ASTRAZENECA DOESNT WORK
"A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [ASTRAZENECA] vaccine DID NOT show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant [South African Variant]"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2102214
"A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [ASTRAZENECA] vaccine DID NOT show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant [South African Variant]"
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2102214
The New England Journal of Medicine
Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant | NEJM
Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation
of the efficacy...
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation
of the efficacy...
"COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/
Michael Yeadon 25 Mar 2021 10:43AM
Once an infectious disease is endemic it’s nonsensical to prevent a tiny proportion of people moving from A to B.
The variants narrative is completely fallacious.
I’m immunologically trained & can see gaping holes in the story.
As an illustration, note that the most-different variant is still 99,7% identical to the original sequence.
There’s no way on earth that a 0.3% change will allow a variant to not be recognised by the immune system as the same virus.
It’s as if I put my baseball cap on back to front & expecting not to be recognised as Dr Mike Yeadon.
Worse, once you realise it’s all lies re variants, you surely get a wash of fear?
Why have they all but closed borders?
Why are they making top up vaccines?
Why have global medicines regulators decided no safety studies are required?
What’s happened & happening does not add up.
Once you accept that, you should become sceptical.
There’s risk of being told you’re silly if you ask questions.
But the far bigger risk is NOT questioning things.
No one is going to come & put all this mess right.
Only we can do that & only if enough of us say “I’m not putting up with this nonsense a moment longer”,
Please do that. I can’t communicate how vital it is that you do.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Once an infectious disease is endemic it’s nonsensical to prevent a tiny proportion of people moving from A to B.
The variants narrative is completely fallacious.
I’m immunologically trained & can see gaping holes in the story.
As an illustration, note that the most-different variant is still 99,7% identical to the original sequence.
There’s no way on earth that a 0.3% change will allow a variant to not be recognised by the immune system as the same virus.
It’s as if I put my baseball cap on back to front & expecting not to be recognised as Dr Mike Yeadon.
Worse, once you realise it’s all lies re variants, you surely get a wash of fear?
Why have they all but closed borders?
Why are they making top up vaccines?
Why have global medicines regulators decided no safety studies are required?
What’s happened & happening does not add up.
Once you accept that, you should become sceptical.
There’s risk of being told you’re silly if you ask questions.
But the far bigger risk is NOT questioning things.
No one is going to come & put all this mess right.
Only we can do that & only if enough of us say “I’m not putting up with this nonsense a moment longer”,
Please do that. I can’t communicate how vital it is that you do.
Dr Mike Yeadon
Cc: Posa Beata <Beata.Posa@ema.europa.eu>
Subject: Green Pass Requires Debate, Not Emergency Adoption, COM 2021 130
Date: Thursday, 25 March 2021 09:19
Dear Sirs,
I am an Italian citizen and I am concerned as to the unintended consequences COM 2021130 (Vaccine Certification or Passports system) could have on health and safety, thus breaching Article 191 of the Treaty of Functioning of the European Union, as well the Nurenberg Principle, Code, and Trials (a criminal offence).
As you are aware, currently airlines and other transport carriers forbid boarding to anyone not having a negative PCR (or equivalent) Covid test.
As there exist such practice and precedent, it would be likely that airlines and other transport carriers could use your proposed Vaccine Certification system to restrict boarding thus further preventing EU country nationals from returning to their home country.
The issue is that currently there are NO APPROVED Covid vaccines in any country, as these have only received EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION, insofar the required pre-approval testing are not due to be completed until 2023.
This means that any EU country nationals which would be required to receive a vaccine and show your proposed Vaccine Certificate to return to their home country would be coerced to accept submitting to an experimental vaccine (as alternatively he/she would be prevented to return home, rejoin family, work...).
The Council of Europe has made it clear as per Resolution 2361 (2021) that experimental vaccines are wholly voluntary and not subject to mandates or coercion - as any other way would be a criminal offence and the police may be compelled to intervene!!!
