Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π¨ XRP ARMY - XRP PAIRED WITH GOLD? OIL? ANY COMMODITY?π₯
SEC & CFTC just dropped a historic joint final rule (March 17, 2026).
But what's hidden between the lines?π
$XRP + 15 other major cryptos (BTC, ETH, SOL, HBAR, LINK, ADA, AVAX, DOT & more) are now officially classified as DIGITAL COMMODITIES.
Same exact regulatory bucket as Gold, Oil, Silver, Wheat, Live Cattle - every tradable commodity on earth.
This changes EVERYTHING for the XRP Army:
β βIs XRP a security?β FUD = DEAD forever
β Oversight shifts to CFTC (far more crypto-friendly than SEC)
β Institutions get the green light to treat XRP like any real asset class
The floodgates? WIDE OPEN.
And here's the hidden gem nobody's fully grasping yet:
This commodity status unlocks wild new trading pairings we've only dreamed about:
- XRP/OIL
- XRP/GOLD
- XRP/SILVER
- XRP vs any major commodity futures
XRP isn't "just crypto" anymore - it's a true global commodity bridge with unmatched speed, liquidity, and real-world utility. XRP could quickly become the rails for commodity trades worldwide.
Most advisors and the mainstream world still don't get it⦠but they will. Soon.
The game just changed FOREVERπ¦βπ₯
#XRP #XRPArmy
SEC & CFTC just dropped a historic joint final rule (March 17, 2026).
But what's hidden between the lines?π
$XRP + 15 other major cryptos (BTC, ETH, SOL, HBAR, LINK, ADA, AVAX, DOT & more) are now officially classified as DIGITAL COMMODITIES.
Same exact regulatory bucket as Gold, Oil, Silver, Wheat, Live Cattle - every tradable commodity on earth.
This changes EVERYTHING for the XRP Army:
β βIs XRP a security?β FUD = DEAD forever
β Oversight shifts to CFTC (far more crypto-friendly than SEC)
β Institutions get the green light to treat XRP like any real asset class
The floodgates? WIDE OPEN.
And here's the hidden gem nobody's fully grasping yet:
This commodity status unlocks wild new trading pairings we've only dreamed about:
- XRP/OIL
- XRP/GOLD
- XRP/SILVER
- XRP vs any major commodity futures
XRP isn't "just crypto" anymore - it's a true global commodity bridge with unmatched speed, liquidity, and real-world utility. XRP could quickly become the rails for commodity trades worldwide.
Most advisors and the mainstream world still don't get it⦠but they will. Soon.
The game just changed FOREVERπ¦βπ₯
#XRP #XRPArmy
β€14π₯11π₯±2π―1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This is how the hospice fraud works:
- Get a small office in LA
- Collect Medicare beneficiary numbers
- Enroll people into hospice
- Bill the government for millions
Get caught or become suspicious?
Pack up and walk away with millions
END ALL THE FRAUD.
Nick shirley
- Get a small office in LA
- Collect Medicare beneficiary numbers
- Enroll people into hospice
- Bill the government for millions
Get caught or become suspicious?
Pack up and walk away with millions
END ALL THE FRAUD.
Nick shirley
π44π€¬14β€3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Teslaβs Terafab project launches in less than a week.
Translation: no more begging suppliers for chip capacity.
2nm silicon. 1M wafer starts per month by 2030.
Autonomous cars. Optimus robots. AI supercomputers.
If your whole future runs on chips, donβt outsource your brain.
Translation: no more begging suppliers for chip capacity.
2nm silicon. 1M wafer starts per month by 2030.
Autonomous cars. Optimus robots. AI supercomputers.
If your whole future runs on chips, donβt outsource your brain.
π13β€6π4
Tesla's Terafab is a new $20β25 billion AI chip fabrication project (essentially a "Gigafactory for semiconductors") that officially launches on March 21, 2026. It will produce custom AI5 chips (40β50Γ more compute and 9Γ more memory than current AI4) and memory at massive scale:
starting at ~100,000 wafer starts per month and scaling toward 1 million/month. At full capacity, this enables 100β200 billion chips per yearβfar beyond what external suppliers like TSMC or Samsung can reliably deliver for Tesla's needs.
