Forwarded from Dr. Lynn Fynn’s Science Enlightenment Channel & Stuff
Natural Immunity, an appeal to policy-makers that don’t understand:
Why aren’t you currently vaccinated against Covid 19?
I was previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and tested positive for COVID-19. According to the latest research, this appears to offer protection that is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.
What is the latest research that you’re referencing?
This document summarizes 80 different studies that indicate naturally acquired immunity is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.
Are there studies that suggest otherwise?
Yes. This CDC study suggests that among persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, full vaccination provides additional protection against reinfection. Among previously infected Kentucky residents, those who were not vaccinated were more than twice as likely to be reinfected compared with those with full vaccination.
Why not get the vaccine anyway?
The primary reason is because according to the latest research, previous infection and natural immunity appears to offer protection that is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.
In addition, there are studies (including preprints) that indicate those who receive the vaccine after previously having Covid-19 are at a higher risk for suffering from severe symptoms and adverse reactions including:
Association between previous infection with SARS CoV-2 and the risk of self-reported symptoms after mRNA BNT162b2 vaccination: Data from 3,078 health care workers: Subjects already experiencing COVID-19 had an independent 3-fold higher risk of MSS after the first and a 30% lower risk after the second dose. No severe adverse events were reported.
Previous COVID-19 infection but not Long-COVID is associated with increased adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination: Prior COVID-19 infection but not ongoing Long-COVID symptoms were associated with an increase in the risk of self-reported adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination.
Higher incidence of reported adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) after first dose of COVID-19 vaccine among previously infected health care workers: n our study also, incidence of AEFI reported among those with previous COVID-19 infection was higher than other health workers even after adjusting for their sex, age and profession. Higher incidence of AEFI after first dose of vaccine among previously infected COVID-19 cases has also been reported in a study by Krammer et al (mRNA vaccines) as well as from ZOE COVID Symptom Study being conducted in the United Kingdom (mRNA and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine). Studies on mRNA vaccines by Saadat et al and Krammer F et al6 have brought out that the antibody titers in COVID-19 recovered vaccinees is 10–20 times higher than other vaccine recipients, which can be responsible for higher incidence of AEFI in this group of individuals.
And lastly -- this study comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity:
reinfections versus breakthrough infections demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. [And] that Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant. However, that additional protection was extremely minimal -- increasing incrementally from 99.74% to 99.86%.
Does the CDC recognize natural immunity?
Yes. According to the CDC, “Active Immunity results when exposure to a disease organism triggers the immune system to produce antibodies to that disease. Active immunity can be acquired through natural immunity or vaccine-induced immunity.
Natural immunity is acquired from exposure to the disease organism through infection with the actual disease.
Vaccine-induced immunity is acquired through the introduction of a killed or weakened form of the disease organism through vaccination.
Why aren’t you currently vaccinated against Covid 19?
I was previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and tested positive for COVID-19. According to the latest research, this appears to offer protection that is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.
What is the latest research that you’re referencing?
This document summarizes 80 different studies that indicate naturally acquired immunity is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.
Are there studies that suggest otherwise?
Yes. This CDC study suggests that among persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, full vaccination provides additional protection against reinfection. Among previously infected Kentucky residents, those who were not vaccinated were more than twice as likely to be reinfected compared with those with full vaccination.
Why not get the vaccine anyway?
The primary reason is because according to the latest research, previous infection and natural immunity appears to offer protection that is equal to or more robust and superior to vaccination.
In addition, there are studies (including preprints) that indicate those who receive the vaccine after previously having Covid-19 are at a higher risk for suffering from severe symptoms and adverse reactions including:
Association between previous infection with SARS CoV-2 and the risk of self-reported symptoms after mRNA BNT162b2 vaccination: Data from 3,078 health care workers: Subjects already experiencing COVID-19 had an independent 3-fold higher risk of MSS after the first and a 30% lower risk after the second dose. No severe adverse events were reported.
Previous COVID-19 infection but not Long-COVID is associated with increased adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination: Prior COVID-19 infection but not ongoing Long-COVID symptoms were associated with an increase in the risk of self-reported adverse events following BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination.
