Wonderful support for Baby Will, and his loving, courageous and strong Mother, Father, Family and Friends at the hospital in Auckland, keeping them in our hearts and prayers across New Zealand and all the World π
β€100
Text from the Father of Baby Will in New Zealand π
This happened at around 23.00pm New Zealand time Thursday 8th December 2022.
Baby Will has been kidnapped at almost midnight by four police with zero permission from the parents and while he was deeply asleep.
He is being woken to have tests. He never wakes at night.
He is going to have a huge piece of surgery at 8 am after a broken night and so much stress and his mother , from whom he has never been separated , was not initially allowed to be with him.
She is being coerced into signing documents of full coercion - she is not even allowed anyone else including her husband in her room tonight while she agonises through the long hours until 8 am - and she is frightened that she will be kept from her baby in the operation if she publishes anything about the brutality. They are trying to completely break her spirit.
She is simply desperate to be with her baby and to be in the operation.
And still they are trying to silence her.
This happened at around 23.00pm New Zealand time Thursday 8th December 2022.
Baby Will has been kidnapped at almost midnight by four police with zero permission from the parents and while he was deeply asleep.
He is being woken to have tests. He never wakes at night.
He is going to have a huge piece of surgery at 8 am after a broken night and so much stress and his mother , from whom he has never been separated , was not initially allowed to be with him.
She is being coerced into signing documents of full coercion - she is not even allowed anyone else including her husband in her room tonight while she agonises through the long hours until 8 am - and she is frightened that she will be kept from her baby in the operation if she publishes anything about the brutality. They are trying to completely break her spirit.
She is simply desperate to be with her baby and to be in the operation.
And still they are trying to silence her.
π’111π58π₯6π5β€2π€―1
Honoured to be working with the team supporting Baby Will and his courageous Mother and Father, and Sue Grey in New Zealand π
π62β€44π₯6π3
SUE GREY KICKED OUT OF HOSPITAL
Lawyer Sue Grey went to see Baby Will's mother before his 8am surgery and was kicked out of the hospital by police and threatened with a trespass notice if she did not comply.
The policewoman told Sue that she didnβt believe she was a lawyer.
Sam is very tired but ok. Will is absolutely gorgeous as always, and was smiling and waving his arms and legs, almost singing, as he got ready for his heart surgery.
π Counterspin
NZs Media Revolution
Facts & Evidence based
Not a pay to say platform
www.counterspinmedia.com
Lawyer Sue Grey went to see Baby Will's mother before his 8am surgery and was kicked out of the hospital by police and threatened with a trespass notice if she did not comply.
The policewoman told Sue that she didnβt believe she was a lawyer.
Sam is very tired but ok. Will is absolutely gorgeous as always, and was smiling and waving his arms and legs, almost singing, as he got ready for his heart surgery.
π Counterspin
NZs Media Revolution
Facts & Evidence based
Not a pay to say platform
www.counterspinmedia.com
β€56π16π€―9π3π₯2π₯°1π1
https://rumble.com/v1zq1m2-statement-by-cole-and-sam-9th-dec-2022.html
Baby Will is recovering and well. Huge thanks to everyone π
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
Baby Will is recovering and well. Huge thanks to everyone π
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
Rumble
Statement by Cole & Sam - 9th Dec 2022
Statement by Cole & Sam. Baby Will is stable. The operation took over half a day. Starship offered a family room initially for them both to be near Baby Will. That offer was subsequently withdrawn. Th
β€71π12
Prof. Dolores Cahill:
'Law versus Legal': Importance of 'Trail by Jury' in Law Series (Post 1) π
Act in Honour, Do No Harm:
Every man and woman has a duty in Law to prevent Harm, Injury and Death.
Every man and woman, boy and girl has an inalienable, inherent Right to Life, Travel, Speak, Privacy and Private Property. π
'Law versus Legal'
'Trial by Jury'
'No one is above the Law'
'Fraud unravels All'
'No time limit on Fraud'
Men, Women, their families and their Local Communities can restore Law in a simple and lawful way. Trial by Jury is one of the fundamental ways in Law.
In the 'Law versus Legal' posts here, 'Trial by Jury' is fundamental, a key and foundation knowledge, and to be implemented, it involves men and women working together to understand The Law and the Lawful 'Trial by Jury' process. In Law, Trial by Jury, can establish precedence. Men and Women can participate in a lawful Jury.
In Law, every man and woman is innocent until proven guilty.
