Pence has now joined the three amigos, Ricketts, Doug Ducey and Chris Christie to campaign for Brian Kemp in Georgia. George Dubya is also pumping money into the race for Kemp.
John Fredrick’s is on a bus tour campaigning for Perdue. Bannon says they want to prove that Trump can’t win against a concentrated establishment, thus he’s not a viable candidate for 2024.
Georgia we have to vote for Perdue. The stakes could not be higher.

Wow.
Elon now looking to expose the egregious amount of bots on Twitter and expose the facade to sheep.
What percentage of users are bots? The number must be huge.

https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/4472

Elon Musk is out here trying to red pill the sheep and I'm all for it.

https://t.me/Patri0tsareinContr0l/2105

Prospective juror questionnaire has been added to the Sussmann case court docket.

If the # of bots [fake accounts] on Twitter turn out to be MORE than 5%, then the deal will be off, Musk will walk and Twitter stock would crash, I think. The social media app’s valuation would have to be reconfigured if > 5% of user accounts on it are fraudulent.

Given the bloodletting price action in stocks and the crypto markets following last month's announcement of Musk's deal to take Twitter private--and now, the "relief rally" in both sectors when news comes that the deal is on hold--makes me wonder...was it 'get Musk at all costs'?

Would "they" go to such extreme lengths to stop Musk from taking the premier mind-control and propaganda platform private?

My bet is that they would.

See my two substack posts on (anti-) social media for more.

https://cognitivecarbon.substack.com

Damn this guy just called out the US. Saying we gave you evidence so you must not know what evidence is. kek

Judge Cooper has just issued a ruling on the parties objections to each other's trial exhibits.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638/gov.uscourts.dcd.235638.135.0.pdf

Joe Rogan Says He Gained 700k Twitter Followers in 2 Weeks After Elon Musk's Deal Was Announced 🧐

https://rumble.com/v14lfl3-joe-rogan-says-he-gained-700k-twitter-followers-in-2-weeks-after-elon-musks.html

@ChiefNerd

Joe Rogan and Hotep Jesus Call out the FBI's Involvement in January 6th 🔥

"How about the f*cking known FBI agents who were inciting violence! They had people that were there - for a fact we know that!"

https://rumble.com/v14lgpn-joe-rogan-and-hotep-jesus-call-out-the-fbis-involvement-in-january-6th-.html

@ChiefNerd

Judge Cooper first states he's not making a final ruling on exhibits until trial.

In this order, he's addressing just one particular set of exhibits the Defense seeks to offer into trial: two different sets of handwritten notes taken by DOJ personnel on March 6, 2017.

Judge Cooper is also using this opinion and order to remind both parties of all the proper steps they must follow for the court to admit exhibits like these notes into the trial evidence.

But on Sept. 18 and 19, Sussmann did not tell the truth to a federal official.

There's simply no getting around this.

He did not tell the truth to Baker, and his subsequently telling the truth to others does not negate the fact he made a deceptive statement to a federal official.

In the interim between Sept 19 2016 and March 6, 2017, the FBI briefly opened up an investigation based on the AB hoax before closing it.

Even if Baker knew the truth that Sussmann was lying to him about being there on his own and not representing any clients [something we haven't seen any evidence for at this point], his statement to Baker is still a LIE.

Durham's Special Counsel's Office actually made this point in a prior filing. Even if an FBI official knows that the subject of an interview is telling him something that is false, this doesn't mean that person can't be charged with a crime. Of course they can charged for it.

Remember Igor Danchenko?

He's in the same fix Sussmann is in. He lied to the FBI about a key Steele Dossier source being Chuck Dolan.

The agents interviewing him already knew by the final interviews in 2017 that Dolan was a source. They knew Danchenko was lying to them. They let him talk.

Because they knew Danchenko was lying to them about Dolan's involvement, does that mean Danchenko couldn't be charged for making those false statement to them?

Think carefully before you answer that question.

Planned.

But…..Something also makes me think that perhaps these baby formulas were indeed filled with toxic carcinogens and hormone altering substances.

So we used their plan of food shortage to blame them for the shut down of many food processing plants who were poisoning us all. This has been happening since 2020 too when Tyson chicken plants were shut down Bc of Muh COVID

They get the blame. We get the results. The company stops poisoning us. Win win

Here the judge shows that he certainly grasps the defense Sussmann is attempting to mount with these notes:

"Sure I told Baker I was there on my own, not representing any clients. But I can't charged for this lie because BAKER KNEW I WAS LYING TO HIM. The whole FBI knew I was there to hand this off on behalf of HFA and Joffe. So Durham can't convict me of making a false statement."

This is why the judge makes the statement about how Sussmann wants the notes admitted as trial exhibits because they show details about 'the origins of the Alfa Bank allegations'.

Sussmann wants to argue that irrespective of whatever bullshit he said to Baker, the entire FBI knew he was working for HFA & the DNC, so his lie doesn't count against him.

I won't bore you with the next page of legalese. The judge basically tells the defense what the 2 big hearsay hurdles are they have to clear in order to get the notes admitted as trial exhibits so Sussmann can argue McCabe said he was there for clients and Baker didn't object to that statement or correct him.

Judge Cooper says the defense has to lay the proper foundation for demonstrating the notes are not hearsay and if they can do that, the defense is free to mention the notes in their opening statement.