THE CONVERSATION

PART 1: ERIC CLAPTON

https://youtu.be/4OHmMKrVbNk

t.me/OracleFilms
t.me/robinmg
t.me/lovenotfearmankind

THE CONVERSATION

PART 2: ROBIN MONOTTI

https://youtu.be/uJRtqv6NIU4

t.me/OracleFilms
t.me/robinmg
t.me/lovenotfearmankind

EX PFIZER VP: “THE THING TO BE TERRIFIED OF IS YOUR GOVERNMENT” - The Highwire
https://thehighwire.com/videos/pfizer-vp-the-thing-to-be-terrified-of-is-your-government/

"A group of parents in Gainesville, FL, sent 6 face masks to a lab at the University of Florida, requesting an analysis of contaminants found on the masks after they had been worn. The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria. Although the test is capable of detecting viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, only one virus was found on one mask (alcelaphine herpesvirus 1).
The analysis detected the following 11 dangerous pathogens on the masks:

Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)

Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)

Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)

Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs—resistant to antibiotics)

Escherichia coli (food poisoning)

Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)

Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)

Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires’ disease)

Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)

Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)

Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more."

https://rationalground.com/dangerous-pathogens-found-on-childrens-face-masks/

Raises a few questions on the mad testing craze doesn't it?

Dear all,

This document is important so please read and SHARE widely!

I salute the author as being the only individual other than me who, having noticed unsupported statements about this virus being made, and having proof that at least some people making such statements KNEW THEM TO BE FALSE, has at last written down the essential facts here, that WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO PERSISTENTLY.

When people lie, especially about something as important as this is for all our future, we can be sure of something: they’re hiding something & they intend something other than our best interests at heart.
While we cannot be sure why they’re lying, it’s certain that they are.
Let me ask you something. Once a person is proven to be lying, in this case by his own mouth, why would you believe anything they tell you on the same topic?
Obviously, you should not.

Best wishes,
Dr Mike Yeadon


We will begin our op-ed on the lies of ‘asymptomatic spread’ by using the exact words of Dr. Anthony Fauci of the NIAID. Dr. Fauci, previously stated the following as he advocated and moved to shut the society down: “historically people need to realize that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all history of respiratory viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person. Even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers”. Soon and without scientific evidence, he and his fellow Task Force people changed the narrative to the contrary.

But what did we know? That he knew yet sought to lie to the nation. In asymptomatic individuals, the viral load is typically very low and the infectious period is also short in duration. They, asymptomatic positive persons (assuming they are ‘actually’ positive and not based on an incorrect test), may still exhale virus particles, which another person may encounter. However, the overall likelihood of transmitting the disease to others is negligible. Vanishingly small. Exceedingly small. Thus, asymptomatic cases are not the major drivers of epidemics.

Dr. Fauci and his staff along with the help of the media repeatedly came to the podium and misled the nation for they repeatedly told us that due to asymptomatic spread, we would have to wear masks, and socially distance, and close schools, and shut everything down. Dr. Fauci’s recent e-mails exposing the issue of asymptomatic spread being a non-issue underscores the misinformation he broadcasted to the public. Recent e-mails uncovered show that Fauci stated that “most transmissions” of virus “occur from someone who is symptomatic” and “not asymptomatic”. His comments that were reiterated scores of times on national and international media were the cause of many a loss of life, property, liberty and wealth of an entire generation.

Equally misleading was the premise that all infections equated to severe illness and potential death. This was not only an untruth but has led to scores of teenagers and 20+ year-olds fearful for their lives. They cower below their beds thinking they, in all their health, are at the same risk as their 85 year-old grandmother who has three grave medical conditions. This not only devastated their outlook to the future but hobbled them into a state of depression which translated to an increase in suicides in that cohort. We as a nation (and world) were fed mistruths, lies, and half-truths by what we can only describe as ‘fallen’ nonsensical, illogical, irrational, and specious medical experts on television, on the stage with their government bureaucratic leaders, and academics.

We knew very early on that COVID was amenable to risk stratification and that your baseline risk was most prognostic for mortality, age and obesity being the principle ones along with renal disease and diabetes as well as heart disease. We realized early on that a more focused ‘targeted’ approach was needed and not a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach that would be devastating.

