THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAZIS AND NEONAZIS
Although the nazis hated the jews, the neonazis, with the benefit of hindsight and knowing full well that it was the Moscow led USSR which captured Berlin leading to the fall of Hitler, hate the Russians instead.
They may have some hate for the jews but it's secondary to the hate for the Russians. That in my view is the main difference between nazis and neonazis. The only Russia they liked was one ruled by the CIA under Yeltsin.
Hence the historical absurdity of equating Putin with Hitler. Looking for Hitler's heirs? Look at the CIA, and to the WEF instead.
@robinmg
https://rumble.com/vx8b7j-johnny-vedmore-is-wef-a-cia-backed-creation-with-goal-of-world-government.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2810258/AT-1-000-ex-Nazis-hired-U-S-spies-Cold-War-CIA-helped-America.html
Although the nazis hated the jews, the neonazis, with the benefit of hindsight and knowing full well that it was the Moscow led USSR which captured Berlin leading to the fall of Hitler, hate the Russians instead.
They may have some hate for the jews but it's secondary to the hate for the Russians. That in my view is the main difference between nazis and neonazis. The only Russia they liked was one ruled by the CIA under Yeltsin.
Hence the historical absurdity of equating Putin with Hitler. Looking for Hitler's heirs? Look at the CIA, and to the WEF instead.
@robinmg
https://rumble.com/vx8b7j-johnny-vedmore-is-wef-a-cia-backed-creation-with-goal-of-world-government.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2810258/AT-1-000-ex-Nazis-hired-U-S-spies-Cold-War-CIA-helped-America.html
Rumble
Johnny Vedmore: Is WEF a CIA-backed Creation with Goal of World Government?
Johnny Vedmore discusses the CIA roots of the World Economic Forum which began at a Harvard "International Seminar". It's focus was to bring Europe and America into supranational union and was origina
IT WAS THE RUSSIANS GUV!
IT WASN'T US, WE DID NUFFIN'!
Essentially they succeeded in getting those plugged into corporate media to hate the Russians instead of hating those who made and then released a bioweapon, locked them up for two years, restricted their breathing, and gave them a barrage of toxic injections, leading to numbers of deaths which make the casualties from "Putin's war" pale in comparison.
t.me/robinmg/17128
IT WASN'T US, WE DID NUFFIN'!
Essentially they succeeded in getting those plugged into corporate media to hate the Russians instead of hating those who made and then released a bioweapon, locked them up for two years, restricted their breathing, and gave them a barrage of toxic injections, leading to numbers of deaths which make the casualties from "Putin's war" pale in comparison.
t.me/robinmg/17128
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NAZIS AND NEONAZIS
Although the nazis hated the jews, the neonazis, with the benefit of hindsight and knowing full well that it was the Moscow led USSR which captured Berlin leading to the fall of Hitler, hate the Russians instead.…
Although the nazis hated the jews, the neonazis, with the benefit of hindsight and knowing full well that it was the Moscow led USSR which captured Berlin leading to the fall of Hitler, hate the Russians instead.…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Where were the flags of the Donetsk & Lugansk People's Republics when the post coup illegitimate government of Kiev was doing this to these people? Where was the BBC, CNN? Because this has been going on non stop since 2014, the people doing it were trained by the US & UK's armed forces trainers, and Ukrainian military documents prove it was going to be escalated in March 2022.
Forwarded from Alexander Dugin
Ukrainian nationalism as a geopolitical tool of Atlantism
At the same time the initiator of the cataclysms in Ukraine was the Atlanticist West. Even the neutral, moderately pro-Western - multi-vector - policies of Kuchma or Yanukovich did not suit them. The Atlantists pressured Kiev to turn into an aggressive and radical, attacking Anti-Russia as quickly as possible. Kiev had to attack.
This explains the Orange Revolution, the Maidan, and the reasons for the current Russian military operation.
The West was fighting for Ukraine. It should be taken into account that Ukraine has no state history at all, and the territories in which it is located are historically accidental and are the result of the administrative creativity of the Bolsheviks. When Putin justified the military operation in Ukraine by saying that "Lenin created Ukraine," he was absolutely right. However, Lenin did not create Ukraine as such, but one of the zones of Bolshevik control along with others. The nationality, according to Bolshevik theory, had to be completely overcome in a socialist international society. Lenin created Ukraine and in fact immediately abolished it.
