I don’t feel comfortable recommending any of these vaccines under the current circumstances, but if you feel you must be vaccinated for medical reasons, I would be inclined to Valneva product because it’s old school.
I’m fervently against even offering medical treatments for those not at obviously elevated risk from this virus.
This because everything about how the executive is doing this spells RECKLESS.
Valneva is preferred over the genetic coding interventions because it avoids several steps each without their own variability & is wholly classically done.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7198995/

Here’s a really nicely written paper with one of the best laid-out pictorial descriptions of the elements of our immune responses either to infection or vaccination (the same basic steps are involved)

I am sharing vaccine info but I stand by my Monotti Protocol, based on regular vitamin D and easily available off the shelf early treatment. To gage how much vitamin D you need, if you like apps you can try a phone app called "dminder". Try it out.

"Opposition politicians said last week that he had contracted Covid-19, but this has not been confirmed.
Magufuli was one of Africa's most prominent coronavirus sceptics, and called for prayers and herbal-infused steam therapy to counter the virus.
Magufuli declared Tanzania "Covid-19 free" last June. He mocked the efficacy of masks, expressed doubts about testing, and teased neighbouring countries which imposed health measures to curb the virus.
Tanzania has not published details of its coronavirus cases since May, and the government has refused to purchase vaccines.
Magufuli's death has been attributed to a long-standing heart condition, but many will still suspect that he succumbed to Covid-19.
⚠️It is an irony that the pandemic he so strenuously denied has outlasted him, turning his once heralded presidency into a cautionary tale for the region and the continent.⚠️ But it is his approach to Covid-19 that many analysts say will define his legacy. There has been little testing in the country and no plans made for a vaccination programme, leaving the country as an outlier."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-africa-56437852

The next President of Tanzania... WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM... https://www.weforum.org/people/samia-suluhu-hassan

1 month ago..2 weeks later he disappears, now..dead.

Magafuli's last move

I have seen the future of the West and it looks like this:
https://twitter.com/SMMgirl/status/1372480555456028672?s=19

Dear Head Teacher – why my child must NOT wear a mask | The Conservative Woman
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/dear-head-teacher-why-my-child-must-not-wear-a-mask/

46 residents in Spanish nursing home die after receiving COVID-19 vaccine | News | LifeSite
https://www.lifesitenews.com/mobile/news/46-residents-in-spanish-nursing-home-die-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine?__twitter_impression=true

Hello everyone! Alive & kicking. I don’t have my own channel but o am still doing what I can to keep science honest.
Here’s my take on vaccination. I don’t think there’s a more important time to think, be still, anticipate where your near term decisions will lead us.

Here’s my take on vaccination:
1. Healthy people under 60 are at a very low risk from the virus. If you didn’t seek a flu vaccine then you definitely don’t need this vaccine because flu risk is greater than covid risk for the under-70s.
2. I do not believe for one minute that vaccination will result in our freedoms being returned. The whole coercive act around forcing people who won’t benefit to get vaccinated is to get digital ID on everyone. The way to oppose evil is to exert your rights & say “No, thanks”. Not to go along with it. That way lies permanent purgatory because what’s next? A top up against variants? You’ll be made to take every vaccine the authorities dictate.
3. Some tourist dependent countries want tourists so badly they will admit them without vaccination. Help them by going there. This pressure succeeds or it fails. It won’t take years. We have to win or it’ll be forced into our children.
4. Consider younger people. They’re not at a measurable risk. Taking a vaccine helps them not at all, but it adds risk for adverse effects in the mid to long term. No one can tell us what that risk is because the technology is new & the data simply doesn’t exist. Because they’re different from anything we’ve done before, it’s irresponsible to be rolling out vaccines except to those at clearly elevated risk if infected.
5. Why are medical professionals silent? Why are all institutions supine? I don’t know, but it’s frightening.

Please do not give up your freedom to decide whether or not to consent to an experimental medical intervention in exchange for SOME of your freedoms back.
It’s unethical to pressure you to accept vaccination for NON MEDICAL reasons.
Accept restrictions that they threaten you with. If enough of us cross our arms, look then in the eye & say “No, thanks”, they lose.
Vaccine passports are a blind tunnel from which nether we nor our children will ever emerge. It’s a one way trap.
They need to impose them en masse or it won’t work. Don’t do their work for them. Don’t be bribed , frightened or lied into accepting what your gut advises you not to.
The Council of Europe, of which we remain a member, is explicit: member states are reminded that it is illegal to mandate or coerce populations into accepting medical interventions & they must not discriminate against those choosing to decline.

In U.K. our all causes mortality has sunk back to normal. Now, I don’t believe for a moment that lockdowns have been the cause. It’s massed population immunity. I know I called it prematurely last autumn but I’m not ready to completely concede that we were not near herd immunity. And I think we’re there now. My estimate of % of population who’ve been infected is now mainstream with CDC in the US stating around 25%. Evidence continues to emerge that 20-50% of us had some prior immunity. The youngest are effectively resistant to infection & transmission. Simple arithmetic doesn’t leave enough susceptible people to again have an epidemic at scale in already heavily hit regions.
We also know masks are just lies.
So the event is over.
We’ve been deliberately whipped into a MASS PANIC & relentlessly administered fear for a year.
Well, I’m not frightened & I’m not going away.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.03.21251066v1.full.pdf

But here’s the kicker: older people, unfortunately the very age group we know have very much greater risk of severe outcomes including death if infected by SARS-CoV-2, do not respond anything like as well to vaccination (this is the Pfizer one) as those in whom vaccination isn’t really needed.
The process of diminishing immune responses with age, especially in those >80y, has long been recognised. It is thought to be one of if not the most important reason why we see such profound age-related risks. Immunosenescence is a fact of life. Everything-senescence is associated with ageing & while we should do what we can to extend heathy lifespan, I personally don’t want to live longer than my health. Aging can be cruel. But it is also an entirely natural process & it seems as a society, we refuse to recognise what our ancestors accepted as an inevitable part of ‘the circle of life’.

