This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tesla’s Terafab project launches in less than a week.
Translation: no more begging suppliers for chip capacity.
2nm silicon. 1M wafer starts per month by 2030.
Autonomous cars. Optimus robots. AI supercomputers.
If your whole future runs on chips, don’t outsource your brain.
Translation: no more begging suppliers for chip capacity.
2nm silicon. 1M wafer starts per month by 2030.
Autonomous cars. Optimus robots. AI supercomputers.
If your whole future runs on chips, don’t outsource your brain.
👍13❤6👎4
Tesla's Terafab is a new $20–25 billion AI chip fabrication project (essentially a "Gigafactory for semiconductors") that officially launches on March 21, 2026. It will produce custom AI5 chips (40–50× more compute and 9× more memory than current AI4) and memory at massive scale:
starting at ~100,000 wafer starts per month and scaling toward 1 million/month. At full capacity, this enables 100–200 billion chips per year—far beyond what external suppliers like TSMC or Samsung can reliably deliver for Tesla's needs.
The chips are for internal use only (not sold externally), powering:
Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Cybercab robotaxis (autonomous ride-hailing fleets).
Millions (potentially billions long-term) of Optimus humanoid robots.
Dojo supercomputers and future AI applications.
This vertical integration solves a critical bottleneck: Musk has stated that even best-case supplier scenarios aren't enough for the volume required. Without Terafab, scaling robotaxis and Optimus to transformative levels would be impossible.
"How many billions and trillions will Tesla do out of Terafab" refers to the annual revenue enabled by these chips (i.e., high-margin income from robotaxi operations + Optimus sales/rentals/leasing). Tesla provides no official projections tied specifically to Terafab—it's too new and speculative. Legacy auto/energy businesses (~$100B+ current run-rate) are separate.
My optimistic but grounded projections (annual additional revenue from Terafab-enabled AI businesses) assume:
Successful fab ramp (volume production ~2027).
Regulatory approval for unsupervised autonomy.
Rapid Cybercab fleet growth (low-cost vehicles + high utilization at ~$0.20–1/mile).
Optimus scaling to meaningful production (Musk sees it as potentially 80% of Tesla's future value).
Projected annual revenue enabled by Terafab (in USD):
Year 1 (2027): ~$5 billion (early pilots, limited Cybercab/Optimus deployments).
Year 2 (2028): ~$30 billion (US city rollouts begin).
Year 3 (2029): ~$100 billion (multi-city fleets + initial Optimus sales).
Year 4 (2030): ~$300 billion (accelerating adoption).
Year 5 (2031): ~$750 billion (0.75 trillion; global expansion).
Year 10 (2036): ~$3 trillion (mature robotaxi networks + mass Optimus deployment; aligns with bull-case analyst views like ~$250B robotaxi by mid-2030s plus much larger Optimus impact).
These are illustrative/optimistic and draw from public analyst models (e.g., Wolfe Research ~$250B robotaxi by 2035) and Musk's vision (Optimus/robotaxi as multi-trillion opportunities). Real outcomes could be far lower (delays common in Musk timelines) or higher. Risks include fab execution challenges (Tesla's first semiconductor plant), regulation, competition, and economic factors. Conservative scenarios might be 20–50% of these figures; super-bull cases higher.
Here's a clear bar-chart graphic summarizing the ramp (created via precise data visualization for accuracy):
This shows the exponential growth potential once the chip supply unlocks full AI/robotics scale. Terafab could be one of the highest-ROI projects in Tesla's history—if it delivers. All numbers are forward-looking estimates only; actual results will depend on execution.
starting at ~100,000 wafer starts per month and scaling toward 1 million/month. At full capacity, this enables 100–200 billion chips per year—far beyond what external suppliers like TSMC or Samsung can reliably deliver for Tesla's needs.
The chips are for internal use only (not sold externally), powering:
Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Cybercab robotaxis (autonomous ride-hailing fleets).
Millions (potentially billions long-term) of Optimus humanoid robots.
Dojo supercomputers and future AI applications.
This vertical integration solves a critical bottleneck: Musk has stated that even best-case supplier scenarios aren't enough for the volume required. Without Terafab, scaling robotaxis and Optimus to transformative levels would be impossible.
