https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/supplies-of-sedative-used-for-covid-19-patients-diverted-from-france-to-avoid-potential-shortages

Hold on, was Covid19 not meant to be a respiratory disease? What were all those ventilators for in reality if patients were given midazolam?

"Midazolam has been associated with respiratory depression and respiratory arrest , especially when used for sedation in noncritical care settings."
https://www.drugs.com/sfx/midazolam-side-effects.html

Yet:

19th May 2020: "Supplies of sedative midazolam used for COVID-19 patients diverted from France to avoid potential shortages - The Pharmaceutical Journal"

MAY 2020: "A spokesperson from Accord Healthcare, one of five manufacturers of the drug, told The Pharmaceutical Journal that it had to gain regulatory approval to sell French-labelled supplies of midazolam injection to the NHS, after having already sold two years’ worth of stock to UK wholesalers “at the request of the NHS” in March 2020.
The DHSC said the request for extra stock was part of “national efforts to respond to the coronavirus outbreak”

https://pharmaceutical-journal.com/article/news/supplies-of-sedative-used-for-covid-19-patients-diverted-from-france-to-avoid-potential-shortages

Evidence for a connection between coronavirus disease-19 and exposure to radiofrequency radiation from wireless communications including 5G

"SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, surfaced in Wuhan, China shortly after the implementation of city-wide (fifth generation [5G] of wireless communications radiation [WCR]), and rapidly spread globally, initially demonstrating a statistical correlation to international communities with recently established 5G networks. In this study, we examined the peer-reviewed scientific literature on the detrimental bioeffects of WCR and identified several mechanisms by which WCR may have contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic as a toxic environmental cofactor.

By crossing boundaries between the disciplines of biophysics and pathophysiology, we present evidence that WCR may: (1) cause morphologic changes in erythrocytes including echinocyte and rouleaux formation that can contribute to hypercoagulation; (2) impair microcirculation and reduce erythrocyte and hemoglobin levels exacerbating hypoxia; (3) amplify immune system dysfunction, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity, and hyperinflammation; (4) increase cellular oxidative stress and the production of free radicals resulting in vascular injury and organ damage; (5) increase intracellular Ca2+ essential for viral entry, replication, and release, in addition to promoting pro-inflammatory pathways; and (6) worsen heart arrhythmias and cardiac disorders."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/

NON-GMP-COMPLIANT BATCHES ASSOCIATED WITH DEATHS AND DISABILITIES

"Pfizer produced 33 batches of vaccine between July and November of 2020. However, the regulators wrote to Pfizer informing them that they were not GMP compliant in 117 different ways.

Despite these batches being non-compliant, they were shipped anyway within a week, and resulted in over 1000 deaths.

The batches are from Pfizer's EJ, EK, and EL series.

Under emergency use authorisation, GMP compliance must still be upheld.

The extreme variation in toxicity between batches of equal size is evidence of the breakdown of manufacturing compliance which resulted in high levels of death and disability."

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WMUvLcmP1Wtk/

NON-GMP-COMPLIANT BATCHES ASSOCIATED WITH DEATHS AND DISABILITIES

Do Pfizer Batch Codes code for Toxicity ?

"Each range of toxicity (indexed by levels of adverse reactions) has a distinct alpha numeric batch code. As the alphabet ascends, the toxicity appears to decrease in a linear step-wise fashion.

Was Pfizer testing out different concentrations of vaccine - and labelling each dosage level with a particular code? Scientists normally label each experimental condition carefully, so they can record and monitor the effects of that condition. Is that what is happening here?

Certainly, the batch codes within a particular toxicity range are not random between one range and another, but seem to ascend alphabetically as the toxicity falls.

And within each range, all the batch codes form a sequential mathematical series !

It appears that the adverse reactions may not be so much the product of the ill health of the vaccine recipients, but rather may simply be dependent upon the particular batch code series administered."

https://www.bitchute.com/video/CB49QokMgGV5/

The Ethical Case Against Covid-19 Vaccine Mandates

"In the fall of 2021, Dr. Julie Ponesse saw her academic career of 20 years fall apart after she refused to comply with a Canadian university's COVID vaccine mandate.

This is her account of the battle and its aftermath, written with passion and intelligence. But Dr. Ponesse's story travels beyond the personal and examines the ethical and philosophical dimensions of our pandemic response.

If there is anyone out there who feels alone in the struggle to preserve personal choice and freedom, this book offers some very human advice on how to move forward and makes it clear that your voice deserves to be heard."

https://www.mychoicebook.ca/

London’s Met Police is expanding its use of facial recognition technology

"In a little-publicised decision made at the end of August, the Mayor of London’s office approved a proposal allowing the Met to boost its surveillance technology. The proposal says that in the coming months the Met will start using Retrospective Facial Recognition (RFR), as part of a £3 million, four-year deal with Japanese tech firm NEC Corporation. The system examines images of people obtained by the police before comparing them against the force’s internal image database to try and find a match.

“Those deploying it can in effect turn back the clock to see who you are, where you've been, what you have done and with whom, over many months or even years,” says Ella Jakubowska, policy advisor at  European Digital Rights, an advocacy group. Jakubowska says the technology can “suppress people's free expression, assembly and ability to live without fear”.

