Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs
"In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.
We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.
These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs
"In this paper, we present the evidence that vaccination, unlike natural infection, induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health.
We explain the mechanism by which immune cells release into the circulation large quantities of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.
These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357994624_Innate_Immune_Suppression_by_SARS-CoV-2_mRNA_Vaccinations_The_role_of_G-quadruplexes_exosomes_and_microRNAs
ResearchGate
(PDF) Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes and microRNAs
PDF | The mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were brought to market in response to the widely perceived public health crises of Covid-19. The utilization of mRNA... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
These are good films, well-made, engrossing, etc, though I find them too long. This one is 1h 50min. But for someone coming in from the cold, it’s a detailed exposition.
Cheers,
Mike
https://planetlockdownfilm.com/documentary/
Cheers,
Mike
https://planetlockdownfilm.com/documentary/
This short interview is well worth watching.
It’s very frightening what’s happening.
https://globalintelhub.com/blackrock-manager-ed-dowd-says-deaths-caused-by-pfizer-jab-will-result-in-a-financial-scandal-enron-2-0/
It’s very frightening what’s happening.
https://globalintelhub.com/blackrock-manager-ed-dowd-says-deaths-caused-by-pfizer-jab-will-result-in-a-financial-scandal-enron-2-0/
Global Intel Hub
BLACKROCK MANAGER Ed Dowd
BLACKROCK MANAGER Ed Dowd SAYS DEATHS CAUSED BY PFIZER JAB WILL RESULT IN A FINANCIAL SCANDAL - ENRON 2.0! sdf
Forwarded from BOX CLEVER ARMY 🏅🫡 👑
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🆘WOW‼️ 🇬🇧 UK PEOPLE'S CONVOY 🇬🇧 🏴 🏴 🏴 IF YOU AREN'T YET IN LONDON, WHY THE FCUK NOT⁉️ HOPE YOU ARE HERE AT 7am MONDAY TO SIT DOWN NEXT TO ME IN WESTMINSTER AND FIGHT FOR THE CHILDRENS FUTURE 🙏
Forwarded from UNN
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Absolutely SHOCKING scenes emerge from a motorway bridge in Leicester. Gaynor was on the bridge supporting the UK Freedom Convoy with other women when what appears to be an extremely aggressive Police Officer goes to arrest her.
More to follow.
More to follow.
Forwarded from UNN
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
More shocking footage of the way Gaynor was treated by an out of control Policeman.
She will be joining David Clews live tonight on UNN from 19:30 on dlive.tv/unitynews
She will be joining David Clews live tonight on UNN from 19:30 on dlive.tv/unitynews
GRAND JURY TRIAL BEGINS INTO CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY - DAY 1:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pbl2FDKid1ea/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pbl2FDKid1ea/
Bitchute
Bitchute is a video service that prioritizes creators and champions users' freedoms and privacy.
ACCEPTABLE INTEGRITY OF mRNA IN VIALS - PFIZER
In EMA documents Pfizer set their own arbitrary standard for "acceptable" integrity of mRNA in their active ingredient - >50%. Meaning that the batches can vary in the amount of active in drug substance between 50-100%. Researchers found a significant inverse relationship between this % and toxicity - the lower the integrity, the less toxic the batch. This huge variability also has very large impact on how much active ingredient ends up in a tiny amount of the vax in a vial, since these liquid substances are never equally distributed through the volume. Therefore, some vials may contain almost no or no active ingredient, while others contain concentrated amounts. This may explain some of the large variations in toxicity we see among batches.
This "acceptability standard" was set by Pfizer arbitrarily. The toxicity of batches is inversely related to the % of integrity of mRNA in the batch. In other words, the more this bioweapon is broken, the safer it is. No batches are safe however, we are only discussing relative differences.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8tbOPuO0jyuV/
In EMA documents Pfizer set their own arbitrary standard for "acceptable" integrity of mRNA in their active ingredient - >50%. Meaning that the batches can vary in the amount of active in drug substance between 50-100%. Researchers found a significant inverse relationship between this % and toxicity - the lower the integrity, the less toxic the batch. This huge variability also has very large impact on how much active ingredient ends up in a tiny amount of the vax in a vial, since these liquid substances are never equally distributed through the volume. Therefore, some vials may contain almost no or no active ingredient, while others contain concentrated amounts. This may explain some of the large variations in toxicity we see among batches.