The chips are for internal use only (not sold externally), powering:
Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Cybercab robotaxis (autonomous ride-hailing fleets).
Millions (potentially billions long-term) of Optimus humanoid robots.
Dojo supercomputers and future AI applications.
This vertical integration solves a critical bottleneck: Musk has stated that even best-case supplier scenarios aren't enough for the volume required. Without Terafab, scaling robotaxis and Optimus to transformative levels would be impossible.
"How many billions and trillions will Tesla do out of Terafab" refers to the annual revenue enabled by these chips (i.e., high-margin income from robotaxi operations + Optimus sales/rentals/leasing). Tesla provides no official projections tied specifically to Terafabβit's too new and speculative. Legacy auto/energy businesses (~$100B+ current run-rate) are separate.
My optimistic but grounded projections (annual additional revenue from Terafab-enabled AI businesses) assume:
Successful fab ramp (volume production ~2027).
Regulatory approval for unsupervised autonomy.
Rapid Cybercab fleet growth (low-cost vehicles + high utilization at ~$0.20β1/mile).
Optimus scaling to meaningful production (Musk sees it as potentially 80% of Tesla's future value).
Projected annual revenue enabled by Terafab (in USD):
Year 1 (2027): ~$5 billion (early pilots, limited Cybercab/Optimus deployments).
Year 2 (2028): ~$30 billion (US city rollouts begin).
Year 3 (2029): ~$100 billion (multi-city fleets + initial Optimus sales).
Year 4 (2030): ~$300 billion (accelerating adoption).
Year 5 (2031): ~$750 billion (0.75 trillion; global expansion).
Year 10 (2036): ~$3 trillion (mature robotaxi networks + mass Optimus deployment; aligns with bull-case analyst views like ~$250B robotaxi by mid-2030s plus much larger Optimus impact).
These are illustrative/optimistic and draw from public analyst models (e.g., Wolfe Research ~$250B robotaxi by 2035) and Musk's vision (Optimus/robotaxi as multi-trillion opportunities). Real outcomes could be far lower (delays common in Musk timelines) or higher. Risks include fab execution challenges (Tesla's first semiconductor plant), regulation, competition, and economic factors. Conservative scenarios might be 20β50% of these figures; super-bull cases higher.
Here's a clear bar-chart graphic summarizing the ramp (created via precise data visualization for accuracy):
This shows the exponential growth potential once the chip supply unlocks full AI/robotics scale. Terafab could be one of the highest-ROI projects in Tesla's historyβif it delivers. All numbers are forward-looking estimates only; actual results will depend on execution.
starting at ~100,000 wafer starts per month and scaling toward 1 million/month. At full capacity, this enables 100β200 billion chips per yearβfar beyond what external suppliers like TSMC or Samsung can reliably deliver for Tesla's needs.
The chips are for internal use only (not sold externally), powering:
Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Cybercab robotaxis (autonomous ride-hailing fleets).
Millions (potentially billions long-term) of Optimus humanoid robots.
Dojo supercomputers and future AI applications.
This vertical integration solves a critical bottleneck: Musk has stated that even best-case supplier scenarios aren't enough for the volume required. Without Terafab, scaling robotaxis and Optimus to transformative levels would be impossible.
"How many billions and trillions will Tesla do out of Terafab" refers to the annual revenue enabled by these chips (i.e., high-margin income from robotaxi operations + Optimus sales/rentals/leasing). Tesla provides no official projections tied specifically to Terafabβit's too new and speculative. Legacy auto/energy businesses (~$100B+ current run-rate) are separate.
My optimistic but grounded projections (annual additional revenue from Terafab-enabled AI businesses) assume:
Successful fab ramp (volume production ~2027).
Regulatory approval for unsupervised autonomy.
Rapid Cybercab fleet growth (low-cost vehicles + high utilization at ~$0.20β1/mile).
Optimus scaling to meaningful production (Musk sees it as potentially 80% of Tesla's future value).
