Forwarded from Nigel Utton
Ah excellent exposรฉ of how social media groups can be manipulated. Please share. We all need to know this information:
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/corbett-report-videos/id424412530?i=1000630930143
https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/corbett-report-videos/id424412530?i=1000630930143
Apple Podcasts
A Gentleman's Guide to Trolls, Bots, Sealions, Forum Spies and Other Pests - #SolutionsWatch
Let's face it: comments often suck. And who's to say they're even real? But what's the solution to these crappy communications? Well, don't read the comments, o
๐4โค2๐1
World Freedom Alliance - Official pinned ยซhttps://tube.doortofreedom.org/w/tQSZ82s1x4navx4jS6h9Wv?start=2sยป
Forwarded from Velstandspartiet - Jorden Frihed Kundskab (Mads Palsvig)
X (formerly Twitter)
Mads Palsvig on X
Should the death penalty be introduced for people working for the government or secret agencies or multinational corporations as trolls, that either censor freedom of speech or are paid to create confusion with false claims and harassment on peoples socialโฆ
๐ฏ1
Forwarded from WFA Community
You can follow Dr Adilโs court case on here
https://www.youtube.com/live/moOKSEt5etk?si=jPC41h4KmNauH-Ft
https://www.youtube.com/live/moOKSEt5etk?si=jPC41h4KmNauH-Ft
YouTube
Adil (appellant) v General Medical Council (respondent)
Thursday 19 October 2023
Before Lord Justice Bean
Lord Justice Popplewell
Lord Justice Dingemans
The underlying appeal was brought under s40 of the Medical Act 1983 against four decisions of the Medical Practitionersโ Tribunalโs (โthe Tribunalโ) decisionsโฆ
Before Lord Justice Bean
Lord Justice Popplewell
Lord Justice Dingemans
The underlying appeal was brought under s40 of the Medical Act 1983 against four decisions of the Medical Practitionersโ Tribunalโs (โthe Tribunalโ) decisionsโฆ
Forwarded from Charlie Ward & Friends
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐21โค16๐3๐2
Forwarded from Lรคkaruppropet
๐ฌ๐ง๐บ๐ธ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฆ๐บ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฆ It is estimated that nearly 24,000 fewer children than expected based on the trend of the previous 10 years will be born in Sweden in 2022-2023.
In our calculation, we have used the same calculation that we have made every month over the past year or so regarding the number of births in Sweden per 100,000 women aged 18-45. We have obtained the number of fewer births that have occurred in 2022 and based on the data for the first 8 months of the year, we have made an estimate of the number of fewer births for the whole of 2023.
In 2022, 9,816 fewer children were born than the expected number based on the trend from the previous 10 years, and for 2023 the estimate is that 14,012 fewer children are born, which means that an estimated 23,828 fewer children are born in Sweden in 2022-2023.
The decline in birth rates coincides with the start of vaccination of the childbearing population (May 2021).
In our calculation, we have used the same calculation that we have made every month over the past year or so regarding the number of births in Sweden per 100,000 women aged 18-45. We have obtained the number of fewer births that have occurred in 2022 and based on the data for the first 8 months of the year, we have made an estimate of the number of fewer births for the whole of 2023.
In 2022, 9,816 fewer children were born than the expected number based on the trend from the previous 10 years, and for 2023 the estimate is that 14,012 fewer children are born, which means that an estimated 23,828 fewer children are born in Sweden in 2022-2023.
The decline in birth rates coincides with the start of vaccination of the childbearing population (May 2021).
๐7๐3โค1
Forwarded from Oracle Films
Jaw-dropping watching the BBC out-BBC itself during its coverage of the parliamentary debate on excess deaths today. No fewer than nine egregious slogans were cycled onscreen throughout MP Andrew Bridgenโs speech, presumably in a failed attempt to undermine the many verifiable statements he was making.
An honest media should be functioning as a watchdog; a line of defence between the public and forces of power and influence; holding said forces to account. Not simply acting as a mouthpiece and propaganda arm for them. Weโve seen the results of the latter over the last three years or more, and it has been disastrous.
The public deserve better than this.
An honest media should be functioning as a watchdog; a line of defence between the public and forces of power and influence; holding said forces to account. Not simply acting as a mouthpiece and propaganda arm for them. Weโve seen the results of the latter over the last three years or more, and it has been disastrous.
The public deserve better than this.
๐37๐1
Forwarded from David W
For those who want to lodge a complaint to the BBC about how they ran biased vaccine statement tickers under Andrew Bridgen MP's speech in parliament, on BBC Parliament Live at 2:30pm Oct 20th 2023
I have today sent this complaint to The BBC, using this link:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints/make-a-complaint/
Feel free to make the following words your own:
As Andrew Bridgen MP was speaking yesterday, the BBC was pushing out numerous messages at the bottom of the screen. There were at least eight - I have screen shots of eight.
Such as "The NHS says Covid-19 vaccines used in the UK are safe and the best protection from getting seriously ill with the disease"
The BBC in their own editorial guidelines say:
'The BBC is committed to achieving due impartiality in all its output. This commitment is fundamental to our reputation, our values and the trust of audiences.'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/impartiality
BBC clearly BROKE these yesterday.
The minister for Health Maria Caulfield MP gave a response to Andrew Bridgen MP and the duty of the BBC is to respect impartiality and allow both to speak freely in the debate, without forcing a BBC view on viewers via the underlying ticker .
"Utter Disgrace" are the words which come to me
The BBC are introducing their personal corporation bias into our democratic process and whoever is responsible, including their boss(es) needs to be swiftly brought to account, shown Section 4 of Impartiality guideline and gain assurances that it NEVER happens again.
My request is for a clear public apology from the BBC, together with a public statement that such a bias will never reoccur.
I have today sent this complaint to The BBC, using this link:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/contact/complaints/make-a-complaint/
Feel free to make the following words your own:
As Andrew Bridgen MP was speaking yesterday, the BBC was pushing out numerous messages at the bottom of the screen. There were at least eight - I have screen shots of eight.
Such as "The NHS says Covid-19 vaccines used in the UK are safe and the best protection from getting seriously ill with the disease"
The BBC in their own editorial guidelines say:
'The BBC is committed to achieving due impartiality in all its output. This commitment is fundamental to our reputation, our values and the trust of audiences.'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/editorialguidelines/guidelines/impartiality
BBC clearly BROKE these yesterday.
The minister for Health Maria Caulfield MP gave a response to Andrew Bridgen MP and the duty of the BBC is to respect impartiality and allow both to speak freely in the debate, without forcing a BBC view on viewers via the underlying ticker .
"Utter Disgrace" are the words which come to me
The BBC are introducing their personal corporation bias into our democratic process and whoever is responsible, including their boss(es) needs to be swiftly brought to account, shown Section 4 of Impartiality guideline and gain assurances that it NEVER happens again.
My request is for a clear public apology from the BBC, together with a public statement that such a bias will never reoccur.
www.bbc.co.uk
Section 2: Impartiality
๐18๐5โค3