Higher incidence of reported adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) after first dose of COVID-19 vaccine among previously infected health care workers: n our study also, incidence of AEFI reported among those with previous COVID-19 infection was higher than other health workers even after adjusting for their sex, age and profession. Higher incidence of AEFI after first dose of vaccine among previously infected COVID-19 cases has also been reported in a study by Krammer et al (mRNA vaccines) as well as from ZOE COVID Symptom Study being conducted in the United Kingdom (mRNA and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine). Studies on mRNA vaccines by Saadat et al and Krammer F et al6 have brought out that the antibody titers in COVID-19 recovered vaccinees is 10–20 times higher than other vaccine recipients, which can be responsible for higher incidence of AEFI in this group of individuals.
And lastly -- this study comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity:
reinfections versus breakthrough infections demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity. [And] that Individuals who were both previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and given a single dose of the vaccine gained additional protection against the Delta variant. However, that additional protection was extremely minimal -- increasing incrementally from 99.74% to 99.86%.
Does the CDC recognize natural immunity?
Yes. According to the CDC, “Active Immunity results when exposure to a disease organism triggers the immune system to produce antibodies to that disease. Active immunity can be acquired through natural immunity or vaccine-induced immunity.
Natural immunity is acquired from exposure to the disease organism through infection with the actual disease.
Vaccine-induced immunity is acquired through the introduction of a killed or weakened form of the disease organism through vaccination.
Forwarded from Dr. Lynn Fynn’s Science Enlightenment Channel & Stuff
Either way, if an immune person comes into contact with that disease in the future, their immune system will recognize it and immediately produce the antibodies needed to fight it. Active immunity is long-lasting, and sometimes life-long.”
What is the CDC’s stance on Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2?
The CDC does not currently have a definitive stance on Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2.
As studies continue to confirm that natural immunity is protective, I’m hopeful the CDC will provide clarity on this.
Most recently in September, Dr. Sunjy Gupta interviewed Dr. Fauci on CNN (2:18 mark) about a study in Israel that indicated natural immunity providing better protection than the vaccine alone. Dr. Fauci responded by saying “That’s a really good point, Sunjay. I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that. That’s something that we’re going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response. The one thing the paper from Israel didn’t tell you is whether or not as high as the protection is with natural infection, what's the durability compared to the durability of the vaccine. So, it is conceivable that you got infected and you are protected but you may not be protected for an indefinite period of time. So I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously because you very appropriately pointed out, it is an issue and there could be an argument for saying what you’ve said.”
Then there is 29 supportive reasons-
https://brownstone.org/articles/natural-immunity-and-covid-19-twenty-nine-scientific-studies-to-share-with-employers-health-officials-and-politicians/amp/
What is the CDC’s stance on Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2?
The CDC does not currently have a definitive stance on Natural Immunity to SARS-CoV-2.
As studies continue to confirm that natural immunity is protective, I’m hopeful the CDC will provide clarity on this.
Most recently in September, Dr. Sunjy Gupta interviewed Dr. Fauci on CNN (2:18 mark) about a study in Israel that indicated natural immunity providing better protection than the vaccine alone. Dr. Fauci responded by saying “That’s a really good point, Sunjay. I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that. That’s something that we’re going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response. The one thing the paper from Israel didn’t tell you is whether or not as high as the protection is with natural infection, what's the durability compared to the durability of the vaccine. So, it is conceivable that you got infected and you are protected but you may not be protected for an indefinite period of time. So I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously because you very appropriately pointed out, it is an issue and there could be an argument for saying what you’ve said.”
Then there is 29 supportive reasons-
https://brownstone.org/articles/natural-immunity-and-covid-19-twenty-nine-scientific-studies-to-share-with-employers-health-officials-and-politicians/amp/
Brownstone Institute
Natural Immunity and Covid-19: Thirty Scientific Studies to Share with Employers, Health Officials, and Politicians ⋆ Brownstone…
Studies demonstrating what was and is already known: natural immunity for a SARS-type virus is robust, long-lasting, and broadly effective.
“He was down with Covid (last year), and got vaccinated. This comes as a huge shock for all of us,” Shah added.