Projected annual revenue enabled by Terafab (in USD):
Year 1 (2027): ~$5 billion (early pilots, limited Cybercab/Optimus deployments).
Year 2 (2028): ~$30 billion (US city rollouts begin).
Year 3 (2029): ~$100 billion (multi-city fleets + initial Optimus sales).
Year 4 (2030): ~$300 billion (accelerating adoption).
Year 5 (2031): ~$750 billion (0.75 trillion; global expansion).
Year 10 (2036): ~$3 trillion (mature robotaxi networks + mass Optimus deployment; aligns with bull-case analyst views like ~$250B robotaxi by mid-2030s plus much larger Optimus impact).
These are illustrative/optimistic and draw from public analyst models (e.g., Wolfe Research ~$250B robotaxi by 2035) and Musk's vision (Optimus/robotaxi as multi-trillion opportunities). Real outcomes could be far lower (delays common in Musk timelines) or higher. Risks include fab execution challenges (Tesla's first semiconductor plant), regulation, competition, and economic factors. Conservative scenarios might be 20β50% of these figures; super-bull cases higher.
Here's a clear bar-chart graphic summarizing the ramp (created via precise data visualization for accuracy):
This shows the exponential growth potential once the chip supply unlocks full AI/robotics scale. Terafab could be one of the highest-ROI projects in Tesla's historyβif it delivers. All numbers are forward-looking estimates only; actual results will depend on execution.
β€13π7π3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The McCullough Foundation reviewed 300 studies, and they found the #1 risk factor for autism to be βcombination vaccines.β
βThere are more children in the United States today with profound autism β completely disabled β than there ever were with polio,β he lamented.
βWeβve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.β
But itβs not just the profound autism thatβs showing up.
In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.
βIt doesnβt prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.β
βThere are more children in the United States today with profound autism β completely disabled β than there ever were with polio,β he lamented.
βWeβve, in a sense, caused a major public health crisis through this vaccine ideology.β
But itβs not just the profound autism thatβs showing up.
In a survey of approximately 13,000 people, one result about gender identity stood out immediately.
βIt doesnβt prove causation. But it is a signal that large is difficult to ignore.β
π₯21π―15π€¬5β€4π€―1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Order 34-105047, formally approving Nasdaq's proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2025-072, as amended) to let tokenized versions of stocks and exchange-traded products (ETPs) trade right alongside traditional ones on the same order book.
What This Actually Means
Tokenized securities = digital representations of ownership recorded and transferred on a permissioned blockchain (via the Depository Trust Company's pilot program, which got a no-action letter from the SEC in December 2025).
They trade under the same ticker, CUSIP, and rights (dividends, voting, etc.) as the regular shares β they're fully fungible and interchangeable.
Only certain "DTC Eligible Securities" qualify at first (think Russell 1000 stocks and major ETFs like those tracking the S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100).
Settlement stays T+1 for now (via DTC), but the blockchain infrastructure opens the door to faster/near-instant settlement, easier fractional shares, 24/7 trading potential, and better audit trails β all while staying fully under existing U.S. securities laws and Nasdaq's surveillance.
Nasdaq will issue an alert at least 30 days before tokenized trading actually starts (expected sometime after DTC's infrastructure is ready, possibly late 2026).
Why This Matters
This is the first major U.S. exchange to get the green light for real tokenized equity trading integrated into the national market system. It's not some offshore or synthetic thing β it's regulated TradFi meeting blockchain in a compliant way. Expect this to accelerate real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, bring more institutional money on-chain, and set the stage for similar moves (NYSE/ICE have been exploring too).
The approval comes after public comments, amendments, and proceedings β and fits the current SEC's more innovation-friendly stance on digital assets.
Huge milestone for efficient, accessible markets. If you're into crypto infrastructure or RWAs, this is the kind of regulatory clarity that actually moves the needle. π
(Details straight from the official SEC order and Nasdaq's filings.)
