Connie Kritzberg of the Dallas Times Herald. When Kritzberg’s article was published the following day, she was surprised to discover that someone had added a sentence to her story.

Kritzberg herself had written:
“The hole in the front of the throat was described as an entry wound. The wound in the back of the head, the major one, was either an exit wound or a tangential exit wound.”¹

Immediately after those lines, someone else had inserted an additional sentence, which read:
“One doctor conceded that it was possible that there was only one wound.”²

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-president-kennedy-part-4/

"At the very moment Kennedy was shot, four female employees of the Texas School Book Depository at Dealey Plaza—Victoria Adams, Sandra Styles, Elsie Dorman, and Dorothy May Garner—were standing by the window of the fourth-floor office.

Twenty-three-year-old Victoria Adams initially thought she had heard a firecracker when the shooting began. But when she saw the chaos unfolding below on Elm Street, she realized that something dramatic had happened.

Grabbing her friend Sandra Styles by the arm, she suggested that they go downstairs to see what was happening. The two women passed through a storage room on their way to the rear staircase and hurried down the creaking stairs.

By this point, Victoria had begun to fear the worst and exclaimed that she thought the President had been shot."

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-president-kennedy-part-5/

"After studying the 26 volumes of the Warren Commission report in detail, businessman John Armstrong found so much information suggesting that there may have been an Oswald double that he launched a full-time investigation of his own.

The theory of an Oswald double had already been advanced in 1966 by Professor Richard H. Popkin in the book The Second Oswald. Popkin pointed to several details that, in his view, suggested the existence of a double and argued that all observations of a second Oswald constituted evidence of a conspiracy.

Armstrong, for his part, spent twelve years researching and reading everything he could find about Oswald and the Kennedy assassination. The project took him not only to the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington and to several U.S. states, but also to Switzerland and Argentina."

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-john-f-kennedy-part-6/

"Skull and Bones was founded in 1832 as an American branch of a German student society known as Der Eulogianische Club. The name can be traced to the Latin word eulogia, meaning “blessing,” and has sometimes been associated with the Eucharist. Eulogia can also signify eloquence, and one version of the story holds that the group’s name derives from the fact that its members worshipped a Greek goddess named Eulogia, who was said to have ascended to heaven together with the eloquent Greek philosopher Demosthenes after his death in 322 BC.
It has been speculated that the number 322, which appears beneath the skull in the fraternity’s emblem, refers to the idea that the Order originated from—or identifies itself with—a Greek brotherhood dating back to the time of Demosthenes’ death in 322 BC.
The affairs of Skull & Bones were managed by the Russell Trust Association under the leadership of Daniel Coit Gilman, the first president of Johns Hopkins University and also a co-founder of the Carnegie Institution for Science.¹"

https://www.vaken.se/behind-the-scenes-of-a-secret-societ

On August 22, 1957, Lee Harvey Oswald departed from San Diego for Japan aboard the USS Bexar.

In September, he was assigned to Marine Air Control Squadron 1 (MACS-1) at the top-secret underground base at Naval Air Facility Atsugi, where he worked with classified radar equipment.

Atsugi was also the base from which the highly secret Lockheed U-2 spy plane operated on missions over Soviet territory.

Only the most capable recruits were assigned to Atsugi, and as a consequence of his position there, Oswald received a security clearance—an authorization granting access to military areas containing classified information.

According to the author, this and other facts call into question portrayals of Oswald as an unintelligent failure.

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-president-kennedy-part-7/

When the car carrying Kennedy passed by and turned onto Elm Street, Dallas Sheriff W.W. Mabra and Police Officer Orville Smith were standing on the sidewalk in front of the courthouse on Houston Street. Approximately one minute after the car had turned right onto Houston Street, the officers heard three shots fired, whereupon Smith turned to Mabra and exclaimed, “That sounded like a deer rifle!”

Five days later, Sheriff Mabra wrote the following in his police report:

“… I went to the railroad yard and parking area west of the Book Depository and helped search the area. I spoke with a city policeman who said he was stationed at the railroad yard and had the area under observation and that no one came that way.”

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-president-kennedy-part-8/

All of the independent researchers who have investigated the Kennedy assassination and been ridiculed by proponents of the official version, which holds Lee Harvey Oswald solely responsible for the crime, can take comfort in the fact that they are in good company.

During the Warren Commission’s investigation, Senator Richard Russell became increasingly skeptical of the process, particularly regarding the so-called “magic bullet.” The theory was crucial to the Commission’s conclusion that the assassination was the work of a lone gunman, because a fourth bullet would have proven that there had to be at least one additional shooter.

Russell at times conducted his own investigation, assisted by a retired Army intelligence colonel named Philip Corso, who had previously served on Eisenhower’s National Security Council.

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-president-kennedy-part-9/

Researcher and author Harold Weisberg argued that the first thing one must do to determine who was behind the Kennedy assassination is to ask two questions:

“Who benefited from it, and which of those who benefited were in a position to frame Lee Harvey Oswald?”

According to Weisberg, this ruled out the Mafia as well as right-wing and left-wing extremist groups.

Instead, he concluded that those who had both the means and the motive were the forces that feared and opposed Kennedy’s foreign-policy initiatives concerning Vietnam and the Soviet Union:

“There was a very powerful, well-connected coalition that opposed the winding down of the Vietnam venture and feared that Kennedy would act to free us from what they viewed as a potentially lucrative war.”

https://www.vaken.se/the-assassination-of-president-kennedy-part-10/

In the debate over vaccine safety, a larger issue is often overlooked: how vaccination campaigns undermine natural herd immunity and expose young people to significant risk. Immunologist Tetyana Obukhanych, who holds a PhD from Rockefeller University and has conducted research at Harvard Medical School and Stanford University School of Medicine, explains why unvaccinated children do not pose a danger to those around them.

Her reasons for beginning to question vaccination stem from personal experience. Despite being fully vaccinated against common childhood diseases, she still became ill. Having been indoctrinated into the belief that vaccine-induced immunity was equivalent to natural immunity, she nevertheless chose to re-examine the underlying science.

https://www.vaken.se/immunologist-tetyana-obukhanych-unvaccinated-children-pose-no-danger-to-those-around-them/