Therefore, after 1991 there were peoples and territories on the territory of Ukraine with completely different history, identity, language and culture. Half of them were not at all different from the Russians. The second half was more or less Russified Ukrainians. And only an overwhelming minority professed a self-styled nationalist ideology. But only this minority was capable, according to Western geopoliticists, of transforming Ukrainians into a "nation" at an accelerated pace. It was an Atlanticist geopolitical project. In other countries, the West has carefully eradicated nationalism, especially in its radical forms. In Ukraine, however, the West acted in exactly the opposite way, actively supporting all forms of nationalism up to the most extreme. According to Atlanticist strategists, this was the only way to speed up the formation of an artificial, rigidly Russophobic construct, a virtual simulacrum of a nation. That is why the information sphere was so important, as it obsessively inculcated Ukrainians with an unfounded hatred of Russians and everything that united our peoples. Any nonsense was used, up to "ancient civilization of ancient Ukrainians," which would have caused only complete bewilderment in the West. However, the entire operation was supervised by the Atlanticist secret services, and that is why the West created an artificial image of Ukraine as a young and openly vulnerable democracy, suffering from the Russian threat. In fact, a Nazi mindset was obsessively asserted in society, inextricably linked with Atlanticism and even liberal globalism (no matter how much these systems contradict each other, because globalism denies the state, and liberalism any collective identity, and above all national identity).
At the same time the initiator of the cataclysms in Ukraine was the Atlanticist West. Even the neutral, moderately pro-Western - multi-vector - policies of Kuchma or Yanukovich did not suit them. The Atlantists pressured Kiev to turn into an aggressive and radical, attacking Anti-Russia as quickly as possible. Kiev had to attack.
This explains the Orange Revolution, the Maidan, and the reasons for the current Russian military operation.
The West was fighting for Ukraine. It should be taken into account that Ukraine has no state history at all, and the territories in which it is located are historically accidental and are the result of the administrative creativity of the Bolsheviks. When Putin justified the military operation in Ukraine by saying that "Lenin created Ukraine," he was absolutely right. However, Lenin did not create Ukraine as such, but one of the zones of Bolshevik control along with others. The nationality, according to Bolshevik theory, had to be completely overcome in a socialist international society. Lenin created Ukraine and in fact immediately abolished it.
Therefore, after 1991 there were peoples and territories on the territory of Ukraine with completely different history, identity, language and culture. Half of them were not at all different from the Russians. The second half was more or less Russified Ukrainians. And only an overwhelming minority professed a self-styled nationalist ideology. But only this minority was capable, according to Western geopoliticists, of transforming Ukrainians into a "nation" at an accelerated pace. It was an Atlanticist geopolitical project. In other countries, the West has carefully eradicated nationalism, especially in its radical forms. In Ukraine, however, the West acted in exactly the opposite way, actively supporting all forms of nationalism up to the most extreme. According to Atlanticist strategists, this was the only way to speed up the formation of an artificial, rigidly Russophobic construct, a virtual simulacrum of a nation. That is why the information sphere was so important, as it obsessively inculcated Ukrainians with an unfounded hatred of Russians and everything that united our peoples. Any nonsense was used, up to "ancient civilization of ancient Ukrainians," which would have caused only complete bewilderment in the West. However, the entire operation was supervised by the Atlanticist secret services, and that is why the West created an artificial image of Ukraine as a young and openly vulnerable democracy, suffering from the Russian threat. In fact, a Nazi mindset was obsessively asserted in society, inextricably linked with Atlanticism and even liberal globalism (no matter how much these systems contradict each other, because globalism denies the state, and liberalism any collective identity, and above all national identity).
Once again, and just like with SARSCoV2, we have to be clear that we are still dealing with the CIA. SARSCoV2 & Ukraine are just two faces of the same CBDC CIA coin. 💰
Forwarded from A McFinn
Amazon selling Ukrainian Nazi t shirts! 😳
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=azov+battalion&crid=1GDH5QFP7AL3D&sprefix=azov%2Caps%2C747&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_1_4
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=azov+battalion&crid=1GDH5QFP7AL3D&sprefix=azov%2Caps%2C747&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_1_4
Forwarded from Dr. Thomas Binder, MD
In the future, public schools in Orange County, California, will require students who want to participate in sports programs to undergo a heart examination beforehand. The aim is to use an ECG, at the least, to rule out increased risk of sudden cardiac arrest.
