#LOVEnotfear Eric Clapton DJ set
https://youtu.be/SQ6g5-hMFns

FREEDOM

https://instagram.com/lovenotfearmankind
https://lovenotfearmankind.org
t.me/lovenotfearmankind

As immunology would teach us, those who’ve been infected do NOT benefit from vaccination.
I feel embarrassed that (a) a study was thought necessary to learn this & (b) that I need to relay these results!
Mike


Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Methods. Employees of the Cleveland Clinic Health System working in Ohio on Dec 16, 2020, the day COVID-19 vaccination was started, were included. Any subject who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at least 42 days earlier was considered previously infected. One was considered vaccinated 14 days after receipt of the second dose of a SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection over the next five months, among previously infected subjects who received the vaccine, was compared with those of previously infected subjects who remained unvaccinated, previously uninfected subjects who received the vaccine, and previously uninfected subjects who remained unvaccinated. Results. Among the 52238 included employees, 1359 (53%) of 2579 previously infected subjects remained unvaccinated, compared with 22777 (41%) of 49659 not previously infected. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection remained almost zero among previously infected unvaccinated subjects, previously infected subjects who were vaccinated, and previously uninfected subjects who were vaccinated, compared with a steady increase in cumulative incidence among previously uninfected subjects who remained unvaccinated. Not one of the 1359 previously infected subjects who remained unvaccinated had a SARS-CoV-2 infection over the duration of the study. In a Cox proportional hazards regression model, after adjusting for the phase of the epidemic, vaccination was associated with a significantly lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among those not previously infected (HR 0.031, 95% CI 0.015 to 0.061) but not among those previously infected (HR 0.313, 95% CI 0 to Infinity). Conclusions. Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination, and vaccines can be safely prioritized to those who have not been infected before.

Agenda 21, The 2030 Agenda for sustainable develoement & The Hegelian Dialectic "New Normal"

I included the great Rosa Koire in this video, where back in 2012, she uses the term "New Normal", in relation to 'Problem > Reaction > Solution', she also talks about Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, have a listen . . .

Here’s the video in Bitchute:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6pyoSMavRqC2/

Agenda 21, The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development & The Hegelian Dialectic "New Normal"

I included the great Rosa Koire in this video, where back in 2012, she uses the term "New Normal", in relation to 'Problem > Reaction > Solution', she also talks about Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030, have a listen . . .

Here’s the video in Bitchute:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6pyoSMavRqC2/

RIGHT NOW WITH GARETH ICKE: JOURNALIST JACQUI DEEVOY, EXPLOSIVE STORY ON STATE EUTHANASIA

https://www.bitchute.com/video/sVVHjKMEWilo/

Apparently, this is coming. I still refuse to believe it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9656117/Britain-lead-way-vaccine-passports-G7-summit.html

Britain will lead the way on vaccine passports at the G7 summit as Boris Johnson is urged to establish globally agreed way of checking who is jabbed and tested to save time for airlines
Boris Johnson has been urged to establish a globally agreed way of recognising whether passengers have been vaccinated and tested so that airlines do not have to verify claims.

What is this globally agreed way ? Who "agreed" for all of us ??
The G7 is presided by the UK , Cornwall, 11-13 June, 2021.

It cannot be legal to inject magnetic lipoprotein into us without declaring it in the open and reaching a public consensus on the issue. WE HAVE TO PROVE IT TO THEM and demand answers.

Can anyone believe this ?? Still he cannot force it. However, there will be some dim mothers who will comply ! Tragic as it is.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9656305/Covid-vaccines-rolled-schoolchildren-aged-12-15-early-August.html

Calling a reguatlor with almost a million pounds donations from the Gates Foundation "Independent' is like calling a nursery "safe for little children" after it received donations by Jimmy Savile.

The Covid vaccine rollout is about using the power of the state to maximize corporate profits for pharmaceutical companies. 