What This Actually Means
Tokenized securities = digital representations of ownership recorded and transferred on a permissioned blockchain (via the Depository Trust Company's pilot program, which got a no-action letter from the SEC in December 2025).
They trade under the same ticker, CUSIP, and rights (dividends, voting, etc.) as the regular shares β they're fully fungible and interchangeable.
Only certain "DTC Eligible Securities" qualify at first (think Russell 1000 stocks and major ETFs like those tracking the S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100).
Settlement stays T+1 for now (via DTC), but the blockchain infrastructure opens the door to faster/near-instant settlement, easier fractional shares, 24/7 trading potential, and better audit trails β all while staying fully under existing U.S. securities laws and Nasdaq's surveillance.
Nasdaq will issue an alert at least 30 days before tokenized trading actually starts (expected sometime after DTC's infrastructure is ready, possibly late 2026).
Why This Matters
This is the first major U.S. exchange to get the green light for real tokenized equity trading integrated into the national market system. It's not some offshore or synthetic thing β it's regulated TradFi meeting blockchain in a compliant way. Expect this to accelerate real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, bring more institutional money on-chain, and set the stage for similar moves (NYSE/ICE have been exploring too).
The approval comes after public comments, amendments, and proceedings β and fits the current SEC's more innovation-friendly stance on digital assets.
Huge milestone for efficient, accessible markets. If you're into crypto infrastructure or RWAs, this is the kind of regulatory clarity that actually moves the needle. π
(Details straight from the official SEC order and Nasdaq's filings.)
β€14
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The ultimate vision: Teslaβs powerful AI chip sits at the heart of a unified ecosystem. SpaceX connects the planet (and Mars), Neuralink links minds, The Boring Company builds tunnels, xAI adds intelligence, X delivers real-time data β all powered seamlessly by one Tesla brain for a multiplanetary future.
π€10π₯8β€2π1π€¬1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π¨BREAKING: JOE ROGAN GETS INTO A HEATED CURSING FIGHT WITH HIS GUEST OVER VACCINES
π9β€3
The Resurrection of the Christ: Part One
Release date: March 26, 2027
The Resurrection of the Christ: Part One is an upcoming American epic biblical drama film directed by Mel Gibson from a script he co-wrote with Randall Wallace, and based on the story he wrote with his brother Donal Gibson and Wallace. Gibson also serves as producer alongside Bruce Davey.
https://youtube.com/shorts/-cwD-lYN2Bo
Release date: March 26, 2027
The Resurrection of the Christ: Part One is an upcoming American epic biblical drama film directed by Mel Gibson from a script he co-wrote with Randall Wallace, and based on the story he wrote with his brother Donal Gibson and Wallace. Gibson also serves as producer alongside Bruce Davey.
https://youtube.com/shorts/-cwD-lYN2Bo
β€43π4π3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π¨ Tulsi Gabbard on the threats of Islam and the Muslim brotherhood:
βThe United States continues to face an evolving thread landscape with the geographically diverse set of Islamic terrorist actors seeking to propagate their ideology globally and harm Americans.
Even as Al-Qaeda and Isis remain weaker today, the spread of Islamist ideology in some cases led by individuals and organizations associated with the Muslim brotherhood.. poses a fundamental threat to freedom and the foundational principles that underpin western civilization.
Islamist groups and individuals use this ideology for recruiting and financial support for terrorist groups and individuals around the world and to advanced their political objective of establishing an Islamist caliphate governed by Sharia Law.β
https://rumble.com/v77auu2-tulsi-gabbard-on-the-threats-of-islam-and-the-muslim-brotherhood.html
βThe United States continues to face an evolving thread landscape with the geographically diverse set of Islamic terrorist actors seeking to propagate their ideology globally and harm Americans.
Even as Al-Qaeda and Isis remain weaker today, the spread of Islamist ideology in some cases led by individuals and organizations associated with the Muslim brotherhood.. poses a fundamental threat to freedom and the foundational principles that underpin western civilization.