Unfortunately, officials still do not want to admit that such cases have increased since the start of the campaign to inject unnecessary, ineffective, unsafe experimental mRNA and DNA injections that can cause, amongst many other severe adverse events, sudden cardiac arrest due to myocarditis or myocardial infarction.
https://www.ocps.net/departments/athletics/sports_physicals
Unfortunately, officials still do not want to admit that such cases have increased since the start of the campaign to inject unnecessary, ineffective, unsafe experimental mRNA and DNA injections that can cause, amongst many other severe adverse events, sudden cardiac arrest due to myocarditis or myocardial infarction.
https://www.ocps.net/departments/athletics/sports_physicals
"Putin wipes out entire city"
First of all, there was a battle between the Donetsk People's Republic (not "Putin") and Ukraine's army who were shelling them from civilian building compounds.
Secondly, as per resident accounts, the city was liberated, not "wiped out".
Thirdly, the locals ascertain responsibility for the extensive damage to Zelensky, not Putin.
British corporate propaganda is laughable, Covid science-fiction was more believable. You have to be a total idiot to believe any of it.
Patrick Lancaster reports from Volnovakha:
https://youtu.be/Lbiplu3Cyjg
First of all, there was a battle between the Donetsk People's Republic (not "Putin") and Ukraine's army who were shelling them from civilian building compounds.
Secondly, as per resident accounts, the city was liberated, not "wiped out".
Thirdly, the locals ascertain responsibility for the extensive damage to Zelensky, not Putin.
British corporate propaganda is laughable, Covid science-fiction was more believable. You have to be a total idiot to believe any of it.
Patrick Lancaster reports from Volnovakha:
https://youtu.be/Lbiplu3Cyjg
Forwarded from Xoaquin Flores - New Resistance
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💢Pep Guardiola (coach Manchester City) isn't happy that all of civil society and matters unrelated to war must rally round this or that side, when it was politicians after money that caused crises like Ukraine.
“The politicians are there to avoid situations like Ukraine, but it happens because they are complete failures. And they do it for money. It's happening in Syria, Afghanistan, where innocent people are being killed because some people want money"
At first glance, seems neutral. But the wars he lists are all Deep State wars.
Thing is, people aren't allowed to say what they really think.
Read between the lines and you know what side he's on.
@NewResistance
“The politicians are there to avoid situations like Ukraine, but it happens because they are complete failures. And they do it for money. It's happening in Syria, Afghanistan, where innocent people are being killed because some people want money"
At first glance, seems neutral. But the wars he lists are all Deep State wars.
Thing is, people aren't allowed to say what they really think.
Read between the lines and you know what side he's on.
@NewResistance
Can we have a British media personality saying what Guardiola said or does the national hypocrisy bubble not allow it?
I ❤ PEP GUARDIOLA ⚽️
t.me/robinmg/17136
I ❤ PEP GUARDIOLA ⚽️
t.me/robinmg/17136
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
💢Pep Guardiola (coach Manchester City) isn't happy that all of civil society and matters unrelated to war must rally round this or that side, when it was politicians after money that caused crises like Ukraine.
“The politicians are there to avoid situations…
“The politicians are there to avoid situations…
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w
A 2021 News-review type article on mRNA agents. If I wasn’t highly suspicious, I’d not have noticed a few items:
1. Several existing vaccines being converted to mRNA types. Why?
Existing products work well enough & we have years of manufacturing plus clinical experience on safety & effectiveness. Changing platform throws all 3 in doubt, adds hundred of millions in at-risk capital & will almost certainly end up with a more expensive product with ultra cold chain requirements. Finally, there’ll safety alerts at the margin, because mRNA vaccines are not controllable as to how much coded protein ends up being synthesised. Toxicity is always related to dose/conc.
Is it simply because it’ll be patented & expensive?
Mike
A 2021 News-review type article on mRNA agents. If I wasn’t highly suspicious, I’d not have noticed a few items:
1. Several existing vaccines being converted to mRNA types. Why?
Existing products work well enough & we have years of manufacturing plus clinical experience on safety & effectiveness. Changing platform throws all 3 in doubt, adds hundred of millions in at-risk capital & will almost certainly end up with a more expensive product with ultra cold chain requirements. Finally, there’ll safety alerts at the margin, because mRNA vaccines are not controllable as to how much coded protein ends up being synthesised. Toxicity is always related to dose/conc.
Is it simply because it’ll be patented & expensive?
Mike
Nature
The tangled history of mRNA vaccines
Nature - Hundreds of scientists had worked on mRNA vaccines for decades before the coronavirus pandemic brought a breakthrough.
Russophobes, germophobes, it’s all the same…
"How seamlessly we have moved from war with covid, to war with Russia. But how, by what process has this happened, and why?
