"The discovery that Sars Cov 2 is a bacterial virus has enormous consequences. The risk among vaccinated people of fatal enhancemeny of the disease or ADE. The phenomenon of vaccine resistance causing the spread of more dangerous and contagious mutantions of the virus" Dr Loretta Bolgan, Italy
https://scenarieconomici.it/moltissimo-di-cio-che-ci-dicono-su-virus-e-vaccini-e-sbagliato-il-resto-e-nascosto/

See what they were trying to distract us from now? The whole house of vaccine ID cards is premised on bad science, we can blow it down if we all blow at the same time in the right direction.

SARSCoV2 "injects its own genetic content into the bacterium and from there it is replicated. We have absolute and indisputable evidence of this with the many experimental tests we have performed. We are also collecting electron microscope photos. Let me explain. A virus normally attacks our cells, namely the epithelium and mucous membranes. It tries to enter and replicate itself and this induces an immune response in the host. It triggers a series of biochemical events to which the body responds with inflammation proteins. But above our cells there is the microbiome, or a layer of "good" bacteria that live with us. In the case of a bacteriophage virus, it does not pass without first interfacing with the microbiome, but also enters the bacteria. We were tied to the classic concept that the problem is that phages are usually ten times smaller than a coronavirus! Diphtheria, for example, is also a disease caused by a bacterium that produces toxins because it has been colonized by a phage virus."

https://www.affaritaliani.it/coronavirus/vaccino-attuale-non-sufficiente-ci-vuole-altro-per-debellare-il-virus-720062.html

"How did you understand this?

We at Craniomed do research on proteins. The absence of taste and smell in Covid patients was the subject of study and we used a very fine method, mass spectrometry, to find some abnormal proteins, which interfere with the nerve transmission of the two senses mentioned above. We have found such abnormal proteins in the blood and urine in people affected by COVID-19. Well, we have observed the same toxins several times in the same person but each time with different amino acids and this has made us go back to a concept of classical biology: when there are defects in the production of amino acids in the person, the origin of the problem is of type bacterial."

"Can you explain exactly how the evidence was reached that Sars Cov 2 replicates its RNA in bacteria?

I will try to explain it in a simple way. We did this by culturing bacteria from our microbiome and the virus. First, we took the fecal swab of some COVID-19 patients and cultured it for up to 7.14 and 30 days, seeing that the virus increased RNA production. Then, we took the virus and cultured it with bacteria from the fecal swab of a non-sick person, seeing that it replicated here too. Finally, we took the bacteria from the first experiment and separated them from the virus! We grew them on their own and at 30 days they were still producing virions. The evidence was clear and we were incredulous at what we observed."

SARSCoV2 "can be treated with antibiotics and avoiding some drugs but at "time zero".
Q: "What antibiotics? And also here what evidence do you have?"
A: "We tested 18 antibiotics and treated 115 symptomatic infected with previous pathologies. Azithromycin, amoxicillin, metronidazole and vancomycin work great. We gave these antibiotics and probiotics immediately and at “time zero”. The problem with this virus is toxins. Some enhance the drugs normally taken by people being treated for other previous diseases. For example, anti-inflammatories such as ibufrofen and even paracetamol cause many problems. Let's take an example. We have the rationale that bacteria produce a protein very similar to phospholipase A 2, which acts on inflammation and enhances pneumonia and coagulation of the vascular microcirculation. If we administer an anti-inflammatory NSAID we will amplify this effect. That is, we make pneumonia more severe. Increases in coagulation, neurological problems, pneumonia have resulted from this toxin-drug synergy. The toxin similar to conotoxin is the one that is most deleterious and is the one that acts on our autonomic nervous system and increases the effect of our neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, therefore all people who take drugs such as to name a few are at greater risk. ace inhibitors, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, drugs for Parkinson's, and other similar diseases"

"What about current vaccines? Are they needed in the light of this evidence?"

"We need other vaccines, in addition to these already present. Since Sars Cov 2 also replicates in bacteria, current vaccines will have partially sufficient efficacy. For RNA vaccines that derive from gene therapies, we do not yet know if there are any long-term positive effects in terms of efficacy. Instead, the vaccine solution against toxins will certainly be taken into consideration. I clarify, they are pros for vaccines but they must be the right ones, it cannot be ignored that the virus is also a bacteriophage and that above all powerful toxins are released! Something is needed here to fight the toxins. I remember that the diphtheria vaccine did exactly that." CARLO BROGNA

See above. The logic of vaccine passports when the vaccines are even partially the "wrong" ones for such a virus is now entirely not tenable even in principle. We need to insist on this point: they are the wrong type of vaccine as they were designed by scientists who did not know the virus spreads also through bacteria. Antibiotics or bacteriostatics are more appropriate even in principle at this stage, together with any antiviral supplement such as zinc, vitamins C&D, & Ivermectin. Vaccines? Wrong design in the first place.

