Ripple’s official announcement from 9 January
Ripple (via its UK subsidiary Ripple Markets UK Ltd) received:
An Electronic Money Institution (EMI) licence from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
Cryptoasset Registration under the UK’s Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs).
These permissions allow Ripple to expand its licensed Ripple Payments platform so UK institutions can send cross-border payments using digital assets under a regulated framework. Ripple handles the underlying blockchain and operational complexity; clients get the rails without building the infrastructure themselves.
Exact scope and hard limits
This is not a blank-cheque retail crypto licence. FCA conditions are restrictive:
No services to retail clients without prior written FCA consent.
Cannot issue electronic money or provide payment services to consumers, micro-enterprises, or charities (at this stage).
No crypto ATMs, no appointing agents or distributors without prior written consent.
The activity is deliberately confined to institutional / wholesale use cases. This is consistent with how the FCA has been sequencing crypto permissions ahead of the fuller regime.
Regulatory context (the important part)
This sits in the current transitional framework. The UK is moving cryptoassets fully under the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA). MLR-registered firms will need to apply for full authorisation under the new regime. Applications were expected to open around September 2026, with the new rules taking effect around October 2027. The EMI + cryptoasset registration is a meaningful step that lets Ripple operate and scale now, but it is not the final state.
London has been Ripple’s largest office outside the US since 2016. The company has repeatedly described the UK as core to its strategy, with ongoing headcount growth and university funding via the University Blockchain Research Initiative.
What this actually means for payments and XRP
Institutional on-ramp in a major financial centre: UK banks, fintechs, and corporates can now access regulated digital-asset payments infrastructure more cleanly. That is the practical value.
Ripple Payments already connects to global payout partners. The UK licence plugs a significant jurisdiction into that network.
XRP and the XRP Ledger remain the settlement layer Ripple builds on. The licence does not “approve XRP” as a security or anything similar; it expands the regulated environment in which digital assets (including XRP as a bridge asset and RLUSD) can be used for institutional flows.
This sits alongside Ripple’s broader licensing push (75+ licences/registrations globally by mid-2026, including subsequent EU EMI and full MiCA CASP authorisations). Regulatory coverage is the company’s primary institutional selling point.
Ripple (via its UK subsidiary Ripple Markets UK Ltd) received:
An Electronic Money Institution (EMI) licence from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
Cryptoasset Registration under the UK’s Money Laundering Regulations (MLRs).
These permissions allow Ripple to expand its licensed Ripple Payments platform so UK institutions can send cross-border payments using digital assets under a regulated framework. Ripple handles the underlying blockchain and operational complexity; clients get the rails without building the infrastructure themselves.
Exact scope and hard limits
This is not a blank-cheque retail crypto licence. FCA conditions are restrictive:
No services to retail clients without prior written FCA consent.
Cannot issue electronic money or provide payment services to consumers, micro-enterprises, or charities (at this stage).
No crypto ATMs, no appointing agents or distributors without prior written consent.
The activity is deliberately confined to institutional / wholesale use cases. This is consistent with how the FCA has been sequencing crypto permissions ahead of the fuller regime.
Regulatory context (the important part)
This sits in the current transitional framework. The UK is moving cryptoassets fully under the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA). MLR-registered firms will need to apply for full authorisation under the new regime. Applications were expected to open around September 2026, with the new rules taking effect around October 2027. The EMI + cryptoasset registration is a meaningful step that lets Ripple operate and scale now, but it is not the final state.
London has been Ripple’s largest office outside the US since 2016. The company has repeatedly described the UK as core to its strategy, with ongoing headcount growth and university funding via the University Blockchain Research Initiative.
What this actually means for payments and XRP
Institutional on-ramp in a major financial centre: UK banks, fintechs, and corporates can now access regulated digital-asset payments infrastructure more cleanly. That is the practical value.
Ripple Payments already connects to global payout partners. The UK licence plugs a significant jurisdiction into that network.
XRP and the XRP Ledger remain the settlement layer Ripple builds on. The licence does not “approve XRP” as a security or anything similar; it expands the regulated environment in which digital assets (including XRP as a bridge asset and RLUSD) can be used for institutional flows.