Barot played 38 first-class and as many List A matches with 20 T20 games. For Saurashtra, he featured in 21 Ranji Trophy games, 17 List A matches and 11 T20 appearances. The Ranji final in March 2020 was his last first-class match.
https://www.telegraphindia.com/sports/saurashtras-avi-barot-passes-away-at-29/cid/1834841
Barot played 38 first-class and as many List A matches with 20 T20 games. For Saurashtra, he featured in 21 Ranji Trophy games, 17 List A matches and 11 T20 appearances. The Ranji final in March 2020 was his last first-class match.
https://www.telegraphindia.com/sports/saurashtras-avi-barot-passes-away-at-29/cid/1834841
Telegraphindia
Saurashtra’s Avi Barot passes away at 29
He died while being taken to hospital after feeling unwell at his home in Ahmedabad on Friday night; he is survived by his mother and wife
Signs of depleted immunity following the AstraZeneca and Pfizer injections as reported by the MHRA (UK) to 6th October 2021.
Table shows the numbers of infections reported and disclosed by the MHRA.
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table shows the numbers of infections reported and disclosed by the MHRA.
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Signs of depleted immunity following AstraZeneca and Pfizer Covid-19 injections as reported by the MHRA (UK) to 6th October 2021.
Table shows fatalities as a result of infections as disclosed by the MHRA following the injections.
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
Table shows fatalities as a result of infections as disclosed by the MHRA following the injections.
Link: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
“Conclusions
This study provided in vivo evidence that inadvertent intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may induce myopericarditis. Brief withdrawal of syringe plunger to exclude blood aspiration may be one possible way to reduce such risk.”
See earlier related posts on this topic: https://t.me/robinmg/10132
“I suspect that at least the majority of very rapidly manifesting reactions is caused in this manner. In addition, animal experiments have shown more severe myocarditis after i.v. than after i.m. injection. Clotting etc. should likewise be more strongly induced. Overall, I suspect that accidental i.v. injection plays a major role.” Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD. See :https://t.me/robinmg/10133
Link to the study: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab707/6353927?searchresult=1
This study provided in vivo evidence that inadvertent intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may induce myopericarditis. Brief withdrawal of syringe plunger to exclude blood aspiration may be one possible way to reduce such risk.”
See earlier related posts on this topic: https://t.me/robinmg/10132
“I suspect that at least the majority of very rapidly manifesting reactions is caused in this manner. In addition, animal experiments have shown more severe myocarditis after i.v. than after i.m. injection. Clotting etc. should likewise be more strongly induced. Overall, I suspect that accidental i.v. injection plays a major role.” Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD. See :https://t.me/robinmg/10133
Link to the study: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab707/6353927?searchresult=1
This is potentially a way to kill every person injected with a gene-based covid19 vaccine.
I’m not sure I understand it. It’s no less complicated than my concern that “it’s the boosters” idea.
Best wishes
Mike
"Threlkeld added, Williams also had been vaccinated for COVID about a month ago and that testing found the two types of antibodies in his system - one type of antibody that results from a natural COVID infection, and a second type of antibody from the vaccine. Threlkeld also said Williams tested negative for COVID-19 while in the hospital.
Ordinary vaccines we have lots of experience with, such as measles, the flu shot, mumps and similar do not carry a risk beyond that of natural infection and cannot be weaponized because they produce the exact same antibody response as a natural infection. If you have had either the measles or the shot you will have antibodies but an antibody test will not tell you which since they're not distinguishable.
I suspected from the start that due to the way these mRNA shots work -- they are not actually a vaccine at all in that they do not "mimic" natural infection but rather cause your cells to produce the spike protein that the virus has and that elicits an immune response -- that the antibodies produced by those jabs would be distinct and distinguishable from natural infection.
All of the so-called "experts" who worked to develop these and the firms involved knew damn well this was the case when they started developing them -- and did it anyway.
Now we have hard, scientific confirmation of that and it's very bad.
In fact it's potentially nation-ending bad.
An adversary that develops a virus (e.g. another modified/mutated bat virus, for example) that selectively targets ADE in people with the specific antibodies from vaccination, which are distinct from natural infection, could easily kill every single person who was vaccinated and not harm or only make mildly sick those who either had Covid-19 naturally or who were uninfected and unvaccinated."