Trial by Jury is how the Innocence and guilt of men and women accused of a crime in Law are determined.
The Law applies to women and men, girls and boys who are living.
If you are interested in learning and education, you are welcome to email 'Education and Training' as a subject to connect@custodean.com
If anyone is interested in a 'Train the Trainers' initiative, for everyone, including working or retired Police, Lawyers, Justices, Judges, all Knowledgeable in the Law, History, Philosophy, Private Investigators, Fraud Investigators, Knowledge of the Trust's and Financial Instruments behing the 'Charging' of 'Constructive Trust', are all most welcome.
Volunteers to prepare Specialist Modules and Presentations are most welcome.
Thank you πππ
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
'Law versus Legal': Importance of 'Trail by Jury' in Law Series (Post 1) π
Act in Honour, Do No Harm:
Every man and woman has a duty in Law to prevent Harm, Injury and Death.
Every man and woman, boy and girl has an inalienable, inherent Right to Life, Travel, Speak, Privacy and Private Property. π
'Law versus Legal'
'Trial by Jury'
'No one is above the Law'
'Fraud unravels All'
'No time limit on Fraud'
Men, Women, their families and their Local Communities can restore Law in a simple and lawful way. Trial by Jury is one of the fundamental ways in Law.
In the 'Law versus Legal' posts here, 'Trial by Jury' is fundamental, a key and foundation knowledge, and to be implemented, it involves men and women working together to understand The Law and the Lawful 'Trial by Jury' process. In Law, Trial by Jury, can establish precedence. Men and Women can participate in a lawful Jury.
In Law, every man and woman is innocent until proven guilty.
Trial by Jury is how the Innocence and guilt of men and women accused of a crime in Law are determined.
The Law applies to women and men, girls and boys who are living.
If you are interested in learning and education, you are welcome to email 'Education and Training' as a subject to connect@custodean.com
If anyone is interested in a 'Train the Trainers' initiative, for everyone, including working or retired Police, Lawyers, Justices, Judges, all Knowledgeable in the Law, History, Philosophy, Private Investigators, Fraud Investigators, Knowledge of the Trust's and Financial Instruments behing the 'Charging' of 'Constructive Trust', are all most welcome.
Volunteers to prepare Specialist Modules and Presentations are most welcome.
Thank you πππ
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
Telegram
Dolores Cahill
The REAL Prof. Dolores Cahill,
Scientist, Immunologist, Inventor and Innovator.
custodean.com
ProfDoloresCahill.com
Scientist, Immunologist, Inventor and Innovator.
custodean.com
ProfDoloresCahill.com
π40β€1π₯1π€1
Prof. Dolores Cahill: 'Law versus Legal': Importance of 'Trial by Jury' in Law (Post 2)
'Law versus Legal'
'Trial by Jury'
'No one is above the Law'
'Fraud unravels All'
'No time limit on Fraud'
Every one of us has a duty in Law to prevent Harm, Injury and Death.
If we do not, in Law, we are as guilty as the man or woman that do Harm.
Conscience and the discernment of Right and Wrong is fundamental to the 'Trial by Jury' in Law.
The Law applies to all Men, Women, Boys and Girls, the Law applies to those who are alive. In Law, men and women, who are alive, are Innocent or Guilty. This is determined in a 'Trial by Jury' formed by 12 men and women.
The Legal System applies to non-living entities. It has a different language, legalese. Words can be defined with different meanings. In Legalese, non-living entities, like Person, Citizen can only be Guilty or Not Guilty.
In a medical treatment of a man or woman, boy or girl, the Law applies to all men and women involved. The lawful language in each Country is determined in Law for example, it is Gaelic and English in Γire/Ireland. Language is critical, the definition of words, including in Manuals and Glossarys are important.
It is straight forward to assess what language is used in lawful documents. Using the incorrect language is issuing a Counterfeit and is unlawful.
Applying the 'Legal' System and 'legalese' when say 'English' and the 'Law' can and should be applied is a criminal offence. If done by people dressed up as 'Judges', 'Police' in the course of their duty, it is one of the highest criminal offences, such as malfeasance, with up to 20 years in prison in English.
No one is above the Law.
A 'Trial by Jury' in Law, using say English and constituted by men and women obligated to uphold the Law, is how malfeasance and misconduct in Public Office can be decided upon.
Every one is Innocent until Proven Guilty in a 'Trial by Jury'.
