Chris Whitty Catching Himself Out 2 Years Ahead Of Time In 2018
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/chris-whitty-catching-himself-out-2-years-ahead-of-time-in-2018_RgigGrGCF5q6HxG.html

Do not comply.

That's it. That's the post.

No offence..but Brits are easily distracted (not all, thankfully)... as an East European who has lived in London for over 30years I have seen the cultural difference... there's a positive side of Brits that is being exploited against them...their desire to do charity and help others....so as long as they're being told to do something in order to save or help someone else, they will have great trouble reconciling this to the actual motivation behind that request...."surely not"..."don't be silly"....

Outside the parliament in Rome. A demonstration of thousands of restaurant owners and entrepreneurs against the lockdown and restrictions tyranny.

THINGS HEATING UP IN ITALY. See my third twitter account for some videos: @robinmonotti3

💉 PRESS RELEASE: Doctors and Scientists Accuse Medical Regulator of Downplaying COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers

The European Medicines Agency is misleading citizens into medical experimentation, experts warn

"Doctors and scientists from 25 countries have today issued a rebuttal letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), following the regulator’s dismissal of their earlier warnings regarding COVID-19 vaccine dangers from clotting and bleeding."

➥ Link to the full press release

RA Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, hier geht's zum Kanal:
@ReinerFuellmich
Mehr Infos unter:
fuellmich.com/newsletter

On the plus side, presumably almost 50% of Americans know what is going on, because most of the Republican Party did not go along with it. They will not save anybody but they are helping the cultural scientific opposition in the English language. This is a significant cultural sector to make a difference to the narrative. Most Swedes too, most Russians including Putin who has called out The Great Reset. Unfortunately almost all religious leaders are silent, as are most human rights groups.

"But the party left the door open to backing testing certification that could, for example, allow people to attend large events after a negative Covid test."

Labour MPs Told The Party Will Vote Against Domestic Vaccine Passports
https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/coronavirus-vaccine-passports-labour-vote_uk_606c904ec5b68872efebd478/

BEWARE OF THE JABBERWACKY (or, Why Are People So Crazy about Being Guinea Pigs?)



https://wp.me/paXmj6-jn2

Hi Robin, I’ve followed you for a year now. Enjoy your content. I wondered if you knew that Gandhi started his civil disobedience not in India but in South Africa where in 1906 the British passed a law requiring Indians to be fingerprinted for certificates, they opposed it. He gave this famous speech. It’s good to share this with your many followers so they see that history repeats itself every few generations.
https://youtu.be/5hS1YWtalPY

Covid: US rules out federal vaccine passports - BBC News
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/world-us-canada-56657194?__twitter_impression=true

VACCINE PASSPORTS
USA ❌
RUSSIA ❌
MEXICO ❌
EU ✅
CHINA ?
UK ✅
ISRAEL ✅

PRESS RELEASE - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Doctors and Scientists Accuse Medical Regulator of Downplaying COVID-19 Vaccine Dangers
The European Medicines Agency is misleading citizens into medical experimentation, experts warn
April 7th, 2021
As vaccine passports are being proposed around the world, doctors and scientists from 25 countries have contested regulators' claims that COVID-19 vaccines are safe.
On April 1st the experts issued a rebuttal letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), following the regulator’s dismissal of their earlier warnings regarding COVID-19 vaccine dangers from clotting and bleeding.
Within days of the EMA receiving the group’s original letter on March 1st, outlining risks of blood disorders from COVID-19 vaccines, over a dozen countries suspended the AstraZeneca vaccine following deaths from clotting and bleeding, as the doctors had warned.
On March 23rd, however, the EMA dismissed the group’s concerns as relating to “minor” and “rare” events, concluding that “a positive benefit-risk balance has been established.”
The doctors and scientists have hit back, accusing the EMA of misleading the public on the vaccines’ true risk-benefit profile. “Your reply of March 23 is unconvincing and unacceptable,” they wrote, noting that recorded cases of life-threatening cerebral venous thrombosis (CSVT) post-vaccination likely “represent just the tip of a huge iceberg”. Common reactions to vaccination, including headache, nausea, blurred vision and vomiting, they state, are symptoms of CSVT, and should be assessed as such, immediately.
Clotting and bleeding after vaccination can also “be expected to increase with each re-vaccination, and each intervening coronavirus exposure” the group warned. Over time “this renders both repeated vaccination and common coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom - in the absence of ‘vaccination’ - COVID-19 poses no substantive risk."
“Such is the real risk-benefit analysis of the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’. Either the EMA lacks the subject-matter expertise to appreciate the molecular science of this reality, or it lacks the medical ethics to act accordingly.”
The group, Doctors for Covid Ethics, which includes professors of immunology and microbiology, described the EMA’s responses to their concerns as “unscientific”, “vague”, and lacking credibility. They have offered to liaise with the agency to mitigate against vaccination risks and ethics violations, including helping the EMA to “craft a focussed pharmacovigilance plan.” The experts stress that all signs and symptoms of thrombosis post vaccination, such as headaches and nausea, must be assessed using D-dimer tests, in order to “rapidly diagnose” thrombotic events.
The group warned that continuing to administer inadequately tested, and inadequately monitored, gene-based COVID-19 vaccines represents dangerous medical experimentation, whose “true risks far outweigh any theoretical benefits”, reflecting “serious violations of medical ethics and citizens’ medical rights.”
“Misleading populations into accepting investigational agents such as the gene-based COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, or coercing them through ‘vaccine passports’, constitutes clear and egregious violations of the Nuremberg Code”, they caution.
The letter is addressed to Emer Cooke, Executive Director of the EMA, and was copied to the lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, Charles Michel, President of the Council of Europe, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. 