What, if they exist, are the links between these two totally different enemies?
The how is relatively easy to define. The narrative – everything in these mediatised days is about the narrative – is much the same in each case.
A dreadful scourge of mankind (the coronavirus, Russia) suddenly emerges out of nowhere and ravages populations. Governments, overwhelmed, clueless how to respond but under huge pressure from media and public to ‘do something’, flail about, alighting on draconian measures (lockdowns, sanctions) which make everybody feel good about themselves but do nothing to solve the problem and boomerang on the societies which deploy them.
However, there is no price to pay for this self-inflicted damage because it’s all the fault of the covid or Putin, isn’t it, and so the restrictions/sanctions are ratcheted up and extended.
There is no cost-benefit analysis, no scrutiny. Left and Right are united in baying for what amounts to self-abuse, especially as the poor will bear the brunt. Only a few cranks or marginalised figures on the Right (Farage, Tucker Carlson) or the Provisional wing of the Left (Piers Corbyn and Jeremy Corbyn) beg to differ. With covid it was slightly different, thanks to a number of freedom-loving Conservative MPs, but the fact remains: Right and Left were broadly united on covid and even more so on Ukraine. Much the same analysis could be made of the climate ‘emergency’ fandango.
The techniques used to develop the narrative are the same in each case. The mainstream media open the spigots, as they have now with Ukraine, for an inescapable torrent of ‘coverage’ indistinguishable from propaganda. Dissenting voices, even distinguished professors and diplomats, are denigrated, marginalised, silenced and ignored.
War porn, hospital porn, swamp the media. Crisis actors (featured in NHS ads and, allegedly, Ukrainian PR videos) make their cameo appearances. We clap for the Ukrainians (well, nearly) and believe all their claims, implicitly, just as we believed our politicians and public health officials.
We follow events by the hour. The daily death count which worked so well with covid doesn’t work so well with Ukraine, because according to the UN the death count after two weeks is still in the low hundreds, a figure about which Yemenis and Syrians could only dream. Never mind, the daily refugee count will do. This has the advantage of allowing us to flagellate ourselves for never doing enough and being selfish."
https://21stcenturywire.com/2022/03/12/covid-climate-russia-what-will-the-next-horseman-of-the-apocalypse-be/
"How seamlessly we have moved from war with covid, to war with Russia. But how, by what process has this happened, and why?
What, if they exist, are the links between these two totally different enemies?
The how is relatively easy to define. The narrative – everything in these mediatised days is about the narrative – is much the same in each case.
A dreadful scourge of mankind (the coronavirus, Russia) suddenly emerges out of nowhere and ravages populations. Governments, overwhelmed, clueless how to respond but under huge pressure from media and public to ‘do something’, flail about, alighting on draconian measures (lockdowns, sanctions) which make everybody feel good about themselves but do nothing to solve the problem and boomerang on the societies which deploy them.
However, there is no price to pay for this self-inflicted damage because it’s all the fault of the covid or Putin, isn’t it, and so the restrictions/sanctions are ratcheted up and extended.
There is no cost-benefit analysis, no scrutiny. Left and Right are united in baying for what amounts to self-abuse, especially as the poor will bear the brunt. Only a few cranks or marginalised figures on the Right (Farage, Tucker Carlson) or the Provisional wing of the Left (Piers Corbyn and Jeremy Corbyn) beg to differ. With covid it was slightly different, thanks to a number of freedom-loving Conservative MPs, but the fact remains: Right and Left were broadly united on covid and even more so on Ukraine. Much the same analysis could be made of the climate ‘emergency’ fandango.
The techniques used to develop the narrative are the same in each case. The mainstream media open the spigots, as they have now with Ukraine, for an inescapable torrent of ‘coverage’ indistinguishable from propaganda. Dissenting voices, even distinguished professors and diplomats, are denigrated, marginalised, silenced and ignored.
War porn, hospital porn, swamp the media. Crisis actors (featured in NHS ads and, allegedly, Ukrainian PR videos) make their cameo appearances. We clap for the Ukrainians (well, nearly) and believe all their claims, implicitly, just as we believed our politicians and public health officials.
We follow events by the hour. The daily death count which worked so well with covid doesn’t work so well with Ukraine, because according to the UN the death count after two weeks is still in the low hundreds, a figure about which Yemenis and Syrians could only dream. Never mind, the daily refugee count will do. This has the advantage of allowing us to flagellate ourselves for never doing enough and being selfish."
https://21stcenturywire.com/2022/03/12/covid-climate-russia-what-will-the-next-horseman-of-the-apocalypse-be/
21st Century Wire
Covid, Climate, Russia – Hysteria and the Next Horseman of The Apocalypse
<strong>Peter Ford</strong> | Left and Right are united in baying for what amounts to self-abuse, especially as the poor will bear the brunt.
