The Trump administration, through Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, is actively drawing up plans to withdraw or block U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) processing at international airports located in sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.
What the Policy Entails
Mullin has stated publicly (including in a May 26, 2026 Fox News interview with Sean Hannity and earlier appearances) that in sanctuary jurisdictions where local officials limit cooperation with ICE (e.g., ignoring detainers or restricting enforcement), it makes no sense for the federal government to continue processing international flights and cargo.
Key quote from Mullin:
“We’re currently drawing up plans to say in these sanctuary cities where the local radical left Democrats aren’t allowing us to do our jobs and enforce federal laws, then we shouldn’t be processing international flights into their cities either.”
This is framed as leverage and resource prioritization. Without CBP officers at the airport, international passenger arrivals cannot be legally processed — exactly as discussed in the prior exchange about removing customs from an airport like PHL. Flights would be diverted, and direct international service would effectively end at those facilities.
Current Status (as of May 28, 2026)
Planning stage, not yet executed. Mullin has said the administration is “drawing up plans” and “not initiating” the cutoff “yet,” but the policy work is underway.
Trigger: Recent protests and clashes at an ICE detention facility in New Jersey, plus ongoing sanctuary non-cooperation.
Potential targets: Major international hubs in sanctuary cities/jurisdictions, including JFK (New York), LAX (Los Angeles), O’Hare (Chicago), SFO (San Francisco), and others. No final list has been released.
Broader context: This fits the administration’s larger pressure campaign on sanctuary cities (funding cuts, enforcement actions). Trump has long threatened to withhold federal funds from such jurisdictions.
Immediate Reactions and Risks
Travel industry opposition: The U.S. Travel Association, major airlines, and hotel groups have condemned the idea, warning of “devastating consequences” for tourism, trade, and the economy — especially with the 2026 FIFA World Cup approaching.
Internal pushback: Even some Trump administration figures (e.g., Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy) have questioned the practicality.
Legal and local response: Affected cities and states (e.g., California Gov. Gavin Newsom) have signaled they will sue. Critics argue it would harm non-sanctuary travelers and economies that rely on these airports.
Practical effect if implemented: As previously outlined, it would shut down international passenger processing at those airports, forcing rerouting, massive disruptions, job losses, and economic damage — the same outcome as a full customs removal.
This is not speculation or media spin; it comes directly from Mullin’s on-record statements and reporting across Reuters, AP, The Guardian, Time, and others. It remains a live proposal rather than finalized policy, but the administration is treating it seriously as a tool to compel cooperation on immigration.
If this moves forward and affects a specific airport (including any sanctuary-related status for Philadelphia), the consequences for travelers, airlines, and the local economy would be severe and immediate.
What the Policy Entails
Mullin has stated publicly (including in a May 26, 2026 Fox News interview with Sean Hannity and earlier appearances) that in sanctuary jurisdictions where local officials limit cooperation with ICE (e.g., ignoring detainers or restricting enforcement), it makes no sense for the federal government to continue processing international flights and cargo.
Key quote from Mullin:
“We’re currently drawing up plans to say in these sanctuary cities where the local radical left Democrats aren’t allowing us to do our jobs and enforce federal laws, then we shouldn’t be processing international flights into their cities either.”
This is framed as leverage and resource prioritization. Without CBP officers at the airport, international passenger arrivals cannot be legally processed — exactly as discussed in the prior exchange about removing customs from an airport like PHL. Flights would be diverted, and direct international service would effectively end at those facilities.
Current Status (as of May 28, 2026)
Planning stage, not yet executed. Mullin has said the administration is “drawing up plans” and “not initiating” the cutoff “yet,” but the policy work is underway.
Trigger: Recent protests and clashes at an ICE detention facility in New Jersey, plus ongoing sanctuary non-cooperation.
Potential targets: Major international hubs in sanctuary cities/jurisdictions, including JFK (New York), LAX (Los Angeles), O’Hare (Chicago), SFO (San Francisco), and others. No final list has been released.
Broader context: This fits the administration’s larger pressure campaign on sanctuary cities (funding cuts, enforcement actions). Trump has long threatened to withhold federal funds from such jurisdictions.
