QAnon+ 🇺🇲🦅
28.1K subscribers
46.8K photos
21.1K videos
114 files
17.8K links
Patriots WWG1WGA
Download Telegram
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 WOW! El Salvador President Nayib Bukele is forcing his nation’s worst criminals in CECOT sit through mass trials, cuffed and CHAINED — sending a message that crime is crushed with an iron fist

🔥🇺🇸🇸🇻

BUKELE: “These “mass trials” and the prosecution of the leadership of criminal organizations for the crimes committed by their members are not a legal innovation; they are a recognized doctrine in international law. It is called “command responsibility,” and it was applied by the Allied countries in the Nuremberg Trials.”

Being tough on crime WORKS @nayibbukele
🔥36💯22❤9
🔥52💯22👏3❤1👌1
Powell trespassed Pirro's prosecutors. Boasberg blocked the search warrants. Tillis blocked Warsh's confirmation. A rogue Obama judge & a RINO senator built him a perfect escape route. Kevin Warsh inherits the Fed. America inherits the bill.
💩35🤬28🤡3❤1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Michigan ballot bombshell exposes 18-20% "FRAUDULENT VOTER" anomalies in the 2020 election, totaling 154k fraudulent ballots in just 2 counties, with an estimated 900k in all of Michigan.

Massive amounts of absentee ballots were being mailed to the Michigan clerk's office from the secretary of state containing signatures that all came from the same person. The addresses for each person on the ballot wasn't a person's home address, it was the secretary of state's address.

An investigation into ballot stuffing found a 17.6% voter fraud anomaly rate. A survey and physical home address checks confirmed that the ballots were indeed fraudulent, but it gets even worse, showing ties to elected state representatives.

A leaked email from State Senator Ruth Johnson, former Secretary of State, wrote an email to her Republican colleagues in the State Senate claiming, based on her own investigation, that current Michigan Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, went back 12 years and put over 800,000 ineligible voters onto the voter rolls, which coincidentally lines up with the estimated 900k total amount of fraudulent voters found.
👍26🤬13❤4😱3🥱1
💯24👍22🔥2
😁14❤3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
DNA Protocol (@DNAOnChain) executed the first-ever zero-knowledge proof transaction on the XRPL testnet. They anchored a verified ZK proof derived from real genomic/DNA data. The proof verifies the data's integrity and properties without exposing any of the underlying sensitive information. This was a genuine milestone for privacy-preserving identity on a public ledger.

April 14, 2026: XRPL Commons + Boundless (the ZK proving network spun out of RISC Zero) announced native zero-knowledge proof verification support on the XRP Ledger. It's live on a dedicated Devnet environment (complete with starter kits, examples, and already used in XRPL hackathons). Not mainnet yet — but very much "dropped" for developers right now.

The ~3-week gap is what the "just days after" / "coincidence? 👀" narrative is playing on. In crypto time, that's basically simultaneous.

What This Actually Enables
Zero-knowledge proofs let someone prove a statement is true (e.g., "this transaction is valid, funded, compliant, and the DNA sample matches the claimed profile") without revealing the underlying data (amounts, counterparties, full genomic sequence, etc.).

On XRPL this now means:
Private yet auditable/compliant transactions (solves the classic "transparency tax" that scares institutions).

Confidential payments, treasury ops, stablecoin flows, and DeFi without broadcasting every detail to the entire network.

Advanced identity use cases — exactly what DNA Protocol is pioneering with genomic/biological identity.

Banks and institutions can now run "blind" KYC, sanctions screening, or data verification while everything stays on the public ledger for settlement and auditability.

The XDNA Connection
DNA Protocol is building the ZK-powered identity layer directly on XRPL. Their $XDNA token powers proof submission, access control, incentives, and spam prevention for this system.

Native ZK verification on the ledger is literally the infrastructure upgrade that makes scaling projects like this smoother, cheaper, and more powerful. XRPL isn't just tolerating privacy experiments anymore — it's shipping the primitives to make them native. So yes, it looks a lot like the ledger is laying runway for exactly this kind of application.

(There's also the post-quantum angle Ripple quietly dropped in their roadmap around the same time — exploring post-quantum ZK primitives and signatures. DNA Protocol has already been experimenting with quantum-resistant elements too. The stack is coming together.)

Bottom Line
This is real progress toward institutional-grade privacy on a public, fast, low-cost chain. No more choosing between "fully transparent public chain" or "private permissioned silo." You can have both.

It's still early (devnet/testnet only, mainnet timeline TBD, real adoption depends on builders shipping apps), but the direction is clear and bullish for the entire XRPL ecosystem — including DNA Protocol / $XDNA.
❤10👍4👏3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
YACHT GIRLS, PROSTITUTION, AND TRAFFICKING
A huge secret nobody talks about is the underground world of Yacht girls. Models or girls aspiring to be celebrities prostitute themselves for fame and fortune to wealthy clients on yachts. Many are underage as well. The widows of Chris Cornell and Chester Bennington, having been escorts themselves just before they met the musicians, later on became traffickers and procurers themselves. Once the men realized this painful fact, along with the secrets of other acquaintances, a plan to end their lives was set in motion. They had to be stopped by any means.
❤9💯8🤯5😱2
The Liberal Communist Philanthropy Machine: How Extreme Left Foundations Shape U.S. Policy.

Major left-leaning foundations dominate large-scale giving: Open Society Foundations (George Soros network), Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Tides Foundation/Network, MacArthur Foundation, and others. These have collectively granted billions over decades to groups in this category for racial justice, voting rights, immigration advocacy, LGBTQ+ issues, criminal justice reform, and “social action.”

