Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Friday that his country is βnot favorableβ toward Finland and Sweden joining NATO, indicating that Turkey could use its status as a member of the Western military alliance to veto moves to admit the two countries.
@RedPillPharmacist
https://t.co/olurBzVwhM
@RedPillPharmacist
https://t.co/olurBzVwhM
π₯242π75π27π€10π©2
Forwarded from π― Andrea Jane Rex π
This is the link for the UN Security Council meeting this morning scheduled for 10 AM Eastern. (Not live yet.)
Russia has requested to present further evidence of biological weapons programs in Ukraine during this morning's meeting.
https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1y/k1yhsampmo
Russia has requested to present further evidence of biological weapons programs in Ukraine during this morning's meeting.
https://media.un.org/en/asset/k1y/k1yhsampmo
π265π₯102π38π©4
Forwarded from MistyG
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Pence has now joined the three amigos, Ricketts, Doug Ducey and Chris Christie to campaign for Brian Kemp in Georgia. George Dubya is also pumping money into the race for Kemp.
John Fredrickβs is on a bus tour campaigning for Perdue. Bannon says they want to prove that Trump canβt win against a concentrated establishment, thus heβs not a viable candidate for 2024.
Georgia we have to vote for Perdue. The stakes could not be higher.
John Fredrickβs is on a bus tour campaigning for Perdue. Bannon says they want to prove that Trump canβt win against a concentrated establishment, thus heβs not a viable candidate for 2024.
Georgia we have to vote for Perdue. The stakes could not be higher.
π©488π193π35π€¬30π€21π₯15π9π₯°1
Forwarded from ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter πΈ (Pepe Lives Matter)
Wow.
Elon now looking to expose the egregious amount of bots on Twitter and expose the facade to sheep.
What percentage of users are bots? The number must be huge.
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/4472
Elon now looking to expose the egregious amount of bots on Twitter and expose the facade to sheep.
What percentage of users are bots? The number must be huge.
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/4472
Telegram
KanekoaTheGreat
Elon Musk tweets that deal for Twitter is on hold pending details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts represented fewer than 5% of its monetizable daily active users during the first quarter
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1525049369552048129β¦
https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1525049369552048129β¦
π₯354π68π37β€4π₯°2π©1
Forwarded from ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter πΈ (Pepe Lives Matter)
Elon Musk is out here trying to red pill the sheep and I'm all for it.
https://t.me/Patri0tsareinContr0l/2105
https://t.me/Patri0tsareinContr0l/2105
π485π₯215π25β€15π©1
Forwarded from StormyPatriotJoe Channel (Stormy Patriot Joe)
ππππππ
β€699π142π₯104π47π€20π₯°3π©3
Forwarded from Brian Cates (Brian Cates)
Prospective juror questionnaire has been added to the Sussmann case court docket.
π173π₯52π16π₯°5π©1
Forwarded from Brian Cates (Brian Cates)
If the # of bots [fake accounts] on Twitter turn out to be MORE than 5%, then the deal will be off, Musk will walk and Twitter stock would crash, I think. The social media appβs valuation would have to be reconfigured if > 5% of user accounts on it are fraudulent.
π₯479π85π21π©17β€3
Forwarded from CognitiveCarbon Public (Cognitive Carbon)
Given the bloodletting price action in stocks and the crypto markets following last month's announcement of Musk's deal to take Twitter private--and now, the "relief rally" in both sectors when news comes that the deal is on hold--makes me wonder...was it 'get Musk at all costs'?
Would "they" go to such extreme lengths to stop Musk from taking the premier mind-control and propaganda platform private?
My bet is that they would.
See my two substack posts on (anti-) social media for more.
https://cognitivecarbon.substack.com
Would "they" go to such extreme lengths to stop Musk from taking the premier mind-control and propaganda platform private?
My bet is that they would.
See my two substack posts on (anti-) social media for more.
https://cognitivecarbon.substack.com
Substack
CognitiveCarbonβs Content | Substack
Things worth sharing from the desk of CognitiveCarbon. Click to read CognitiveCarbonβs Content, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.
π₯132π39π€16π₯°2β€1π©1
Forwarded from anon_fa_mous
Damn this guy just called out the US. Saying we gave you evidence so you must not know what evidence is. kek
π₯861π151π54π13π©4
Forwarded from Brian Cates (Brian Cates)
Judge Cooper has just issued a ruling on the parties objections to each other's trial exhibits.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.135.0.pdf
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.135.0.pdf
π109π₯17π©9π₯°3π3
Forwarded from Chief Nerd
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Joe Rogan Says He Gained 700k Twitter Followers in 2 Weeks After Elon Musk's Deal Was Announced π§
https://rumble.com/v14lfl3-joe-rogan-says-he-gained-700k-twitter-followers-in-2-weeks-after-elon-musks.html
@ChiefNerd
https://rumble.com/v14lfl3-joe-rogan-says-he-gained-700k-twitter-followers-in-2-weeks-after-elon-musks.html
@ChiefNerd
π284π₯102π21π©1
Forwarded from Chief Nerd
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Joe Rogan and Hotep Jesus Call out the FBI's Involvement in January 6th π₯
"How about the f*cking known FBI agents who were inciting violence! They had people that were there - for a fact we know that!"
https://rumble.com/v14lgpn-joe-rogan-and-hotep-jesus-call-out-the-fbis-involvement-in-january-6th-.html
@ChiefNerd
"How about the f*cking known FBI agents who were inciting violence! They had people that were there - for a fact we know that!"
https://rumble.com/v14lgpn-joe-rogan-and-hotep-jesus-call-out-the-fbis-involvement-in-january-6th-.html
@ChiefNerd
π₯387π40π21
Forwarded from Brian Cates (Brian Cates)
Judge Cooper first states he's not making a final ruling on exhibits until trial.
