Less Annoying CRM 4.8 - прикольно. Надо потестить, за что они столько звездочек набрали.
Это впечатляюще, сколько они уже агентов понаделали для анализа звонков.
Понравилось, что MEDDIC есть - это одна из сильных sales методологий. Видимо разговор скорится исходя из метрик этого подхода.
Понравилось, что MEDDIC есть - это одна из сильных sales методологий. Видимо разговор скорится исходя из метрик этого подхода.
Крутейшая статья про то, как Harvey AI построил свой GTM
https://www.startupriders.com/p/harvey-ai-growth-playbook
https://www.startupriders.com/p/harvey-ai-growth-playbook
Startupriders
🌊 How Harvey Hit $200M+ ARR by Selling Trust Before Software
The expand-collapse playbook for vertical AI, from a cold email to $11B.
Lead_Generation_for_Mental_Health_App_Mindstrong_Health_Case_Study.docx
12.2 KB
Три хороших case study для email-рассылки на качественную базу ~500 контактов
#email_outreach
#email_outreach
Writing cold emails.pdf
28.5 MB
Полезно почитать для проверки своих холодных имейлов #email_outreach
Help me define the expert role that will produce the strongest possible judgment for this task:
[INSERT TASK / CONTEXT]
Create a concise role description that explains why this role is the right judgment lens for the task.
Use this structure:
1. Exact domain: what field/context this expert understands deeply.
2. Decision type: what kinds of decisions this role should help with.
3. Judgment criteria: what good judgment means in this context.
4. Filters: what weak advice, false signals, or generic thinking this role should reject.
5. Trade-offs to notice: the main tensions this expert should weigh.
Keep it compact: 120–180 words max. Prioritize depth and precision of judgment over breadth, credentials, or generic expertise. The output should start with “Act as…” and be ready to paste into another LLM prompt.
[INSERT TASK / CONTEXT]
Create a concise role description that explains why this role is the right judgment lens for the task.
Use this structure:
1. Exact domain: what field/context this expert understands deeply.
2. Decision type: what kinds of decisions this role should help with.
3. Judgment criteria: what good judgment means in this context.
4. Filters: what weak advice, false signals, or generic thinking this role should reject.
5. Trade-offs to notice: the main tensions this expert should weigh.
Keep it compact: 120–180 words max. Prioritize depth and precision of judgment over breadth, credentials, or generic expertise. The output should start with “Act as…” and be ready to paste into another LLM prompt.