Forwarded from R
Screenshot of page 29 https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/34
I tweeted this. Watch them ban me again:
"In a country which has already reached herd immunity it is entirely possible that injections are killing more people than they are saving. This possibility cannot be excluded a priori because people are emotionally invested in the injections narrative. I am pro-safety (treatment)"
"In a country which has already reached herd immunity it is entirely possible that injections are killing more people than they are saving. This possibility cannot be excluded a priori because people are emotionally invested in the injections narrative. I am pro-safety (treatment)"
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
“You may forget but let me tell you this: someone in some future time will think of us”
SAPPHO
c.630 - c.570 BCE
SAPPHO
c.630 - c.570 BCE
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Please watch this 2minute compilation of senior authority figures truthfully telling you that ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION isn’t a thing.
Since those without symptoms are not a respiratory health threat to others, it follows that there is:
1. no need for masks (even if you believe they work to stop respiratory virus transmission, which they definitely do not).
2. No justification for lockdown (which also has no effect on epidemic spreading, unsurprisingly, since almost no symptomatic people would be walking about, because they’re ill).
3. No utility in mass testing of the well.
ONCE YOU REALISE THAT THE FOUNDATIONAL STORY OF ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION IS A LIE, the whole fraud collapses.
Ask yourself, why would the U.K. government lie about such fundamental things? And follow it up with MONTHS of propaganda about how “you could be spreading the virus without knowing it” (that’s another lie).
Now try this question: why are SCORES OF COUNTRIES all telling their populations the SAME LIES?
Passes muster for me as clear evidence of planning, a conspiracy if you prefer.
Nothing theoretical about it.
Or you can continue to contort logic & believe a bunch of obvious lies.
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://twitter.com/RealJoelSmalley/status/1394004338385768449?s=19
Since those without symptoms are not a respiratory health threat to others, it follows that there is:
1. no need for masks (even if you believe they work to stop respiratory virus transmission, which they definitely do not).
2. No justification for lockdown (which also has no effect on epidemic spreading, unsurprisingly, since almost no symptomatic people would be walking about, because they’re ill).
3. No utility in mass testing of the well.
ONCE YOU REALISE THAT THE FOUNDATIONAL STORY OF ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION IS A LIE, the whole fraud collapses.
Ask yourself, why would the U.K. government lie about such fundamental things? And follow it up with MONTHS of propaganda about how “you could be spreading the virus without knowing it” (that’s another lie).
Now try this question: why are SCORES OF COUNTRIES all telling their populations the SAME LIES?
Passes muster for me as clear evidence of planning, a conspiracy if you prefer.
Nothing theoretical about it.
Or you can continue to contort logic & believe a bunch of obvious lies.
Dr Mike Yeadon
https://twitter.com/RealJoelSmalley/status/1394004338385768449?s=19
Do not vaccinate children against COVID-19 until Phase 3 trials are complete - Petitions
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/586017
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/586017
Petitions - UK Government and Parliament
Petition: Do not vaccinate children against COVID-19 until Phase 3 trials are complete
A risk vs benefit calculation does not support giving COVID-19 vaccines, which use novel technologies and are still in Phase 3 trials, to healthy children.
Any rollout should not start until trials are complete and all findings are published and peer…
Any rollout should not start until trials are complete and all findings are published and peer…
'How convenient that UK has the Indian variant and in India/[Pakistan] they have the UK variant! This is getting ridiculous':
https://twitter.com/MHilltobe/status/1394636774169890818?s=19
https://twitter.com/MHilltobe/status/1394636774169890818?s=19
I sincerely welcome a more truthful variant than the current government. How long do we need to wait for this much needed mutation? Let's apply more immune pressure towards the ones at the top & hope for their swift immune escape.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Meanwhile in Liverpool..
Forwarded from AnnaN
I think transmission route is less important than susceptibility... this is why some get ill, others not.
Genetics, prior cross immunity from common colds, how run down you are, stress, vit d deficiencies at end of winter....
Béchamp knew what was what! And you know he was onto something because the pharma shills spend a lot of effort ‘debunking’ him, and making sure their ‘fact checks’ are no. 1 in the search results. 🤡
Genetics, prior cross immunity from common colds, how run down you are, stress, vit d deficiencies at end of winter....
Béchamp knew what was what! And you know he was onto something because the pharma shills spend a lot of effort ‘debunking’ him, and making sure their ‘fact checks’ are no. 1 in the search results. 🤡
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
It is an EXTREMELY important interview.
