‼️TUESDAY‼️
19th October 2021

BE THERE!

⬆️ LONDON UK 🇬🇧

ITALY 1938 vs ITALY 2021

I warned about this last January in my talk to Geopolitics & Empire. Robin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOp3oY6cUts

GENOVA PORT, ITALY 🇮🇹 Policeman brings food to port workers on strike and No Green Pass demonstrators. Tells them to keep going and not give up. 19th October 2021.

Decline in the Birth Rate – England and Wales

The latest information from the ONS only looks to be providing information on the birth rate in England and Wales for the first quarter of this year (Jan – Mar 2021). This data was released at the end of June 2021 and the quarter 2 data now looks very overdue.

In the Q1 data we can see that both January and February 2021 had a lower birth rate than usual in comparison to previous years. March 2021 looks though to be on a par with what we might expect compared to recent years anyway.

That said the overall birth rate in Q1 of 2021 in England and Wales compared to this same quarter in 2019 and 2020 looks to be down by circa 7k plus births –about 5% lower than Q1 in 2019 or 2020.

As the numbers from the govt look broadly on a par or lower for stillbirths it means there has either been less pregnancies than usual starting in 2020 or more miscarriages or abortions have happened?


See related posts and links below

Decline in the Birth Rate – England and Wales

See Table of Data in the post above :https://t.me/robinmg/10210

The latest information from the ONS only looks to be providing information on the birth rate in England and Wales for the first quarter of this year (Jan – Mar 2021). This data was released at the end of June 2021 and the quarter 2 data now looks very overdue.

In the Q1 data we can see that both January and February 2021 had a lower birth rate than usual in comparison to previous years. March 2021 looks though to be on a par with what we might expect compared to recent years anyway.

That said the overall birth rate in Q1 of 2021 in England and Wales compared to this same quarter in 2019 and 2020 looks to be down by circa 7k plus births –about 5% lower than Q1 in 2019 or 2020.

As the numbers from the govt look broadly on a par or lower for stillbirths it means there has either been less pregnancies than usual starting in 2020 or more miscarriages or abortions have happened?

Per the govt abortion rates have been rising for last 3-4 years with reports showing that 2020 showed a record numbers of abortions which would obviously impact on live birth numbers in 2021. We are told that there were 209,917 abortions in England and Wales in 2020, the highest number since the Abortion Act was introduced.

However, the numbers show that abortions in 2020 were up circa 2.5k on 2019 so this would not explain the reason for the drop in the birth rate of circa 7k live births.

There is therefore a clearly evident drop in the birth rate in Q1 of 2021 which can only be due to more miscarriages, very late terminations or fewer women choosing to get pregnant last year.

Have the injections played a role in increasing miscarriages if women in their third trimester were injected between January and March 2021?

Is it perhaps that the level of care given to pregnant women from the NHS was poorer as almost all attention was diverted towards Covid which in turn could have lead to a greater number of miscarriages?

Or is it that fewer women for whatever reason got pregnant in 2020?

See the further related posts below


Link: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/datasets/provisionalbirthsinenglandandwales

Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/abortion-statistics-for-england-and-wales-2020/abortion-statistics-england-and-wales-2020.

Decline in the Birth Rate – Scotland

Unlike in England and Wales we do have the Q2 2021 (Apr-June) data for the number of live births in Scotland and the numbers shows a dramatic drop in the birth rate in Scotland in both Q1 and Q2.

In fact there were just 11,441 births registered in Scotland between 1 April and 30 June 2021 compared to a 5 year average (2015-2019) of 13,157; this is a sizeable fall of 13 percent.

In Q1 2021 in Scotland there was an 8.5 per cent fall in births compared with the quarter one average over the previous five years.

See further related posts below

Link: https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files//statistics/births-marriages-deaths-quarterly/21/q2/quarter-2-21-report.pdf

Decline in the Birth Rate – Scotland


Unlike in England and Wales we do have the Q2 2021 (Apr-June) data for the number of live births in Scotland and the numbers shows a dramatic drop in the birth rate in Scotland in both Q1 and Q2.

In fact there were just 11,441 births registered in Scotland between 1 April and 30 June 2021 compared to a 5 year average (2015-2019) of 13,157; this is a sizeable fall of 13 percent.

In Q1 2021 in Scotland there was an 8.5 per cent fall in births compared with the quarter one average over the previous five years.

Official figures on abortions showed there were 13,815 abortions carried out in 2020 in Scotland – the highest total since 2008 but an increase in 2020 of 209 from 2019 so as with England this was not the reason for the decline in the birth rate in Scotland.

So there is clearly an evident drop in the birth rate in Q1 and Q2 of 2021 which can only be due to more miscarriages or less women choosing to get pregnant.