Immediate Reactions and Risks
Travel industry opposition: The U.S. Travel Association, major airlines, and hotel groups have condemned the idea, warning of “devastating consequences” for tourism, trade, and the economy — especially with the 2026 FIFA World Cup approaching.
Internal pushback: Even some Trump administration figures (e.g., Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy) have questioned the practicality.
Legal and local response: Affected cities and states (e.g., California Gov. Gavin Newsom) have signaled they will sue. Critics argue it would harm non-sanctuary travelers and economies that rely on these airports.
Practical effect if implemented: As previously outlined, it would shut down international passenger processing at those airports, forcing rerouting, massive disruptions, job losses, and economic damage — the same outcome as a full customs removal.
This is not speculation or media spin; it comes directly from Mullin’s on-record statements and reporting across Reuters, AP, The Guardian, Time, and others. It remains a live proposal rather than finalized policy, but the administration is treating it seriously as a tool to compel cooperation on immigration.
If this moves forward and affects a specific airport (including any sanctuary-related status for Philadelphia), the consequences for travelers, airlines, and the local economy would be severe and immediate.
🔥35❤6👏3💯2🤔1
Can y'all EVEN IMAGINE the WOKE meltdowns if this happens?!?😂😂😂
To make the depicted $250 Trump bill real:
Amend 31 U.S.C. § 5114(b) (or create a narrow exemption) to permit a living person’s portrait. Without this, the Secretary of the Treasury cannot legally direct the BEP to engrave or print it. A blanket change or a Trump-specific carve-out (e.g., “except for individuals who have served as President”) would be required.
Amend the Federal Reserve Act (specifically 12 U.S.C. § 418, the 8th undesignated paragraph of Section 16) to authorize issuance of $250 Federal Reserve Notes and direct (or permit) the $250 denomination with Trump’s portrait. This is the provision that currently limits the Fed/BEP to the seven standard denominations.
To make the depicted $250 Trump bill real:
Amend 31 U.S.C. § 5114(b) (or create a narrow exemption) to permit a living person’s portrait. Without this, the Secretary of the Treasury cannot legally direct the BEP to engrave or print it. A blanket change or a Trump-specific carve-out (e.g., “except for individuals who have served as President”) would be required.
Amend the Federal Reserve Act (specifically 12 U.S.C. § 418, the 8th undesignated paragraph of Section 16) to authorize issuance of $250 Federal Reserve Notes and direct (or permit) the $250 denomination with Trump’s portrait. This is the provision that currently limits the Fed/BEP to the seven standard denominations.
👏26😁12🤣7🎉5❤🔥3👍2❤1😍1
“Allahu Akbar” Knife Attack at Swiss Train Station, Injuring 3, Sparks Fresh Security Fears Across Europe
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/allahu-akbar-knife-attack-swiss-train-station-injuring/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/allahu-akbar-knife-attack-swiss-train-station-injuring/
The Gateway Pundit
“Allahu Akbar” Knife Attack at Swiss Train Station, Injuring 3, Sparks Fresh Security Fears Across Europe * The Gateway Pundit…
A knife attack at a crowded Swiss train station has reignited growing fears across Europe that years of weak migration policies and failed integration efforts…
🤬19❤3💯3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸 Graduation turned into a WWE Royal Rumble real quick. The guy wanted to release all built up grudges before bowing out. One of many.
💩26🤡18🥴3🤮2❤1
This is an official Province of Alberta Order in Council (O.C. 160/2026), dated May 28, 2026—the same day as today.
It is a formal executive order, signed by the Lieutenant Governor (signature appears to read “Shaklani” or similar) and by Danielle Smith as Chair (Premier of Alberta). It orders the government to conduct a non-binding, stand-alone provincial referendum under the Referendum Act (section 5.1).
Exact referendum question voters will see (they must pick only one option):
Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?
Option 1: Alberta should remain a province of Canada.
Option 2: The Government of Alberta should commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada.
Key operational details spelled out in the order:
Date: October 19, 2026 (stand-alone referendum, not piggy-backed on any other vote).
Held across the entirety of the Province of Alberta.
Result is explicitly not binding (point 4).
Not conducted by mail-in ballot, but advance voting and special ballots (as defined in the Election Act) are still allowed.
