The Left is going to steal the Swedish election....elections are never this close...

Tesla Cyber SUV concept companion app 📐🔋
​An interactive concept running live on grok.me showing what an olive-wrapped Cyber SUV dashboard could look like.
​📱 Test the interface: https://tesla-cyber-suv.grok.me

This Couple Trapped Children in a Trailer for Years: Now Florida Is Seeking the Death Penalty

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/couple-trapped-children-trailer-years-now-florida-seeking/

Just like I delivered on the Great Big Beautiful Bill, which everyone said was impossible to pass, and the $1,776 to our great Military Warriors, I will get the $5000 for adult citizens if the Republicans win the House and Senate. JUST GET OUT AND VOTE REPUBLICAN!!! President DJT

Democrats will reach superretardation way before AI reaches superintelligence. — BOOKMARK THIS!!!

Republicans just got another bad decision from the United States Supreme Court, one that the Court System took forever to give, and then blamed it, in part, on no time left to implement a solution to our totally CORRUPT and out of control Mail-In voting “disaster,” which is a laughing stock all over the World, and where we are the only country that has to endure such a Nation Destroying SCAM. Justices Alito and Thomas, legends both, strongly disagreed with this horrible, highly political, ruling. It is a big loss for Republicans, and America itself, and makes cheating by the Radical Left “Dumocrats,” on Mail-In Ballots, a much easier thing to do - And now they have an open field to do so! The Supreme Court has really let our Country down! Certain Justices are petrified of these crazed and depraved Democrats, and are totally unable to show the courage necessary to save our America. Their horrible decision on Tariffs will be costing the U.S.A., for many years to come, Trillions and Trillions of Dollars. They didn’t even state, “money paid does not have to be paid back,” much to the benefit of entities that truly hate our Country, and have been RIPPING IT OFF FOR YEARS, unnecessarily costing us, immediately, Billions of Dollars. Likewise, the Supreme Court’s Decision on Birthright Citizenship is a complete and total disaster for America, and has already led to massive corruption with respect to “citizenship” in our Country. The damage done to America is incalculable, and they know this, just as everyone else does - It is an irreparable and unrecoverable harm! The Court’s inability and unwillingness to do the right thing for our Country will go down, in a very negative way, in the annals of History. This Supreme Court is bullied and cajoled by the Radical Left into making decisions that have set America back at least a hundred years. These are not the people I interviewed to serve on the United States Supreme Court, they are merely a shell of their original selves, a Court that is costing the United States Trillions of Dollars with shockingly bad rulings that are of such magnitude that it won’t be easily possible for our Country to recover or heal. It is a Court that will go down as having rendered some of the most destructive, hurtful, and damaging decisions in our Country’s history. It is not easy for me to write this criticism of the United States Supreme Court - it will likely cost me dearly for years to come - but I feel it my obligation and duty, as President, to do so for the America we love! Thank you for your attention to this very important matter. God bless the U.S.A. President DONALD J. TRUMP

If Congress remains deadlocked on comprehensive legislation like the CLARITY Act, the executive branch cannot create new statutory law out of thin air, but it can construct an aggressive, de facto federal regulatory regime using existing administrative levers, interagency coordination, and enforcement mechanisms.

​1. Interagency Mobilization via Executive Order and FSOC
The White House directs agency coordination by issuing targeted Executive Orders and activating the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC). Under Dodd-Frank Title VIII, FSOC holds the statutory authority to designate specific digital asset activities, clearing platforms, or stablecoin arrangements as "systemically important financial market utilities" (SIFMUs). This designation places them directly under Federal Reserve and prudential oversight without requiring new congressional authorization.

​2. Coordinated Administrative Rulemaking (SEC and CFTC)
Rather than relying solely on ad-hoc litigation, the SEC and CFTC can formalize market operations through notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA):
​Joint Jurisdictional Guidance: The two agencies can publish harmonized rules defining the boundary between "digital asset securities" and "digital commodities."
​Conditional Exemptive Relief: Regulators can craft tailored safe-harbor pathways, allowing token issuers to register under simplified, modified disclosure requirements under existing Section 36 exemptive authority of the Exchange Act.
​Custody and Clearing Mandates: Agencies can finalize strict asset-safeguarding rules, effectively barring commingling by requiring all registered intermediaries to custody assets with qualified, independent custodians.

