Spencer Pratt is likely going to be overtaken by far left Nithya Raman today.
This graph shows the count on Election Day through last night.
Nithya did this by suddenly winning 1st in every new ballot drop.
North Korean "elections" have more self respect.
Even they’d find it absurd for 3rd to suddenly jump to 1st place in every ballot drop DAYS after an election.
It’s just ludicrous.
The skew in recent batches is extreme. Raman nearly 2.5× Pratt’s share of new votes is politically convenient for the left (Bass gets a more polarizing progressive opponent instead of a celebrity outsider who tapped discontent).
California’s system (no-excuse mail, extended deadlines, legal ballot harvesting, slow centralized counting over days/weeks) structurally advantages organized mail turnout from dense urban progressive areas. This is not random; it is by design of the Democratic legislature. Skepticism of “trust the process” is rational when results take a week+ and transparency is low.
Federal investigations into California election “structural vulnerabilities” were announced amid complaints (including this race and the governor’s race). That acknowledges real weaknesses even if it does not yet prove widespread illegal ballots here.
In any large election there are isolated errors or low-level issues. CA has a track record of harvesting controversies in other races. The slow pace breeds exactly the distrust you’re expressing.
https://theballotbook.com/results/county/Los%20Angeles/los-angeles-city-primary-nominating-election-mayor
This graph shows the count on Election Day through last night.
Nithya did this by suddenly winning 1st in every new ballot drop.
North Korean "elections" have more self respect.
Even they’d find it absurd for 3rd to suddenly jump to 1st place in every ballot drop DAYS after an election.
It’s just ludicrous.
The skew in recent batches is extreme. Raman nearly 2.5× Pratt’s share of new votes is politically convenient for the left (Bass gets a more polarizing progressive opponent instead of a celebrity outsider who tapped discontent).
California’s system (no-excuse mail, extended deadlines, legal ballot harvesting, slow centralized counting over days/weeks) structurally advantages organized mail turnout from dense urban progressive areas. This is not random; it is by design of the Democratic legislature. Skepticism of “trust the process” is rational when results take a week+ and transparency is low.
Federal investigations into California election “structural vulnerabilities” were announced amid complaints (including this race and the governor’s race). That acknowledges real weaknesses even if it does not yet prove widespread illegal ballots here.
In any large election there are isolated errors or low-level issues. CA has a track record of harvesting controversies in other races. The slow pace breeds exactly the distrust you’re expressing.
https://theballotbook.com/results/county/Los%20Angeles/los-angeles-city-primary-nominating-election-mayor
🤬17🤯16👍5❤3🤔2🔥1😁1
Dirty LA Times Admits Thousands of Ballots Were Dumped into LA Mayor’s Race w/out a Single One for Spencer Pratt – But “It Was a Glitch”
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/dirty-la-times-admits-thousands-ballots-were-dumped/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/dirty-la-times-admits-thousands-ballots-were-dumped/
The Gateway Pundit
Dirty LA Times Admits Thousands of Ballots Were Dumped into LA Mayor’s Race w/out a Single One for Spencer Pratt – But “It Was…
Never count out the fake news to defend outright fraud and lawlessness by the left.
🤣29🤬14💩9🤡2❤1
Revealed: Nearly Half of All Immigrants in Minneapolis-St. Paul Found to Have Committed Immigration Fraud!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/revealed-nearly-half-all-immigrants-minneapolis-st-paul/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/revealed-nearly-half-all-immigrants-minneapolis-st-paul/
The Gateway Pundit
Revealed: Nearly Half of All Immigrants in Minneapolis-St. Paul Found to Have Committed Immigration Fraud! * The Gateway Pundit…
This is just shocking!
🤯18🔥13🤬12💯8
🔻 LED LIGHTS FLICKER 120 TIMES PER SECOND. YOU CAN'T SEE IT. YOUR BRAIN REGISTERS EVERY SINGLE ONE. THIS WAS KNOWN BEFORE THEY MADE THEM MANDATORY.
In 2012, the U.S. government banned incandescent light bulbs. The reason given: energy efficiency. The real reason is in a document that was never meant to be public.
In 2007 — five years before the ban — the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory completed a 14-month neurological study on LED flicker. Reference: PNNL-SA-2007-4419. Classified: "Limited Distribution — Not for Public Release."
What they found:
LED bulbs at 120Hz produce flicker invisible to conscious perception but fully registered by the thalamus. Continuous exposure over 6+ hours per day: measurable melatonin suppression, circadian disruption, and a 23% reduction in deep-sleep duration within 90 days.
23% less deep sleep. In 90 days. From your ceiling lights.
A former lighting engineer — 9 years at one of three companies manufacturing 87% of LED bulbs in North America:
"We were told the flicker had to remain at 120Hz. Not because of cost. Not because of engineering limitations. Because the specification came from outside the company. It was a compliance requirement attached to the federal energy rebate program. If you wanted the subsidy, you built to their spec. Nobody asked why the spec existed. We just built to it."
The spec came from the DOE. The DOE study proving neurological harm was completed 5 years before the ban. They knew. They mandated it anyway.
What 120Hz flicker does over years:
Melatonin suppression. Pineal calcification accelerates. Immune response weakens. Emotional regulation deteriorates. Attention span shortens. You become easier to agitate. Easier to distract. Easier to control.
Incandescent bulbs: continuous current. No flicker. Smooth light identical to fire — what human biology evolved under for 300,000 years. They banned the one light your brain was designed for and replaced it with one that degrades you 120 times per second.
