"First, though, the lies. It’s abundantly clear now that pretty much everything that the public has been told and continues to be told is between untrue and downright lies.

I offer as a shortlist that:

-PCR mass testing reasonably reliably distinguishes infected and infectious people from others;

-that masks reduce transmission of respiratory viruses; 

-that transmission of infection in the absence of symptoms is an important contribution to epidemic spreading;

-that lockdowns as executed reduce hospitalisation and deaths;

-that no matter how small the remaining susceptible population and no matter that virtually no people who, if infected, might die remain unvaccinated, the position is perilous;

-that no pharmaceutical treatments are available;

-that variants are different enough to warrant border closures and require new vaccines;

-that the gene-based vaccines are safe and effective;

-that ‘vaccine passports’ will increase safety while having no material impacts on freedom of choice in a liberal democracy.

It is impossible to believe that intelligent, well-connected and well-briefed senior advisers to governments don’t know that almost all, if not all, of the above are simply not true.
It is not a matter of opinion in almost all cases. These statements, which have been explicitly stated and used in justification for the extraordinary interferences in the lives of citizens in democratic countries, are mostly demonstrably wrong, as defined by there being multiple well-conducted, peer-reviewed studies showing the contrary.
To continue with the pretence that there’s scientific uncertainty, and it’s therefore understandable that an adviser might offer nuanced advice, is wrong and misleading. This perhaps is where the mainstream media has been most culpable.
It is not reasonable to expect typical viewers and readers of speeches, articles and editorials – whether by scientist sceptics or by critical commentators – to appreciate that, when we point out that what’s happening doesn’t make sense, we mean ‘the executive is knowingly and deliberately harming the country and its citizens’. We are mostly not saying this, leaving it to the audience to sum up for themselves. But in my view the audience are reluctant to do this. They want to believe in government and perhaps above all they want a quiet life. To disbelieve is so much harder than to believe."

Why are we being lied to about Covid? There’s no good reason | The Conservative Woman
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-are-we-being-lied-to-about-covid-theres-no-good-reason/

I can't message you so I'll reply to this, I expressed concerns about the "vaccines" to my local MP Anthony Browne (South Cambridgeshire), I included a link to a video by Mike Yeadon, this is his response, can you get this to Mike Yeadon?

Thank for sharing this. I find it sad that Dr LaMattina, who I respected so much for his championship of science when he was worldwide head of R&D at Pfizer, should be so easily duped by propaganda.
It’s clear, sadly, that he’s not examined a single, central claim of the official covid19 narrative.
I say this, because he’s smart, and had he looked, I’m confident he’d appreciate that he too is being lied to by stakeholders he’s trusted for his whole career, such as medicines regulators & scientists advising governments.
I ask him to invest effort in reviewing the evidence for asymptomatic transmission. The claim that this process is important to epidemic spreading is absolutely foundational to imposition of masks, lockdown & mass testing, none of which can be justified in its absence or have ever previously been recommended in pandemic response plans.
I further invite him to consult competent immunologists on the question of need for additional vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 virus ‘variants’. If he did so, he would learn that none are different enough to justify this. Yet it’s absolutely clear that people are going to be injected with substances which purport to be such ‘variant vaccines’.
Finally, a few minutes examining the clinical literature on ivermectin in covid19 will tell him that there has been & continues to be an intense campaign to suppress information on its considerable utility.
Best wishes
Mike

Asymptomatics spread immunity not disease:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22036-z

SWEDEN: Region Östergötland has examined all deaths that have died at home or in special housing with confirmed covid-19.Covid-19 was estimated to be the direct cause of death in 15 percent of deaths. For a majority of the deceased - as many as 70 percent - covid-19 was a contributing factor rather than a direct cause. In 15 percent, the cause of death was judged to be other diseases, then most often heart disease.
https://lakartidningen.se/aktuellt/nyheter/2020/08/covid-19-oftast-inte-ensam-orsak-vid-dodsfall-bland-aldre/

#SWEDEN: Region Östergötland:
Of 100% confirmed "Covid19 deaths", after examination of the evidence, it was shown that:
-15% only were real Covid19 deaths
-70% Covid19 not the cause, but a contributing factor
-15% NOT Covid19 related deaths
https://lakartidningen.se/aktuellt/nyheter/2020/08/covid-19-oftast-inte-ensam-orsak-vid-dodsfall-bland-aldre/

Answer to the question: "Isn't Ivermectin an anti-parasitic drug?"