Since receiving the correspondence, the EMA has maintained its public advice of March 31st that vaccine-related clotting is “very rare”, and that “no evidence” of a causal relationship between COVID-19 vaccines and blood clotting exists.        

Link to Doctors for Covid Ethics rebuttal letter to EMA (April 1st): https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/rebuttal-letter-to-european-medicines-agency-from-doctors-for-covid-ethics-april-1-2021-7d867f0121e
Link to EMA letter to Doctors for Covid Ethics (March 23rd):  https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/reply-from-the-european-medicines-agency-to-doctors-for-covid-ethics-march-23-2021-d6760984dd06
Doctors for Covid Ethics is a group of over 100 doctors and scientists from 25 countries.
Web: https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Drs4CovidEthics
For comment contact Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD: sucharit.bhakdi@gmx.de or Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD: mpalmer@uwaterloo.ca

Further resources
Original Doctors for Covid Ethics letter to EMA (Delivered March 1st):  https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter-from-doctors-and-scientists-to-the-european-medicines-agency-regarding-covid-19-f6e17c311595
List of signatories: https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/doctors-for-covid-ethics-signatories-15878f9ff76
Video statement (March 11th) by Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene: https://lbry.tv/@Doctors4CovidEthics:d/Prof.-Sucharit-Bhakdi-statement-on-EMA-open-letter.ENG:0
Doctors, scientists, lawyers and colleagues in allied disciplines can sign the open letter by sending their name, qualifications, areas of expertise and country of practice to: Doctors4CovidEthics@protonmail.com, with web verification (eg workplace or registration link, not for publication).
END
###

ACTION: Cut and paste and reply to @EMA_News @SKyriakidesEU on twitter

Rebuttal letter to European Medicines Agency from Doctors for Covid Ethics, April 1, 2021
Doctors for Covid Ethics:
https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/rebuttal-letter-to-european-medicines-agency-from-doctors-for-covid-ethics-april-1-2021-7d867f0121e

"Comparing weekly mortality in 24 European countries, the findings in this paper suggest that more severe lockdown policies have not been associated with lower mortality. In other words, the lockdowns have not worked as intended. Further tests also show that early interventions offered no additional benefits or effectiveness and even indicate that the lockdowns of the spring of 2020 were associated with significantly more deaths in the particular age group between 60 and 79 years.
These general findings are consistent with the results of previous papers using a variety of simpler methods to test the effects of lockdowns. Contrary to persistent political claims, as indicated by recent research in Bendavid et al. (2021), the traditional approach of carefully disseminating public information about the epidemic and relying on voluntary measures may have represented the only policy significantly associated with fewer cases than no reaction at all, although almost all other countries went substantially further. Likewise, much has been made of the timing of lockdowns, but the present analysis does not indicate that early lockdowns were more effective. Examples also suggest that lockdown timing may not have been a significant determinant of mortality development: while Belgium and Portugal were among the countries that locked down soon after seeing the first COVID-related death, the former saw an 11% increase in mortality, compared with the preceding three years, while the latter only saw a 2% increase. Among countries that locked down later, the UK experienced an 18% higher mortality than the preceding years, while German mortality in the first half of 2020 was almost exactly average for the time of the year. As such, the data illustrate that strategic examples as are often used in popular media can be highly misleading, which necessitates a more comprehensive evaluation of lockdown efficacy.
The main problem at hand is therefore that the evidence presented here suggests that lockdowns have not significantly affected the development of mortality in Europe. They have nevertheless wreaked economic havoc in most societies and may lead to a substantial number of additional deaths for other reasons. A British government report from April for example assessed that a limited lockdown could cause 185,000 excess deaths over the next years, while UNICEF warns of an increase in child marriages, owing to the economic effects of Western lockdowns in developing countries (DHSC 2020; Philipose and Aika 2021). Evaluated as a whole, at a first glance, the lockdown policies of the Spring of 2020 therefore appear to be substantial long-run government failures."

Did Lockdown Work? An Economist’s Cross-Country Comparison | CESifo Economic Studies | Oxford Academic
https://academic.oup.com/cesifo/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cesifo/ifab003/6199605

COVID19 MORTALITY: 0.15%
FLU MORTALITY: 0.1%

"All systematic evaluations of seroprevalence data converge that SARS‐CoV‐2 infection is widely spread globally. Acknowledging residual uncertainties, the available evidence suggests average global IFR of ~0.15% and ~1.5‐2.0 billion infections by February 2021 with substantial differences in IFR and in infection spread across continents, countries, and locations."

Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID‐19: an overview of systematic evaluations - Ioannidis - - European Journal of Clinical Investigation - Wiley Online Library
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13554