This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"A license to live."
"I don't know who this guy is but people need to listen to him. The Digital Identity Bill going through Australian Parliament is a massive worry. Digital ID's will enable a social credit system and mark the end of universal human rights. It is on the agenda throughout the world." [Daniel Fooks, Twitter]
"I don't know who this guy is but people need to listen to him. The Digital Identity Bill going through Australian Parliament is a massive worry. Digital ID's will enable a social credit system and mark the end of universal human rights. It is on the agenda throughout the world." [Daniel Fooks, Twitter]
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
I have now read the Human Rights review documentation and I am seriously concerned.
The review seeks to impose a rights culture that displaces personal responsibility in favour of "the public interest”.
The proposed reforms say “the international human rights framework recognises that not all rights are absolute and that an individual’s rights may need to be balanced, either against the rights of others or against the wider public interest.
Further concerning statements are:
“The idea that rights come alongside duties and responsibilities is steeped in the UK tradition of liberty, but is also reflected in the qualifications in the Convention and is explicit in Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights (‘Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible’). The increasing reliance on human rights claims over the years has, however, led to a culture of rights decoupled from our responsibilities as citizens, and a displacement of due consideration of the wider public interest”.
"Whilst human rights are universal, a Bill of Rights could require the courts to give greater consideration to the behaviour of claimants and the wider public interest when interpreting and balancing qualified rights. More broadly, our proposals can also set out more clearly the extent to which the behaviour of claimants is a factor that the courts take into account when deciding what sort of remedy, if any, is appropriate. This will ensure that claimants’ responsibilities, and the rights of others, form a part of the process of making a claim based on the violation of a human right”.
There are other concerning statements too, but you get the gist from the above.
Under the proposed reforms it is clear that Parliament is seeking to impose itself as arbiter of when a person can have human rights and when they cannot. This is disgraceful. It does not matter the crime, major or minor, a person must always have their human rights available to them and protected. It is abundantly clear to me that although the proposed reforms mention the courts power to decide matters, the govt expect the courts to be led on this by parliament, (and legislation), whatever the govt decide their rules to be at any given time.
This is an overt attack on personal freedoms in a bid to enforce communitarianism (which is worse than socialism, and is in fact totalitarianism). Wider interests should never trump an individual’s rights, the latter of which are fundamental freedoms that are God given.
These proposed changes seek to make sure that Human Rights are NOT fundamental and universal. Giving power to the courts to say you are not entitled to your human rights if they think your behaviour has not been what they consider "good" is a huge worry, knowing how much the courts are now refusing to challenge govt policy decisions and harmful legislation.
The separation of powers has been lost in this country for some time now. These proposed reforms confirm parliaments march to make itself the sovereign power and authority to decide on people's fundamental rights according to its own whim, and this must be stopped at all costs.
The consultation is open until 8th March and the link to respond to it is below. We desperately need everyone to take action and say no to these reforms.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights
The review seeks to impose a rights culture that displaces personal responsibility in favour of "the public interest”.
The proposed reforms say “the international human rights framework recognises that not all rights are absolute and that an individual’s rights may need to be balanced, either against the rights of others or against the wider public interest.
Further concerning statements are:
“The idea that rights come alongside duties and responsibilities is steeped in the UK tradition of liberty, but is also reflected in the qualifications in the Convention and is explicit in Article 29 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights (‘Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible’). The increasing reliance on human rights claims over the years has, however, led to a culture of rights decoupled from our responsibilities as citizens, and a displacement of due consideration of the wider public interest”.
"Whilst human rights are universal, a Bill of Rights could require the courts to give greater consideration to the behaviour of claimants and the wider public interest when interpreting and balancing qualified rights. More broadly, our proposals can also set out more clearly the extent to which the behaviour of claimants is a factor that the courts take into account when deciding what sort of remedy, if any, is appropriate. This will ensure that claimants’ responsibilities, and the rights of others, form a part of the process of making a claim based on the violation of a human right”.
There are other concerning statements too, but you get the gist from the above.
Under the proposed reforms it is clear that Parliament is seeking to impose itself as arbiter of when a person can have human rights and when they cannot. This is disgraceful. It does not matter the crime, major or minor, a person must always have their human rights available to them and protected. It is abundantly clear to me that although the proposed reforms mention the courts power to decide matters, the govt expect the courts to be led on this by parliament, (and legislation), whatever the govt decide their rules to be at any given time.