Forwarded from World Council for Health
🚨 First Open Letter on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty
Read the open letter here: worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/2022/03/pandemic-treaty/45591
WCH urges everyone to approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, civil society groups, professionals, public figures, and independent media to:
✓ Raise awareness about the implications of the proposed global pandemic agreement
✓ Call for national campaigns that protect natural law and democratic constitutions
✓ Join credible civil society coalitions such as WCH
Download the open letter here.
#StopTheTreaty | Prepared by WCH Law and Activism Committee
📌 Follow World Council for Health:
➨ @WCH_org
🗣 Join the discussion:
➨ @worldforhealthchat
Read the open letter here: worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/2022/03/pandemic-treaty/45591
WCH urges everyone to approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, civil society groups, professionals, public figures, and independent media to:
✓ Raise awareness about the implications of the proposed global pandemic agreement
✓ Call for national campaigns that protect natural law and democratic constitutions
✓ Join credible civil society coalitions such as WCH
Download the open letter here.
#StopTheTreaty | Prepared by WCH Law and Activism Committee
📌 Follow World Council for Health:
➨ @WCH_org
🗣 Join the discussion:
➨ @worldforhealthchat
Saint Augustine
City of God, Book 1, 32
32. Of the establishment of scenic entertainments.
"Besides, though the pestilence was stayed, this was not because the voluptuous madness of stage-plays had taken possession of a warlike people hitherto accustomed only to the games of the circus; but these astute and wicked spirits, foreseeing that in due course the pestilence would shortly cease, took occasion to infect, not the bodies, but the morals of their worshippers, with a far more serious disease."
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/45304/45304-h/45304-h.htm#Page_1
City of God, Book 1, 32
32. Of the establishment of scenic entertainments.
"Besides, though the pestilence was stayed, this was not because the voluptuous madness of stage-plays had taken possession of a warlike people hitherto accustomed only to the games of the circus; but these astute and wicked spirits, foreseeing that in due course the pestilence would shortly cease, took occasion to infect, not the bodies, but the morals of their worshippers, with a far more serious disease."
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/45304/45304-h/45304-h.htm#Page_1
CALLING OUT THE FLAG BIG LIE
I hereby call out the new Big Lie: the "standing with Ukraine" symbol of the waving of the Ukrainian flag or ribbon by non Ukrainians (Ukrainians are justified in waving their national flag if they so wish) in a context of military conflict between four parties (current government, Donetsk, Lugansk & Russia) is not "showing solidarity with refugees", but it is a psychological operation to turn the bourgeois middle classes of Europe into rabid warmongers.
If refugees were the concern then flags of Peace would have served a better purpose. This is because there are millions of refugees waving the flags of Donetsk and Lugansk too. This "standing with Ukraine" symbolised by the flag of a belligerent party to this four way conflict is designed to erode any morality left and possibility of understanding a world made of complexities where what is required is not judgement, but morally driven understanding of complexity.
It is designed to infect the soul of the middle classes with the germ of war in the terrain of destruction.
@robinmg
I hereby call out the new Big Lie: the "standing with Ukraine" symbol of the waving of the Ukrainian flag or ribbon by non Ukrainians (Ukrainians are justified in waving their national flag if they so wish) in a context of military conflict between four parties (current government, Donetsk, Lugansk & Russia) is not "showing solidarity with refugees", but it is a psychological operation to turn the bourgeois middle classes of Europe into rabid warmongers.
If refugees were the concern then flags of Peace would have served a better purpose. This is because there are millions of refugees waving the flags of Donetsk and Lugansk too. This "standing with Ukraine" symbolised by the flag of a belligerent party to this four way conflict is designed to erode any morality left and possibility of understanding a world made of complexities where what is required is not judgement, but morally driven understanding of complexity.
It is designed to infect the soul of the middle classes with the germ of war in the terrain of destruction.
@robinmg
Forwarded from Election Wizard
Confirmation from the Ukrainian president that indeed, a propaganda war is underway, fueled in part or whole by Big Tech.
Russia Attacks Ukraine | Invasion Or Collective Self-Defence? What International Law Says About Putin Action
Collective Self-Defence?
https://legal.un.org/repertory/art51.shtml
"The law of prohibition of use of force in the UN charter has an exception in the form of law of self-defence and collective self-defence (Article 51). In the present case, we must focus on the concept of collective self-defence.