This "acceptability standard" was set by Pfizer arbitrarily. The toxicity of batches is inversely related to the % of integrity of mRNA in the batch. In other words, the more this bioweapon is broken, the safer it is. No batches are safe however, we are only discussing relative differences.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8tbOPuO0jyuV/
Bitchute
Bitchute is a video service that prioritizes creators and champions users' freedoms and privacy.
❤1👍1
Forwarded from 𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙀𝙈𝙀𝙇𝘽𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝙀 ™ (𝙍𝙄𝙎𝙀𝙈𝙀𝙇𝘽𝙊𝙐𝙍𝙉𝙀)
Ottawa 🇨🇦 Truckers Convoy 🔥 Insane Scenes...Police are rounding up and allegedly arresting people and removing the fuel supplies...On what grounds is this legal?... Protesting is not a crime 👇👊
THE MONOTTI BIOWEAPON TEST
I have devised a simple fool-proof test to indicate whether an in injection, or any other medical intervention is a vaccine or a bioweapon. The test is very simple:
If the substance results in more than 50 deaths worldwide in one year or a smaller amount of time, then the substance can safely be categorised as a bioweapon.
This is because weapons are used to harm, and by definition and fact the substance which leads to more than 50 deaths is harming people.
It is irrelevant whether some hypnotised people claim the substance has saved their life, there are always people making all sorts of claims that poisons are good for you, including the wildest claim made by pharmaceutical companies already convicted of criminal offences and therefore entirely unreliable as a category in its entirety, same goes for the associated "scientists".
Given in the case of the current Covid-19 injections, the numbers of deaths are over 50,000 worldwide in one single year, there is really no doubt whatsoever that what is in the vials is a bioweapon, and therefore not a vaccine which is by definition meant to help people rather than harm them.
I have devised a simple fool-proof test to indicate whether an in injection, or any other medical intervention is a vaccine or a bioweapon. The test is very simple:
If the substance results in more than 50 deaths worldwide in one year or a smaller amount of time, then the substance can safely be categorised as a bioweapon.
This is because weapons are used to harm, and by definition and fact the substance which leads to more than 50 deaths is harming people.
It is irrelevant whether some hypnotised people claim the substance has saved their life, there are always people making all sorts of claims that poisons are good for you, including the wildest claim made by pharmaceutical companies already convicted of criminal offences and therefore entirely unreliable as a category in its entirety, same goes for the associated "scientists".
Given in the case of the current Covid-19 injections, the numbers of deaths are over 50,000 worldwide in one single year, there is really no doubt whatsoever that what is in the vials is a bioweapon, and therefore not a vaccine which is by definition meant to help people rather than harm them.
Broken Bioweapon.pptx
7.2 MB
ACCEPTABLE INTEGRITY OF mRNA IN VIALS - PFIZER
In EMA documents Pfizer set their own arbitrary standard for "acceptable" integrity of mRNA in their active ingredient - >50%. Meaning that the batches can vary in the amount of active in drug substance between 50-100%. Researchers found a significant inverse relationship between this % and toxicity - the lower the integrity, the less toxic the batch. This huge variability also has very large impact on how much active ingredient ends up in a tiny amount of the vax in a vial, since these liquid substances are never equally distributed through the volume. Therefore, some vials may contain almost no or no active ingredient, while others contain concentrated amounts. This may explain some of the large variations in toxicity we see among batches.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8tbOPuO0jyuV/
In EMA documents Pfizer set their own arbitrary standard for "acceptable" integrity of mRNA in their active ingredient - >50%. Meaning that the batches can vary in the amount of active in drug substance between 50-100%. Researchers found a significant inverse relationship between this % and toxicity - the lower the integrity, the less toxic the batch. This huge variability also has very large impact on how much active ingredient ends up in a tiny amount of the vax in a vial, since these liquid substances are never equally distributed through the volume. Therefore, some vials may contain almost no or no active ingredient, while others contain concentrated amounts. This may explain some of the large variations in toxicity we see among batches.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8tbOPuO0jyuV/
This article originally appeared in German on 27 January 2022, by the “Polizei für Aufklärung” (Police for Clarification), Tangstedt, Germany https://echte-polizisten.de/ziele-der-wasserwerferei/
Police tactics when deploying water cannons
When, where and why are water cannons being used by the police and how have their tactics changed over time? In this short report, the German association “Polizei für Aufklärung” (Police for Clarification) explains the policies behind these measures.