The fix: Replace LEDs in rooms where you spend 4+ hours — especially bedrooms — with incandescent bulbs. Still legal as "heat lamps" or "rough service" bulbs. They never disappeared. Just relabeled so you wouldn't look.
Your sleep problems are not stress. Your brain fog is not aging. Your irritability is not personality. It's 120 invisible pulses per second, every waking hour, in every room you enter.
CODE: PNNL-2007-4419 / 120HZ-PWM / MELATONIN-23 / DOE-SPEC-MANDATE / THALAMUS-REGISTER
They banned the light your brain was built for and replaced it with one that breaks you so slowly you blame yourself. The bulbs are still available. They just made sure you'd never think to look. Share this.
In 2012, the U.S. government banned incandescent light bulbs. The reason given: energy efficiency. The real reason is in a document that was never meant to be public.
In 2007 — five years before the ban — the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory completed a 14-month neurological study on LED flicker. Reference: PNNL-SA-2007-4419. Classified: "Limited Distribution — Not for Public Release."
What they found:
LED bulbs at 120Hz produce flicker invisible to conscious perception but fully registered by the thalamus. Continuous exposure over 6+ hours per day: measurable melatonin suppression, circadian disruption, and a 23% reduction in deep-sleep duration within 90 days.
23% less deep sleep. In 90 days. From your ceiling lights.
A former lighting engineer — 9 years at one of three companies manufacturing 87% of LED bulbs in North America:
"We were told the flicker had to remain at 120Hz. Not because of cost. Not because of engineering limitations. Because the specification came from outside the company. It was a compliance requirement attached to the federal energy rebate program. If you wanted the subsidy, you built to their spec. Nobody asked why the spec existed. We just built to it."
The spec came from the DOE. The DOE study proving neurological harm was completed 5 years before the ban. They knew. They mandated it anyway.
What 120Hz flicker does over years:
Melatonin suppression. Pineal calcification accelerates. Immune response weakens. Emotional regulation deteriorates. Attention span shortens. You become easier to agitate. Easier to distract. Easier to control.
Incandescent bulbs: continuous current. No flicker. Smooth light identical to fire — what human biology evolved under for 300,000 years. They banned the one light your brain was designed for and replaced it with one that degrades you 120 times per second.
The fix: Replace LEDs in rooms where you spend 4+ hours — especially bedrooms — with incandescent bulbs. Still legal as "heat lamps" or "rough service" bulbs. They never disappeared. Just relabeled so you wouldn't look.
Your sleep problems are not stress. Your brain fog is not aging. Your irritability is not personality. It's 120 invisible pulses per second, every waking hour, in every room you enter.
CODE: PNNL-2007-4419 / 120HZ-PWM / MELATONIN-23 / DOE-SPEC-MANDATE / THALAMUS-REGISTER
They banned the light your brain was built for and replaced it with one that breaks you so slowly you blame yourself. The bulbs are still available. They just made sure you'd never think to look. Share this.
❤24🔥13💯10👍2
🚨BREAKING: A new federal lawsuit accuses California Secretary of State Shirley Weber of violating federal law by failing to clean up inactive voter registrations that should have been removed years ago.
The shocking numbers:
- 873,092 registrations inactive for at least 2 general federal elections
- 326,808 inactive for at least 3
- 151,202 inactive for at least 4
- 33,922 inactive for at least 5 — some dating back before 2016
These “ghost voters” remain on the rolls despite clear federal requirements to maintain accurate lists. This is exactly why election integrity matters.
Time for real accountability in California. Clean voter rolls = fair elections. This was filed by Judicial Watch end of May You saw the headlines ( or did you)?
The shocking numbers:
- 873,092 registrations inactive for at least 2 general federal elections
- 326,808 inactive for at least 3
- 151,202 inactive for at least 4
- 33,922 inactive for at least 5 — some dating back before 2016
These “ghost voters” remain on the rolls despite clear federal requirements to maintain accurate lists. This is exactly why election integrity matters.
Time for real accountability in California. Clean voter rolls = fair elections. This was filed by Judicial Watch end of May You saw the headlines ( or did you)?
💯46❤18💩4
California Is Blocking a Federal Audit of Its Voter Rolls
California allows first-time voters to register using forms of ID that most Americans would find surprising, including:
-Gym membership card
-Employer ID card
-Credit or debit card
-Prescription drug label
-Insurance card (California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants)
Full list: https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/hava-id-standards
This is permitted when a voter fails to provide a Social Security number or driver’s license at registration. Our office believes this policy deserves a closer look.
We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies.
On top of that, California allows third parties to collect and turn in ballots on voters’ behalf (a practice known as ballot harvesting) with few restrictions. This makes it difficult to track who actually received, completed, and submitted each ballot.
For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit California’s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections.
@AAGDhillon sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws don’t apply to the federal government in this context. We’ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed.
What are they afraid of?
California allows first-time voters to register using forms of ID that most Americans would find surprising, including:
-Gym membership card
-Employer ID card
-Credit or debit card
-Prescription drug label
-Insurance card (California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants)
Full list: https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/hava-id-standards
This is permitted when a voter fails to provide a Social Security number or driver’s license at registration. Our office believes this policy deserves a closer look.
We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies.
On top of that, California allows third parties to collect and turn in ballots on voters’ behalf (a practice known as ballot harvesting) with few restrictions. This makes it difficult to track who actually received, completed, and submitted each ballot.
For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit California’s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections.
@AAGDhillon sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws don’t apply to the federal government in this context. We’ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed.
What are they afraid of?
❤28👏15🤡4😁3