This sits alongside Ripple’s broader licensing push (75+ licences/registrations globally by mid-2026, including subsequent EU EMI and full MiCA CASP authorisations). Regulatory coverage is the company’s primary institutional selling point.
🔥3❤2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 JUST IN: Everyone celebrated the wrong half of the ISO 20022 switch.
Yes, 11,000+ institutions retired SWIFT MT and now speak one format. That's the messaging layer.
But a message is an instruction, not money. ISO 20022 standardised how banks describe a payment. It did nothing about what actually moves between them.
That gap is still filled by pre-funded nostro accounts and correspondent chains, days of delay and trapped capital.
A common language makes machines agree. It doesn't make value move.
Settlement needs an asset that clears in seconds, runs 24/7, and belongs to no single bank.
The world just finished standardising the paperwork. $XRP is what goes in the envelope.
Yes, 11,000+ institutions retired SWIFT MT and now speak one format. That's the messaging layer.
But a message is an instruction, not money. ISO 20022 standardised how banks describe a payment. It did nothing about what actually moves between them.
That gap is still filled by pre-funded nostro accounts and correspondent chains, days of delay and trapped capital.
A common language makes machines agree. It doesn't make value move.
Settlement needs an asset that clears in seconds, runs 24/7, and belongs to no single bank.
The world just finished standardising the paperwork. $XRP is what goes in the envelope.
💯3👍2😍1
🚨 SEPTEMBER 15: THE CLARITY ACT FACES ITS BIGGEST TEST 🇺🇸
60 votes are needed.
If all 53 Republicans vote YES, just 7 Democrats need to step up.
The pressure is building.
7 votes could unlock a new era of crypto regulation in America. 🔥
#Crypto and $XRP is watching. 👀
60 votes are needed.
If all 53 Republicans vote YES, just 7 Democrats need to step up.
The pressure is building.
7 votes could unlock a new era of crypto regulation in America. 🔥
#Crypto and $XRP is watching. 👀
❤16👍5😁4💩1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
WOW. This brave Christian migrant from Iran walked up and WENT BERSERK on the proposed Islamic Center in McKinney, TX — straight to the council's face
A Christian immigrant from Iran delivered an emotional warning to the McKinney, Texas, City Council over a proposed Islamic center, drawing on his own experience living under Iran’s Islamic government. He argued that Americans should understand the implications of Sharia law and warned officials against dismissing concerns from people who have experienced religious restrictions firsthand. He also described friends who, according to him, faced imprisonment or death in Iran after leaving Islam or criticizing religious authorities, urging Americans to protect religious freedom and the separation of religion and government.
A Christian immigrant from Iran delivered an emotional warning to the McKinney, Texas, City Council over a proposed Islamic center, drawing on his own experience living under Iran’s Islamic government. He argued that Americans should understand the implications of Sharia law and warned officials against dismissing concerns from people who have experienced religious restrictions firsthand. He also described friends who, according to him, faced imprisonment or death in Iran after leaving Islam or criticizing religious authorities, urging Americans to protect religious freedom and the separation of religion and government.
👏39🔥7
Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed's Father-in-law and Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations
Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed is married to psychiatrist Sarah Jukaku. Her father—El-Sayed’s father-in-law—is Dr. Jukaku S. Tayeb (also referred to as Tayeb Jukaku or Jukaku Tayeb), a Michigan nephrologist of Indian origin.
Documented roles:
President of CAIR-Michigan from 2005 to 2010; remains on the board.
Member of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) Founders Committee since at least 2007. This is a small leadership/donor group that requires significant annual contributions (minimum $5,000).
Both CAIR and ISNA were named unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007–2008 United States v. Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism-financing case in U.S. history. Federal prosecutors explicitly listed them among entities “who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood.” Court evidence included financial ties and organizational links to Hamas. A federal judge later ruled there was ample evidence supporting the designations.
Neither group is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department, but the trial record and related federal documents treat them as part of the historical U.S. Muslim Brotherhood network.