Preventing EU country nationals to return home unless he/she has received an experimental vaccine would be in breach of the EU country nationals inalienable right of freedom of movement and expression and right to bodily integrity and in breach of the Nurenberg Code against human experimentation.
It might be different if such vaccine certificates and restrictions were to be issued after 2023 when the vaccine trials are completed.
Subject: Green Pass Requires Debate, Not Emergency Adoption, COM 2021 130
Date: Thursday, 25 March 2021 09:19
Dear Sirs,
I am an Italian citizen and I am concerned as to the unintended consequences COM 2021130 (Vaccine Certification or Passports system) could have on health and safety, thus breaching Article 191 of the Treaty of Functioning of the European Union, as well the Nurenberg Principle, Code, and Trials (a criminal offence).
As you are aware, currently airlines and other transport carriers forbid boarding to anyone not having a negative PCR (or equivalent) Covid test.
As there exist such practice and precedent, it would be likely that airlines and other transport carriers could use your proposed Vaccine Certification system to restrict boarding thus further preventing EU country nationals from returning to their home country.
The issue is that currently there are NO APPROVED Covid vaccines in any country, as these have only received EMERGENCY AUTHORIZATION, insofar the required pre-approval testing are not due to be completed until 2023.
This means that any EU country nationals which would be required to receive a vaccine and show your proposed Vaccine Certificate to return to their home country would be coerced to accept submitting to an experimental vaccine (as alternatively he/she would be prevented to return home, rejoin family, work...).
The Council of Europe has made it clear as per Resolution 2361 (2021) that experimental vaccines are wholly voluntary and not subject to mandates or coercion - as any other way would be a criminal offence and the police may be compelled to intervene!!!
Preventing EU country nationals to return home unless he/she has received an experimental vaccine would be in breach of the EU country nationals inalienable right of freedom of movement and expression and right to bodily integrity and in breach of the Nurenberg Code against human experimentation.
It might be different if such vaccine certificates and restrictions were to be issued after 2023 when the vaccine trials are completed.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
However, you would have to bear in mind that even after 2023 some individuals would have legitimate medical or religious reasons for which they may wish NOT to be injected with some medical products, hence even after 2023 it would be unlawful to restrict EU country nationals to return home and freely travel and exercise their inalienable human rights.
I'd also like to point out as it has some relevance that EMA (copied herewith) have grossly misrepresented to the general public that these experimental vaccines are "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE."
Well educated persons would certainly know and understand that such claim can only be reasonably made at the conclusion of the safety and efficacy studies in 2023, and not whilst those studies are under-way.
Indeed, there are many unknowns in respect of these experimental vaccines.
It appears they have some prophilactic effect, but to date NOBODY has been able to demostrate through serological studies that these experimental vaccines produce immunity.
Any claims by EMA and national governments and its agents that these experimental vaccines can lead to herd immunity are gross misrepresentations of fact until serological studies are published and peer reviewed to demonstrate that these experimental vaccines could provide immunity hence contribute to herd immunity (I have requested from EMA such data under the FOI and EMA has confirmed such data to date does not exist).
Therefore, the only scientific established path to herd immunity to date is by way of naturally acquired immunity and NOT these experimental vaccines.
There would be no benefit at this stage absent serological studies to confirm the contrary to adopt these experimental vaccines in a herd immunity strategy or any other strategy which would restrict inalienable rights of EU country nationals to freely go about their life within or outside the EU.
The above does not represent my views, but is based on the enclosed public data and evidence by renowned scientists, none of which are anti-vaxxers.
Kindly also accept as part of this submission the expert opinion and evidence presented by Prof. Dolores Cahill here:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/must-watch-professor-dolores-cahill-lawyer-dr-reiner-fuellmich_bhiXMUOG4jtoTR4.html
See also as furhter expert opinion and evidence:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/downloads/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=shg0VWkz0VM
For the avoidance of doubt, I am not an anti-vaxxer, never been, never will, and where benefits exceed the risks I am favourable to fully tested and fully approved vaccines, but I am, as you also should be, against coercion into being subjected to experimental vaccines, fear inducing psychological torture, and denial of inalienable rights.