Italian Doctors reveal serious damage to the mucosa by the entirely unnecessary nasopharyngeal swabs
https://youtu.be/R-LhOzV_wa0

Certainly amongst my clients those whom felt they had covid and recovered then for some illogical reason felt they needed the jab have been very unwell, one died one with a serious injury and still not sure she will make it. Both were brain haemorrhages. I have written to my MP saying that we should be T cell testing but he wrote back stating the evidence of T cell immunity is not strong enough! I believe MD’s have also written to the CDC asking for prior immunity testing before jabs. I guess there would then be a far lower uptake and would cause political ramifications hence the pushback.

I take the same stance as Robin.
It’s all but impossible to nail it’s origins; there is evidence of multiple contributors across the world; no one would be terribly surprised if it was or wasn’t a product of lab work as it wouldn’t alter the facts in the ground; likewise going down the rabbit hole in whether it exists at all, or differently from as advertised doesn’t get us out of jail. Finally, lots of people have this covered & it’s not a differentiating skill for me as a critic mostly of policy.
Cheers
Mike

"Crotty and Alessandro Sette, also at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology, tested T cells from people who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2, either naturally or through vaccination. Their T cell response was not dampened by the variants . Sette says that while a weakened B cell response could let the virus get a foothold, it is plausible that T cell activity will keep it from running rampant through the body. “In a scenario where infection is not prevented, you could have a T cell response that could modulate the severity of the infection,” he says."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/your-immune-system-evolves-to-fight-coronavirus-variants/?amp=true

A very good paper, exposing the notion of requiring repeated vaccination by altered vaccines as a lie.

Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.27.433180v1

"The safety, tolerability and reactogenicity of available COVID-19 vaccines in different recipient groups.. A prior COVID-19 infection was associated with an increased risk of any side effect (risk ratio 1.08, 95% confidence intervals (1.05–1.11)), fever (2.24 (1.86–2.70)), breathlessness (2.05 (1.28–3.29)), flu-like illness (1.78 (1.51–2.10)), fatigue (1.34 (1.20–1.49)) and local reactions (1.10 (1.06–1.15)). It was also associated with an increased risk of severe side effects leading to hospital care (1.56 (1.14–2.12)). While mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher incidence of any side effect (1.06 (1.01–1.11)) compared with viral vector-based vaccines, these were generally milder (p < 0.001), mostly local reactions."

Life | Free Full-Text | Self-Reported Real-World Safety and Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Vaccine Recipient Survey
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/3/249

INDIA:
https://twitter.com/nature4ver/status/1392054521690423297?s=09

"Researchers in The Netherlands and Germany have warned that Pfizer-BioNTech’s coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine induces complex reprogramming of innate immune responses that should be considered in the development and use of mRNA-based vaccines."
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210510/Research-suggests-Pfizer-BioNTech-COVID-19-vaccine-reprograms-innate-immune-responses.aspx

GOA, INDIA: "Patients will be treated with ivermectin 12mg for a period of 5 days. Expert panels from the UK, Italy, Spain and Japan, found a large, statistically significant reduction in mortality, time to recovery and viral clearance in Covid-19 patients treated with ivermectin," the Health Minister also said, after a meeting with top health officials and Chief Minister Pramod Sawant.

Rane said that Goa would be the first state in the country to endorse the new Covid treatment protocol.

"However, this does not prevent Covid-19 infection, but helps in reducing the severity of the disease "

https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/coronavirus/news/goa-recommends-ivermectin-to-all-above-18-to-combat-covid-in-state/amp_articleshow/82518759.cms

IVERMECTIN IS KRYPTONITE FOR THE SUPERCROOKS.