One recent CauseIQ analysis showed 3,348 organizations in this space received at least $478.8 million in foundation grants in a single year, with the top 10 funders accounting for a huge share.

Open Society alone has reported tens of millions in U.S. civil rights grants; Tides and similar pass-through entities amplify this.
Individual wealthy donors aligned with Democrats (via direct gifts, donor-advised funds, or super PAC-adjacent channels) also contribute heavily. OpenSecrets data on the broader “Non-profits, Foundations & Philanthropists” category consistently shows 70-80% of political contributions going to Democrats (vs. 20-30% to Republicans) over the past 15+ years.

Government funding: Many receive federal, state, or local grants. Democratic administrations and blue-state/city governments have prioritized funding for equity-focused programs, legal services, voter engagement, and social justice initiatives that align with these organizations’ missions. This creates a feedback loop.

Scale of the sector: These 16,551 groups generate >$22 billion in annual revenue and hold ~$30 billion in assets (per CauseIQ). The largest ones (ACLU, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, various legal aid societies, voter mobilization groups) rely heavily on a mix of small individual donors + major progressive philanthropy.

Here are the main mechanisms, with real-world examples:

Litigation (Court-Driven Policy Change)
Groups sue federal/state governments, corporations, schools, and police departments to reinterpret or expand laws.

ACLU, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights, and SPLC have shaped voting rights, immigration enforcement, criminal justice, speech codes, and DEI policies through landmark cases.
This bypasses legislatures and creates precedents that affect the entire country.

Advocacy, Lobbying & Grassroots Pressure
They draft model legislation, testify before Congress/statehouses, run public campaigns, and mobilize supporters.

Pushed expansions of voting access rules, criminal justice reforms (e.g., bail changes, reduced prosecutions), sanctuary policies, and equity mandates in education/hiring.

“Education” campaigns on systemic racism, extremism (SPLC hate maps), gender ideology, and climate justice influence media coverage and elite opinion.

Voter Mobilization & Electoral Impact
Nonpartisan-on-paper voter registration, education, and get-out-the-vote drives (especially in minority and low-income communities) disproportionately boost Democratic turnout.

Groups like the League of Women Voters, NAACP, and various “civic engagement” nonprofits have been central to turnout efforts.
They also litigate and advocate against voter ID laws, purging of inactive voters, and other election integrity measures.

Research, Narrative Control & Cultural Shift
They produce studies, reports, and training materials cited by media, schools, corporations, and government agencies.
Long-term funding of academia, ethnic/gender studies programs, and media partnerships has contributed to shifts in how race, gender, immigration, and “equity” are discussed in institutions.

Corporate pressure via ESG ratings, boycotts, and “stakeholder capitalism” campaigns pushes businesses toward progressive policies.

Service Provision & Quasi-Governmental Role
Many receive government contracts to deliver legal aid, housing, education, or social services. This gives them a seat at the table when policies are designed and implemented—especially in Democratic-led cities and states.
🤬8🔥4❤1💩1
❤30💯9🔥6
🤣30😁29💯5💩4👍2🤬1🤩1🤡1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Why the US Has Not Cut Off the Bank of China (BOC) via Section 311

The US has not invoked Section 311 of the USA PATRIOT Act against BOC (or other major Chinese state banks) to sever its dollar access, despite China’s central role in the fentanyl crisis.

The Problem
China supplies most fentanyl precursors to Mexican cartels (Sinaloa, CJNG), which synthesize and smuggle the drug into the US, causing ~70,000+ overdose deaths per year.

Chinese underground money laundering networks (CMLOs) dominate laundering of cartel proceeds via mirror transactions, bulk cash deposits at US banks, trade-based methods, and crypto—often interfacing with accounts at major Chinese banks including BOC, ICBC, and Agricultural Bank of China.
China’s totalitarian surveillance state and CCP control over state-owned banks make large-scale precursor exports and laundering tolerance implausible without state knowledge or acquiescence.

Why Section 311 Has Not Been Used on BOC

Section 311 allows FinCEN to designate a foreign bank as a “primary money laundering concern” and cut it off from the US financial system (as done to China’s Bank of Dandong in 2017 for North Korea, and to three Mexican banks in 2025 for fentanyl/cartel activity). It has not been applied to BOC because:

Evidence threshold: Laundering is primarily through diffuse underground networks and specific customer accounts, not proven as core institutional policy at BOC. US actions target networks, individuals, and Mexican banks instead.

Economic and strategic costs: Cutting major Chinese banks would disrupt legitimate US-China trade finance, raise costs for American businesses, risk Chinese retaliation (e.g., on US banks in China or Treasury holdings), and accelerate global de-dollarization.

“Too big to sanction” precedent: Policymakers have hesitated on Big Four banks (seen in 2018 NK cases) to avoid systemic fallout.

Targeted alternatives preferred: Treasury uses OFAC sanctions on precursor firms/launderers, FinCEN advisories forcing US banks to scrutinize Chinese-linked activity, DOJ indictments, and new fentanyl-specific authorities rather than broad 311 action.

Bottom Line
US policy reflects pragmatic restraint balancing national security against economic self-harm and escalation risks in great-power competition with China. The fentanyl crisis is real and enabled by Chinese networks with likely state tolerance, but full disconnection of BOC is viewed as a last-resort “financial nuclear option.” Stronger targeted pressure (more designations, secondary sanctions, or 311 if evidence solidifies) is increasingly advocated, but current approach prioritizes precision over broad rupture.
👍11❤1🔥1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Breaking News:
😱14🤯7🤬4❤2👌2👏1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Always Killary
😁27💯3❤2🤣1
👍24🤩1💯1