He knows. Everything.
Obviously he was right not to expose the lot in one go.
Even Tucker Carlson might not buy the truth.
I’m angling to see if he’ll interview me.
He knows. Everything.
Obviously he was right not to expose the lot in one go.
Even Tucker Carlson might not buy the truth.
I’m angling to see if he’ll interview me.
👍1
Forwarded from Bobby's Network ツ 🐭🐓🐀☠️
The CDC released a new guidance document "COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough case investigation. Information for public health, clinical, and reference laboratories".
Quote:
𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗥𝗧-𝗣𝗖𝗥 𝗖𝘁 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 ≤ 𝟮𝟴.
1st (false) Conclusion:
The False Positives-rate will fall dramatically ("yipee").
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗹:
FP-rate will fall, yes - but only with the vaccinated, 2 datasets are created, cloaked and compared as the same, Jabs will appear to work.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗹:
Only those COVID-19 cases are reported when people have been vaccinated + hospitalised/dead.
Source:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-for-laboratories-COVID-vaccine-breakthrough-case-investigation.pdf
Quote:
𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗥𝗧-𝗣𝗖𝗥 𝗖𝘁 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 ≤ 𝟮𝟴.
1st (false) Conclusion:
The False Positives-rate will fall dramatically ("yipee").
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗹:
FP-rate will fall, yes - but only with the vaccinated, 2 datasets are created, cloaked and compared as the same, Jabs will appear to work.
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗨𝗹𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗹:
Only those COVID-19 cases are reported when people have been vaccinated + hospitalised/dead.
Source:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-for-laboratories-COVID-vaccine-breakthrough-case-investigation.pdf
⬆️ What this means is that there will be two types of test, one applied to the vaccinated (the correct parameter of cycle thresholds) and one to the non vaccinated (the wrong parameter leading to 90% false positives). Correct @bobby_network?
This is not good news for mRNA vaccines. Non-neutralizing antibodies are those which cause vaccine enhanced disease or ADE.
"In summary, we demonstrate that the antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination comprise a large proportion of non-neutralizing antibodies and are co-dominated by NTD and RBD antibodies. The NTD portion of the spike represents, thus, an important vaccine target. Since all viral variants of concern are heavily mutated in this region, these observations warrant further attention to optimize SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Finally, broadly cross-reactive mAbs to β-coronavirus spike proteins are induced after vaccination, and suggest a potential development path for a pan-β-coronavirus vaccine."
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2.full
"In summary, we demonstrate that the antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination comprise a large proportion of non-neutralizing antibodies and are co-dominated by NTD and RBD antibodies. The NTD portion of the spike represents, thus, an important vaccine target. Since all viral variants of concern are heavily mutated in this region, these observations warrant further attention to optimize SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Finally, broadly cross-reactive mAbs to β-coronavirus spike proteins are induced after vaccination, and suggest a potential development path for a pan-β-coronavirus vaccine."
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2.full
medRxiv
The plasmablast response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination is dominated by non-neutralizing antibodies and targets both the NTD and…
In this study we profiled vaccine-induced polyclonal antibodies as well as plasmablast derived mAbs from individuals who received SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine. Polyclonal antibody responses in vaccinees were robust and comparable to or exceeded those seen…
"For a given concentration of antibody and a specific targeting domain, the stoichiometry [reactants and products in chemical reactions] of antibody engagement on a virion is dependent on the strength of interaction between antibody and antigen [substance that when introduced into the body stimulates the production of an antibody]. ADE [antibody dependent enhancement or vaccine enhanced disease] is induced when the stoichiometry is below the threshold for neutralization. Therefore, higher affinity antibodies can reach that threshold at a lower concentration and mediate better protection.
We argue that ADE should be given full consideration in the safety evaluation of emerging candidate vaccines for SARS-CoV-2."
The potential danger of suboptimal antibody responses in COVID-19 | Nature Reviews Immunology
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-0321-6
We argue that ADE should be given full consideration in the safety evaluation of emerging candidate vaccines for SARS-CoV-2."
The potential danger of suboptimal antibody responses in COVID-19 | Nature Reviews Immunology
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-0321-6
Nature
The potential danger of suboptimal antibody responses in COVID-19
Nature Reviews Immunology - Here, Iwasaki and Yang highlight the potential dangers of inducing suboptimal antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2. They stress the need for proper safety evaluation of...