This is an overt attack on personal freedoms in a bid to enforce communitarianism (which is worse than socialism, and is in fact totalitarianism). Wider interests should never trump an individual’s rights, the latter of which are fundamental freedoms that are God given.
These proposed changes seek to make sure that Human Rights are NOT fundamental and universal. Giving power to the courts to say you are not entitled to your human rights if they think your behaviour has not been what they consider "good" is a huge worry, knowing how much the courts are now refusing to challenge govt policy decisions and harmful legislation.
The separation of powers has been lost in this country for some time now. These proposed reforms confirm parliaments march to make itself the sovereign power and authority to decide on people's fundamental rights according to its own whim, and this must be stopped at all costs.
The consultation is open until 8th March and the link to respond to it is below. We desperately need everyone to take action and say no to these reforms.
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/human-rights-act-reform-a-modern-bill-of-rights
GOV.UK
Human Rights Act Reform: A Modern Bill of Rights
A consultation on proposals to reform the Human Rights Act 1998.
Jan 31, 2022: Premier of Manitoba (Canada) Heather Stefanson has removed Josh Guenter from his recent appointment as a legislative assistant to the minister of health for defending bodily autonomy, and government overreach. Media tows line in sowing division and hatred, painting resistance as racist, etc.
https://globalnews.ca/news/8584907/manitoba-tory-backbencher-loses-appointment-after-meeting-with-trucker-convoy/
https://globalnews.ca/news/8584907/manitoba-tory-backbencher-loses-appointment-after-meeting-with-trucker-convoy/
Forwarded from Piers_Corbyn_Stopnewnormal
We'll be at The Albert Hall Weds 2nd Feb 6pm to protest against their discriminatory and bio-fascist decision to CONTINUE demanding covid passports or proof of negative SC2 test upon entry. They're doing this via "spot checks" They have also decided to stop taking cash for tickets and all bars/cafes inside their venue, using “covid” as the pathetic excuse.
This is medical apartheid.
You can also let them know what you think of their policy here https://www.royalalberthall.com/your-visit/contact-us/
https://t.me/Pierscorbyn
This is medical apartheid.
You can also let them know what you think of their policy here https://www.royalalberthall.com/your-visit/contact-us/
https://t.me/Pierscorbyn
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/shining-s...
You’d be forgiven for thinking I’d long have been beyond shocking.
That’s wrong. Ignoring suffering is never OK. But these bastards at the NIH are knowingly doing just that. They were probably told to stop responding. Right. That would have been the moment when I would have ignored the orders, at best. Folk at NIH: wth has happened to you???
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
You’d be forgiven for thinking I’d long have been beyond shocking.
That’s wrong. Ignoring suffering is never OK. But these bastards at the NIH are knowingly doing just that. They were probably told to stop responding. Right. That would have been the moment when I would have ignored the orders, at best. Folk at NIH: wth has happened to you???
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
Forwarded from Oracle Films
Forwarded from Ley Ann
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
A request for victims in West Yorkshire to contact the police regarding any adverse reactions or blackmail relating to covid_19 vaccines
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Crime Reference Number from West Yorkshire Police
#13220052372
Issued at Elland Rd Police Station, Leeds.
Saturday 29th January 2022
Linked to Hammersmith Crime Ref : 6029679/21
Victims in West Yorkshire can quote this number to link it to the ongoing investigation
A request for victims in West Yorkshire to contact the police regarding any adverse reactions or blackmail relating to covid_19 vaccines
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Crime Reference Number from West Yorkshire Police
#13220052372
Issued at Elland Rd Police Station, Leeds.
Saturday 29th January 2022
Linked to Hammersmith Crime Ref : 6029679/21
Victims in West Yorkshire can quote this number to link it to the ongoing investigation
Forwarded from Insider Paper
JUST IN - Canada's Quebec scraps proposed tax on the unvaccinated: Premier Legault
Follow @InsiderPaper
Follow @InsiderPaper
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Human rights are not rights if they can be taken away by the state, and are in fact therefore privileges to be dealt out how the state sees fit. This cannot be allowed to be the case
This is the most-cited paper claiming asymptomatic transmission.
There are a number of problems with it.
The main one, apparently reported in the German main media, is that the claimed index Patient was “well & with no symptoms” during her visit to Germany.