The Law applies in all Countries and to all men and women.
Knowledge of the Law underpins all aspects of our communities and Nations, including Accountability, Protection of Right to Life and Freedom.
One man or woman determined to be engaged in unlawful actions and or omissions can set Precedent in Law.
connect@custodean πππ
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
'Law versus Legal'
'Trial by Jury'
'No one is above the Law'
'Fraud unravels All'
'No time limit on Fraud'
Every one of us has a duty in Law to prevent Harm, Injury and Death.
If we do not, in Law, we are as guilty as the man or woman that do Harm.
Conscience and the discernment of Right and Wrong is fundamental to the 'Trial by Jury' in Law.
The Law applies to all Men, Women, Boys and Girls, the Law applies to those who are alive. In Law, men and women, who are alive, are Innocent or Guilty. This is determined in a 'Trial by Jury' formed by 12 men and women.
The Legal System applies to non-living entities. It has a different language, legalese. Words can be defined with different meanings. In Legalese, non-living entities, like Person, Citizen can only be Guilty or Not Guilty.
In a medical treatment of a man or woman, boy or girl, the Law applies to all men and women involved. The lawful language in each Country is determined in Law for example, it is Gaelic and English in Γire/Ireland. Language is critical, the definition of words, including in Manuals and Glossarys are important.
It is straight forward to assess what language is used in lawful documents. Using the incorrect language is issuing a Counterfeit and is unlawful.
Applying the 'Legal' System and 'legalese' when say 'English' and the 'Law' can and should be applied is a criminal offence. If done by people dressed up as 'Judges', 'Police' in the course of their duty, it is one of the highest criminal offences, such as malfeasance, with up to 20 years in prison in English.
No one is above the Law.
A 'Trial by Jury' in Law, using say English and constituted by men and women obligated to uphold the Law, is how malfeasance and misconduct in Public Office can be decided upon.
Every one is Innocent until Proven Guilty in a 'Trial by Jury'.
The Law applies in all Countries and to all men and women.
Knowledge of the Law underpins all aspects of our communities and Nations, including Accountability, Protection of Right to Life and Freedom.
One man or woman determined to be engaged in unlawful actions and or omissions can set Precedent in Law.
connect@custodean πππ
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
Telegram
Dolores Cahill
The REAL Prof. Dolores Cahill,
Scientist, Immunologist, Inventor and Innovator.
custodean.com
ProfDoloresCahill.com
Scientist, Immunologist, Inventor and Innovator.
custodean.com
ProfDoloresCahill.com
π29
Prof. Dolores Cahill:
'Law versus Legal': Importance of 'Trial by Jury' (Post 3):
Response to a comment:
Being dressed up as a 'Judge' or 'Police', does NOT make anyone a Judge or Police. The test is, are they operating lawfully and by Law. This is the theme of 'Law versus Legal' and why I use 'dressed up' as a 'Judge', 'Police', 'Coroner' etc. This can be assessed in a Trial by Jury. Every man and woman is Innocent until proven Guilty by Law.
It is up to the Jury to assess every situation.
No one is above the Law.
For example, the employment status of the man or woman dressed up as a 'Judge' can be assessed. Are the a Judge under Law. Being an Agent of a Business Entity, or of a Business Corporation that is not declared, which involves any financial gain or conflict of interest, is not only unlawful, if identified in a Lawful 'Trial by Jury', would be a Criminal Offence, for example, Malfeasance, Criminal Misrepresentation, Deception, Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation for Financial Gain, all can have among the most severe penalties, as such concealed Conflicts of Interest would deny Justice to men and women, the highest crime developed by Societies over many thousands of years, such as DlΓ na FΓ©ine and later Brehon Law.
Importantly, also the history of the 'court' can be assessed, and if the Court is lawful and operating lawfully in the Nation.
For example, is the 1924 'Courts' 'Act' lawful?
The requirement to assess this is on those 'dressed up' as 'Judges', 'Police' etc, they should assess their own role. This can also be lawfully assessed by anyone with Standing in Law, and by Trial by Jury, to forensically assess the lawfulness of the 'Courts', those who present themselves 'dressed up' and paid as 'Judges' 'Police', etc, what is the language used, the language used in the documents, etc.
No one is above the Law.
All Medical treatment is in the Natural Law Inalienable Right to Life, Bodily Integrity, and Right to Informed Consent without any Coersion.
