S UPER
P ARAMAGNETIC
I RON
O XIDE
N ANOPARTICLES

or SPIONs. Look them up. 🧲

C ERTIFICATE
O F
V ACCINATION
I DENTITY
D OCUMENT

+

S UPER
P ARAMAGNETIC
I RON
O XIDE
N ANOPARTICLES

💳+🦠+🧲

"India asks social media firms to remove reference to 'Indian variant' of coronavirus"

"This is completely FALSE. There is no such variant of Covid-19 scientifically cited as such by the World Health Organisation (WHO). WHO has not associated the term 'Indian Variant' with the B.1.617 variant of the coronavirus in any of its reports," stated the letter, which is not public."

https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN2D22AG

Yesterday I posted an article making a clear link between face masks and black fungus.

"In pre-Covid times, the ‘black fungus’ mucormycosis used to be rare and seen mainly in immunocompromised people."

https://m.timesofindia.com/city/mumbai/mumbai-mucormycosis-a-death-sentence-once-it-reaches-the-brain/amp_articleshow/82469417.cms

"Magnetism in drug delivery: The marvels of iron oxides and substituted ferrites nanoparticles.
Magnetically guided nanosystems, where particles such as iron oxides are guided to specific regions using an external magnetic field, can provide magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) while delivering a therapeutic payload at the same time, which represents a breakthrough in disease therapy and make MNPs excellent candidates for several biomedical applications"
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341416644_Magnetism_in_drug_delivery_The_marvels_of_iron_oxides_and_substituted_ferrites_nanoparticles

The Truth is there for who have eyes to see... 👀 🧲 🦠

https://youtu.be/uaJiC6uwwZI

"What are magnetic beads?
Magnetic beads are made up of tiny (20 to 30 nm) particles of iron oxides, such as magnetite (Fe3O4), which give them superparamagnetic properties.
Superparamagnetic beads are different to more common ferromagnets in that they exhibit magnetic behavior only in the presence of an external magnetic field . This property is dependent on the small size of the particles in the beads, and enables the beads to be separated in suspension, along with anything they are bound to. Since they don’t attract each other outside of a magnetic field, they can be used without any concern about unwanted clumping.
There are many types of magnetic beads available. Different surface coatings and chemistries give each type of bead its own binding properties, which can be used for magnetic separation (isolation and purification) of nucleic acids, proteins, or other biomolecules in an easy, effective, and scalable way.
This ease-of-use makes them automation friendly and well suited for a range of applications, including sample preparation for next generation sequencing (NGS) and PCR, protein purification, molecular and immunodiagnostics, and even magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS), among many others. They also ease some of the challenges associated with extracting nucleic acids from different sample types."
https://www.cytivalifesciences.com/en/us/news-center/magnetic-beads-a-simple-guide-10001

They chose their weapon. Time for us to choose ours..

The final duel of truth against lies
https://youtu.be/qwb3P0fuM1c

Coming soon...

🔎"ACRObiosystems: SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD-coupled Magnetic Beads"🧲
Background
The pre-coupled magnetic beads coupled with biotinylated SARS-CoV-2 Spike RBD protein to streptavidin conjugated magnetic beads, which can capture the Anti- SARS-CoV-2 antibody or ACE2 protein from cell or serum sample. The beads are in uniform size, narrow size distribution with large surface area and unique surface coating, which can help you get the best performance and highly reproducible results. This very first SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein RBD-coupled magnetic beads will bring great convenience with minimum non-specific binding and developed protocols. This ready to use products could greatly save your time and hassle.
Application
This product is intended for immunocapture, biopanning and flow cytometry. This product is produced non-sterile."
https://www.acrobiosystems.com/P3194-SARS-CoV-2-Spike-RBD-coupled-Magnetic-Beads.html

"Van could have called this album AstraZeneca Weeks. His lyrics describe a world turned upside down by COVID. A world sliding into soft totalitarianism and digitally-enhanced tyranny. A world where unelected bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci overrule elected representatives with the approval of CNN. A world where the media divide the voters by hyping partisanship, distract them by packaging politics as entertainment and cancel anyone who disagrees...This isn’t fantasy: it’s the news that’s fit to print — and the news that our media are too cowardly and corrupt to print. Van Morrison can speak honestly because he’s an artist, and this is what art used to do, before it degenerated into virtue-signaling ."
https://spectator.us/book-and-art/van-morrison-sane-man-mad-world/

This is very important expert testimony from the most-published cardio/renal medical doctor in history, Dr Peter McCullough.
With multiple coauthors, he put together a multi-drug treatment plan for Covid19 patients prior to hospitalisation. Before this, there was the concept of “treatment nihilism”, the belief that there wasn’t anything that could be done.
It’s not true. It’s actually among THE most treatable viral diseases.
But this information is hidden from most of us. YouTube even banned McCullough’s initial presentation.

