How did that work..? 🤣🤣🤣

🚨 BREAKING: The suspension of the Army aircrew who flew by Kid Rock’s house has been LIFTED, per Pete Hegseth

LET’S GO!!! 🙌🏼🇺🇸

“No punishment. No investigation. Carry on, patriots,” Hegseth said
👍👍👍👍👍

A major global player in commercial payments (handling 140+ currencies across 200+ countries) — just announced a strategic partnership with Ripple to roll out stablecoin-enabled cross-border payments for businesses.

Quick breakdown of the deal:
How it works: Convera handles the full end-to-end customer experience (fiat in and out). Ripple supplies the backend infrastructure for liquidity, on/off-ramps, and settlement.

The “stablecoin sandwich” model: Payments start and end in traditional fiat currency, but use regulated stablecoins for the fast middle leg of settlement. This makes transfers quicker and more reliable, especially in corridors where traditional banking rails are slow or limited.

Who benefits: Businesses (from small companies to large treasuries/CFOs) get faster, more flexible global payments without having to directly manage crypto themselves.

Key quotes from the announcement:
Patrick Gauthier, CEO of Convera: “With the growing presence and use of digital currencies such as crypto and stablecoins, Convera has maintained a thoughtful approach… Ripple is a clear leader in the crypto space and a natural fit for Convera.”

Aaron Slettehaugh, SVP of Product at Ripple: “Enterprises are increasingly looking for faster, more flexible ways to move money globally without taking on the complexity of digital assets directly.”

Important note on XRP and RLUSD: The official press release talks about “regulated stablecoins” and Ripple’s digital-asset capabilities in general — it doesn’t explicitly name RLUSD (Ripple’s own USD stablecoin) or XRP. However, this directly aligns with Ripple’s broader push to integrate RLUSD into its payments solutions for exactly this kind of enterprise use case (faster fiat-to-fiat rails via stablecoins on blockchain infrastructure).

This is another step in Ripple’s enterprise adoption story — bringing stablecoin settlement to a huge traditional payments network without forcing customers to touch crypto directly. Convera is already teasing more details at Fintech Meetup tomorrow in Vegas.

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20260331576971/en/Convera-Joins-Forces-with-Ripple-to-Empower-Stablecoin-Enabled-Cross-Border-Payments

The alert refers to a major milestone in global payments infrastructure that’s already in effect (not literally "as of today," April 1, 2026). SWIFT—the messaging network used by over 11,000 banks in 200+ countries—completed its full migration to ISO 20022 for cross-border payment instructions on November 22, 2025. This ended the multi-year "coexistence" period where old MT-format messages (like MT103) were still accepted. As of late 2025 onward, all payment messages on SWIFT must now use the ISO 20022 (MX) format exclusively for core cross-border flows.

What ISO 20022 Actually Is and Why It Matters for "Global Banking Transparency"
ISO 20022 is an international standard for financial messaging (not a blockchain or new payment rail). It replaces older, limited "MT" formats with highly structured, data-rich XML-based messages. Key upgrades include:
Richer data fields — Every payment now carries far more structured info (e.g., purpose codes, remittance details, full party identification, structured addresses, LEI codes, etc.).

Better transparency and compliance — Easier real-time screening for AML, sanctions, fraud, and tax evasion because regulators and banks get clearer "who, what, why" details instead of vague free-text fields.

Interoperability — Works across SWIFT, major domestic high-value systems (Fedwire, CHAPS, TARGET2, etc.), and even emerging systems like CBDCs or tokenized assets.

Efficiency gains — Faster straight-through processing, fewer errors/rejections, reduced need for manual intervention, and better analytics for treasuries/corporates.

The next enforcement wave hits in November 2026: SWIFT and aligned market infrastructures will ban fully unstructured postal addresses. Payments will require at least "hybrid" or fully structured addresses (minimum: town name + country code). Non-compliant messages will be rejected or delayed.

This is a quiet but massive shift toward global banking transparency. Banks can now track money flows with far greater precision, which strengthens anti-money-laundering efforts while enabling faster, cheaper cross-border payments.