An ethical Covid vaccine policy would begin with TCell screening for all patients before any vaccinations are even deemed necessary. But that would imply a responsible medical system that is not driven by the profit motive. If you already have natural immunity you don't need the vaccine.

Let's begin by discussing cross reactive immunity. Millions of people have cross reactive immunity to SarsCov2 because of previous infections with related coronaviruses.  That puts the Herd Immunity Threshold at between 50 and 25% because so many are already incapable of contracting Covid.

Next the Millions of Covid recovered people don't need a vaccine.  They have durable, long term TCell,  Antibody, Bcell, Cd4, Cd8, Bone marrow immunity, etc.  In fact it has been shown that vaccinating Covid recovered patients diminishes their innate immune response and is therefore contraindicated.  Why are there no exemptions for natural immunity? Because natural immunity doesn't benefit corporate profits. 

Most young people are not at risk of dying from Covid. Excluding people with pre existing conditions, cancer and the immune compromised. The CDC statistics are very clear in this regard. Therefore forcing an experimental medical intervention on them is particularly aggregious.  Especially when you take into account the tsunami of Covid vaccine injuries and deaths that we are presently beginning to experience.  Keep in mind that the VAERS system generally only reports between 1% and 10% of adverse reactions. 

I have treated an unacceptable number of adverse reactions to the experimental Covid vaccines.  I've seen more adverse reactions in the past 4 months than I've seen in the past 15 years of practicing medicine. Capitalism in the Vaccine Industry and the lack of corporate liability is deeply disturbing to me.  Safety and efficacy are not taken into consideration,  only profit. 💰💰💰

So far I've witnessed 3 cases of Bell's Palsy,  1 Parotitis,  1 Trigeminal Neuralgia,  3 cases of Shingles,  1 stroke, 2 Guillan Barre,  1 runaway high blood pressure spike,  1 miscarriage. Etc...  Disaster.

Of course all of the adverse reactions I've seen are acute. We aren't even talking about the long term implications.  We are definitely already seeing Antibody Dependent Enhancement and Pathogenic Priming in the vaccinated. We won't see the cancers, autoimmune disease or inflammatory conditions for a few weeks to years after the injection as it takes some time for cell signaling to mount an inflammatory response.  The biggest concern is long term neuro degenerative issues like prion disease.  Only time will tell.  But I'm certain that the Vaccine Aftermarket will be primed to rake in astronomical profits. Orders of magnitude greater than profits from direct Vaccine sales.

Next,  let's consider the warnings of Nobel Prize winning immunologist Luc Montagnier that the mass vaccination campaign is causing Antibody Dependent Enhancement which is driving immune escape mutations and creating the variants.  This mass vaccination strategy might be beneficial for Pharma in that it will drive the booster shot market. But it will not end the Pandemic. 

The most disturbing part of this medical malpractice fiasco is the latest Lancet study that shows the Pfizer as being 0.84% effective, Moderna at 1.2% effective, J&J 1.2% effective. How useless.

People need to stop mistaking a marketing campaign for a health campaign. 💸💸💸

And finally it's important to remember that using government force to push a corporate profit agenda is fascism. 

The real 1.2% figures of Covid19 gene therapy injection efficacy are absolute risk. It means that out of 100 people, 98.8 need to be injected, twice, in order to reduce some symptom of Covid19 in 1.2 out of 100 people in the random general population. But how many will develop adverse reactions, immune suppression or antibody-dependent enhancement? Many more than 1.2%..?

"The recent example of COVID-19 vaccination is illustrative. Preliminary results from mRNA COVID-19 vaccines suggested a relative risk reduction for confirmed COVID-19 cases of around 95% in the vaccinated compared with the placebo group, which has no doubt contributed to driving public adherence to vaccination.7 It may have been much less the case had the absolute risk reduction been discussed, which was around 1% (confirmed COVID-19 cases 1.21% and 0.07% in the non-vaccinated and vaccinated groups, respectively7)."

https://gut.bmj.com/content/early/2021/04/01/gutjnl-2021-324689#block-system-main

MIDAZOLAM STOPS PEOPLE BREATHING:
"Prescriptions for the drug midazolam doubled during the pandemic"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8514081/Number-prescriptions-drug-midazolam-doubled-height-pandemic.html

Let's get Matt Hancock on the ropes and put him on the defensive. All of us need to expose the Midazolam story on social media non stop and show how Matt Hancock was orchestrating all of it. This is Mike Yeadon's "unexpected card". We need to play it NOW.