His testimony to a senate committee:
https://youtu.be/QAHi3lX3oGM

The current version of the simplified treatment guide:
https://aapsonline.org/

Mike Y

"It looks like 1st July 2021 is a possible start date for this system, also known as Vaccine Passports.

I find it completely horrifying.
These add nothing to safety but will mark to the first step INSIDE what I’ve termed the Gates of Hell. There is no return from this point. Why can so few people see this for what it is?
Mike"

————————-///
 
On Thursday May 20 we had a new press release by the European Parliament on the EU Digital COVID certificate.
 
For those interested please read on particularly:
 
* Some insights I gained from going through the functional/technical documentation of this certificate:
* Although the data will not be centralized, there WILL be Global interoperability
* The certificate can be used for many more purposes than meets the eye
* The supporting press conference by the lead negotiator of the deal, Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, as it is cleat that Europe:
* Is oblivious to the science. Legal certainty (consistency) across Europe is preferred over the science – the real benefit – behind the Certificate
* Clearly has a max vaccination agenda (which we already knew – at the start of this year Ursula Von der Leyen already twittered her 70% vax target by the start of the summer)
 
 
WHAT?
 
May 20: EU digital Covid Certificate: provisional deal between Parliament and Council
In brief:
 
* Aim is to facilitate the right to free movement during pandemic and contribute to gradually lifting restrictions
* Tests should be affordable and accessible
* At least €100 million from the Emergency Support Instrument to purchase tests
* Common format for certificate and framework to be accepted by member states
 
EU digital Covid Certificate: provisional deal between Parliament and Council | News | European Parliament (europa.eu)<https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20210517IPR04111/eu-digital-covid-certificate-provisional-deal-between-parliament-and-council>
 
 
WHEN?
 
Thursday May 20 the press release mentioned above was published and a supporting press conference was given by the lead negotiator Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR – about which more later.
 
The agreed text will now be circulated for approval and if confirmed, it will be tabled for adoption in plenary during the June I plenary session (7-10 June 2021).
 
When adopted, the new directive will be effective as of July 1st (a directive is MANDATORY legislation to be adopted by each member state of the EU).
 
As of that day, a EU COVID certificate will be required to travel across member states of the EU.
 
 
 
What is this EU Digital COVID certificate about?
 
 
1. Free movement across member states of the EU, without any discrimination and without any restrictions
The Digital COVID certificate will allow free movement within the EU when:
 
* Fully vaccinated
* Recent proof of prior infection (valid for 6 months)
* Negative PCR-test not more than 72 hours old
 
[cid:image001.png@01D74F1F.CF551880]
 
We’re being told this certificate is to re-allow free movement across member states of the EU, without any discrimination and without any restrictions.
 
However, this is not true…
 
Imagine I’d like to visit my family in law in the small country Luxemburg. As we live in Belgium, as of July 1st we’ll need this certificate to cross the border.
 
Same if I’d like to go shopping in The Netherlands.
 
 
 
1. Effective for a period of 12 months only
However, the Q&A provides a potentially more sinister image:
“The certificates are linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Digital Green Certificate system will be suspended once the World Health Organization (WHO) declares the end of the international public health emergency caused by COVID-19.

Similarly, if the WHO declares a new international public health emergency caused by COVID-19, a variant of it, or a similar infectious disease, the system could be reactivated.”
 
Digital Green Certificate (europa.eu)<https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_1187>
 
 
 
1. Data will not be stored centrally
Technically this statement seems to be true.
 
However, the technical documentation reveals that certificates will be validated through a central European kind of “Access gateway”.
 
And this “Access Gateway” will be compatible with a standard/system that the UN Super Government is developing:
“The Trust Framework should not prevent interoperability with the solutions designed on a global level, such as the one being developed by the WHO or ICAO. This is one of the primary design principles and it has implications in all components of the proposed trust framework.”
 