Have the injection of pregnant women of poorer quality of care played a role?

https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files//statistics/births-marriages-deaths-quarterly/21/q1/quarter-1-21-report.pdf

https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files//statistics/births-marriages-deaths-quarterly/21/q2/quarter-2-21-report.pdf

https://righttolife.org.uk/news/scotland-abortion-numbers-rise-to-second-highest-ever-on-record-accompanies-introduction-of-diy-home-abortions

Declining Birth Rate

The table above shows that there have been a total of 615 reports of the loss of a baby, input and disclosed by the MHRA to 6th October 2021 following the Covid-19 injections.

If just 1% of the true figure is reported then there may have been as many as 61.5k miscarriages after the injections; if 10% were reported there could still be over 6k miscarriages after the injections.

Is this the reason for the declining birth rate that is already becoming evident?

See related posts above

Link to MHRA reports: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Link to post providing links to support only 1-10% being reported: https://t.me/robinmg/9206

Censorship: I’ve never seen a “Temporary removal” label on any scientific paper.

Not as if the subject is topical at all is it?

Mike

​​Are covid “vaccines” giving people AIDS? Immune system functions are dropping around 5% EACH WEEK in those who were vaccinated

The latest data from the United Kingdom’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report suggests that people who have been “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) are losing about five percent of their immune systems per week.

Doubly injected people between the ages of 40 and 70 have already lost about 40 percent of the immune system capacity from the moment they get injected.

“If this continues then 30-50 year-olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year,” reports .

There is no denying, based on the data, that fully vaccinated people now suffer from what appears to be acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, more popularly known as AIDS. Their immune systems are fading away, which many have been warning would be the case.

“People aged 40-69 have already lost 40% of their immune system capability and are losing it progressively at 3.3% to 6.4% per week,”

Interestingly, the worst-off demographic is people aged 40-49, who are suffering total immune system loss in about nine weeks.

Elderly people over the age of 80 last about 20 weeks, while the 50-59 age category only gets about 15 weeks.

“Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months,” warns The Exposé.

“30-50 year-olds will have lost it by Christmas. These people will then effectively have full blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS (National Health Service).”

Getting a “booster” shot will only speed up the death process

It is not just that the jabs do not provide the claimed amount of protection against the Fauci Flu. The fact of the matter is that they provide no protection at all in the long term and actually destroy a person’s immune system.

“Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the last column above). The figures above indicate that their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time),” The Exposé explains.

“But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination.”

People who take the Biden “Booster” shots will only accelerate this process by adding even more immune-destroying chemicals to their bodies. The downward spiral will move even faster, in other words, the more shots a person gets.

“If we do nothing about this, it will only get much worse than we ever could have imagined,” wrote one Exposé commenter. “I, for one, appreciate all who have stood against and continue to stand against this tyranny.”

“The spike protein hijacks your mitochondria … forever,” wrote another. “Mitochondria is the heart of your immune system. Essentially, it takes over your immune system. The spike proteins are the bioweapons. Your own immune system becomes a deadly weapon. This is HIV on steroids.”

Others echoed these same sentiments, noting that it is painfully obvious what the agenda is. How anyone could argue with a straight face that this is all for “public health” remains a mystery.

Subscribe ➡️⬇️➡️ @naomirwolf

Table for the post above

Natural Immunity, an appeal to policy-makers that don’t understand:

Why aren’t you currently vaccinated against Covid 19?

I was previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and tested positive for COVID-19. According to the latest research, this appears to offer protection that is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.

What is the latest research that you’re referencing?

This document summarizes 80 different studies that indicate naturally acquired immunity is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.

Are there studies that suggest otherwise?

Yes. This CDC study suggests that among persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, full vaccination provides additional protection against reinfection. Among previously infected Kentucky residents, those who were not vaccinated were more than twice as likely to be reinfected compared with those with full vaccination.

Why not get the vaccine anyway?

The primary reason is because according to the latest research, previous infection and natural immunity appears to offer protection that is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.

In addition, there are studies (including preprints) that indicate those who receive the vaccine after previously having Covid-19 are at a higher risk for suffering from severe symptoms and adverse reactions including:

Association between previous infection with SARS CoV-2 and the risk of self-reported symptoms after mRNA BNT162b2 vaccination: Data from 3,078 health care workers: Subjects already experiencing COVID-19 had an independent 3-fold higher risk of MSS after the first and a 30% lower risk after the second dose. No severe adverse events were reported.
Previous COVID-19 infection but not Long-COVID is associated with increased adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination: Prior COVID-19 infection but not ongoing Long-COVID symptoms were associated with an increase in the risk of self-reported adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination.
Higher incidence of reported adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) after first dose of COVID-19 vaccine among previously infected health care workers: n our study also, incidence of AEFI reported among those with previous COVID-19 infection was higher than other health workers even after adjusting for their sex, age and profession. Higher incidence of AEFI after first dose of vaccine among previously infected COVID-19 cases has also been reported in a study by Krammer et al (mRNA vaccines) as well as from ZOE COVID Symptom Study being conducted in the United Kingdom (mRNA and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine). Studies on mRNA vaccines by Saadat et al and Krammer F et al6 have brought out that the antibody titers in COVID-19 recovered vaccinees is 10–20 times higher than other vaccine recipients, which can be responsible for higher incidence of AEFI in this group of individuals.