"How many billions and trillions will Tesla do out of Terafab" refers to the annual revenue enabled by these chips (i.e., high-margin income from robotaxi operations + Optimus sales/rentals/leasing). Tesla provides no official projections tied specifically to Terafab—it's too new and speculative. Legacy auto/energy businesses (~$100B+ current run-rate) are separate.
My optimistic but grounded projections (annual additional revenue from Terafab-enabled AI businesses) assume:
Successful fab ramp (volume production ~2027).
Regulatory approval for unsupervised autonomy.
Rapid Cybercab fleet growth (low-cost vehicles + high utilization at ~$0.20–1/mile).
Optimus scaling to meaningful production (Musk sees it as potentially 80% of Tesla's future value).
Projected annual revenue enabled by Terafab (in USD):
Year 1 (2027): ~$5 billion (early pilots, limited Cybercab/Optimus deployments).
Year 2 (2028): ~$30 billion (US city rollouts begin).
Year 3 (2029): ~$100 billion (multi-city fleets + initial Optimus sales).
Year 4 (2030): ~$300 billion (accelerating adoption).
Year 5 (2031): ~$750 billion (0.75 trillion; global expansion).
Year 10 (2036): ~$3 trillion (mature robotaxi networks + mass Optimus deployment; aligns with bull-case analyst views like ~$250B robotaxi by mid-2030s plus much larger Optimus impact).
These are illustrative/optimistic and draw from public analyst models (e.g., Wolfe Research ~$250B robotaxi by 2035) and Musk's vision (Optimus/robotaxi as multi-trillion opportunities). Real outcomes could be far lower (delays common in Musk timelines) or higher. Risks include fab execution challenges (Tesla's first semiconductor plant), regulation, competition, and economic factors. Conservative scenarios might be 20–50% of these figures; super-bull cases higher.
Here's a clear bar-chart graphic summarizing the ramp (created via precise data visualization for accuracy):
This shows the exponential growth potential once the chip supply unlocks full AI/robotics scale. Terafab could be one of the highest-ROI projects in Tesla's history—if it delivers. All numbers are forward-looking estimates only; actual results will depend on execution.
❤13👍7👎3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be “combination vaccines.”
“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.
“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”
But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.
In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.
“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.”
“There are more children in the United States today with profound autism — completely disabled — than there ever were with polio,” he lamented.
“We’ve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.”
But it’s not just the profound autism that’s showing up.
In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.
“It doesn’t prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.”
🔥21💯15🤬5❤4🤯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Order 34-105047, formally approving Nasdaq's proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2025-072, as amended) to let tokenized versions of stocks and exchange-traded products (ETPs) trade right alongside traditional ones on the same order book.
What This Actually Means
Tokenized securities = digital representations of ownership recorded and transferred on a permissioned blockchain (via the Depository Trust Company's pilot program, which got a no-action letter from the SEC in December 2025).
They trade under the same ticker, CUSIP, and rights (dividends, voting, etc.) as the regular shares — they're fully fungible and interchangeable.
Only certain "DTC Eligible Securities" qualify at first (think Russell 1000 stocks and major ETFs like those tracking the S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100).
Settlement stays T+1 for now (via DTC), but the blockchain infrastructure opens the door to faster/near-instant settlement, easier fractional shares, 24/7 trading potential, and better audit trails — all while staying fully under existing U.S. securities laws and Nasdaq's surveillance.
Nasdaq will issue an alert at least 30 days before tokenized trading actually starts (expected sometime after DTC's infrastructure is ready, possibly late 2026).
Why This Matters
This is the first major U.S. exchange to get the green light for real tokenized equity trading integrated into the national market system. It's not some offshore or synthetic thing — it's regulated TradFi meeting blockchain in a compliant way. Expect this to accelerate real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, bring more institutional money on-chain, and set the stage for similar moves (NYSE/ICE have been exploring too).
The approval comes after public comments, amendments, and proceedings — and fits the current SEC's more innovation-friendly stance on digital assets.
Huge milestone for efficient, accessible markets. If you're into crypto infrastructure or RWAs, this is the kind of regulatory clarity that actually moves the needle. 🚀
(Details straight from the official SEC order and Nasdaq's filings.)