The bottom line is that there are limits, really severe ones too, in terms of what vaccination can do to protect the very old from the consequences of viral infection.

Ask yourself this: if the most vulnerable are often far less likely to gain effective protection from vaccination, and those who do benefit are usually able to resist infection without vaccination, what the hell are we doing, vaccinating the world?
It’s almost - not quite - pointless. I’m sure there’s a sizeable cohort between 60 & 80 who are greatly helped by vaccination. But the median age of death with covid19 is over 80. And very few people younger than 60 & without prior serious illnesses, succumb to this virus.
Mike

MIKE YEADON ON VANDEN BOSSCHE'S PREDICTIONS:

"Respectfully, I disagree that there’s a risk as outlined.

I am unconvinced that antibodies play am important role in protection, certainly against severe disease. That task belongs to other components of the immune system, notably T-cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, which are trained to detect & destroy virus infected cells.
Antibodies cannot do that for they are very large molecules, generally considered to remain outside cells. Yet the virus resides & replicates inside cells. It’s when they leave fragments of themselves displayed on the surface of those calls & are recognised by T-cells, that’s when they are marked for controlled destruction & with it, the virus within.
That capability, to detect the virus, uses a complex “molecular identity parade”: the virus is cut up into hundreds of unique short pieces. Each of us possesses huge diversity in our T-cells ability to recognise these unique pieces of foreign invader & then multiply through what’s called clonal expansion until we have hundreds of millions of each T-cell type against several dozen different pieces of virus.
If a variant infects us, the vast majority of the virus sequence is unchanged, and do almost every trained type of T-cell still finds & kills cells bearing the same pieces they’re trained to recognise, and to kill variant infected cells.
This has been shown to work in recent experiments by talented immunologists at the La Jolla Institute in California. They must be working flat out & they work is world class.
Very many authors but look for papers in Cell (2021) by lead author Tarke, A et al.
They’ve made a comprehensive study of every protein ‘snippet’ into which this virus is cut, finding something like 600 unique pieces.
Each person uses a few dozen snippets to train their T-cells, and that collection is called our ‘repertoire’. Our repertoire is unique: mine is different from yours, the permutations & combinations of snippets we each use to protect us is different.
Not only does this mean the virus has to do the equivalent of rolling 40 sixes in a row to escape immunity, but even in that unlikely event, it has no significance to the POPULATION. Because each of us has a different repertoire.
Trust me: this overblown virus is pretty ordinary from an immunological perspective. The most likely end game is it dies out or becomes low level endemic within the next year."

Please watch this. Carl Jung said that frightened people are much more dangerous than angry people. We are in a mass hysteria. It’s not accidental. But it won’t continue indefinitely. What will have changed when it ends?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEDn8694d4E

Pro lockdown folk appear to have a semi religious belief that lockdowns MUST work, because this is a human contact transmitted infection & lockdown reduces average number of contacts.
I’ve been astonished by the number of people who uncritically accept this.
Of course, what matters is not the number of contacts, but the number of contacts which lead to INFECTION.
Now, this pivots on density of infectious individuals. I don’t accept that transmission of infective levels of virus occurs from people without symptoms, not at any frequency with which we need to be concerned.
Transmission is also far lower outside with massive air dilution than inside in still rebreathed air.
Consider the phenotype of a person infected with virus, but who has no symptoms. Because symptoms are a consequence of either substantial virus pathology in lungs & elsewhere, or of the body’s response to invasion, its logical to expect INFECTIOUS people have much virus in their airways also have SYMPTOMS. Not saying 100% match, but in the vast majority of infectious individuals, they will feel unwell. They’re much less likely to be walking around & able to bump into susceptible people.
In contrast, consider institutions. Hospitals & care homes are in contrast, with large numbers of people & patients especially & from time to time, residents, are there because they’re not only symptomatic, but ill, often seriously ill.
In short, I believe the virus was never anywhere near as prevalent in the community as in institutions. And that’s why lockdown did little except to damage society & the economy. lockdown did little to reduce INFECTIOUS contacts. Reduction in contacts which were most unlikely to lead to infection was an illogical step to have taken.
In parallel to this logical argument we have the empirical evidence that the bulk of infections were acquired in institutions & not random contacts in the community.
This isn’t a new concept, either: both SARS & MERS are considered largely as infectious diseases of INSTITUTIONS. Not the community.
I hope I’ve acknowledged the logical approach outlined by those favouring lockdown & believing it MUST work, while providing a coherent & internally consistent explanation why it is in fact not true. My explanation tallies with the great bulk of international literature in this point, that indiscriminate lockdowns are not associated with lower mortality, either of deaths attributed to Covid19 or all causes mortality.
We must not make this mistake again.
Best wishes,
Mike

Please Retweet.
Let's get Mike Yeadon's words across
https://twitter.com/robinmonottibot/status/1372513498031390722?s=19