And lastly -- this study comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity:
reinfections versus breakthrough infections demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. [And] that Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant. However, that additional protection was extremely minimal -- increasing incrementally from 99.74% to 99.86%.

Does the CDC recognize natural immunity?

Yes. According to the CDC, “Active Immunity results when exposure to a disease organism triggers the immune system to produce antibodies to that disease. Active immunity can be acquired through natural immunity or vaccine-induced immunity.

Natural immunity is acquired from exposure to the disease organism through infection with the actual disease.
Vaccine-induced immunity is acquired through the introduction of a killed or weakened form of the disease organism through vaccination.

Either way, if an immune person comes into contact with that disease in the future, their immune system will recognize it and immediately produce the antibodies needed to fight it. Active immunity is long-lasting, and sometimes life-long.”

What is the CDC’s stance on Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2?

The CDC does not currently have a definitive stance on Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2.

As studies continue to confirm that natural immunity is protective, I’m hopeful the CDC will provide clarity on this.

Most recently in September, Dr. Sunjy Gupta interviewed Dr. Fauci on CNN (2:18 mark) about a study in Israel that indicated natural immunity providing better protection than the vaccine alone. Dr. Fauci responded by saying “That’s a really good point, Sunjay. I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that. That’s something that we’re going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response. The one thing the paper from Israel didn’t tell you is whether or not as high as the protection is with natural infection, what's the durability compared to the durability of the vaccine. So, it is conceivable that you got infected and you are protected but you may not be protected for an indefinite period of time. So I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously because you very appropriately pointed out, it is an issue and there could be an argument for saying what you’ve said.”

Then there is 29 supportive reasons-

https://brownstone.org/articles/natural-immunity-and-covid-19-twenty-nine-scientific-studies-to-share-with-employers-health-officials-and-politicians/amp/

“He was down with Covid (last year), and got vaccinated. This comes as a huge shock for all of us,” Shah added.

Barot played 38 first-class and as many List A matches with 20 T20 games. For Saurashtra, he featured in 21 Ranji Trophy games, 17 List A matches and 11 T20 appearances. The Ranji final in March 2020 was his last first-class match.

https://www.telegraphindia.com/sports/saurashtras-avi-barot-passes-away-at-29/cid/1834841

Signs of depleted immunity following the AstraZeneca and Pfizer injections as reported by the MHRA (UK) to 6th October 2021.

Table shows the numbers of infections reported and disclosed by the MHRA.

Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Signs of depleted immunity following AstraZeneca and Pfizer Covid-19 injections as reported by the MHRA (UK) to 6th October 2021.

Table shows fatalities as a result of infections as disclosed by the MHRA following the injections.

Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

“Conclusions
This study provided in vivo evidence that inadvertent intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may induce myopericarditis. Brief withdrawal of syringe plunger to exclude blood aspiration may be one possible way to reduce such risk.”

See earlier related posts on this topic: https://t.me/robinmg/10132

“I suspect that at least the majority of very rapidly manifesting reactions is caused in this manner. In addition, animal experiments have shown more severe myocarditis after i.v. than after i.m. injection. Clotting etc. should likewise be more strongly induced. Overall, I suspect that accidental i.v. injection plays a major role.” Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD. See :https://t.me/robinmg/10133

Link to the study: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab707/6353927?searchresult=1

This is potentially a way to kill every person injected with a gene-based covid19 vaccine.
I’m not sure I understand it. It’s no less complicated than my concern that “it’s the boosters” idea.
Best wishes
Mike

"Threlkeld added, Williams also had been vaccinated for COVID about a month ago and that testing found the two types of antibodies in his system - one type of antibody that results from a natural COVID infection, and a second type of antibody from the vaccine. Threlkeld also said Williams tested negative for COVID-19 while in the hospital. 

Ordinary vaccines we have lots of experience with, such as measles, the flu shot, mumps and similar do not carry a risk beyond that of natural infection and cannot be weaponized because they produce the exact same antibody response as a natural infection.  If you have had either the measles or the shot you will have antibodies but an antibody test will not tell you which since they're not distinguishable.
I suspected from the start that due to the way these mRNA shots work -- they are not actually a vaccine at all in that they do not "mimic" natural infection but rather cause your cells to produce the spike protein that the virus has and that elicits an immune response -- that the antibodies produced by those jabs would be distinct and distinguishable from natural infection.
All of the so-called "experts" who worked to develop these and the firms involved knew damn well this was the case when they started developing them -- and did it anyway.
Now we have hard, scientific confirmation of that and it's very bad.
In fact it's potentially nation-ending bad.
An adversary that develops a virus (e.g. another modified/mutated bat virus, for example) that selectively targets ADE in people with the specific antibodies from vaccination, which are distinct from natural infection, could easily kill every single person who was vaccinated and not harm or only make mildly sick those who either had Covid-19 naturally or who were uninfected and unvaccinated."

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=241577