In this order, he's addressing just one particular set of exhibits the Defense seeks to offer into trial: two different sets of handwritten notes taken by DOJ personnel on March 6, 2017.
Judge Cooper is also using this opinion and order to remind both parties of all the proper steps they must follow for the court to admit exhibits like these notes into the trial evidence.
In this order, he's addressing just one particular set of exhibits the Defense seeks to offer into trial: two different sets of handwritten notes taken by DOJ personnel on March 6, 2017.
Judge Cooper is also using this opinion and order to remind both parties of all the proper steps they must follow for the court to admit exhibits like these notes into the trial evidence.
π140π₯39π4π©1
Forwarded from Brian Cates (Brian Cates)
Sussmann wants to get these 2 sets of notes entered into the trial exhibits because he wants argue as part of his defense that Andrew McCabe told Mary McCord and Tashina Gauhar [who then wrote it down] that Sussmann told the group he was briefing that the Alfa Bank Allegations were shared with the FBI by "an attorney on behalf of his client".
As I stated in a recent column, this is all irrelevant, as Sussmann changed his story depending on who he was speaking to.
Yes, for the record, it is true that after he lied to Baker on Sept. 18 in a text message, and after he lied to Baker in person on Sept. 19 in their meeting at FBI HQ when he handed off the AB hoax, Sussmann told other people the truth, that he was there for his clients. Hillary for America and Rodney Joffe.
No one contests this.
Sussmann also told the truth under oath to Congress when he testified in December of 2017, that he was there for his clients.
As I stated in a recent column, this is all irrelevant, as Sussmann changed his story depending on who he was speaking to.
Yes, for the record, it is true that after he lied to Baker on Sept. 18 in a text message, and after he lied to Baker in person on Sept. 19 in their meeting at FBI HQ when he handed off the AB hoax, Sussmann told other people the truth, that he was there for his clients. Hillary for America and Rodney Joffe.
No one contests this.
Sussmann also told the truth under oath to Congress when he testified in December of 2017, that he was there for his clients.
π152π₯41π15π©2π1
Forwarded from Brian Cates (Brian Cates)
But on Sept. 18 and 19, Sussmann did not tell the truth to a federal official.
There's simply no getting around this.
He did not tell the truth to Baker, and his subsequently telling the truth to others does not negate the fact he made a deceptive statement to a federal official.
In the interim between Sept 19 2016 and March 6, 2017, the FBI briefly opened up an investigation based on the AB hoax before closing it.
Even if Baker knew the truth that Sussmann was lying to him about being there on his own and not representing any clients [something we haven't seen any evidence for at this point], his statement to Baker is still a LIE.
Durham's Special Counsel's Office actually made this point in a prior filing. Even if an FBI official knows that the subject of an interview is telling him something that is false, this doesn't mean that person can't be charged with a crime. Of course they can charged for it.
Remember Igor Danchenko?
He's in the same fix Sussmann is in. He lied to the FBI about a key Steele Dossier source being Chuck Dolan.
The agents interviewing him already knew by the final interviews in 2017 that Dolan was a source. They knew Danchenko was lying to them. They let him talk.
Because they knew Danchenko was lying to them about Dolan's involvement, does that mean Danchenko couldn't be charged for making those false statement to them?
Think carefully before you answer that question.
There's simply no getting around this.
He did not tell the truth to Baker, and his subsequently telling the truth to others does not negate the fact he made a deceptive statement to a federal official.
In the interim between Sept 19 2016 and March 6, 2017, the FBI briefly opened up an investigation based on the AB hoax before closing it.
Even if Baker knew the truth that Sussmann was lying to him about being there on his own and not representing any clients [something we haven't seen any evidence for at this point], his statement to Baker is still a LIE.
Durham's Special Counsel's Office actually made this point in a prior filing. Even if an FBI official knows that the subject of an interview is telling him something that is false, this doesn't mean that person can't be charged with a crime. Of course they can charged for it.
Remember Igor Danchenko?
He's in the same fix Sussmann is in. He lied to the FBI about a key Steele Dossier source being Chuck Dolan.
The agents interviewing him already knew by the final interviews in 2017 that Dolan was a source. They knew Danchenko was lying to them. They let him talk.
Because they knew Danchenko was lying to them about Dolan's involvement, does that mean Danchenko couldn't be charged for making those false statement to them?
Think carefully before you answer that question.
π137π₯37π€12π3π1π©1
Forwarded from β Dr C β (IET 17 β
β
β
)
Planned.
Butβ¦..Something also makes me think that perhaps these baby formulas were indeed filled with toxic carcinogens and hormone altering substances.
So we used their plan of food shortage to blame them for the shut down of many food processing plants who were poisoning us all. This has been happening since 2020 too when Tyson chicken plants were shut down Bc of Muh COVID
They get the blame. We get the results. The company stops poisoning us. Win win
Butβ¦..Something also makes me think that perhaps these baby formulas were indeed filled with toxic carcinogens and hormone altering substances.
So we used their plan of food shortage to blame them for the shut down of many food processing plants who were poisoning us all. This has been happening since 2020 too when Tyson chicken plants were shut down Bc of Muh COVID
They get the blame. We get the results. The company stops poisoning us. Win win
π255π₯88π€70π€¬45π©21π2π₯°1