THE MIDAZOLAM CARD AS OUR UNEXPECTED MOVE:
We can't keep playing along to their narrative, if we do so we will always be on the defensive and the reactive and one or more steps behind them. We need to turn the table on them and define our own rules, define our own narrative. Our rules to our own game is the only way we will win this. I would like to see banners and placards asking Matt Hancock about MIDAZOLAM at the next demos. Gareth Icke and Jacqui Deevoy together with the Daily Expose did a great job on this. @ClareWH on this group is coordinating with the Daily Expose and I suggest you do the same with your info: share with her or the Daily Expose. But it's just the start. We need to keep pushing this. We can't let them bury this story. They are afraid. Matt Hancock is very afraid because we all know what he did. We need to keep pushing this story. We need to build public awareness if we want justice for this. It was a difficult story to break but it has been done now and we need to be coordinated on it. Articles, blog posts, anybody who has evidence please pass it to the Daily Expose. This is in my view what Mike Yeadon calls the "unexpected card". They did not think we would play. So let's play it. We are playing to win now. We are on the offensive now. We need to force a retreat, the minimum result will be they sacrifice Matt Hancock to save themselves. Let's do it. Stop playing to their narrative and let's impose our own. Let's play a game we can only win. Let's do this. Let's change history for the better. Are you in?

LOVE NOT FEAR: PEACEFUL NON COMPLIANCE TO THE NARRATIVES OF FEAR. Violence is exactly the card they want us to play and the quickest way to close this channel. It's the trap to impose martial law which is there and ready. Unless the army is on the side of the minority, and it isn't, it is a stupid strategy. If you are for violence this channel is not for you. The best way to close down any channel here is to pay 77th to impersonate a violent agitator to lure and steer the channel (and me) in that direction. This is called a "Sting Operation". No such agitators will be allowed to incite violence on this channel as my first assumption is they are working as government infiltrators. If you are doing that on this channel expect to be removed. Find another channel if you are genuine but this channel is for peaceful protest NOT violent protest. This is won on ideas, as they have the army we don't.

Put in an FOI request for Hancock's emails and correspondence with the terms 'MIDAZOLAM' 'Hospitals' 'Care Homes'.

I just fixed a few typos:

I am writing to request information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

I would be interested in any information held by your organisation regarding my request which is any and all correspondence from 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2020 which include the terms 'Midazolam', 'hospitals' and 'care homes'.


I understand that I do not have to specify particular files or documents and it is the department's responsibility to provide the information I require. If you need further clarification please contact me by email.

I would like the information to be emailed to me in electronic form.

If my request is denied in whole or in part I ask that you justify all deletions by reference to specific exemptions of the act. I will also expect you to release all non-exempt material. I reserve the right to appeal your decision to withhold any information or to charge excessive fees.

I would be grateful if you could confirm in writing that you have received this request. I look forward to your response within 20 working days as outlined by the statute.

This is the subject line I used: Freedom of Information Request: 'Midazolam', 'hospitals' and 'care homes'

If you don't yet know these guys by name, you've definitely seen their work!

"The White Rose is a global network of nonviolent, independent activists, each a powerful one-man operation, all working in unison to disseminate a much needed counter-narrative to the relentless fear mongering, lies and propaganda we've all been bombarded with since the onset of the Covid-19 scamdemic.

In an age of rampant internet censorship, where all dissenting voices are silenced, and only government and corporate media propaganda is allowed a platform, we are taking the immense power of meme warfare to the streets, via the medium of stickers!"

Join them below:

t.me/jointhewhiterose