Police tactics when deploying water cannons
When, where and why are water cannons being used by the police and how have their tactics changed over time? In this short report, the German association “Polizei für Aufklärung” (Police for Clarification) explains the policies behind these measures.
When the new “Water Cannon 10,000” [Ed. cannon = a big gun or mounted weapon] manufactured by the Austrian company Rosenbauer replaced the old green water cannons in Germany about 10 years ago, most of the police were enthusiastic. In the police force, they were kindly abbreviated as “Wawe” [Ed. from the German Wasserwerfer, literally water thrower] and even people without a direct connection to the police were, for the most part, impressed by this new technology.
However, ordinary citizens have rarely had the opportunity to actually see one of these giants, maybe only by chance when they are being transported from once place to another. In the past, one of the rare possibilities to see one of these water cannons was during a so-called “large-scale police situation”, such as in context with football matches or demonstrations. To see a water cannon in action, actually shooting water, was only really possible during a public open house at the police station.
The intended use of these new water cannons
If they are used so rarely, the question arises as to why the police have purchased such new vehicles in the first place, and then painstakingly trained highly qualified personnel to operate them. Due to the so-called hollow jet technology, the “Wawe 10” — just like a fire engine — can “fan out” it’s water jet. When in use, this allows a much more reasonable use of this “aid of physical force”. The old green water cannon in full jet mode (without fanning) had always been considered disproportionate to sit-in blockades (such as people blocking an intersection while sitting). The water cannon operations in the context of the “Stuttgart 21” [Ed. railway and urban development project] demonstrations resulted in condemnations by police colleagues for exactly this reason, being disproportionate.
With a fanned out beam, the output strength can be controlled much better, and now it is used more often, as the risk of injury is significantly reduced. In police academy, students in are given the opportunity to sit in this fanned-out beam themselves as part of their studies. Everyone who operates such a vehicle will have definitely experienced this situation. Once again, the question of necessity arises. Just to “shower down” a few sit-ins, so that our police colleagues do not have to actually physically remove the participants, this is hardly a reason to procure vehicles which cost [Ed. taxpayers] one million Euros each.The main purpose of a water cannon use is to create distance
This reasoning has not changed from the very beginning. The aim is to establish distance between the so-called disturber or offender (usually stone throwers) and the police officers or between hostile groups. In other countries, rubber bullets are used for this purpose, but they often cause significant injuries.
From past experience
Even amongst the police, the necessity of water cannons has been often questioned. However, the experience gained during the operations surrounding the G20 summit in Hamburg has clearly shown why water cannons may be necessary to cope during situations where the police are involved:
1. Protection function for colleagues
The beam of the water cannon reaches about 60 meters. No normal person can throw a stone that far. Thus, the police deployed at the same distance of the water cannon are not “in a shower of stones”, as long as the water cannon is shooting water.
2. Preventive effect
In addition, the water cannons are often used for preventive purposes. The mere presence of these giants can have an inhibiting effect on problematic groups prone to violent actions. Problematic football fans can be “persuaded” by a short advance of the water cannon, combined with a clear tactical loudspeaker announcement, to stop throwing bottles without even having to shoot water. Against this backdrop, the exterior of the water cannon was even deliberately designed to look martial [Ed. militaristic, suggestive of war].