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=241577
I’m not sure I understand it. It’s no less complicated than my concern that “it’s the boosters” idea.
Best wishes
Mike
"Threlkeld added, Williams also had been vaccinated for COVID about a month ago and that testing found the two types of antibodies in his system - one type of antibody that results from a natural COVID infection, and a second type of antibody from the vaccine. Threlkeld also said Williams tested negative for COVID-19 while in the hospital.
Ordinary vaccines we have lots of experience with, such as measles, the flu shot, mumps and similar do not carry a risk beyond that of natural infection and cannot be weaponized because they produce the exact same antibody response as a natural infection. If you have had either the measles or the shot you will have antibodies but an antibody test will not tell you which since they're not distinguishable.
I suspected from the start that due to the way these mRNA shots work -- they are not actually a vaccine at all in that they do not "mimic" natural infection but rather cause your cells to produce the spike protein that the virus has and that elicits an immune response -- that the antibodies produced by those jabs would be distinct and distinguishable from natural infection.
All of the so-called "experts" who worked to develop these and the firms involved knew damn well this was the case when they started developing them -- and did it anyway.
Now we have hard, scientific confirmation of that and it's very bad.
In fact it's potentially nation-ending bad.
An adversary that develops a virus (e.g. another modified/mutated bat virus, for example) that selectively targets ADE in people with the specific antibodies from vaccination, which are distinct from natural infection, could easily kill every single person who was vaccinated and not harm or only make mildly sick those who either had Covid-19 naturally or who were uninfected and unvaccinated."
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=241577
The Market Ticker
The West's Obituary
<p>Right now the Chinese are furiously working in their biolabs, as are a whole host of other nefarious nations, such as North Korea and likely Iran.</p><p><a
Let children's voices be heard... UsforThem's latest campaign aims to illustrate the lived experiences of youngsters, who have been ignored for too long, by too many.
📢Please get involved in our latest campaign #ShineALight if your child or children have a story to tell and a message to be heard.
 Perhaps they want to highlight how the reintroduction of restrictive measures, such as bubbles and masks in school have affected them, or how their friendships have been affected.
 Perhaps they'd like to highlight positive steps their school have taken to get back to normal, or measures schools have taken to help children who are suffering from the impact of covid-measures on their mental health.
 Perhaps they have sufferered as a consequence of vaccination coersion or intimidation.
Whatever your child has experienced since the start of the Autumn term, whether positive or negative, if they'd like to help raise awareness of what children are going through, we'd like to hear about it! Parents or children can take part by completing a short form - scroll down for link.
N.B. In order to have the most impact, please keep stories concise and focussed. A few lines are ideal, so we can turn these into short, snappy social media squares and reach as wide an audience as possible. You can of course choose to remain anonymous when submitting your comments.
Shine A Light - UsforThem
https://usforthem.co.uk/shine-a-light/?utm_source=UsforThem&utm_campaign=c06e1e135a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_09_06_05_30_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e634215e5e-c06e1e135a-509599458
📢Please get involved in our latest campaign #ShineALight if your child or children have a story to tell and a message to be heard.
 Perhaps they want to highlight how the reintroduction of restrictive measures, such as bubbles and masks in school have affected them, or how their friendships have been affected.
 Perhaps they'd like to highlight positive steps their school have taken to get back to normal, or measures schools have taken to help children who are suffering from the impact of covid-measures on their mental health.
 Perhaps they have sufferered as a consequence of vaccination coersion or intimidation.
Whatever your child has experienced since the start of the Autumn term, whether positive or negative, if they'd like to help raise awareness of what children are going through, we'd like to hear about it! Parents or children can take part by completing a short form - scroll down for link.
N.B. In order to have the most impact, please keep stories concise and focussed. A few lines are ideal, so we can turn these into short, snappy social media squares and reach as wide an audience as possible. You can of course choose to remain anonymous when submitting your comments.
