Forwarded from Läkaruppropet
🇺🇸🇨🇦🇬🇧🇮🇪🇦🇺🇳🇿🇿🇦 On Thursday, May 23, Senator Ron Johnson held the Sovereignty Summit in Washington D.C., calling for the postponement of the decision on changes to the IHR and on a new pandemic treaty, because the WHO has violated its own statutes that require proposals for changes to be communicated to the 194 member states at least 4 months in advance. Signatures of parliamentarians from around the world on a petition linked to the Sovereignty Summit have now reached 216 parliamentarians from 34 countries.
Signatures and number of countries for the continents in rank order and total number of signatures for each continent and country:
North America: 73 signatures; 3 countries:
* USA (69)
* Canada (3)
* Honduras (1)
Europe (65; 18):
* Portugal (16)
* Germany (8)
* Estonia (7)
* Croatia (6)
* Finland (4)
* Italy (3)
* Lithuania (3)
* Netherlands (3)
* Norway (2)
* Romania (2)
* Switzerland (2)
* United Kingdom (2)
* Sweden (2)
* Cyprus (1)
* Poland (1)
* Czech Republic (1)
* Turkey (1)
* Austria (1)
South America (59;3):
* Brazil (56)
* Argentina (3)
* Uruguay (1)
Africa (8;4):
* Kenya (3)
* Uganda (3)
* Malawi (1)
* South Africa (1)
Asia (7; 4):
* Lebanon (3)
* Israel (2)
* Philippines (1)
* Kuwait (1)
Oceania (3;2):
* Australia (2)
* New Zealand (1)
Countries with most signatures:
1. USA 69
2. Brazil 56
3. Portugal 16
4. Germany 8
5. Estonia 7
6. Croatia 6
7. Finland 4
https://reviewthewho.org
Signatures and number of countries for the continents in rank order and total number of signatures for each continent and country:
North America: 73 signatures; 3 countries:
* USA (69)
* Canada (3)
* Honduras (1)
Europe (65; 18):
* Portugal (16)
* Germany (8)
* Estonia (7)
* Croatia (6)
* Finland (4)
* Italy (3)
* Lithuania (3)
* Netherlands (3)
* Norway (2)
* Romania (2)
* Switzerland (2)
* United Kingdom (2)
* Sweden (2)
* Cyprus (1)
* Poland (1)
* Czech Republic (1)
* Turkey (1)
* Austria (1)
South America (59;3):
* Brazil (56)
* Argentina (3)
* Uruguay (1)
Africa (8;4):
* Kenya (3)
* Uganda (3)
* Malawi (1)
* South Africa (1)
Asia (7; 4):
* Lebanon (3)
* Israel (2)
* Philippines (1)
* Kuwait (1)
Oceania (3;2):
* Australia (2)
* New Zealand (1)
Countries with most signatures:
1. USA 69
2. Brazil 56
3. Portugal 16
4. Germany 8
5. Estonia 7
6. Croatia 6
7. Finland 4
https://reviewthewho.org
❤18👍7😁2
Forwarded from Kim
From the Tokyo protest - huge news, a former Japanese govt minister apologises to the crowd for the deaths and injuries from the covid jabs. https://www.aussie17.com/p/japans-former-minister-for-internal
Aussie17
Japan's Former Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications Apologizes During Today's Massive Protest Against the WHO
"I apologize to all of you. So many have died, and they shouldn’t have"
❤11👍2👀2
Forwarded from Läkaruppropet
🇬🇧🇮🇪🇺🇸🇨🇦🇦🇺🇳🇿🇿🇦 Become the master of your own house, and you won't have to take any vaccines and be controlled by supranational bodies like the WHO or corrupt health authorities. Becoming an agent of your own body is easier than you might think. Simply try to live a healthy life and you will not die from any viral infection, except if you have one or more risk factors.
And if you're going to do one more thing, take 125 micrograms of vitamin D (equivalent to 5 000 IU, international units) daily, all year round. For vitamin D to enter the cells more easily, we also recommend Zinc, 25 mg.
Many of us specialists in The Doctors' Appeal take vitamin D daily, and we never get any serious infections, at most one cold a year 😊
And if you're going to do one more thing, take 125 micrograms of vitamin D (equivalent to 5 000 IU, international units) daily, all year round. For vitamin D to enter the cells more easily, we also recommend Zinc, 25 mg.