3. Use in violent situations
Apart from the possibility of water delivery against a sit-in blockade or against aggressive football fans
However, ordinary citizens have rarely had the opportunity to actually see one of these giants, maybe only by chance when they are being transported from once place to another. In the past, one of the rare possibilities to see one of these water cannons was during a so-called “large-scale police situation”, such as in context with football matches or demonstrations. To see a water cannon in action, actually shooting water, was only really possible during a public open house at the police station.
The intended use of these new water cannons
If they are used so rarely, the question arises as to why the police have purchased such new vehicles in the first place, and then painstakingly trained highly qualified personnel to operate them. Due to the so-called hollow jet technology, the “Wawe 10” — just like a fire engine — can “fan out” it’s water jet. When in use, this allows a much more reasonable use of this “aid of physical force”. The old green water cannon in full jet mode (without fanning) had always been considered disproportionate to sit-in blockades (such as people blocking an intersection while sitting). The water cannon operations in the context of the “Stuttgart 21” [Ed. railway and urban development project] demonstrations resulted in condemnations by police colleagues for exactly this reason, being disproportionate.
With a fanned out beam, the output strength can be controlled much better, and now it is used more often, as the risk of injury is significantly reduced. In police academy, students in are given the opportunity to sit in this fanned-out beam themselves as part of their studies. Everyone who operates such a vehicle will have definitely experienced this situation. Once again, the question of necessity arises. Just to “shower down” a few sit-ins, so that our police colleagues do not have to actually physically remove the participants, this is hardly a reason to procure vehicles which cost [Ed. taxpayers] one million Euros each.The main purpose of a water cannon use is to create distance
This reasoning has not changed from the very beginning. The aim is to establish distance between the so-called disturber or offender (usually stone throwers) and the police officers or between hostile groups. In other countries, rubber bullets are used for this purpose, but they often cause significant injuries.
From past experience
Even amongst the police, the necessity of water cannons has been often questioned. However, the experience gained during the operations surrounding the G20 summit in Hamburg has clearly shown why water cannons may be necessary to cope during situations where the police are involved:
1. Protection function for colleagues
The beam of the water cannon reaches about 60 meters. No normal person can throw a stone that far. Thus, the police deployed at the same distance of the water cannon are not “in a shower of stones”, as long as the water cannon is shooting water.
2. Preventive effect
In addition, the water cannons are often used for preventive purposes. The mere presence of these giants can have an inhibiting effect on problematic groups prone to violent actions. Problematic football fans can be “persuaded” by a short advance of the water cannon, combined with a clear tactical loudspeaker announcement, to stop throwing bottles without even having to shoot water. Against this backdrop, the exterior of the water cannon was even deliberately designed to look martial [Ed. militaristic, suggestive of war].
3. Use in violent situations
Apart from the possibility of water delivery against a sit-in blockade or against aggressive football fans
, the water cannons are therefore only used against violent “disturbers” or offenders.
4. Aids of physical violence
As far as direct coercion is concerned, it should also be mentioned that the use of water cannons (without added irritants)* is merely an aid to physical violence. Of course, any use of the water cannon is subject to the principle of proportionality, which means that the use must be suitable, necessary and appropriate. [Ed. *Do they also use these water cannons with added irritants?]
The – unfortunately frightening – current practices
Since March 2020, not only police operations in general, but in particular the deployment of water cannons in Germany has drastically changed. Just consider the now legendary Hessian measuring sticks [Ed. These 1.5 meter sticks have been used to measure if mandated social distancing was being carried out correctly during demonstrations]. Instead of calm, de-escalation tactics, water cannons and
other police measures have been used to intimidate or even deter peacefully demonstrating citizens. The effect of a water cannon on a hardcore ‘Ultra’ extremist from the Dresden [football club] fan scene will differ significantly from it’s effect on a single mother with her child in a stroller. The reaction of the football fan will probably be a mischievous smile. The single mother will probably go home rather frightened, not only to avoid risking the safety of her child.
In Berlin, peaceful demonstrators are now being cleared out of the way with water cannons. The same is happening in Frankfurt. From the Netherlands, a video was released in the spring of 2021, where a young woman, running parallel to a water cannon at a distance of about 10 meters, was suddenly hit directly in the head — without any violent action on her part — by a full jet of high-pressured water. Because of this, which in any case is absolutely forbidden, she was thrown against a wall by the force of the water cannon. For police specialists on water cannons, these are absolutely disturbing images.