Shine A Light - UsforThem
https://usforthem.co.uk/shine-a-light/?utm_source=UsforThem&utm_campaign=c06e1e135a-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2021_09_06_05_30_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e634215e5e-c06e1e135a-509599458
UsforThem
Shine A Light - UsforThem
Loading…
Southwest scrapped a plan to put unvaccinated workers with pending exemptions on unpaid leave after the Dec. 8 deadline.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/19/southwest-vaccine-mandate-unpaid-leave-exemptions.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/19/southwest-vaccine-mandate-unpaid-leave-exemptions.html
CNBC
Southwest drops plan to put unvaccinated staff on unpaid leave starting in December
Southwest and American Airlines are trying to reassure employees about job security ahead of the federal vaccine deadline.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Reports of Canadian military forcibly injecting native american indians. After further verification it seems the reports may be false.
11 minute video of the events yesterday in Trieste, Italy.
https://rumble.com/vnxpz5-trieste-18-ottobre-2021-siamo-tutti-italiani.html
https://rumble.com/vnxpz5-trieste-18-ottobre-2021-siamo-tutti-italiani.html
Rumble
Trieste, 18 ottobre 2021, siamo tutti Italiani
Il 18 ottobre 2021 il mondo ha visto in diretta quanto è accaduto a Trieste: la polizia ha colpito con idranti e lacrimogeni manifestanti inermi. Questo video vuole mostrare al mondo cosa è successo.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
GENOVA PORT, ITALY 🇮🇹
19th October 2021
19th October 2021
Forwarded from RT UK
Things for kids to do this October half-term:
- Go for walks
- Go pumpkin picking
- Get vaccinated?
Sajid Javid today announced 12-15-year-olds will now be able to use the online portal to book themselves a first dose of the jab at walk-in vaccine centres over the half term.
Subscribe to RT UK: t.me/RTUKNEWS
- Go for walks
- Go pumpkin picking
- Get vaccinated?
Sajid Javid today announced 12-15-year-olds will now be able to use the online portal to book themselves a first dose of the jab at walk-in vaccine centres over the half term.
Subscribe to RT UK: t.me/RTUKNEWS
Forwarded from HATS 🎩
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Woman in Italy denied medical treatment because she failed to produce Convid Passport.
@HATSTRUTH 🎩
@HATSTRUTH 🎩
Forwarded from UNN
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Police rush to protect Michael Gove as he’s chased by pro freedom protesters on the streets outside the home office.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
LONDON UK 🇬🇧 People gather outside the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation HQ, call for his immediate arrest. @UnityNewsNetwork
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
LONDON UK 🇬🇧 Fans welcome Michael Gove..
Gove was part of a committee of cabinet ministers, comprising Johnson, Rishi Sunak and Matt Hancock, that forced restrictions. He is chair of the COVID-19 operations subcommittee. Under the terms of England's all-tier COVID-19 restrictions in December 2020, pubs were only legally allowed to serve alcoholic beverages with a substantial meal. Gove said that this did not include Scotch eggs, which he defined as a "starter" on multiple occasions (although he said it "would count as a substantial meal if there were table service"); however, he later backtracked and said: "I do recognise that it is a substantial meal."
In a COBR meeting Gove chaired on 24 November 2020, he agreed, with the leaders of the UK's devolved governments, to a set of rules governing social mixing for the whole of the country over the Christmas period. It allowed for up to three households to form a "bubble" from 23 to 27 December, but was cancelled for London and South East.
Gove was part of a committee of cabinet ministers, comprising Johnson, Rishi Sunak and Matt Hancock, that forced restrictions. He is chair of the COVID-19 operations subcommittee. Under the terms of England's all-tier COVID-19 restrictions in December 2020, pubs were only legally allowed to serve alcoholic beverages with a substantial meal. Gove said that this did not include Scotch eggs, which he defined as a "starter" on multiple occasions (although he said it "would count as a substantial meal if there were table service"); however, he later backtracked and said: "I do recognise that it is a substantial meal."
In a COBR meeting Gove chaired on 24 November 2020, he agreed, with the leaders of the UK's devolved governments, to a set of rules governing social mixing for the whole of the country over the Christmas period. It allowed for up to three households to form a "bubble" from 23 to 27 December, but was cancelled for London and South East.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
LONDON UK 🇬🇧 Potemkin Parliament.. not even hiding it any longer.