Many of us specialists in The Doctors' Appeal take vitamin D daily, and we never get any serious infections, at most one cold a year 😊
👍13❤2🔥2
Forwarded from World Wide Freedom Rallies
🇯🇵 Japan - Hibiya (Tokyo) [May 31, 2024]
Anti-WHO rally against the power grab of the WHO, with Professors/members of the House of Representatives and MANY people: NO to the pandemic treaty!
We need more of this!
https://t.me/BMediaWWD
Anti-WHO rally against the power grab of the WHO, with Professors/members of the House of Representatives and MANY people: NO to the pandemic treaty!
We need more of this!
https://t.me/BMediaWWD
❤35👏7👍2
At the ‘Road to Geneva’ Rally against the WHO.. at the Gates of the UN in Geneva. June 1st.
We live-streamed with the rally in Japan .. power in numbers and power in collaboration. We rallied together across the world Japan-Geneva
Freedom leaders from around the world came to Geneva to unite in our message to the WHO & the world.
We have the power & we will win !! 💪🏻
We live-streamed with the rally in Japan .. power in numbers and power in collaboration. We rallied together across the world Japan-Geneva
Freedom leaders from around the world came to Geneva to unite in our message to the WHO & the world.
We have the power & we will win !! 💪🏻
❤40👏10👍4🕊2
Forwarded from World Wide Freedom Rallies
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤37❤🔥7👏7🔥3👍1
Forwarded from Läkaruppropet
🇺🇸🇨🇦🇬🇧🇮🇪🇦🇺🇳🇿🇿🇦 In her latest article, Meryl Nass shows clearly and pedagogically why the recently concluded 77th WEF meeting was a veritable failure for the globalists.
The changes to the IHR are benign. Meryl Nass has highlighted relevant changes to help readers confirm this. The plain text is unchanged from the 2005 (existing) version of the IHR, the capitalised text is new text (= changes).
“There are two major arguments that the WHO has not followed its own procedures:
1. the decision about the IHR yesterday should be null and void because the final targeted set of amendments was not presented to the member nations 4 months ahead of their consideration, as required by IHR Article 55 paragraph 2, and
2. the amendments passed in 2022 were not voted on in the plenary session and therefore should be null and void
However, no member nations at this point have challenged the validity of these procedures, and if they do not, the people and their elected representatives have found no way to stop the WHO.
Assuming the WHO is not challenged over its many procedural violations, this is what we can expect:
* For nations that issued a relevant reservation or rejection of the 2022 amendments, including Slovakia, New Zealand, Iran, probably the Netherlands and possibly other nations, the newly passed amendments will go into effect in 2 years, on June 1, 2026—unless these nations make a reservation or rejection of them within 18 months.
* For all other nations the amendments will go into effect in 1 year, on June 1, 2025 unless they reserve or reject within 10 months.
THIS MEANS EVERY NATION HAS AT A MINIMUM 10 MONTHS TO AVOID ANY PROVISIONS IT DOES NOT LIKE IN THE NEWLY AMENDED DOCUMENT. IT SIMPLY HAS TO WRITE TO THE WHO AND SAY IT REJECTS WHATEVER IT DOES NOT LIKE. In the US, the next President can do this until April 1, 2025.
Slovakia’s diplomat did not “break consensus” to stop the approval of the document, but shortly afterward, when given the opportunity, stated that Slovakia would be rejecting the amended IHR.
What I have been hearing is that people are unhappy with various provisions of the document, WITHOUT REALIZING THAT MOST OF THE ISSUES THEY DISLIKE ARE IN THE EXISTING IHR AND HAVE BEEN THERE FOR MANY YEARS.
Vaccine certificates have always been in the IHRs, for example. The changes to vaccine certificates are minor, compared to what was proposed, and btw they are recommendations, not orders from the WHO. THEY WILL NOT NEED TO BE DIGITAL, WHICH IS A CRUCIAL POINT—AS THEY WERE GOING TO BE THE GATEWAY TO DIGITAL IDENTITY, DIGITAL MONEY AND MASSIVELY INCREASED SURVEILLANCE. They need to be signed by a doctor, which was already true in many countries.
I will provide more detail tomorrow (it’s midnight) and I will provide examples of some of the terrible things that were proposed but got scuttled. And then you too will realize what a hail of bullets we have dodged.