[cid:image006.png@01D74F1F.CF551880]
trust-framework_interoperability_certificates_en.pdf (europa.eu)<https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/trust-framework_interoperability_certificates_en.pdf>
 
No-one needs to be an IT expert to understand that “data will not be stored centrally” is pure semantics. The “Gateway”:
 
* Is at the center of this system
* Will be interoperable with the standard/system the UN Super Government is developing
 
 
 
1. The Certificate will only be used to validate vaccine status/immunity/negative test
That’s what we’re being told…
 
However, a simple certificate valid Y/N should suffice then, right?
 
In reality, 3 different types of certificates will be in use – as per the 3 use cases and – in my opinion – quite a few details is collected as part of each certificate:
 
* Vaccination status
* Immunity after recent infection
* Recent negative test
 
The validity of these 3 types of certificates can be managed centrally. And theoretically, health institutions could decide that e.g. a certificate of recent infection is not valid for 180 days, but only let’s say 90 (less sinister: it could also be prolonged).
 
Moreover, the functional documentation for the certificate says following:
Modularity and scalability. This is strongly linked with the previous key design principle. The trust framework architecture should be modular and easily scalable, for instance, to additional usage scenarios, use cases and types of certificates. The trust framework already supports different usage scenarios (e.g. alternative settings in which certificates may be requested or verification may take place). Examples of other types of certificates that could be supported by potential extensions of the trust framework include certificate of negative COVID-19 tests and certificates of recovery from COVID-19, while examples of other use cases that could be supported are travel or (participation in) leisure activities (i.e. proof of vaccination for non-health-related purposes in domestic or international settings). Decisions related to ethical, societal or political questions pertaining to the use cases should be tackled separately.
 
trust-framework_interoperability_certificates_en.pdf (europa.eu)<https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/ehealth/docs/trust-framework_interoperability_certificates_en.pdf>
 
Please read this carefully and let it sink in. This could have really scary consequences.
 
 
 
PRESS CONFERENCE BY LEAD NEGOTIATOR Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR
 
As mentioned previously, the press release was supported by an associated press conference by Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR, who negotiated the deal between the European Council (which unites the leaders of the European member states) and the European Parliament.
 
I created a transcript of the important stuff – details in attachment.
 
I’m copying the most notable pieces here:
“Listen let me make clear one point of substance. We have a situation here which is unprecedented and poses a whole array of scientific challenges. But we are not here to come up with scientific responses but to make laws. And that’s what we do.

And the whole principle of this law is: all European citizens – every citizen that from regulation onwards 1) gets a PCR 2) a serological test OR 3) a vaccination shall be provided with a certificate. Automatically. Issued by the Health System of the member state in which the European citizens intend to enjoy free movement back again.
Because I get asked so many times: how can you makes sure the vaccination gets it right? That the vaccination is safe? Or actually that you’re immune after the vaccination? How do you make sure that the PCR is not obsolete? How do you make sure…? No, listen… Those are scientific questions that I don’t want to be answered by this LEGAL instrument. This piece of legislation. We have to ascertain some legal clarity, some rules, which are binding for the states so that we regain trust not only member states between each other but also European citizens. Trust that they can actually exert their right to free movement with no arbitrary restrictions. As a matter of principle. And that’s what we do.”
 
“Supposedly, we are heading for a situation in which all of European citizens will be finally vaccinated. Eventually, it’s going to happen. So, let’s hope that it will happen. But as so far it is not the situation, there’s people resorting to PCRs or antigen tests which are also allowed according to the member states policy.”
 
 
For those of you still reading: thanks for taking the time. I’m afraid this train can no longer be stopped and I’m genuinely concerned. I genuinely don’t know what to do.
 

"Routine immunisation in schools
Young people aged 16 and 17 are presumed, in law, to be able to consent to
their own medical treatment. Younger children who understand fully what is
involved in the proposed procedure (referred to as ‘Gillick competent’) can
also give consent, although ideally their parents will be involved.
If a person aged 16 or 17 or a Gillick-competent child consents to treatment, a
parent cannot override that consent.
If a person aged 16 or 17 or a Gillick-competent child refuses treatment that
refusal should be accepted. It is unlikely that a person with parental
responsibility could overrule such a refusal. It is possible that the court might
overrule a young person’s refusal if an application to court is made
under section 8 of the Children Act 1989 or the inherent jurisdiction of the
High Court.
There is no requirement for consent to be in writing ."
Green-Book-Chapter-2-Consent-PDF-77K.pdf