The purchase of the system is one of the first times the Met’s use of RFR has been publicly acknowledged. Previous versions of its facial recognition web page on the Wayback Machine shows references to RFR were added at some stage between November 27, 2020, and February 22, 2021. The technology is currently used by six police forces in England and Wales, according to a report published in March. “The purchase of a modern, high-performing facial recognition search capability reflects an upgrade to capabilities long used by the Met as well as a number of other police forces,” a spokesperson for the Met says.

Critics argue that the use of RFR encroaches on people’s privacy, is unreliable and could exacerbate racial discrimination. “In the US, we have seen people being wrongly jailed thanks to RFR,” says Silkie Carlo, director of civil liberties group Big Brother Watch. “A wider public conversation and strict safeguards are vital before even contemplating an extreme technology like this, but the Mayor of London has continued to support expensive, pointless and rights-abusive police technologies.”

https://archive.is/bhcW3

This short video puts to rest the idea that vaccine passports & mandatory vaccination can play any role in reducing the spread of the virus.
On the contrary, it makes it worse.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q5DjWbyYdvnt/

Whilst you were distracted by “Sir” Tony Blair, the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Vaccinated account for 3 in every 4 Omicron Hospitalisations

The latest data available from the UK Health Security Agency confirms that 3 in every 4 Omicron cases admitted to hospital up to 29th December 2021 were people who had been vaccinated against Covid-19…

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/05/3-in-4-omicron-hospitalisations-vaccinated/

Just one fifth of the weekly rise in Covid inpatients was caused by people admitted to hospital because of the virus, figures suggest

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/12/28/covid-hospital-data-should-treated-caution-many-patients-admitted/

Well, this makes perfect sense. If you’ve got stark, raving mad.
Mike

Any Severe Covid Patient Can Produce More Virus Than All The Children in America

"I will not dive into the rationale for the intolerable crime against humanity committed on our children throughout the world these past two years.

The fact is that children have been accused of being the principal source of SARS-COV-2 and have been outrageously bullied because of that. It is ironic that those who feel at peace bullying our children are often the same righteous people who were tutoring against bullying practices at school a few years ago…

The reality is that collectively children are least prone to propagating a toxic dose of SARS-COV-2: they carry the smallest viral load for the shortest duration.  In fact, it is certain healthy1 children produce exponentially less than very elderly/sick persons with delayed immune responses.
I had addressed this extensively in my August article: “A Novel Perspective on a Not So Novel Virus”, highlighting the many differences in propagation dynamics between children and adults, summarised in the scheme below, and explaining why children can be natural vaccines more than anything else.

But, I hadn’t taken the time to prove how dramatic the difference was between a child mildly sick for a couple of days and an elderly carrying the virus for weeks.

In fact, a simple mathematical calculation using this duration and the SC2 propagation speed is sufficient to demonstrate the reality of who is poisonous to whom. And spoiler alert, it’s not the children.

THE REALITY IS THAT ONE SINGLE SEVERE COVID PATIENT CAN PRODUCE MORE VIRUS THAN ALL CHILDREN IN AMERICA. THAT’S FACTUAL.

Even considering infecting doses are the same - which we know they aren’t because LTCF patients cross-infect each other with very heavy inocula - a huge difference lies in the exponential propagation left untouched by the immune system in ageing or sick patients.

A recent study 2 estimated that the reproduction yield of SARS-COV-2 in the body to be 10x per 36/48 hours.  In other words, a delay of 12 days in the immune reaction vs children could account for expansion - adjusting for obesity acceleration and for ACE2 differential - of nearly 100 million times.  And that’s not adjusted for higher and repeated doses 100-1000x inocula…

In other words, all the healthy kids in America - distributed across the country -  cannot together ever produce the amount of one single severe patient dying of COVID, let alone LTCF patients surrounded with hundreds of elderly each producing high viral loads. 

Not only are kids not producing anywhere near what an immuno-senescent sick elderly produces, but they are widely dispersed and therefore the toxic consequences on the community cannot be not compared."

https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/any-severe-covid-patient-can-produce?r=4jnik

New York Times Admits America Sacrificed Children’s Well-Being For Sake Of [Fake] Adults’ Safety In The Name Of COVID-19

https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-york-times-admits-america-sacrificed-childrens-well-being-for-sake-of-adults-safety-in-the-name-of-covid-19

"The truth about NHS capacity."
https://youtu.be/FxRvsrYGbX4

"Nigel Farage: Is the NHS fit for purpose?"
https://youtu.be/ddQdc1HOoDE

SEPARATION OF MEDICINE AND THE STATE IS ESSENTIAL:

An alternative to the current National Health Service is a Local Health Service.

No more centralised state control of medicine ever again. It is open to wide scale top down corruption & abuse without any accountability as clearly demonstrated in the last 2 years if not the last 3 decades.

The LHS (Local Health Service) should be the new NHS. Let's get this debate going.

Localism instead of centralization. The primary advantage of a local health service is accountability. The local health service and its staff are much more easily held accountable by the local community. No centralised smoke-screens.

We should not tolerate politicians imposing medical decisions ever again.