QAnon+ ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿฆ…
28.2K subscribers
46.7K photos
21.1K videos
114 files
17.8K links
Patriots WWG1WGA
Download Telegram
Kristen Welker demonstrates all five stages of Trump Derangement Syndrome
๐Ÿคฃ71๐Ÿ’ฏ25๐Ÿ˜18๐Ÿคก5โค1
Spencer Pratt is now OUT of contention for the LA Mayorโ€™s race.

Nithya Raman won 1st in every new ballot dropโ€” Never in election history has the 3rd place contender SURGE by winning the most ballot drops.

This is such utter bullshit, itโ€™s laughable.
๐Ÿคฌ65๐Ÿ’ฉ15๐Ÿ‘11๐Ÿ‘Ž4๐Ÿฅด3โค1๐Ÿ˜ฑ1๐Ÿคก1
๐Ÿ”ฅ24๐Ÿ’ฉ7
๐Ÿ”ป LED LIGHTS FLICKER 120 TIMES PER SECOND. YOU CAN'T SEE IT. YOUR BRAIN REGISTERS EVERY SINGLE ONE. THIS WAS KNOWN BEFORE THEY MADE THEM MANDATORY.

In 2012, the U.S. government banned incandescent light bulbs. The reason given: energy efficiency. The real reason is in a document that was never meant to be public.

In 2007 โ€” five years before the ban โ€” the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory completed a 14-month neurological study on LED flicker. Reference: PNNL-SA-2007-4419. Classified: "Limited Distribution โ€” Not for Public Release."

What they found:

LED bulbs at 120Hz produce flicker invisible to conscious perception but fully registered by the thalamus. Continuous exposure over 6+ hours per day: measurable melatonin suppression, circadian disruption, and a 23% reduction in deep-sleep duration within 90 days.

23% less deep sleep. In 90 days. From your ceiling lights.

A former lighting engineer โ€” 9 years at one of three companies manufacturing 87% of LED bulbs in North America:

"We were told the flicker had to remain at 120Hz. Not because of cost. Not because of engineering limitations. Because the specification came from outside the company. It was a compliance requirement attached to the federal energy rebate program. If you wanted the subsidy, you built to their spec. Nobody asked why the spec existed. We just built to it."

The spec came from the DOE. The DOE study proving neurological harm was completed 5 years before the ban. They knew. They mandated it anyway.

What 120Hz flicker does over years:

Melatonin suppression. Pineal calcification accelerates. Immune response weakens. Emotional regulation deteriorates. Attention span shortens. You become easier to agitate. Easier to distract. Easier to control.

Incandescent bulbs: continuous current. No flicker. Smooth light identical to fire โ€” what human biology evolved under for 300,000 years. They banned the one light your brain was designed for and replaced it with one that degrades you 120 times per second.

The fix: Replace LEDs in rooms where you spend 4+ hours โ€” especially bedrooms โ€” with incandescent bulbs. Still legal as "heat lamps" or "rough service" bulbs. They never disappeared. Just relabeled so you wouldn't look.

Your sleep problems are not stress. Your brain fog is not aging. Your irritability is not personality. It's 120 invisible pulses per second, every waking hour, in every room you enter.

CODE: PNNL-2007-4419 / 120HZ-PWM / MELATONIN-23 / DOE-SPEC-MANDATE / THALAMUS-REGISTER

They banned the light your brain was built for and replaced it with one that breaks you so slowly you blame yourself. The bulbs are still available. They just made sure you'd never think to look. Share this.
โค24๐Ÿ”ฅ13๐Ÿ’ฏ10๐Ÿ‘2
Nithya Raman came in 1st place the last three late mail-in-ballot dumps.

Ballots Printed on demand.
๐Ÿคฌ33๐Ÿ˜13โค3๐Ÿคก1
๐Ÿ’ฏ62๐Ÿ”ฅ4
๐ŸšจBREAKING: A new federal lawsuit accuses California Secretary of State Shirley Weber of violating federal law by failing to clean up inactive voter registrations that should have been removed years ago.

The shocking numbers:
- 873,092 registrations inactive for at least 2 general federal elections
- 326,808 inactive for at least 3
- 151,202 inactive for at least 4
- 33,922 inactive for at least 5 โ€” some dating back before 2016

These โ€œghost votersโ€ remain on the rolls despite clear federal requirements to maintain accurate lists. This is exactly why election integrity matters.

Time for real accountability in California. Clean voter rolls = fair elections. This was filed by Judicial Watch end of May You saw the headlines ( or did you)?
๐Ÿ’ฏ46โค18๐Ÿ’ฉ4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐Ÿ˜25๐Ÿ’ฏ16๐Ÿคฎ6โค4๐Ÿ”ฅ2
California Is Blocking a Federal Audit of Its Voter Rolls

California allows first-time voters to register using forms of ID that most Americans would find surprising, including:

-Gym membership card
-Employer ID card
-Credit or debit card
-Prescription drug label
-Insurance card (California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants)

Full list: https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/hava-id-standards

This is permitted when a voter fails to provide a Social Security number or driverโ€™s license at registration. Our office believes this policy deserves a closer look.

We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies.

On top of that, California allows third parties to collect and turn in ballots on votersโ€™ behalf (a practice known as ballot harvesting) with few restrictions. This makes it difficult to track who actually received, completed, and submitted each ballot.

For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit Californiaโ€™s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections.

@AAGDhillon sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws donโ€™t apply to the federal government in this context. Weโ€™ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed.

What are they afraid of?
โค28๐Ÿ‘15๐Ÿคก4๐Ÿ˜3
๐Ÿคฏ14๐Ÿ˜12
โค35๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ’ฏ1
The myth of 'No evidence of widespread election fraud' in a nutshell: Voter fraud isn't a bug โ€” it's a feature in California
โค21๐Ÿ˜ฑ7๐Ÿ˜5
๐Ÿคฎ20๐Ÿ”ฅ9๐Ÿคฏ9๐Ÿ˜3
๐Ÿ”ฅ19๐Ÿ˜10๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿคฌ1
Oh Shyt!!!!! Another scandal incoming๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜†๐Ÿ˜…
๐Ÿ˜24๐Ÿ’ฏ20โค1๐Ÿ˜ฑ1