Apparently the reality was that she wasn’t well & had dosed herself with all the pharmacy preparations she could use in order to barrel through her short, but intense, multi-site visit. She fell frankly ill on the flight back to China.
That rather changes things, because there’s no other written-up evidence of mass asymptomatic transmission. At all.
On the contrary, large real world studies failed to find convincing evidence of it.
It’s fraud. A carefully thought out one, too.
Scroll to the end of the listing of doctors & scientists acknowledged.
See “Christian Drosten”.
By astonishing coincidence, he was a senior advisor to Angela Merkel for many years. The same Angela Merkel who was one of Klaus Schwab’s “Global Young Leaders” (yes, it’s been in planning that long).
Turns out that Christian Drosten makes another, utterly pivotal contribution to blowing life into this global fraud.
He’s one of the authors of the first paper describing the PCR method allegedly for detection of infection by SARS-CoV-2. That method manuscript was already on the WHO website before it was published & is what Tedros refers to when he says “Test, test, test”.
Anyway, the paper is submitted to the journal “Eurosurveillance”, accepted 24h later & published a further 24h after that.
The paper is a fake, as is the faked peer review which cannot have been done at the pace they claim.
Typically it takes months for the average paper to go through peer review & finally to get published (usually after amendments).
The journal has a fast track process. The median time in fast track is a few weeks.
Drostens faked PCR methods paper stands out in being the only paper reviewed & published in two days in the entire history of the journal.
A little later, several authors pulled that methods paper to pieces & demanded its retraction. I’ll post a link to that, called the “Corman Drosten Review”.
You decide.
How likely is it that one person should find themselves as pivotal creators of the two enduring scientific lies underscoring the fake pandemic we’re living in?
Both the duff PCR method (recall that it’s Nobel Prize-winning inventor always argued against using PCR for clinical diagnosis....such a shame he died late in 2019, isn’t it? He’d have been such an ally. RIP Kary Mullis). Without this test, they wouldn’t be able to invent “cases” & to assign large numbers of deaths to “covid19”.
And then also the asymptomatic transmission lie. Without that, there would be no reason to lock down healthy people, perform mass testing, force people to wear masks & persuade them to get injected with bad gene based treatments.
What a coincidence.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2001468
There are a number of problems with it.
The main one, apparently reported in the German main media, is that the claimed index Patient was “well & with no symptoms” during her visit to Germany.
Apparently the reality was that she wasn’t well & had dosed herself with all the pharmacy preparations she could use in order to barrel through her short, but intense, multi-site visit. She fell frankly ill on the flight back to China.
That rather changes things, because there’s no other written-up evidence of mass asymptomatic transmission. At all.
On the contrary, large real world studies failed to find convincing evidence of it.
It’s fraud. A carefully thought out one, too.
Scroll to the end of the listing of doctors & scientists acknowledged.
See “Christian Drosten”.
By astonishing coincidence, he was a senior advisor to Angela Merkel for many years. The same Angela Merkel who was one of Klaus Schwab’s “Global Young Leaders” (yes, it’s been in planning that long).
Turns out that Christian Drosten makes another, utterly pivotal contribution to blowing life into this global fraud.
He’s one of the authors of the first paper describing the PCR method allegedly for detection of infection by SARS-CoV-2. That method manuscript was already on the WHO website before it was published & is what Tedros refers to when he says “Test, test, test”.
Anyway, the paper is submitted to the journal “Eurosurveillance”, accepted 24h later & published a further 24h after that.
The paper is a fake, as is the faked peer review which cannot have been done at the pace they claim.
Typically it takes months for the average paper to go through peer review & finally to get published (usually after amendments).
The journal has a fast track process. The median time in fast track is a few weeks.
Drostens faked PCR methods paper stands out in being the only paper reviewed & published in two days in the entire history of the journal.
A little later, several authors pulled that methods paper to pieces & demanded its retraction. I’ll post a link to that, called the “Corman Drosten Review”.
You decide.
How likely is it that one person should find themselves as pivotal creators of the two enduring scientific lies underscoring the fake pandemic we’re living in?
Both the duff PCR method (recall that it’s Nobel Prize-winning inventor always argued against using PCR for clinical diagnosis....such a shame he died late in 2019, isn’t it? He’d have been such an ally. RIP Kary Mullis). Without this test, they wouldn’t be able to invent “cases” & to assign large numbers of deaths to “covid19”.