​3. Bank-Rail Ring-Fencing (Fed, OCC, and FDIC)
Prudential banking regulators can dictate crypto market conduct by controlling access to fiat rails:
​Capital and Liquidity Surcharges: Enforcing punitive risk-weights and capital requirements on traditional banks holding crypto assets or providing custody services.
​Master Account Gatekeeping: The Federal Reserve can deny or delay access to the Federal Reserve payment system for state-chartered crypto trust institutions, effectively forcing platforms to comply with federal standards to access liquidity.

​4. Expanding National Security and FinCEN Mandates
The Treasury Department can expand Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance via FinCEN rulemaking. By broadly defining "money transmitters" to encompass decentralized finance (DeFi) smart-contract deployers, wallet providers, and liquidity pools, the executive branch can unilaterally enforce stringent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Financing of Terrorism (CFT) requirements across the ecosystem.

​5. Setting Precedent Through Consent Decrees
Agencies enforce compliance by leveraging settlements. When the SEC or CFTC settles with major exchanges, they embed structural operational mandates—such as mandatory audits, independent monitoring, and token-delisting protocols—into court-approved consent decrees, turning individual settlements into de facto industry-wide operating templates.

​The Major Questions Constraint
Any unilateral administrative push faces severe judicial limits. Following the Supreme Court's curtailment of agency deference in Loper Bright and the application of the Major Questions Doctrine, sweeping rules that attempt to transform the statutory scope of the SEC or CFTC without explicit congressional authorization will face immediate federal court challenges and injunctions. The executive branch can restrict and enforce, but permanent market structure clarity ultimately requires Congress.

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Senators who voted against advancing the Crypto Clarity Act:

Independents:

• Angus King
• Bernie Sanders

Republicans:

• Thom Tillis
• Jerry Moran
• Josh Hawley
• Susan Collins

Democrats:

• Andy Kim
• Tim Kaine
• Jack Reed
• Mark Kelly
• Ed Markey
• Tina Smith
• Jon Ossoff
• Alex Padilla
• Ron Wyden
• Dick Durbin
• Gary Peters
• Peter Welch
• Jeff Merkley
• Cory Booker
• Jacky Rosen
• Adam Schiff
• Brian Schatz
• Patty Murray
• Mark Warner
• Elissa Slotkin
• Mazie Hirono
• Chris Murphy
• Ben Ray Luján
• Ruben Gallego
• Maria Cantwell
• Maggie Hassan
• Amy Klobuchar
• Martin Heinrich
• John Fetterman
• Tammy Baldwin
• Michael Bennet
• Chuck Schumer
• Jeanne Shaheen
• Chris Van Hollen
• Elizabeth Warren
• Kirsten Gillibrand
• Raphael Warnock
• John Hickenlooper
• Tammy Duckworth
• Richard Blumenthal
• Lisa Blunt Rochester
• Sheldon Whitehouse
• Catherine Cortez Masto

Submit Comments on S7-2026-27
Regulation Crypto Assets
Complete this form to submit your comments. Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
Important: All comments will be made available to the public. Submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. This form should not be used for submitting a tip or complaint (including a whistleblower complaint). If you wish to submit a tip or complaint regarding a potential violation of the federal securities laws, please use our online form, or mail your information to the SEC Complaint Center at the following address: SEC Complaint Center, 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549-0213. You can also send a fax to 703-813-6965.

https://I.fixupx.com/InvestWithD/status/2100136482279506349

The central claim in that post is supported by the Senate’s official record, with one important clarification.
On September 15, the Senate rejected cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 3633, the CLARITY Act, 49–50. It was a procedural vote, not a final vote on the substance of the bill.

Sen. Thom Tillis initially voted YES and then changed his vote to NO. That put him on the prevailing side of the failed motion.
The official Senate record specifically says: “Motion by Senator Tillis to reconsider the vote … entered in Senate.”