On January 23rd of this year, peaceful demonstrators in Brussels were being chased through the city, [in fear of] police using water cannons, instead of arresting conspicuously problematic groups at an early stage and excluding them from the demonstration. For any police officer who has experience with large-scale crowds, such an approach is an absolute sign of incompetence.
In police academy, future officers are trained to be absolutely reserved and unobtrusive amidst large gatherings of peaceful people and when there no obvious threats from outside.
Today’s more offensive use of water cannons against peaceful citizens, obviously with the aim of deterring participants. This in no way corresponds with the values of the members of the association “Polizei für Aufklärung”, which have developed on the basis of their professional experience as police officers.
4. Aids of physical violence
As far as direct coercion is concerned, it should also be mentioned that the use of water cannons (without added irritants)* is merely an aid to physical violence. Of course, any use of the water cannon is subject to the principle of proportionality, which means that the use must be suitable, necessary and appropriate. [Ed. *Do they also use these water cannons with added irritants?]
The – unfortunately frightening – current practices
Since March 2020, not only police operations in general, but in particular the deployment of water cannons in Germany has drastically changed. Just consider the now legendary Hessian measuring sticks [Ed. These 1.5 meter sticks have been used to measure if mandated social distancing was being carried out correctly during demonstrations]. Instead of calm, de-escalation tactics, water cannons and
other police measures have been used to intimidate or even deter peacefully demonstrating citizens. The effect of a water cannon on a hardcore ‘Ultra’ extremist from the Dresden [football club] fan scene will differ significantly from it’s effect on a single mother with her child in a stroller. The reaction of the football fan will probably be a mischievous smile. The single mother will probably go home rather frightened, not only to avoid risking the safety of her child.
In Berlin, peaceful demonstrators are now being cleared out of the way with water cannons. The same is happening in Frankfurt. From the Netherlands, a video was released in the spring of 2021, where a young woman, running parallel to a water cannon at a distance of about 10 meters, was suddenly hit directly in the head — without any violent action on her part — by a full jet of high-pressured water. Because of this, which in any case is absolutely forbidden, she was thrown against a wall by the force of the water cannon. For police specialists on water cannons, these are absolutely disturbing images.
On January 23rd of this year, peaceful demonstrators in Brussels were being chased through the city, [in fear of] police using water cannons, instead of arresting conspicuously problematic groups at an early stage and excluding them from the demonstration. For any police officer who has experience with large-scale crowds, such an approach is an absolute sign of incompetence.
In police academy, future officers are trained to be absolutely reserved and unobtrusive amidst large gatherings of peaceful people and when there no obvious threats from outside.
Today’s more offensive use of water cannons against peaceful citizens, obviously with the aim of deterring participants. This in no way corresponds with the values of the members of the association “Polizei für Aufklärung”, which have developed on the basis of their professional experience as police officers.
Fake news, fake art, fake everything - Frank Wright
"These days, art is a boring lecture communicated through the medium of trash. Its function is to launder money. Most modern books could use practically any corporation’s latest advertisement to illustrate the cover. It is a product in the same vein of television and film and theatre, a parade of tropes deemed worthy by people who don’t much like your reality and would rather you looked at their fantasies instead.
Not all art is quite useless. The older stuff is better in the main to serve the appetite for beauty and for truth. It is simply too dangerous to point out the facts in print these days. It would appear that beauty has been banished from visual art as it has the whiff of bigotry about it. Art is now a senseless prank presented as an intelligence test, whose real purpose is to do with equally dishonest investment portfolios.
If there is an ideology to be drawn from all this product placement it is that of the consumer lifestyle. Anti-life, devoid of substance, it degrades everything it brands. Pointing to nothing but yourself is achingly now. What else is there? Our art is empty because we are full of it, preferring the void of vanity to the content of experience. Life as it is lived cannot be fact-checked, so it does not appear in official sources.