Kindly give due regard to the above and do not implement vaccine certificates/passports as you do already know these would be used to restrict EU nationals inalienable rights including their right to travel and return home to work and rejoin their family with no scientific evidence to date of corresponding benefits to health and herd immunity.
Vaccine passports/certificates would induce and coerce EU nationals to submit themselves to human experimentation this in explicit breach of Nurenberg Principles, Code, Trials, and Resolution 2361 (2021).
For the avoidance of doubt, it would be for you to produce evicence that your proposed vaccine certificates/passports would not be used as a form of coercion into human experimentation in breach of Nurenberg Code, Principles, and UK presided Trials and Resolution 2361 (2021).
Best regards,
Gian A. Ameri, Pz. della Pigna 6, Rome, Italy, 00186
I'd also like to point out as it has some relevance that EMA (copied herewith) have grossly misrepresented to the general public that these experimental vaccines are "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE."
Well educated persons would certainly know and understand that such claim can only be reasonably made at the conclusion of the safety and efficacy studies in 2023, and not whilst those studies are under-way.
Indeed, there are many unknowns in respect of these experimental vaccines.
It appears they have some prophilactic effect, but to date NOBODY has been able to demostrate through serological studies that these experimental vaccines produce immunity.
Any claims by EMA and national governments and its agents that these experimental vaccines can lead to herd immunity are gross misrepresentations of fact until serological studies are published and peer reviewed to demonstrate that these experimental vaccines could provide immunity hence contribute to herd immunity (I have requested from EMA such data under the FOI and EMA has confirmed such data to date does not exist).
Therefore, the only scientific established path to herd immunity to date is by way of naturally acquired immunity and NOT these experimental vaccines.
There would be no benefit at this stage absent serological studies to confirm the contrary to adopt these experimental vaccines in a herd immunity strategy or any other strategy which would restrict inalienable rights of EU country nationals to freely go about their life within or outside the EU.
The above does not represent my views, but is based on the enclosed public data and evidence by renowned scientists, none of which are anti-vaxxers.
Kindly also accept as part of this submission the expert opinion and evidence presented by Prof. Dolores Cahill here:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/must-watch-professor-dolores-cahill-lawyer-dr-reiner-fuellmich_bhiXMUOG4jtoTR4.html
See also as furhter expert opinion and evidence:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/downloads/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=shg0VWkz0VM
For the avoidance of doubt, I am not an anti-vaxxer, never been, never will, and where benefits exceed the risks I am favourable to fully tested and fully approved vaccines, but I am, as you also should be, against coercion into being subjected to experimental vaccines, fear inducing psychological torture, and denial of inalienable rights.
Kindly give due regard to the above and do not implement vaccine certificates/passports as you do already know these would be used to restrict EU nationals inalienable rights including their right to travel and return home to work and rejoin their family with no scientific evidence to date of corresponding benefits to health and herd immunity.
Vaccine passports/certificates would induce and coerce EU nationals to submit themselves to human experimentation this in explicit breach of Nurenberg Principles, Code, Trials, and Resolution 2361 (2021).
For the avoidance of doubt, it would be for you to produce evicence that your proposed vaccine certificates/passports would not be used as a form of coercion into human experimentation in breach of Nurenberg Code, Principles, and UK presided Trials and Resolution 2361 (2021).
Best regards,
Gian A. Ameri, Pz. della Pigna 6, Rome, Italy, 00186
UK PROTEST SCHEDULE
TODAY: BRADFORD
TOMORROW: CHELTENHAM 1pm
3RD APRIL: SPEAKERS CORNER
17TH APRIL: MANCHESTER
24TH APRIL: CENTRAL LONDON
1ST MAY: LIVERPOOL 1PM
29TH MAY: LONDON
26TH JUNE: TBC.
https://youtu.be/w8KQmps-Sog
TODAY: BRADFORD
TOMORROW: CHELTENHAM 1pm
3RD APRIL: SPEAKERS CORNER
17TH APRIL: MANCHESTER
24TH APRIL: CENTRAL LONDON
1ST MAY: LIVERPOOL 1PM
29TH MAY: LONDON
26TH JUNE: TBC.