I realize the IHR is written in legalese and it is hard for those who have not pored over every version of the IHRs (as I have) to contextualize the changes. I will do my very best to clarify.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/merylnass/p/the-ihr-as-amended-yesterday-is-benign?r=1e6da8&utm_medium=ios
The changes to the IHR are benign. Meryl Nass has highlighted relevant changes to help readers confirm this. The plain text is unchanged from the 2005 (existing) version of the IHR, the capitalised text is new text (= changes).
“There are two major arguments that the WHO has not followed its own procedures:
1. the decision about the IHR yesterday should be null and void because the final targeted set of amendments was not presented to the member nations 4 months ahead of their consideration, as required by IHR Article 55 paragraph 2, and
2. the amendments passed in 2022 were not voted on in the plenary session and therefore should be null and void
However, no member nations at this point have challenged the validity of these procedures, and if they do not, the people and their elected representatives have found no way to stop the WHO.
Assuming the WHO is not challenged over its many procedural violations, this is what we can expect:
* For nations that issued a relevant reservation or rejection of the 2022 amendments, including Slovakia, New Zealand, Iran, probably the Netherlands and possibly other nations, the newly passed amendments will go into effect in 2 years, on June 1, 2026—unless these nations make a reservation or rejection of them within 18 months.
* For all other nations the amendments will go into effect in 1 year, on June 1, 2025 unless they reserve or reject within 10 months.
THIS MEANS EVERY NATION HAS AT A MINIMUM 10 MONTHS TO AVOID ANY PROVISIONS IT DOES NOT LIKE IN THE NEWLY AMENDED DOCUMENT. IT SIMPLY HAS TO WRITE TO THE WHO AND SAY IT REJECTS WHATEVER IT DOES NOT LIKE. In the US, the next President can do this until April 1, 2025.
Slovakia’s diplomat did not “break consensus” to stop the approval of the document, but shortly afterward, when given the opportunity, stated that Slovakia would be rejecting the amended IHR.
What I have been hearing is that people are unhappy with various provisions of the document, WITHOUT REALIZING THAT MOST OF THE ISSUES THEY DISLIKE ARE IN THE EXISTING IHR AND HAVE BEEN THERE FOR MANY YEARS.
Vaccine certificates have always been in the IHRs, for example. The changes to vaccine certificates are minor, compared to what was proposed, and btw they are recommendations, not orders from the WHO. THEY WILL NOT NEED TO BE DIGITAL, WHICH IS A CRUCIAL POINT—AS THEY WERE GOING TO BE THE GATEWAY TO DIGITAL IDENTITY, DIGITAL MONEY AND MASSIVELY INCREASED SURVEILLANCE. They need to be signed by a doctor, which was already true in many countries.
I will provide more detail tomorrow (it’s midnight) and I will provide examples of some of the terrible things that were proposed but got scuttled. And then you too will realize what a hail of bullets we have dodged.
I realize the IHR is written in legalese and it is hard for those who have not pored over every version of the IHRs (as I have) to contextualize the changes. I will do my very best to clarify.”
https://open.substack.com/pub/merylnass/p/the-ihr-as-amended-yesterday-is-benign?r=1e6da8&utm_medium=ios
Meryl’s COVID Newsletter
The IHR as amended yesterday is benign. I have highlighted relevant changes to assist readers to confirm this
Everything in plain text is UNCHANGED from the 2005 (existing) version of the IHR. Everything bolded (except section headings) is new language (= amendments).
👍12❤5🤔2❤🔥1
Forwarded from Lisa Victoria
The Website of the Nordic Coalition is finally Live , Iceland, sweden, Finland, Norway and Denmark - Great job! 🙌😇🥳🥳🥳💫✨
https://www.thefinalcountdown.me/
https://www.thefinalcountdown.me/
👌6
If you didn’t see this .. watch it now & know- no matter what ..
WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER !
WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER !
Forwarded from LauraAboli (Laura Aboli)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤🔥21💯3❤2
Forwarded from Läkaruppropet
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇬🇧🇮🇪🇺🇸🇨🇦🇦🇺🇳🇿🇿🇦 An absolutely brilliant speech by cardiologist Aseem Malhotra at the demonstration against the WHO on 1 June in Geneva. He speaks plainly, the WHO is a criminal organisation that is in reality run by Bill Gates. The IT billionaire is still behaving as he did in his boyhood bedroom in the 60s and 70s, playing video games and programming and imagining that one day he could rule the world.
❤28🔥2💯2