What This Actually Means
Tokenized securities = digital representations of ownership recorded and transferred on a permissioned blockchain (via the Depository Trust Company's pilot program, which got a no-action letter from the SEC in December 2025).
They trade under the same ticker, CUSIP, and rights (dividends, voting, etc.) as the regular shares — they're fully fungible and interchangeable.
Only certain "DTC Eligible Securities" qualify at first (think Russell 1000 stocks and major ETFs like those tracking the S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100).
Settlement stays T+1 for now (via DTC), but the blockchain infrastructure opens the door to faster/near-instant settlement, easier fractional shares, 24/7 trading potential, and better audit trails — all while staying fully under existing U.S. securities laws and Nasdaq's surveillance.
Nasdaq will issue an alert at least 30 days before tokenized trading actually starts (expected sometime after DTC's infrastructure is ready, possibly late 2026).
Why This Matters
This is the first major U.S. exchange to get the green light for real tokenized equity trading integrated into the national market system. It's not some offshore or synthetic thing — it's regulated TradFi meeting blockchain in a compliant way. Expect this to accelerate real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, bring more institutional money on-chain, and set the stage for similar moves (NYSE/ICE have been exploring too).
The approval comes after public comments, amendments, and proceedings — and fits the current SEC's more innovation-friendly stance on digital assets.
Huge milestone for efficient, accessible markets. If you're into crypto infrastructure or RWAs, this is the kind of regulatory clarity that actually moves the needle. 🚀
(Details straight from the official SEC order and Nasdaq's filings.)
❤14
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The ultimate vision: Tesla’s powerful AI chip sits at the heart of a unified ecosystem. SpaceX connects the planet (and Mars), Neuralink links minds, The Boring Company builds tunnels, xAI adds intelligence, X delivers real-time data — all powered seamlessly by one Tesla brain for a multiplanetary future.
🤔10🔥8❤2👎1🤬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨BREAKING: JOE ROGAN GETS INTO A HEATED CURSING FIGHT WITH HIS GUEST OVER VACCINES
😁9❤3
The Resurrection of the Christ: Part One
Release date: March 26, 2027
The Resurrection of the Christ: Part One is an upcoming American epic biblical drama film directed by Mel Gibson from a script he co-wrote with Randall Wallace, and based on the story he wrote with his brother Donal Gibson and Wallace. Gibson also serves as producer alongside Bruce Davey.
https://youtube.com/shorts/-cwD-lYN2Bo
Release date: March 26, 2027
The Resurrection of the Christ: Part One is an upcoming American epic biblical drama film directed by Mel Gibson from a script he co-wrote with Randall Wallace, and based on the story he wrote with his brother Donal Gibson and Wallace. Gibson also serves as producer alongside Bruce Davey.
https://youtube.com/shorts/-cwD-lYN2Bo
❤43👍4👏3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 Tulsi Gabbard on the threats of Islam and the Muslim brotherhood:
“The United States continues to face an evolving thread landscape with the geographically diverse set of Islamic terrorist actors seeking to propagate their ideology globally and harm Americans.
Even as Al-Qaeda and Isis remain weaker today, the spread of Islamist ideology in some cases led by individuals and organizations associated with the Muslim brotherhood.. poses a fundamental threat to freedom and the foundational principles that underpin western civilization.
Islamist groups and individuals use this ideology for recruiting and financial support for terrorist groups and individuals around the world and to advanced their political objective of establishing an Islamist caliphate governed by Sharia Law.”
https://rumble.com/v77auu2-tulsi-gabbard-on-the-threats-of-islam-and-the-muslim-brotherhood.html
“The United States continues to face an evolving thread landscape with the geographically diverse set of Islamic terrorist actors seeking to propagate their ideology globally and harm Americans.
Even as Al-Qaeda and Isis remain weaker today, the spread of Islamist ideology in some cases led by individuals and organizations associated with the Muslim brotherhood.. poses a fundamental threat to freedom and the foundational principles that underpin western civilization.