This sobering analysis of U.K. Govts advisors presentation, being wholly lies & deceit, tells us the eleventh hour is coming.
They are so brazen because they no longer fear discovery. Why not?
Because they have full control.

Israeli kids told they no longer have to wear masks. Priceless

APARTHEID ON THE ISLE OF MAN:
"Fully vaccinated residents will be able to travel without restrictions, should plans be approved by Tynwald tomorrow.
The borders won't fully reopen on 28 June, but government has proposed some changes.
If approved, from June 28, fully vaccinated residents and non-residents will be able to travel without testing or isolation whilst restrictions would remain in place for those who haven't had both doses."

CoMin proposes unrestricted travel for fully vaccinated residents - Manx Radio
https://www.manxradio.com/news/isle-of-man-news/comin-proposes-unrestricted-travel-for-fully-vaccinated-residents/

Robin can you share the CTA by Time for Recovery to investigate the use of fear in the Covid campaign via BPS:

19-Year-Old College Freshman Dies From Heart Problem One Month After Second Dose of Moderna Vaccine
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/19-year-old-dies-heart-problem-moderna-vaccine/

Robin Monotti (almost) visits the Serpentine Pavilion in Hyde Park, London

"Ivermectin; IVM (red block) inhibits and disrupts binding of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein at the ACE-2 receptors (green). The green dotted lines depict activation pathways and the red dotted lines depict the inhibition pathways."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-021-00430-5

Subject: Making contact Paul Alexander >><< Mike Yeadon


http://groups.google.com/group/c19d-list/t/11008f4cd528446?utm_source=digest&utm_medium=email

Hello Paul!

I was so pleased to read your long article sent round in the email group. 

Other than me, you’re the only qualified person I’ve come across who has dispassionately taken apart the statements of senior scientific advisors and, discovering that they are
(1) not true & 
(2) said by a person who knows them to be untrue & therefore they’re 
(3) a liar.

Nobody else than you & me are taking this approach.

It’s so important that we do call out lies & liars, for their advice is what passes for government policy everywhere these days.

I go further than you. I have taken the same methodical approach that you have and extended it to every one of the major narrative points about this virus & ‘measures’.

I have concluded that 
(1) every one of these main narrative points are false &
(2) each has from time to time been asserted by highly qualified people who know perfectly well that what they’re saying is untrue & therefore they’re 
(3) a liar 

Now, this is the case about every main point, which I list below:

(1) the virus is novel, so no immunity to it & very much more lethal than anything else we’ve encountered.
(2) there are no treatments.
(3) PCR is a reliable test of clinically important infection 
(4) the virus can be spread by infected people without symptoms 
(5) masks protect against transmission 
(6) lockdowns slow transmission through the community 
(7) variants formed during virus replication are more dangerous & some will escape immunity 
(8) it’s uncertain if you can be infected twice 
(9) the vaccines are safe & effective 

Here’s a recent interview, I’m not sure it’s the best one, which is probably the one on Del Bigtree’s Highwire.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eqzgyTMssFvn/

The reason I’m contacting you is not only to say thank you for your approach but to assert that doing this is the only way we have any hope of waking enough people up.

Why? 

Simply because the public are not scientists. It’s no good at all sparring with the scientists advising our respective governments, claiming our scientific views indicate much less risk than we’re being told.

The public cannot weigh up the competing positions &zz find in our favour. To find against their own government’s scientists is to discard everything they’ve been told, in a heartbeat, and they’re never going to do this, ever.

BUT if it is correct to say “they are lying” and prove it, that’s a categorically different task asked of the audience. 

Now they’re asked “has the case been made convincingly that government scientists are lying?”

I think it’s so obvious that they are lying & there’s a decent chance that the audience will accept that they’re lying.

I would appreciate your acknowledging this as an approach of value. If you are in agreement, that’d be wonderful. If you think there’s a refinement that’s needed, please do let me know!

Best wishes & huge thanks,
Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon 

BSc (joint honours at the highest level) Biochemistry & Toxicology 

PhD respiratory pharmacology

32y senior leadership in pharmaceutical R&D

Former Vice President & Chief Scientist, Respiratory & Allergy, Pfizer R&D

Founder & CEO, Ziarco Ltd (acquired by Novartis)

Consultant to 30 start up & venture financed biotech companies (2 of which are now public, most famously Apellis Pharma Inc)