That means there is a procedural mechanism to reconsider the failed cloture vote without simply treating the legislation as permanently dead.
Tillis himself subsequently said that the procedural motion was intended to allow senators to continue working toward an outcome.

What this means for CLARITY
The post is basically correct that Tillis's switch was procedural, not necessarily a substantive abandonment of CLARITY.
But there is an important distinction:
Reconsideration does not mean another CLARITY vote is automatically scheduled. The Senate still needs the political agreement and, critically, 60 votes for cloture. The failed vote was 49–50, so supporters currently remain 11 votes short of the 60-vote threshold on the actual tally.

The Senate's official record therefore gives this sequence:
YES → vote clearly failing → Tillis switches to NO → Tillis files motion to reconsider → procedural pathway remains open.
So the statement “CLARITY is not necessarily dead” is factually supportable. It would be too strong, however, to interpret the procedural maneuver as evidence that a second vote is definitely coming.
Reuters also reports that the legislation is effectively on hold as Congress approaches its election-related recess.

Most important point: this was not a final rejection of the CLARITY Act itself. It was rejection of cloture on the motion to proceed to the bill.

Keep negotiations going — supporters need to resolve remaining disagreements and build a broader bipartisan coalition.
Use Tillis’s reconsideration motion — this keeps a procedural route available to bring the cloture question back.
Get to 60 votes — the September 15 cloture vote was 49–50, so supporters need to add at least 11 votes.
Hold another Senate vote — if negotiations produce enough support, leadership can seek reconsideration/revote.
Pass the Senate — after clearing the Senate, the legislation would need to move through the remaining House process if necessary.
Presidential signature — final enactment requires the President to sign the bill (or Congress to override a veto).

11,100 CHILDREN FOUND.

Let that number sink in.

In just the last 18 months, this FBI has helped locate 11,100 missing children — a 21% INCREASE.

Senator Blackburn noted that under the Biden administration, north of 300,000 children could not be found.

Every number represents a child. A family. A life that matters.

The SEC’s September 17, 2026 “Innovation Exemption” creates a five-year, conditional pathway for tokenized U.S. stocks to trade on-chain using AMMs and liquidity pools. Eligible venues can avoid being treated as traditional exchanges, and certain liquidity providers can avoid dealer status.

Why this matters for Ripple/XRP
It validates blockchain-based market infrastructure. The SEC is explicitly allowing securities trading through smart contracts and on-chain liquidity pools rather than requiring the traditional exchange model.

It could increase institutional tokenization. If stocks, bonds and other securities increasingly move on-chain, infrastructure for tokenized assets becomes more valuable.

That is relevant to Ripple's strategy. Ripple has positioned the XRP Ledger around payments, tokenization and institutional financial infrastructure. An SEC framework that makes on-chain markets more workable is directionally compatible with that model.
AMMs are particularly interesting. The SEC specifically recognizes automated market makers and liquidity pools in the new framework.

Public, permissionless blockchains are explicitly contemplated. The SEC says the smart contracts used by qualifying TSVs must be auditable, public, and deployed on a public, permissionless distributed ledger.

But there is an important limitation
This does not mean XRP itself has received an exemption or that XRP has been classified as a non-security by this order.

The exemption is specifically for tokenized NMS stocks and the venues/liquidity providers facilitating them. It also excludes synthetic versions of stocks, and issuers can prevent their securities from being traded on a TSV.

So I'd characterize the impact as:
SEC accepts on-chain securities + AMM liquidity → more institutional blockchain infrastructure → potentially favorable environment for Ripple/XRPL → potentially positive for XRP utility/adoption.

The big XRP-specific catalyst would be something more direct, such as the SEC explicitly clarifying XRP's regulatory status, allowing XRP to serve as institutional liquidity/collateral, or financial institutions using the XRP Ledger/XRP for tokenized-asset settlement.

The fact that this comes immediately after the Senate's CLARITY Act setback is also significant: the SEC is demonstrating that it can provide some blockchain-market infrastructure clarity through its existing authority even without Congress passing the broader market-structure bill.