The purpose of mass media is to replace, not represent, reality as we find it. The world around the screen does not match its sassy pretensions to progress. The display of revolting debauchery, the valorisation of crime, the weird moral and cultural inversions, the recasting of Western civilisation as the Fall of Man – these mad themes read like the manifesto of some lunatic embarking on a killing spree of pure vengeance.
The simple fact is that no one writes about what is real because it wouldn’t get published. Reality is censored. It’s taboo. If I wrote a short story about the mess of urban life and the abolition of norms it represents in real time, it would serve me best as a career suicide note. It is reckless to notice things out loud. We are expected to learn to make excuses for reality, to learn the habit of doubleseeing. What is there is not really there.
This is the education we all receive, regardless of what we want. You get to choose only between what’s on sale. Politics is no different from entertainment in this way. It too is a false picture having no value as a map. To look at contemporary art, entertainment, news and politics as reliable guides to reality is more escapism than sense. It produces flattering images which match a certain character, itself patterned more and more on these images themselves and less and less on offstage experience. There is a reason we can’t face each other and that is because we don’t.
Reality is no longer a consensus, because many people think reality is what has been peer-reviewed. It is not. Reality, like science, is the result of observation and reflection and then a kind of talk. In a time when only what is agreed among your powerful ‘friends’ online is permitted it is curious that the main point of disagreement is over reality itself. This is a means of defending beliefs from argument. The defence is to take offence. The matter is emotionally charged because what is being defended is not true, but is beloved of some people who wish it were."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/fake-news-fake-art-fake-everything/
"These days, art is a boring lecture communicated through the medium of trash. Its function is to launder money. Most modern books could use practically any corporation’s latest advertisement to illustrate the cover. It is a product in the same vein of television and film and theatre, a parade of tropes deemed worthy by people who don’t much like your reality and would rather you looked at their fantasies instead.
Not all art is quite useless. The older stuff is better in the main to serve the appetite for beauty and for truth. It is simply too dangerous to point out the facts in print these days. It would appear that beauty has been banished from visual art as it has the whiff of bigotry about it. Art is now a senseless prank presented as an intelligence test, whose real purpose is to do with equally dishonest investment portfolios.
If there is an ideology to be drawn from all this product placement it is that of the consumer lifestyle. Anti-life, devoid of substance, it degrades everything it brands. Pointing to nothing but yourself is achingly now. What else is there? Our art is empty because we are full of it, preferring the void of vanity to the content of experience. Life as it is lived cannot be fact-checked, so it does not appear in official sources.
The purpose of mass media is to replace, not represent, reality as we find it. The world around the screen does not match its sassy pretensions to progress. The display of revolting debauchery, the valorisation of crime, the weird moral and cultural inversions, the recasting of Western civilisation as the Fall of Man – these mad themes read like the manifesto of some lunatic embarking on a killing spree of pure vengeance.
The simple fact is that no one writes about what is real because it wouldn’t get published. Reality is censored. It’s taboo. If I wrote a short story about the mess of urban life and the abolition of norms it represents in real time, it would serve me best as a career suicide note. It is reckless to notice things out loud. We are expected to learn to make excuses for reality, to learn the habit of doubleseeing. What is there is not really there.
This is the education we all receive, regardless of what we want. You get to choose only between what’s on sale. Politics is no different from entertainment in this way. It too is a false picture having no value as a map. To look at contemporary art, entertainment, news and politics as reliable guides to reality is more escapism than sense. It produces flattering images which match a certain character, itself patterned more and more on these images themselves and less and less on offstage experience. There is a reason we can’t face each other and that is because we don’t.
Reality is no longer a consensus, because many people think reality is what has been peer-reviewed. It is not. Reality, like science, is the result of observation and reflection and then a kind of talk. In a time when only what is agreed among your powerful ‘friends’ online is permitted it is curious that the main point of disagreement is over reality itself. This is a means of defending beliefs from argument. The defence is to take offence. The matter is emotionally charged because what is being defended is not true, but is beloved of some people who wish it were."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/fake-news-fake-art-fake-everything/
The Conservative Woman
Fake news, fake art, fake everything - The Conservative Woman