Right to collective self-defence provides that a State is within the four walls of international law and the UN charter if they act in self-defence on behalf of other states.
Let’s assume State A has used force against State B. This makes State A an aggressor in international law. In this case, the law of self-defence in the UN charter allows the victim state to legitimately use force against the aggressor state. In this case, there are two uses of force, one is by State A, since it is an aggressor State, it has violated the UN charter [Art.2(4)]; the second use of force is not prohibited as it is legitimate use of force of self-defence under Article 51 of the UN charter.
Now, what if State B is no match to the might of State A? Can State C step in and use force on behalf of State B? The question is legitimate because use of force is not used against State C. Under the law of collective self-defence, it is perfectly within the scheme of the UN charter if State C uses force against State A on behalf of State B. The use of force by State C is covered under the right to collective self-defence and is outside the purview of Article 2(4) of the UN charter.
This is what the Russians have engineered, and here is how.
Russia first carved out two states from the troubled eastern region of Ukraine by recognising their independence and sovereignty. Thus, two more states were born out of Russia [out of Ukraine: the Donetsk & Lugansk Republics]. Since these States invited Russia to protect them from the Ukrainian Armed Force, Russian troops entered their territory without violating Article 2(4). They called the Russian forces in the States carved out of Ukraine as peacekeeping forces.
Subsequently, it was argued that Ukraine attacked these new territories after their independence [which they did in 2014, 2015 and ever since, including in February 2022]. Consequently, Russia argued invocation of Article 51, UN charter, i.e. collective self-defence.
In other words, it acted on behalf of the States of Donetsk and Luhansk, the breakaway States of Ukraine according to Russia. Thus, Russia is arguing that it is invading Ukraine in collective self-defence."
Abishek Mishra
https://news.abplive.com/blog/russia-attacks-ukraine-invasion-or-collective-self-defence-what-international-law-says-about-putin-action-1515388
Collective Self-Defence?
https://legal.un.org/repertory/art51.shtml
"The law of prohibition of use of force in the UN charter has an exception in the form of law of self-defence and collective self-defence (Article 51). In the present case, we must focus on the concept of collective self-defence.
Right to collective self-defence provides that a State is within the four walls of international law and the UN charter if they act in self-defence on behalf of other states.
Let’s assume State A has used force against State B. This makes State A an aggressor in international law. In this case, the law of self-defence in the UN charter allows the victim state to legitimately use force against the aggressor state. In this case, there are two uses of force, one is by State A, since it is an aggressor State, it has violated the UN charter [Art.2(4)]; the second use of force is not prohibited as it is legitimate use of force of self-defence under Article 51 of the UN charter.
Now, what if State B is no match to the might of State A? Can State C step in and use force on behalf of State B? The question is legitimate because use of force is not used against State C. Under the law of collective self-defence, it is perfectly within the scheme of the UN charter if State C uses force against State A on behalf of State B. The use of force by State C is covered under the right to collective self-defence and is outside the purview of Article 2(4) of the UN charter.
This is what the Russians have engineered, and here is how.
Russia first carved out two states from the troubled eastern region of Ukraine by recognising their independence and sovereignty. Thus, two more states were born out of Russia [out of Ukraine: the Donetsk & Lugansk Republics]. Since these States invited Russia to protect them from the Ukrainian Armed Force, Russian troops entered their territory without violating Article 2(4). They called the Russian forces in the States carved out of Ukraine as peacekeeping forces.
Subsequently, it was argued that Ukraine attacked these new territories after their independence [which they did in 2014, 2015 and ever since, including in February 2022]. Consequently, Russia argued invocation of Article 51, UN charter, i.e. collective self-defence.
In other words, it acted on behalf of the States of Donetsk and Luhansk, the breakaway States of Ukraine according to Russia. Thus, Russia is arguing that it is invading Ukraine in collective self-defence."
Abishek Mishra
https://news.abplive.com/blog/russia-attacks-ukraine-invasion-or-collective-self-defence-what-international-law-says-about-putin-action-1515388
legal.un.org
Chapter VII: Article 51 — Charter of the United Nations — Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs — Codification Division…
This is the website of the Repertory of Practice of United Nations Organs (Legal Publications of the Codification Division of the Office of Legal Affairs). Here you will find related information and links.
Forwarded from Emiliano
It's what the USA did for Kuwait against Iraq in 1991
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ali Farag, Egyptian squash player.