⬆️ Veterans and healthcare professionals formed a human shield to protect the demonstrators in Amsterdam The Netherlands.⬇️

Protest in Union Square, New York City

Kyiv/Kiev Ukraine. Anybody recognise the song?

Helsinki, Finland

Belgrade, Serbia

Copenaghen, Denmark, sings BELLA CIAO against the Covid Regime.

AMSTERDAM: STAND OFF between the army veterans for freedom and the riot gear police.
We need the veterans to stand up to defend the right to protest in every single country in the world. Well done, you wrote the history of humanity today.

AMSTERDAM: Army veterans form a human shield against the riot gear police around a line of medical workers & the protesters. We need the veterans to stand up to defend the right to protest in every single country in the world. Well done, you wrote the history of humanity today.

NEW YORK: Vera Sharav, holocaust survivor, this is about eugenics, this is weaponizing medicine for genocide.

LISBON: PORTUGAL

KASSEL, GERMANY

Mike Yeadon: In Germany, Reiner Fuellmich has been taking evidence for months, including from me, to his Corona Committee.

I gave oral testimony on why I think some people develop serious blood clots after vaccination.

I believe I’m on from around 2h 10min. [2h11min25s] Bandwidth was poor & we eventually switched to audio only.

https://youtu.be/Xb9dpuKaDrM?t=2h11m25s

I trust that some vaccinators & some members of the public will, upon hearing this, decide that vaccination, other than for sound, personal, medical reasons, is inappropriate & potentially dangerous.

Once the fact of built-in & inevitable biological variability is appreciated, I would expect medical ethicists to speak out against massed vaccination of the healthy population, who are not at serious risk from the virus itself.

Best wishes
Mike

Mike Yeadon: "Interesting assembly of views on the concerns expressed by Geert Vanden Bossche.
I’m in the minority who don’t believe the vaccination roll out is creating dangerous mutant viruses.
I am with the others unanimously against vaccinating those not at risk from this virus because risk / benefit analysis does not support it.
Not because of the risk of encouraging ‘variants ’.
Best wishes,
Mike"
https://dryburgh.com/vanden-bossche-theory-fact-or-fiction/

"Vitamin D deficiency (≤12ng/mL or <30nmol/L), is independently associated with COVID-19 mortality after adjustment for visceral fat (epicardial fat thickness) [Epicardial fat covers 80% of the heart surface]. Low 25-OHD may contribute to a pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic state, increasing risk"
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.12.21253490v2

Pro lockdown folk appear to have a semi religious belief that lockdowns MUST work, because this is a human contact transmitted infection & lockdown reduces average number of contacts.
I’ve been astonished by the number of people who uncritically accept this.
Of course, what matters is not the number of contacts, but the number of contacts which lead to INFECTION.
Now, this pivots on density of infectious individuals. I don’t accept that transmission of infective levels of virus occurs from people without symptoms, not at any frequency with which we need to be concerned.
Transmission is also far lower outside with massive air dilution than inside in still rebreathed air.
Consider the phenotype of a person infected with virus, but who has no symptoms. Because symptoms are a consequence of either substantial virus pathology in lungs & elsewhere, or of the body’s response to invasion, its logical to expect INFECTIOUS people have much virus in their airways also have SYMPTOMS. Not saying 100% match, but in the vast majority of infectious individuals, they will feel unwell. They’re much less likely to be walking around & able to bump into susceptible people.
In contrast, consider institutions. Hospitals & care homes are in contrast, with large numbers of people & patients especially & from time to time, residents, are there because they’re not only symptomatic, but ill, often seriously ill.
In short, I believe the virus was never anywhere near as prevalent in the community as in institutions. And that’s why lockdown did little except to damage society & the economy. lockdown did little to reduce INFECTIOUS contacts. Reduction in contacts which were most unlikely to lead to infection was an illogical step to have taken.
In parallel to this logical argument we have the empirical evidence that the bulk of infections were acquired in institutions & not random contacts in the community.
This isn’t a new concept, either: both SARS & MERS are considered largely as infectious diseases of INSTITUTIONS. Not the community.
I hope I’ve acknowledged the logical approach outlined by those favouring lockdown & believing it MUST work, while providing a coherent & internally consistent explanation why it is in fact not true. My explanation tallies with the great bulk of international literature in this point, that indiscriminate lockdowns are not associated with lower mortality, either of deaths attributed to Covid19 or all causes mortality.
We must not make this mistake again.
Best wishes,
Mike