If Coersion or threats is used, there is NO consent. Then all medical intervention would be unlawful, such as Assault and Harm, which can be assessed by a 'Trial by Jury'.
If legalese, as a different language is or was used, this can be assessed.
A Trial by Jury' can assess the language used.
If there is a financial transaction or any 'Charge' of any 'Trust' without the full, complete and correct information given, this also can be assessed by a 'Trial by Jury'
Every man or woman is Innocent until proven Guilty.
The Law, Natural Law and 'Trial by Jury' is lawful to protect the lawful rights and freedom of men and women in all countries now.
connect@custodean.com π
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
'Law versus Legal': Importance of 'Trial by Jury' (Post 3):
Response to a comment:
Being dressed up as a 'Judge' or 'Police', does NOT make anyone a Judge or Police. The test is, are they operating lawfully and by Law. This is the theme of 'Law versus Legal' and why I use 'dressed up' as a 'Judge', 'Police', 'Coroner' etc. This can be assessed in a Trial by Jury. Every man and woman is Innocent until proven Guilty by Law.
It is up to the Jury to assess every situation.
No one is above the Law.
For example, the employment status of the man or woman dressed up as a 'Judge' can be assessed. Are the a Judge under Law. Being an Agent of a Business Entity, or of a Business Corporation that is not declared, which involves any financial gain or conflict of interest, is not only unlawful, if identified in a Lawful 'Trial by Jury', would be a Criminal Offence, for example, Malfeasance, Criminal Misrepresentation, Deception, Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation for Financial Gain, all can have among the most severe penalties, as such concealed Conflicts of Interest would deny Justice to men and women, the highest crime developed by Societies over many thousands of years, such as DlΓ na FΓ©ine and later Brehon Law.
Importantly, also the history of the 'court' can be assessed, and if the Court is lawful and operating lawfully in the Nation.
For example, is the 1924 'Courts' 'Act' lawful?
The requirement to assess this is on those 'dressed up' as 'Judges', 'Police' etc, they should assess their own role. This can also be lawfully assessed by anyone with Standing in Law, and by Trial by Jury, to forensically assess the lawfulness of the 'Courts', those who present themselves 'dressed up' and paid as 'Judges' 'Police', etc, what is the language used, the language used in the documents, etc.
No one is above the Law.
All Medical treatment is in the Natural Law Inalienable Right to Life, Bodily Integrity, and Right to Informed Consent without any Coersion.
If Coersion or threats is used, there is NO consent. Then all medical intervention would be unlawful, such as Assault and Harm, which can be assessed by a 'Trial by Jury'.
If legalese, as a different language is or was used, this can be assessed.
A Trial by Jury' can assess the language used.
If there is a financial transaction or any 'Charge' of any 'Trust' without the full, complete and correct information given, this also can be assessed by a 'Trial by Jury'
Every man or woman is Innocent until proven Guilty.
The Law, Natural Law and 'Trial by Jury' is lawful to protect the lawful rights and freedom of men and women in all countries now.
connect@custodean.com π
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
Telegram
Dolores Cahill
The REAL Prof. Dolores Cahill,
Scientist, Immunologist, Inventor and Innovator.
custodean.com
ProfDoloresCahill.com
Scientist, Immunologist, Inventor and Innovator.
custodean.com
ProfDoloresCahill.com
π39β€18
https://youtu.be/78-5Op71SVY
A Song for Baby Will πππ
connect@custodean.com π
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
A Song for Baby Will πππ
connect@custodean.com π
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
YouTube
Awaken
β€47π₯°8π4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Lara Logan: Journalist, USA Press Club: 'The same people who are in favor of open borders, these are the people like the Podesta's of this world who are going with Marina Abramovich and doing spirit cooking dinners. It's not ok...Marina Abramovich can be on the cover of Ukraine's vogue magazine.. dressed up in obviously satanic costumes. It's very simple to me. I'm not ok with it. And I think that there is something wrong with people who are. If we are a society that's reached a point where we're all ok with it then there is something wrong with our society. But I'm not going down with this ship.'
From Lara Logan Interview on Slightly Offens*ve
https://youtu.be/ZOVhdUFxO3k
connect@custodean.comπ
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
From Lara Logan Interview on Slightly Offens*ve
https://youtu.be/ZOVhdUFxO3k
connect@custodean.comπ
https://t.me/DoloresCahill
π63β€24π7π€―1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π₯43π17π’16π10
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π60β€25π₯16π3