And then also the asymptomatic transmission lie. Without that, there would be no reason to lock down healthy people, perform mass testing, force people to wear masks & persuade them to get injected with bad gene based treatments.
What a coincidence.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2001468
The New England Journal of Medicine
Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany | NEJM
In this report, investigators in Germany detected the spread of the novel coronavirus
(2019-nCoV) from a person who had recently traveled from China to Germany for a business
trip. This transmissio...
(2019-nCoV) from a person who had recently traveled from China to Germany for a business
trip. This transmissio...
Forwarded from freedomtirade
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
UNACCEPTABLE VIEWS of TYRANTS' BLUES
The star corrupt pocket tyrants of Klaus Schwab and his WEF are coming apart at the seams as people around the world wake up to the biggest and most evil Pyramid Scheme Scam in the history of Medicine.
ODYSEE VIDEO 5minutes
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/UNACCEPTABLE-VIEWS:4
With a collapsing Covid narrative, the pivot towards war is accelerating.
They want to distract us.
Don't fall for their same old hypno-tricks
Stop the War.
Arrest the War criminals
Arrest the Medical frauds
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE
Pursue HEALTH....Resist TYRANNY
The star corrupt pocket tyrants of Klaus Schwab and his WEF are coming apart at the seams as people around the world wake up to the biggest and most evil Pyramid Scheme Scam in the history of Medicine.
ODYSEE VIDEO 5minutes
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/UNACCEPTABLE-VIEWS:4
With a collapsing Covid narrative, the pivot towards war is accelerating.
They want to distract us.
Don't fall for their same old hypno-tricks
Stop the War.
Arrest the War criminals
Arrest the Medical frauds
FREE JULIAN ASSANGE
Pursue HEALTH....Resist TYRANNY
"Letter: Preston Manning on why the Constitution supports the truckers
It is the Trudeau government not the truckers that is failing to comply with the rule of law
Participants in the Freedom Convoy currently occupying Ottawa are exercising their freedom of belief, expression, association, and assembly — all rights guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section 6 of that Charter also specifically guarantees “mobility rights” — the right of every citizen “to enter, remain in, and leave Canada” and the right to move and gain a livelihood.
If the federal government wants to limit the exercise of these rights, according to Sections 1 and 24(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, it must be able, if challenged, to demonstrate before a court of competent jurisdiction that the law imposing the limitation is reasonable and justifiable in a free and democratic society. This the Trudeau government has failed to do, and thus it is the members of that government not the truckers and their friends who are failing to comply with the rule of law."
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/letter-preston-manning-on-why-the-constitution-supports-the-truckers
— Preston Manning was the founder of the Reform Party of Canada, served as leader of the official Opposition in Parliament and is a founder of the Canada Strong and Free Network.”
It is the Trudeau government not the truckers that is failing to comply with the rule of law
Participants in the Freedom Convoy currently occupying Ottawa are exercising their freedom of belief, expression, association, and assembly — all rights guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Section 6 of that Charter also specifically guarantees “mobility rights” — the right of every citizen “to enter, remain in, and leave Canada” and the right to move and gain a livelihood.
If the federal government wants to limit the exercise of these rights, according to Sections 1 and 24(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, it must be able, if challenged, to demonstrate before a court of competent jurisdiction that the law imposing the limitation is reasonable and justifiable in a free and democratic society. This the Trudeau government has failed to do, and thus it is the members of that government not the truckers and their friends who are failing to comply with the rule of law."
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/letter-preston-manning-on-why-the-constitution-supports-the-truckers
— Preston Manning was the founder of the Reform Party of Canada, served as leader of the official Opposition in Parliament and is a founder of the Canada Strong and Free Network.”
National Post
Letter: Preston Manning on why the Constitution supports the truckers
Letter to the editor:
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"Dr Julie Ponesse, here in Ottawa speaking to the truckers, tells us what their protest means to her.
Please make your own videos telling the truckers what their sacrifice means to you & share them. Use hashtags #FreedomConvoy2022 #WhatTheTruckersMeanToMe" [Canadian COVID Care Alliance]
Please make your own videos telling the truckers what their sacrifice means to you & share them. Use hashtags #FreedomConvoy2022 #WhatTheTruckersMeanToMe" [Canadian COVID Care Alliance]