What Is XRP (Ripple) Doing About This?
RippleNet (the enterprise payment network powered by XRP for liquidity via On-Demand Liquidity) was built from the start to natively support ISO 20022 messaging. Ripple joined the official ISO 20022 Registration Management Group years ago and designed its APIs and schemas to align directly with the standard—no costly translation layers needed.

Banks using RippleNet can send/receive ISO 20022 messages seamlessly and settle instantly using XRP as the bridge asset when needed.

Ripple has publicly positioned itself as complementary to SWIFT, not a pure competitor. Post-2025 migration, XRP-based flows integrate cleanly with the new standard.

Code audits and schema references in RippleNet explicitly support ISO 20022 elements (e.g., external clearing system codes), and Ripple has partnerships/testing with dozens of banks on these rails.

In short: XRP/Ripple is one of the best-positioned crypto projects for this exact transition. While no cryptocurrency token itself can be "ISO 20022 certified" (the standard applies to messaging systems, not assets—per the official ISO FAQ), Ripple’s infrastructure is fully aligned and ready for the post-2025 world.

Do Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) Have This?
No—neither BTC nor ETH has native or built-in ISO 20022 support.
Bitcoin (BTC): It is a simple value-transfer protocol with minimal data fields and no messaging layer. It was never designed for structured financial messaging or bank interoperability. Some wallets or custodians might add metadata externally, but BTC itself does not "speak" ISO 20022.

Ethereum (ETH): It has smart contracts, but no built-in ISO 20022 messaging format. Third-party solutions (e.g., oracles like Chainlink in specific pilots with banks for tokenized assets) can bridge ETH-based assets to ISO 20022 systems experimentally, but the ETH network itself is not aligned like RippleNet.

“You see, if I steal a wallet in Japan that makes me Japanese”
DEI JUDGE

NASA says it will take a few hours to troubleshoot the Artemis toilet

“NO MORE INCOME TAX” — The 1040 U.S. tax form is crossed out in red.
Replaced by → “THE USA TREASURY ASSET-BACKED DIVIDEND DOLLAR”
100% reserve (fully backed by real national assets, not debt)
3% value increase per year (the “dividend”)

The US Debt Clock site (and articles covering its graphics) frames this as part of a supposed shift to “Universal High Income” or a new “Golden Age.” The claim is that once the Treasury issues its own asset-backed currency instead of the current fiat/Fed system, the 3% annual “dividend” on the money itself would replace the need for federal income taxes.

Research presented at the 2026 AAOS meeting indicates that the drug may contribute to osteomalacia, or bone softening, at a rate 2.5 times faster than normal.

Gen. Randy A. George was a vocal personal advocate for either, but official actions and statements during his career show he supported LGBTQ inclusion policies (including transgender service) and enforced the COVID-19 vaccine mandate while later taking steps to ease penalties for refusers.

On LGBTQ Issues
Yes, he publicly supported LGBTQ inclusion. As Lt. Gen. commanding I Corps (2020), he and his Command Sgt. Maj. issued an official statement for Pride Month: “This Pride Month, we honor the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender…” and emphasized diversity and inclusion as a strength for the force. He also directed unit stand-downs for dialogue on racism, discrimination, sexism, and oppression.

In his 2023 Senate confirmation hearing (Advance Policy Questions), George stated that transgender service has “minimal impact” on readiness and that separating all transgender soldiers “would impact unit readiness.” He defended diversity & inclusion (D&I) training as necessary “for building a cohesive team and bringing everybody together,” citing soldiers’ perceptions of discrimination.

As Chief of Staff he continued implementing Biden-era policies (e.g., transgender service, gender-neutral fitness standards) and said the Army should “look like the nation it serves.” In January 2025, when asked about Trump’s transgender policy changes, he remained neutral: the Army was “working through all of that stuff” while staying focused on warfighting.

On the COVID-19 Vaccine
He enforced the mandate as required. Like every senior leader, George oversaw the Army’s compliance with the 2021–2023 DoD vaccine requirement while serving as Vice Chief and then Chief of Staff. The Army administratively separated or disciplined thousands of refusers during that period.