Tayeb has also been a major donor to El-Sayed’s political efforts, contributing hundreds of thousands of dollars (reported totals reaching $200,000–$300,000) to the Fighting for Michigan Super PAC that supported El-Sayed’s 2026 Senate primary campaign.
These connections have been reported in detail by the Washington Free Beacon, referenced in Senate subcommittee hearings on the Muslim Brotherhood network in America, and covered by multiple outlets examining campaign finance and organizational histories.
Campaigning with Hasan Piker
El-Sayed did campaign with Twitch streamer Hasan Piker (commonly misspelled Hassan). Confirmed joint appearances include campus events at the University of Michigan and Michigan State University in April 2026, plus additional campaign-related events in the days before the August 4 primary (including a pre-primary gathering).
In an August 2019 Twitch livestream, Piker stated: “America deserved 9/11, dude. Fuck it, I’m saying it.” He later walked the remark back in part, calling the wording “inappropriate” and framing it as a critique of U.S. foreign policy creating conditions for the attacks. He has repeated related comments in subsequent years. The original quote is not disputed.
When pressed during the 2026 campaign, El-Sayed declined to disavow Piker’s past statements. He described efforts to force a repudiation as “gotcha” politics and “cancel culture,” while separately stating he does not believe the 9/11 attacks were justified. He defended the decision to appear with Piker on the grounds that it reached voters otherwise locked out of the political process.
Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed is married to psychiatrist Sarah Jukaku. Her father—El-Sayed’s father-in-law—is Dr. Jukaku S. Tayeb (also referred to as Tayeb Jukaku or Jukaku Tayeb), a Michigan nephrologist of Indian origin.
Documented roles:
President of CAIR-Michigan from 2005 to 2010; remains on the board.
Member of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) Founders Committee since at least 2007. This is a small leadership/donor group that requires significant annual contributions (minimum $5,000).
Both CAIR and ISNA were named unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007–2008 United States v. Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism-financing case in U.S. history. Federal prosecutors explicitly listed them among entities “who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood.” Court evidence included financial ties and organizational links to Hamas. A federal judge later ruled there was ample evidence supporting the designations.
Neither group is a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department, but the trial record and related federal documents treat them as part of the historical U.S. Muslim Brotherhood network.
Tayeb has also been a major donor to El-Sayed’s political efforts, contributing hundreds of thousands of dollars (reported totals reaching $200,000–$300,000) to the Fighting for Michigan Super PAC that supported El-Sayed’s 2026 Senate primary campaign.
These connections have been reported in detail by the Washington Free Beacon, referenced in Senate subcommittee hearings on the Muslim Brotherhood network in America, and covered by multiple outlets examining campaign finance and organizational histories.
Campaigning with Hasan Piker
El-Sayed did campaign with Twitch streamer Hasan Piker (commonly misspelled Hassan). Confirmed joint appearances include campus events at the University of Michigan and Michigan State University in April 2026, plus additional campaign-related events in the days before the August 4 primary (including a pre-primary gathering).
In an August 2019 Twitch livestream, Piker stated: “America deserved 9/11, dude. Fuck it, I’m saying it.” He later walked the remark back in part, calling the wording “inappropriate” and framing it as a critique of U.S. foreign policy creating conditions for the attacks. He has repeated related comments in subsequent years. The original quote is not disputed.
When pressed during the 2026 campaign, El-Sayed declined to disavow Piker’s past statements. He described efforts to force a repudiation as “gotcha” politics and “cancel culture,” while separately stating he does not believe the 9/11 attacks were justified. He defended the decision to appear with Piker on the grounds that it reached voters otherwise locked out of the political process.
🤬15❤7👍6🤮1
Deep-Red Mississippi Hands Black Robe to Full-Hijab Yemeni Immigration Attorney Who Guides Illegals to Citizenship Paths
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/deep-red-mississippi-hands-black-robe-full-hijab/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/08/deep-red-mississippi-hands-black-robe-full-hijab/
The Gateway Pundit
Deep-Red Mississippi Hands Black Robe to Full-Hijab Yemeni Immigration Attorney Who Guides Illegals to Citizenship Paths * The…
Mississippi conservatives are demanding answers after Ridgeland immigration attorney Assma A.