Islamist groups and individuals use this ideology for recruiting and financial support for terrorist groups and individuals around the world and to advanced their political objective of establishing an Islamist caliphate governed by Sharia Law.β
https://rumble.com/v77auu2-tulsi-gabbard-on-the-threats-of-islam-and-the-muslim-brotherhood.html
π₯26π7β€3π€£1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Brave 12 year old boy in Texas calls out the fact Qurans and Sharia Law pamphlets are being handed out by teachers in his school.
They're grooming young minds.
They're grooming young minds.
π€¬91π19π’6π1
The excerpt blends direct quotes from the U.S. Department of Defense Law of War Manual (pp. 795 and 38) with passages from William E. Birkhimerβs 1914 book Military Government and Martial Law to argue that military government is a distinct constitutional form of authority that can supersede ordinary law β and, per the authorβs reading, even the Constitution and Bill of Rights β during war, occupation, rebellion, or insurrection.
Key elements highlighted:
Definition (Manual p. 795): Military government = the dominion a belligerent exercises over invaded and occupied enemy territory and its inhabitants.
Three kinds of military jurisdiction under the Constitution:
Military Law β governs U.S. forces in peace and war (Congressional rules/articles of war).
Military Government β exercised by the military commander (under Presidential direction and Congressional sanction) in foreign war outside U.S. borders or in rebel-occupied districts; supersedes local law as needed.
Martial Law Proper β invoked by Congress or, in emergencies, the President during invasion/insurrection inside the U.S. when civilian authority fails.
Law of War (Manual p. 38): Not a formal written code but international principles (plus military orders) that apply on the βtheatre of operations,β suspend civilian courts and ordinary law, and can temporarily override even the Constitution itself.
Presidential power (Birkhimer): The President may immediately exercise belligerent rights to repel force (foreign or domestic) without waiting for a Congressional declaration of war; the crisis itself determines the response.
Constitutional basis: Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 (Congress regulates land/naval forces), yet the text asserts military necessity can prevail.
The author declares βCheckmateβ β this framework has existed since the Constitutionβs ratification in 1787. Sections β|45 βββ 47|β (widely interpreted in the source community as referencing Trump as the 45th and future 47th President) are said to outline active military government. Every American, especially military personnel, America First supporters, and PDJT backers, should recognize and appreciate what the military has been doing since January 20, 2017. βHistory will account for it.β π«‘β οΈπΊπΈ
In short, the text presents a legal-historical case that the United States is (or can be) operating under military government as the supreme authority, fully consistent with the Constitutionβs war powers.
Key elements highlighted:
Definition (Manual p. 795): Military government = the dominion a belligerent exercises over invaded and occupied enemy territory and its inhabitants.
Three kinds of military jurisdiction under the Constitution:
Military Law β governs U.S. forces in peace and war (Congressional rules/articles of war).
Military Government β exercised by the military commander (under Presidential direction and Congressional sanction) in foreign war outside U.S. borders or in rebel-occupied districts; supersedes local law as needed.
Martial Law Proper β invoked by Congress or, in emergencies, the President during invasion/insurrection inside the U.S. when civilian authority fails.
Law of War (Manual p. 38): Not a formal written code but international principles (plus military orders) that apply on the βtheatre of operations,β suspend civilian courts and ordinary law, and can temporarily override even the Constitution itself.
Presidential power (Birkhimer): The President may immediately exercise belligerent rights to repel force (foreign or domestic) without waiting for a Congressional declaration of war; the crisis itself determines the response.
Constitutional basis: Article I, Section 8, Clause 14 (Congress regulates land/naval forces), yet the text asserts military necessity can prevail.
The author declares βCheckmateβ β this framework has existed since the Constitutionβs ratification in 1787. Sections β|45 βββ 47|β (widely interpreted in the source community as referencing Trump as the 45th and future 47th President) are said to outline active military government. Every American, especially military personnel, America First supporters, and PDJT backers, should recognize and appreciate what the military has been doing since January 20, 2017. βHistory will account for it.β π«‘β οΈπΊπΈ
In short, the text presents a legal-historical case that the United States is (or can be) operating under military government as the supreme authority, fully consistent with the Constitutionβs war powers.
β€16π10π₯°4