https://youtu.be/w8KQmps-Sog
Parliament fast-tracks procedure to adopt Digital Green Certificate by June | News | European Parliament
According to the Commission proposal, this could include information on whether a traveller has been vaccinated against COVID-19, a COVID-19 test result, and information on recovery from a COVID-19 infection.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210323IPR00654/parliament-fast-tracks-procedure-to-adopt-digital-green-certificate-by-june
According to the Commission proposal, this could include information on whether a traveller has been vaccinated against COVID-19, a COVID-19 test result, and information on recovery from a COVID-19 infection.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210323IPR00654/parliament-fast-tracks-procedure-to-adopt-digital-green-certificate-by-june
European Parliament
Parliament fast-tracks procedure to adopt Digital Green Certificate by June
To facilitate its adoption by the summer, MEPs decided to accelerate the approval of the Digital Green Certificate, allowing for safe and free movement during the pandemic.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
In relation to my frightening warnings, please be clear: I am not saying & do not think that first generation vaccines are designed on purpose to be dangerous.
Their purpose I believe to herd us all into accepting a unique digital ID.
There’s a horrible inevitability that each person vaccinated will have their status recorded on a common database.
Initially it will be used only in relation to border crossings, and gradually to access your own life, as in Israel.
This seems to me so self evident & so open to abuse that, even if you think everything to date is legit, you must object to the very existence of such a database.
It will be a first-in-world such system.
You do need to have read any SciFi or dystopian novels to be quite clear about the risks to our liberty that such a database comprises.
Their purpose I believe to herd us all into accepting a unique digital ID.
There’s a horrible inevitability that each person vaccinated will have their status recorded on a common database.
Initially it will be used only in relation to border crossings, and gradually to access your own life, as in Israel.
This seems to me so self evident & so open to abuse that, even if you think everything to date is legit, you must object to the very existence of such a database.
It will be a first-in-world such system.
You do need to have read any SciFi or dystopian novels to be quite clear about the risks to our liberty that such a database comprises.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
I regret to say I haven’t believed the elected government has been in charge of UK’s pandemic policy response since the fateful day of lockdown #1, and presumably for some time before that.
At first I thought Hancock a buffoon & Gove the slippery operator but I do now think Hancock is central. He’s looking like he’s enjoying it far too much. The only other people I think might know what’s going on in full are Jeremy Hunt & Tony Blair.
At first I thought Hancock a buffoon & Gove the slippery operator but I do now think Hancock is central. He’s looking like he’s enjoying it far too much. The only other people I think might know what’s going on in full are Jeremy Hunt & Tony Blair.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
It’s a great question. Of course, being the early retired scientist person, I have no idea.
I’d hoped it would be enough to point out how madcap is what we’re being told.
Surely, someone is willing to lead the push back? I’m not the right kind of personality to have ever done something like that, and unfortunately I’m no longer in the best of health either.
The key point I’ll make is that NO ONE IS COMING TO SAVE US.
Unlike the last time, WW2, there are no “Allies”.
It’s just us ordinary people.
Enough of us needs to withdraw consent & cooperation with the destruction of our own civil society & liberal democracy.
It’s getting dark & if we don’t say “ENOUGH” pretty soon, the light of freedom will be permanently extinguished.
Mike
I’d hoped it would be enough to point out how madcap is what we’re being told.
Surely, someone is willing to lead the push back? I’m not the right kind of personality to have ever done something like that, and unfortunately I’m no longer in the best of health either.
The key point I’ll make is that NO ONE IS COMING TO SAVE US.
Unlike the last time, WW2, there are no “Allies”.
It’s just us ordinary people.
Enough of us needs to withdraw consent & cooperation with the destruction of our own civil society & liberal democracy.
It’s getting dark & if we don’t say “ENOUGH” pretty soon, the light of freedom will be permanently extinguished.