🚨🔥 HOLY SMOKES, AMERICA — THIS IS THE BOMBSHELL WE’VE BEEN WAITING FOR!!! 🔥🚨

DNI @TulsiGabbard just CONFIRMED on The Megyn Kelly Show that she’s leading a full investigation into Anthony Fauci for alleged perjury and his direct links to U.S.-funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab as part of the COVID-19 origins probe!

Finally… accountability is coming. The truth about what really happened is about to explode! 🇺🇸💥

Here’s the FULL video transcript so you don’t miss a single word:

☑️Tulsi Gabbard:** “But the thing that we are working with Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH director on, as well as Secretary Kennedy, is looking at the gain-of-function research that in the case of the Wuhan lab, as well as many others — many of these other bio labs around the world — was actually U.S.-funded and leads to this dangerous kind of research that in many examples has resulted in either a pandemic or some other major health crisis.”

☑️Megyn Kelly:** “Let me ask you specifically… we already know that EcoHealth Alliance was partnering with this Wuhan lab to do gain-of-function research. We just have never been able to have somebody say, ‘And it was that exact experiment that led to this COVID bug.’ But have we gotten there? What’s the new thing you’re digging into?”

☑️Tulsi Gabbard:** “We are working on it with Jay Bhattacharya and look forward to being able to share that hopefully very soon — that specific link between the gain-of-function research and what we saw with COVID-19. I mean, that would be extraordinary. Because just so the audience knows, if it was Peter Daszak’s research with the Wuhan so-called ‘bat lady’ that caused this pandemic, then Anthony Fauci helped fund the thing he denied over and over and over to Senator Rand Paul… under oath. So is it any wonder that he sought a preemptive pardon… by President Biden before he left office? And then strong-armed and smeared people like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya — anybody who came out and said ‘I don’t know if that’s natural. This actually smacks of lab.’ And the reason why this is so important is not just what happened in the past, it’s because this research is happening in bio labs around the world… Who knows what kinds of pathogens are in these labs and if released could create another COVID-like pandemic… But in order to protect the American people’s best interest, we have to bring about an end to it.”

☑️☑️This is huge, y’all. The American people deserve the full truth! Who else is fired up for real justice?! Drop your thoughts below and RT if you’re ready for answers! ☑️☑️

https://x.com/i/status/2039719849115435305

Let's get out of NATO...give 400B to our military and the rest is savings to us.

🔺THEY TOLD YOU CHEMOTHERAPY SAVES LIVES. HERE IS WHAT THEY DID NOT TELL YOU.

Chemotherapy was derived from mustard gas. The same chemical weapon used to kill soldiers in World War I. After the war, researchers noticed that soldiers exposed to nitrogen mustard had depleted white blood cells. Instead of calling it what it was, a poison, they rebranded it as a “treatment” and injected it into cancer patients.

That was 1946. Eighty years later, it is still the standard of care.

The overall contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was reviewed in a landmark study published in the journal Clinical Oncology in 2004. The number: 2.1% in the United States. 2.3% in Australia. Not 50%. Not 30%. Two percent.

For that two percent, patients endure months of nausea, organ damage, immune system destruction, hair loss, nerve damage, and cognitive decline so severe it has its own medical name: chemo brain. Many patients who “survive” the cancer die within years from the damage caused by the treatment itself. Heart failure. Liver failure. Secondary cancers caused directly by the chemotherapy drugs.

A single round of chemotherapy costs between $10,000 and $200,000. The global oncology drug market generated $223 billion in 2023. That is not a healthcare system. That is a business model built on human suffering.

Meanwhile, Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski developed antineoplaston therapy in the 1970s, a non-toxic treatment that targets cancer cells without destroying healthy tissue. The FDA tried to imprison him. Five times. Five federal grand juries. All five refused to indict him because the evidence of his patients’ survival was undeniable.

They do not want a cure. A cured patient is a lost revenue stream. A dead patient is acceptable. A sick patient who keeps paying is the ideal customer.

That business model is about to be permanently shut down.

🔗 M-B Technology

MedBedTechnology ✅

Let this echo.