💩55👎16🤯2🤮2😁1😱1🤬1
When financial regulatory agencies like the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) indicate they are prepared to advance crypto regulations independently of congressional action (such as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act), they rely on their existing authority under federal law—specifically the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA).
1. The Steps the CFTC Will Take
To implement rules without a new statute, the CFTC utilizes administrative mechanisms that mirror the collaborative "Project Crypto" framework established alongside the SEC:
Joint Interpretive Guidance and Taxonomies: The CFTC and SEC coordinate to define asset classes. By formally classifying tokens that function outside of traditional investment contracts (such as decentralized utility tokens or digital commodities), the CFTC establishes jurisdiction without needing Congress to rewrite definitions.
No-Action Letters and Staff Advisories: The CFTC’s divisions (e.g., Division of Market Oversight, Division of Clearing and Risk) issue targeted advisories granting legal safe harbors to registered entities (like Designated Contract Markets and Derivatives Clearing Organizations) that list or clear digital asset derivatives.
Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking: For permanent regulations, the agency drafts formal rules published in the Federal Register, undergoes public comment periods, and subsequently votes on final implementations regarding spot market oversight, around-the-clock (24/7) trading infrastructure, and custody standards.
Onshoring Derivatives and Products: The CFTC uses its approval powers to bring offshore products (such as crypto asset perpetual contracts) onto domestic, regulated exchanges.
2. How Long Will It Take to Implement?
The timeline depends heavily on the regulatory mechanism chosen:
Immediate to 3 Months (Guidance & No-Action Relief): Joint agency statements, interpretive guidance, and staff no-action letters can take effect almost immediately upon publication. This offers rapid, short-term clarity for market participants.
6 to 18 Months (Formal Rulemaking): Full notice-and-comment administrative rulemaking—which requires drafting proposals, reviewing public feedback, and passing commissioner votes—typically takes between 6 months to a year and a half.
The Caveat (Litigation Risk): Rules implemented purely through executive agency action rather than congressional legislation are inherently more vulnerable to legal challenges under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which can stretch timelines out over years if challenged in federal courts.
3. How It Will Impact XRP
The regulatory shift and the CFTC stepping up its framework carry several direct implications for XRP:
Consolidation of "Digital Commodity" Status: Because joint SEC-CFTC guidance establishes that digital assets can transition out of being investment contracts—and given the resolution of past regulatory disputes—XRP benefits from a clearer pathway to being treated primarily as a digital commodity or utility asset when traded on secondary markets.
Access to U.S. Derivatives and Futures: With the CFTC actively carving out frameworks for digital commodity derivatives and onshoring products like perpetual contracts, regulated U.S. exchanges face fewer regulatory hurdles to list XRP-referenced futures and structured products.
Institutional Adoption and Custody: Clearer jurisdictional lines between the SEC and CFTC remove the compliance gray areas that previously deterred traditional financial institutions, custody providers, and asset managers from integrating XRP into institutional portfolios.
1. The Steps the CFTC Will Take
To implement rules without a new statute, the CFTC utilizes administrative mechanisms that mirror the collaborative "Project Crypto" framework established alongside the SEC:
Joint Interpretive Guidance and Taxonomies: The CFTC and SEC coordinate to define asset classes. By formally classifying tokens that function outside of traditional investment contracts (such as decentralized utility tokens or digital commodities), the CFTC establishes jurisdiction without needing Congress to rewrite definitions.
No-Action Letters and Staff Advisories: The CFTC’s divisions (e.g., Division of Market Oversight, Division of Clearing and Risk) issue targeted advisories granting legal safe harbors to registered entities (like Designated Contract Markets and Derivatives Clearing Organizations) that list or clear digital asset derivatives.
Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking: For permanent regulations, the agency drafts formal rules published in the Federal Register, undergoes public comment periods, and subsequently votes on final implementations regarding spot market oversight, around-the-clock (24/7) trading infrastructure, and custody standards.