Mike
What really works is continuous protest. But with furlough, and others needing to work or tend to families, it seems nobody is willing to do it. It really does require students.
Is there a religion which is explicitly opposed to vaccination, apart from perhaps Christian Orthodox? If not we need to invent one. Then we can use identity politics victimhood back at them..
"The Dutch Reformed Church’s objections seemed to start out as fear of adverse effects, but, for some, have morphed into a belief that vaccines interfere with the relationship with God, as they make people less dependent on God."
Religious exemption for vaccines: Christian Scientists, Catholics, and Dutch Reform Church.
https://slate.com/technology/2015/02/religious-exemption-for-vaccines-christian-scientists-catholics-and-dutch-reform-church.html
Religious exemption for vaccines: Christian Scientists, Catholics, and Dutch Reform Church.
https://slate.com/technology/2015/02/religious-exemption-for-vaccines-christian-scientists-catholics-and-dutch-reform-church.html
Slate Magazine
Why Is There a Religious Exemption for Vaccines? Do Any Religions Really Object?
During the latest round of vaccine panic, it has become a talking point that all but two states—Mississippi and West Virginia—allow parents to skip...
Russian Orthodox Church can be claimed to oppose digital vaccine passports:
"That is why the Church is categorically against the use of digital technologies in ensuring total control over the human person," said Patriarch Kirill."
https://spzh.news/en/news/76907-patriarkh-kirill-vystupil-protiv-totalynogo-cifrovogo-kontrolya-nad-lichnostyju
"That is why the Church is categorically against the use of digital technologies in ensuring total control over the human person," said Patriarch Kirill."
https://spzh.news/en/news/76907-patriarkh-kirill-vystupil-protiv-totalynogo-cifrovogo-kontrolya-nad-lichnostyju
spzh.news
Patriarch Kirill opposes total digital control over person
The development of total control over man means slavery, and everything will depend on who will be the master of these slaves, said the Primate of the ROC.
I AM MOLDOVAN ORTHODOX & MY FAITH PREVENTS ME FROM GETTING THE "VACCINATION" 😎
"The Orthodox Church in Moldova has denounced the potential use of a vaccine against COVID-19, calling it a satanic plan to microchip people, or introduce other foreign devices into the human body.
“The global anti-Christian system wants to introduce microchips into people’s bodies with whose help they can control them, through 5G technology,” a cleric said in a press release on Tuesday evening.
The Moldovan Metropolitan Church, the largest faith group in the country, is canonically subordinated to the Russian Orthodox Church. Official data say almost 97 per cent of people in Moldova are officially Orthodox Christians, and most of them belong to this denomination."
https://balkaninsight.com/2020/05/20/moldovan-church-denounces-covid-vaccine-as-anti-christian-plot/
"The Orthodox Church in Moldova has denounced the potential use of a vaccine against COVID-19, calling it a satanic plan to microchip people, or introduce other foreign devices into the human body.
“The global anti-Christian system wants to introduce microchips into people’s bodies with whose help they can control them, through 5G technology,” a cleric said in a press release on Tuesday evening.
The Moldovan Metropolitan Church, the largest faith group in the country, is canonically subordinated to the Russian Orthodox Church. Official data say almost 97 per cent of people in Moldova are officially Orthodox Christians, and most of them belong to this denomination."
https://balkaninsight.com/2020/05/20/moldovan-church-denounces-covid-vaccine-as-anti-christian-plot/
Balkan Insight
Moldovan Church Denounces COVID Vaccine as Anti-Christian Plot
Echoing a popular right-wing conspiracy theory, the main Church in Moldova has claimed that a vaccine against COVID-19 could allow Microsoft, or other entities, to take remote control of human beings in Moldova and elsewhere.
Forwarded from Deleted Account
As a Muslim our faith forbids any manipulation of our DNA. God made us perfect and we are forbidden from putting any toxins into our body whether it is alcohol, smoking or drugs. Abortion is not permissible either so to put a creation of god in the form of aborted foetal cells into our DNA or chimpanzee cell lines is an abomination. However, so many scholars have told Muslims to take the jab out of fear of reprisals.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
People are being illegally pressurised into accepting vaccination.