I am posting this once more, as it's groundbreaking:
"Scientific evidence for the involvement of human microbiota in the development of COVID-19 disease was reported recently. We elaborated these findings further and collected data on the relationship between faecal bacteria, isolated from stool from COVID-19 patients, and SARS-CoV-2. The preliminary results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 replicates in bacterial growth medium inoculated with a stool sample from an infected patient and that the replication follows bacterial growth.
These results are unexpected and when confirmed on large sample sizes hint towards novel hypotheses on the biology of SARS-CoV-2 and on the COVID-19 epidemiology.
The data reported here suggest a possible ‘bacteriophage-like’ behaviour of SARS-CoV-2, which to our knowledge was never observed or described before. The discovery of possible new modes of action of SARS-CoV-2 has far-reaching implications for the prevention and the treatment of the disease, necessitating quick sharing of even preliminary findings with the global scientific community."
https://zenodo.org/record/4088208#.YE6KnE8XadO

Mike Yeadon on the above image and linked study:

"Robin,
I’ve just been made aware of a study of the effect of mRNA vaccines on female fertility, just begun recruiting in Israel.
Here’s the link to the public disclosure.
I think people should know that such a study is running. Perhaps it’s merely precautionary. Maybe it’s because there’s a low homologous between spike protein & certain key signalling molecules.
I’d appreciate a reproductive endocrinologist critiquing what’s being done, endpoints & statistical powering etc. It is a small study. I dislike underpowered studies as they can be used as a whitewash.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04748172?term=mRNA+vaccine&draw=2&rank=10

Best wishes,
Mike"

Mike Yeadon:

Robin,
Additional warning from the Norwegian regulator.
How long before they all appreciate that spike protein based vaccines aren’t a good idea?
Mike

"A bacterial virus
The thesis supported by Bolgan, since last July, that the virus that causes the covid was a bacterial virus, has recently found confirmation in the research results of Dr. Carlo Brogna and his team with whom Dr. Bolgan has recently started collaborating. Brogna's team was the first in the world to photograph and face the virus. Its bacterial nature explains why antibiotics are effective against the virus, used among other things by those doctors who have identified early home therapy in the field whose success, practically total, in the timely treatment of covid patients at home as outpatients, followed by the promotion and dissemination of the same by the government and the CTS (Italy's SAGE) who continue inexplicably to ignore it."
https://scenarieconomici.it/moltissimo-di-cio-che-ci-dicono-su-virus-e-vaccini-e-sbagliato-il-resto-e-nascosto/

"The bacterial nature of the virus is also consistent with the finding that immune probiotics are effective in its control. When asked, Dr. Bolgan specifies that the awareness of the nature of the virus is of great importance for the identification of the correct treatment and prevention, having "a significant impact on all the knowledge relating to its mode of transmission, putting the whole procedure into question. which has been put in place for its containment such as masks, distancing etc. because they presuppose an environmental spread of the virus, which is found in the environment, different from that expected since this virus behaves more like a phage. Bacteria act as a vehicle for the virus, facilitating the infection of cells including eukaryotes. The virus, it is documented, therefore also enters epithelial cells as well as macrophages. Mainly, however, it is a virus that infects bacteria through which it stimulates the great storm of cytokines together with a strong production of bacterial toxins responsible, among other things, for all the neurological manifestations of covid."

"I have received numerous reports that people who have been vaccinated for the flu and then for covid develop covid after about a week! Swab tests indicate that there is viral replication and this tells us that the virus has reactivated. There are two ways to reactivate. In the first it is due to the persistence of the virus in bacterial cells (not harmful - its presence is simply reactivated at the bacterial level), in the second the reactivation would take place precisely because it would have integrated into the DNA exactly as retroviruses do (typical example herpes which is an integrated retrovirus). This assumes that the RNA of the virus must be back-transcribed and integrated. This behavior has been demonstrated for this virus at the cell level; for the moment it has been seen that the integration is partial, however the evidence of people who get sick after vaccination makes me think that the virus integrates completely."

"To think that there are those who talk about giving a vaccine passport to those who undergo vaccination, an immunity license for a vaccine that does not guarantee any immunity"
"The passport does not make sense a priori. I don't find this strategy correct anyway. In my opinion these seasonal infections have very similar ways of spreading."

"Therefore, make an important and substantial investment in the prevention and treatment of the flu phase and avoid the tracking of positives based on swabs which is strategically not so fundamental, given the problems of managing the few staff and financial resources we have. On the other hand, we take into account the fact that there are studies that are giving us the information that asymptomatic patients, by their characteristic, have selected attenuated viruses within their bodies. Asymptomatics, therefore, select mutants that are not actually capable of causing the disease. This is why they are asymptomatic. They are potentially infectious, but they infect to a low degree. Ultimately it is as if they were natural vaccines because they infect low-grade people with naturally attenuated viruses through their bodies."

"A natural vaccination. These people should be hugged when we meet them?"

"In theory, yes, in theory they are the ones that end the epidemic first because they allow the rapid spread of the virus in the form of a non-dangerous mutant other than the one that can cause the disease; ending the disease earlier, they also prevent the selection of more aggressive and dangerous mutants. They therefore have various purposes. A substantial part of the literature and studies that have not been done enough to see why the asymptomatic is asymptomatic and why the asymptomatic is asymptomatic compared to someone who gets the disease; it seems that the reason lies in the mutants that are replicating in their organism. We take into account, in fact, that a person who has an effective immune system selects, among the various mutants that are formed during the replication of the virus, those that are less dangerous if the immune system is robust because it manages to eliminate those that can cause damage. to the organism. Conversely, those that are attenuated are those that make the person asymptomatic. On the other hand, in those who have a depressed immune system or intoxicated by the use of too many drugs as in the case of the elderly or people who have diseases that cause immunosuppression, the virus breaks through an open door, so it replicates uncontrollably even with more dangerous mutants that replicate faster and are more aggressive."