Onshoring Derivatives and Products: The CFTC uses its approval powers to bring offshore products (such as crypto asset perpetual contracts) onto domestic, regulated exchanges.
2. How Long Will It Take to Implement?
The timeline depends heavily on the regulatory mechanism chosen:
Immediate to 3 Months (Guidance & No-Action Relief): Joint agency statements, interpretive guidance, and staff no-action letters can take effect almost immediately upon publication. This offers rapid, short-term clarity for market participants.
6 to 18 Months (Formal Rulemaking): Full notice-and-comment administrative rulemaking—which requires drafting proposals, reviewing public feedback, and passing commissioner votes—typically takes between 6 months to a year and a half.
The Caveat (Litigation Risk): Rules implemented purely through executive agency action rather than congressional legislation are inherently more vulnerable to legal challenges under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which can stretch timelines out over years if challenged in federal courts.
3. How It Will Impact XRP
The regulatory shift and the CFTC stepping up its framework carry several direct implications for XRP:
Consolidation of "Digital Commodity" Status: Because joint SEC-CFTC guidance establishes that digital assets can transition out of being investment contracts—and given the resolution of past regulatory disputes—XRP benefits from a clearer pathway to being treated primarily as a digital commodity or utility asset when traded on secondary markets.
Access to U.S. Derivatives and Futures: With the CFTC actively carving out frameworks for digital commodity derivatives and onshoring products like perpetual contracts, regulated U.S. exchanges face fewer regulatory hurdles to list XRP-referenced futures and structured products.
Institutional Adoption and Custody: Clearer jurisdictional lines between the SEC and CFTC remove the compliance gray areas that previously deterred traditional financial institutions, custody providers, and asset managers from integrating XRP into institutional portfolios.
❤7👏2💯2👍1
Forwarded from HQ Q - Official
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 JUST IN: BlackRock's Larry Fink calls tokenization "the next generation for markets."
Here's what nobody's connecting.
BlackRock doesn't have to announce anything for its tokenized Treasuries to reach the $XRP Ledger. They already do.
Ondo Finance runs OUSG on the #XRPL. OUSG holds BlackRock's BUIDL fund as its reserve backing. That's $212M of tokenized Treasuries live on the ledger right now.
Fink is describing a future. The $XRP Ledger is running the plumbing for it: 3 to 5 second settlement, 24/7, compliance built into the protocol, and $4B in real world assets already onboard.
The next generation of markets doesn't need to be built. It needs a ledger. And it already picked one.
Here's what nobody's connecting.
BlackRock doesn't have to announce anything for its tokenized Treasuries to reach the $XRP Ledger. They already do.
Ondo Finance runs OUSG on the #XRPL. OUSG holds BlackRock's BUIDL fund as its reserve backing. That's $212M of tokenized Treasuries live on the ledger right now.
Fink is describing a future. The $XRP Ledger is running the plumbing for it: 3 to 5 second settlement, 24/7, compliance built into the protocol, and $4B in real world assets already onboard.
The next generation of markets doesn't need to be built. It needs a ledger. And it already picked one.
💯5❤2👍1👏1🤯1🥱1
ABORTION UNTIL BIRTH.
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey signed the bill.
Democrats celebrated.
This is not a fringe claim. This is the law now in Massachusetts.
The previous 24-week limit is gone. The decision sits with the physician alone.
A child who can survive outside the womb can now be aborted right up to the moment of birth.
They smile for the cameras and call it progress.
This is the moral bankruptcy of a political movement that has abandoned the most vulnerable among us.
Share this if you refuse to look away.
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey signed the bill.
Democrats celebrated.
This is not a fringe claim. This is the law now in Massachusetts.
The previous 24-week limit is gone. The decision sits with the physician alone.
A child who can survive outside the womb can now be aborted right up to the moment of birth.
They smile for the cameras and call it progress.
This is the moral bankruptcy of a political movement that has abandoned the most vulnerable among us.
Share this if you refuse to look away.
🤬59🤮13💩8😱4😢4❤1🤯1