I’m talking about people at NO measurable risk from this virus.
Apparently the administering person cannot absolve themselves of responsibility to ensure fully informed free consent is obtained.
Ask them if they have in front of them the latest information from the Yellow Card system.
If they say yes, ask them a couple if questions, like how many deaths have occurred within 28 days of administration of a covid19 vaccine?
How many of those are like you (so, your age band, sex, medical conditions, current prescriptions taken)?
They won’t know. Gently point out that as they don’t even have all the safety information, how could you possibly arrive at “informed consent”?
Do remind them that “I was only following orders” didn’t wash in Nuremberg & nothing has changed.
If they do have the information you’ve asked for, say “you’ve heard these are experimental & what does that mean?”
Leave a big gap. Do not speak. Wait, wait, wait.
If they tell you the truth, observe that they hadn’t told you that if you were to be vaccinated, you’ve been entered into a clinical trial. And that’s it’s a criminal offence to do that.
The last time a group of doctors were charged with entering humans into a trial of an experimental medical procedure without informed consent, those doctors ended up dangling from a judicial & literal rope.
If they’re still with you at this point, ask them if they’ve a fully developed, conventionally approved vaccine.
If they had, you’d seriously consider that.
So, you’re not refusing, more like waiting.
Cheers
Mike
I’m talking about people at NO measurable risk from this virus.
Apparently the administering person cannot absolve themselves of responsibility to ensure fully informed free consent is obtained.
Ask them if they have in front of them the latest information from the Yellow Card system.
If they say yes, ask them a couple if questions, like how many deaths have occurred within 28 days of administration of a covid19 vaccine?
How many of those are like you (so, your age band, sex, medical conditions, current prescriptions taken)?
They won’t know. Gently point out that as they don’t even have all the safety information, how could you possibly arrive at “informed consent”?
Do remind them that “I was only following orders” didn’t wash in Nuremberg & nothing has changed.
If they do have the information you’ve asked for, say “you’ve heard these are experimental & what does that mean?”
Leave a big gap. Do not speak. Wait, wait, wait.
If they tell you the truth, observe that they hadn’t told you that if you were to be vaccinated, you’ve been entered into a clinical trial. And that’s it’s a criminal offence to do that.
The last time a group of doctors were charged with entering humans into a trial of an experimental medical procedure without informed consent, those doctors ended up dangling from a judicial & literal rope.
If they’re still with you at this point, ask them if they’ve a fully developed, conventionally approved vaccine.
If they had, you’d seriously consider that.
So, you’re not refusing, more like waiting.
Cheers
Mike
"Peacock said she was confident regular booster shots - such as for influenza - would be needed to deal with future variants but that the speed of vaccine innovation meant those shots could be developed at pace and rolled out to the population.
COG-UK was set up by Peacock, a professor at Cambridge, exactly a year ago with the help of the British’s government’s chief scientific adviser, Patrick Vallance.."
Exclusive: Regular booster vaccines are the future in battle with COVID-19 virus, top genome expert says | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-peacock-ex/exclusive-regular-booster-vaccines-are-the-future-in-battle-with-covid-19-virus-top-genome-expert-says-idUSKBN2B70V2
COG-UK was set up by Peacock, a professor at Cambridge, exactly a year ago with the help of the British’s government’s chief scientific adviser, Patrick Vallance.."
Exclusive: Regular booster vaccines are the future in battle with COVID-19 virus, top genome expert says | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-peacock-ex/exclusive-regular-booster-vaccines-are-the-future-in-battle-with-covid-19-virus-top-genome-expert-says-idUSKBN2B70V2
U.S.
Exclusive: Regular booster vaccines are the future in battle with COVID-19 virus, top genome expert says
Regular booster vaccines against the novel coronavirus will be needed because of mutations that make it more transmissible and better able to evade human immunity, the head of Britain's effort to sequence the virus's genomes told Reuters.