Bottom line, no spin
This is not a vote on actual separation. It is a vote on whether the Alberta government should even begin the long, messy constitutional machinery required for a future binding referendum on separation. The current vote is advisory only—politically symbolic, legally toothless. The order itself was recommended by the Minister of Justice and is authorized strictly under the provincial Referendum Act.
The wording is deliberately layered: Option 2 does not ask for immediate independence; it asks for permission to start the legal process toward a future binding vote. That process would still have to navigate the Canadian Constitution, the Clarity Act, Supreme Court precedents (e.g., the 1998 Secession Reference), negotiations with Ottawa and the other provinces, and likely years of litigation.
This is the factual text and legal effect of the document. No hedging, no moral lecture—just what it actually says and what it actually does.
It is a formal executive order, signed by the Lieutenant Governor (signature appears to read “Shaklani” or similar) and by Danielle Smith as Chair (Premier of Alberta). It orders the government to conduct a non-binding, stand-alone provincial referendum under the Referendum Act (section 5.1).
Exact referendum question voters will see (they must pick only one option):
Should Alberta remain a province of Canada, or should the Government of Alberta commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada?
Option 1: Alberta should remain a province of Canada.
Option 2: The Government of Alberta should commence the legal process required under the Canadian Constitution to hold a binding provincial referendum on whether or not Alberta should separate from Canada.
Key operational details spelled out in the order:
Date: October 19, 2026 (stand-alone referendum, not piggy-backed on any other vote).
Held across the entirety of the Province of Alberta.
Result is explicitly not binding (point 4).
Not conducted by mail-in ballot, but advance voting and special ballots (as defined in the Election Act) are still allowed.
Bottom line, no spin
This is not a vote on actual separation. It is a vote on whether the Alberta government should even begin the long, messy constitutional machinery required for a future binding referendum on separation. The current vote is advisory only—politically symbolic, legally toothless. The order itself was recommended by the Minister of Justice and is authorized strictly under the provincial Referendum Act.
The wording is deliberately layered: Option 2 does not ask for immediate independence; it asks for permission to start the legal process toward a future binding vote. That process would still have to navigate the Canadian Constitution, the Clarity Act, Supreme Court precedents (e.g., the 1998 Secession Reference), negotiations with Ottawa and the other provinces, and likely years of litigation.
This is the factual text and legal effect of the document. No hedging, no moral lecture—just what it actually says and what it actually does.
👍17❤9
HORROR: Illegal Alien with DACA Status Kills 4 Young People in Wrong-Way DUI Crash
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/horror-illegal-alien-daca-status-kills-4-young/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/05/horror-illegal-alien-daca-status-kills-4-young/
The Gateway Pundit
HORROR: Illegal Alien with DACA Status Kills 4 Young People in Wrong-Way DUI Crash * The Gateway Pundit * by Jordan Conradson
An illegal alien was arrested on Tuesday on charges related to driving under the influence and killing four young Americans in Oklahoma on Friday. Three teens…
🤬38💩9😢2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ICE HSI St. Paul arrested U.S. citizens Shamso Ahmed Hassan and Hanaan Mursal Yusuf for their alleged roles in a scheme to defraud Medicaid of $21.1M by exploiting a Minnesota program.
Hassan allegedly enrolled the following two companies as service providers for the Minnesota Early Intensive Development and Behavioral Intervention Program:
• Smart Therapy Center LLC
• Star Autism Center LLC
➡️Both subjects allegedly submitted false and fraudulent claims to Medicaid from May 2020 to December 2024 using both companies.
➡️Both subjects were taken into custody at their shared home and remain in federal custody pending judicial proceedings.
🔎This is an FBI-led investigation. ICE HSI is proud to be a part of the investigative team enforcing President @realDonaldTrump's mandate to end benefits fraud.
Hassan allegedly enrolled the following two companies as service providers for the Minnesota Early Intensive Development and Behavioral Intervention Program:
• Smart Therapy Center LLC
• Star Autism Center LLC
➡️Both subjects allegedly submitted false and fraudulent claims to Medicaid from May 2020 to December 2024 using both companies.
➡️Both subjects were taken into custody at their shared home and remain in federal custody pending judicial proceedings.
🔎This is an FBI-led investigation. ICE HSI is proud to be a part of the investigative team enforcing President @realDonaldTrump's mandate to end benefits fraud.
👏41❤17🔥4