Islamist groups and individuals use this ideology for recruiting and financial support for terrorist groups and individuals around the world and to advanced their political objective of establishing an Islamist caliphate governed by Sharia Law.”
https://rumble.com/v77auu2-tulsi-gabbard-on-the-threats-of-islam-and-the-muslim-brotherhood.html
🔥26👏7❤3🤣1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Brave 12 year old boy in Texas calls out the fact Qurans and Sharia Law pamphlets are being handed out by teachers in his school.
They're grooming young minds.
They're grooming young minds.
🤬91👏19😢6👎1
The excerpt blends direct quotes from the U.S. Department of Defense Law of War Manual (pp. 795 and 38) with passages from William E. Birkhimer’s 1914 book Military Government and Martial Law to argue that military government is a distinct constitutional form of authority that can supersede ordinary law — and, per the author’s reading, even the Constitution and Bill of Rights — during war, occupation, rebellion, or insurrection.
Key elements highlighted:
Definition (Manual p. 795): Military government = the dominion a belligerent exercises over invaded and occupied enemy territory and its inhabitants.
Three kinds of military jurisdiction under the Constitution:
Military Law — governs U.S. forces in peace and war (Congressional rules/articles of war).
Military Government — exercised by the military commander (under Presidential direction and Congressional sanction) in foreign war outside U.S. borders or in rebel-occupied districts; supersedes local law as needed.
Martial Law Proper — invoked by Congress or, in emergencies, the President during invasion/insurrection inside the U.S. when civilian authority fails.
Law of War (Manual p. 38): Not a formal written code but international principles (plus military orders) that apply on the “theatre of operations,” suspend civilian courts and ordinary law, and can temporarily override even the Constitution itself.
Presidential power (Birkhimer): The President may immediately exercise belligerent rights to repel force (foreign or domestic) without waiting for a Congressional declaration of war; the crisis itself determines the response.
Constitutional basis: Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 (Congress regulates land/naval forces), yet the text asserts military necessity can prevail.
The author declares “Checkmate” — this framework has existed since the Constitution’s ratification in 1787. Sections “|45 ——— 47|” (widely interpreted in the source community as referencing Trump as the 45th and future 47th President) are said to outline active military government. Every American, especially military personnel, America First supporters, and PDJT backers, should recognize and appreciate what the military has been doing since January 20, 2017. “History will account for it.” 🫡♠️🇺🇸
In short, the text presents a legal-historical case that the United States is (or can be) operating under military government as the supreme authority, fully consistent with the Constitution’s war powers.
Key elements highlighted:
Definition (Manual p. 795): Military government = the dominion a belligerent exercises over invaded and occupied enemy territory and its inhabitants.
Three kinds of military jurisdiction under the Constitution:
Military Law — governs U.S. forces in peace and war (Congressional rules/articles of war).
Military Government — exercised by the military commander (under Presidential direction and Congressional sanction) in foreign war outside U.S. borders or in rebel-occupied districts; supersedes local law as needed.
Martial Law Proper — invoked by Congress or, in emergencies, the President during invasion/insurrection inside the U.S. when civilian authority fails.
Law of War (Manual p. 38): Not a formal written code but international principles (plus military orders) that apply on the “theatre of operations,” suspend civilian courts and ordinary law, and can temporarily override even the Constitution itself.
Presidential power (Birkhimer): The President may immediately exercise belligerent rights to repel force (foreign or domestic) without waiting for a Congressional declaration of war; the crisis itself determines the response.
Constitutional basis: Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 (Congress regulates land/naval forces), yet the text asserts military necessity can prevail.
The author declares “Checkmate” — this framework has existed since the Constitution’s ratification in 1787. Sections “|45 ——— 47|” (widely interpreted in the source community as referencing Trump as the 45th and future 47th President) are said to outline active military government. Every American, especially military personnel, America First supporters, and PDJT backers, should recognize and appreciate what the military has been doing since January 20, 2017. “History will account for it.” 🫡♠️🇺🇸
In short, the text presents a legal-historical case that the United States is (or can be) operating under military government as the supreme authority, fully consistent with the Constitution’s war powers.
❤16👍10🥰4
Yesterday (March 18), Israel hit a relatively small part of Iran’s side of the South Pars Gas Field (the world’s biggest natural gas field, right off the coast in the Persian Gulf, shared with Qatar). Israel did it “out of anger” over other Middle East stuff.516169
Iran thought Qatar helped or knew about it (they didn’t), so Iran fired back and hit Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG facilities (Qatar’s huge LNG export hub). That caused “extensive damage,” sent oil and gas prices skyrocketing, and freaked out global energy markets.bbd52d
Trump just posted this exact statement on Truth Social (and it’s all over the news). The U.S. says it had zero prior knowledge of Israel’s strike, Qatar was completely innocent, and Israel has been told “no more hits on South Pars”… unless Iran touches Qatar again. In that case, Trump is threatening to have the U.S. (with or without Israel) completely obliterate the entire Iranian side of the field with overwhelming force.7ee6cd
Energy prices are already jumping hard because of this.
Undertone / vibe of the text:
Classic Trump “peace through strength” style — blunt, dramatic, and deliberately over-the-top.
Protective big-brother to allies: He goes out of his way to call Qatar “very innocent” and shields it (Qatar hosts huge U.S. military bases and is a major LNG partner). It’s basically saying “you mess with our friends, you mess with us on steroids.”
Subtle shade at Israel: Words like “violently lashed out… out of anger” and “the United States knew nothing” paint Israel as acting hot-headed and independently. He’s publicly reining them in.
Reluctant but ruthless warning to Iran: The “I do not want to authorize this level of violence and destruction because of the long-term implications… but if Qatar’s LNG is again attacked, I will not hesitate” line is the key. It’s trying to sound reasonable and almost regretful, while still dropping the most apocalyptic threat possible (“massively blow up the entirety… strength and power that Iran has never seen”). It’s classic deterrence: “I’m the reasonable one… don’t make me go nuclear on your gas field.”
Overall tone: Authoritative, paternalistic, and zero ambiguity. No diplomatic fluff — it’s a direct “back off or else” message with a side of “I’m trying to stop this from getting worse.”
Basically, Trump is trying to de-escalate while making it crystal clear that any more Iranian moves on Qatar will trigger massive U.S. retaliation. It’s high-stakes Middle East poker, and he just went all-in on protecting the Gulf allies.
Iran thought Qatar helped or knew about it (they didn’t), so Iran fired back and hit Qatar’s Ras Laffan LNG facilities (Qatar’s huge LNG export hub). That caused “extensive damage,” sent oil and gas prices skyrocketing, and freaked out global energy markets.bbd52d
Trump just posted this exact statement on Truth Social (and it’s all over the news). The U.S. says it had zero prior knowledge of Israel’s strike, Qatar was completely innocent, and Israel has been told “no more hits on South Pars”… unless Iran touches Qatar again. In that case, Trump is threatening to have the U.S. (with or without Israel) completely obliterate the entire Iranian side of the field with overwhelming force.7ee6cd
Energy prices are already jumping hard because of this.
Undertone / vibe of the text:
Classic Trump “peace through strength” style — blunt, dramatic, and deliberately over-the-top.
Protective big-brother to allies: He goes out of his way to call Qatar “very innocent” and shields it (Qatar hosts huge U.S. military bases and is a major LNG partner). It’s basically saying “you mess with our friends, you mess with us on steroids.”
Subtle shade at Israel: Words like “violently lashed out… out of anger” and “the United States knew nothing” paint Israel as acting hot-headed and independently. He’s publicly reining them in.
Reluctant but ruthless warning to Iran: The “I do not want to authorize this level of violence and destruction because of the long-term implications… but if Qatar’s LNG is again attacked, I will not hesitate” line is the key. It’s trying to sound reasonable and almost regretful, while still dropping the most apocalyptic threat possible (“massively blow up the entirety… strength and power that Iran has never seen”). It’s classic deterrence: “I’m the reasonable one… don’t make me go nuclear on your gas field.”
Overall tone: Authoritative, paternalistic, and zero ambiguity. No diplomatic fluff — it’s a direct “back off or else” message with a side of “I’m trying to stop this from getting worse.”
Basically, Trump is trying to de-escalate while making it crystal clear that any more Iranian moves on Qatar will trigger massive U.S. retaliation. It’s high-stakes Middle East poker, and he just went all-in on protecting the Gulf allies.
❤27🔥9👏5