The implication is that the risks of a Covid-19 vaccine may outweigh the benefits for certain low-risk populations, such as children, young adults and people who have recovered from Covid-19. This is especially true in regions with low levels of community spread, since the likelihood of illness depends on exposure risk.
And while you would never know it from listening to public-health officials, not a single published study has demonstrated that patients with a prior infection benefit from Covid-19 vaccination. That this isn’t readily acknowledged by the CDC or Anthony Fauci is an indication of how deeply entangled pandemic politics is in science.
There are, however, signs of life for scientific honesty. In May, the Norwegian Medicines Agency reviewed case files for the first 100 reported deaths of nursing-home residents who received the Pfizer vaccine. The agency concluded that the vaccine “likely” contributed to the deaths of 10 of these residents through side effects such as fever and diarrhea, and “possibly” contributed to the deaths of an additional 26. But this type of honesty is rare. And it is rare for any vaccine to be linked to deaths, so this unusual development for mRNA vaccines merits further investigation.
The battle to recover scientific honesty will be an uphill one in the U.S. Anti-Trump politics in the spring of 2020 mushroomed into social-media censorship. News reporting often lacked intellectual curiosity about the appropriateness of public-health guidelines—or why a vocal minority of scientists strongly disagreed with prevailing opinions. Scientists have advocated for or against Covid-19 therapies while having financial relationships with product manufacturers and their foundation benefactors.
Public-health authorities are making a mistake and risking the public’s trust by not being forthcoming about the possibility of harm from certain vaccine side effects. There will be lasting consequences from mingling political partisanship and science during the management of a public-health crisis.
Dr. Ladapo is an associate professor of medicine at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine. Dr. Risch is a professor of epidemiology at Yale School of Public Health.

A reminder of our sister channel LOVE not fear, where we have a musicologist called Eric Clapton offering rare musical gems daily
t.me/lovenotfearmankind

A healthy person with a natural immunity might be a happy person—but to a 2021 biotech entrepreneur, who views the human body as a market to dominate, he is a sheer insult.

https://tessa.substack.com/p/war-natural

Apparently, pericarditis can be followed in a few years by heart failure at an extraordinary rate, leading to early death unless a heart transplant is done.
So the number of healthy young men, none of who was faintly likely to have been killed by the virus, who now are carrying a time bomb like risk, is just terrible.

“There have been more than 1,200 cases of pericarditis or myocarditis in individuals who are aged 30 or younger who have received the vaccine doses, according to the latest CDC findings last week.

The case rate, based on submissions to the FDA- and CDC-operated Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, is higher than expected in young males”.

To reduce viral load you still need high doses of vitamin D, zinc, a zinc ionophore (hydroxychloroquine, quercetin or EGCG) and possibly the macrolide bacteriostatic azithromycin or the tetracycline antibiotic doxycycline which apart from controlling secondary bacterial infections will also reduce viral load as they will limit viral replication in gut bacteria.

"Here, we show that standard doses of ivermectin (IVM), an anti-parasitic drug with potential immunomodulatory activities through the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, prevents clinical deterioration, reduces olfactory deficit and limits the inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tracts in SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters. Whereas it has no effect on viral load in the airways of infected animals, transcriptomic analyses of infected lungs reveal that IVM dampens type-I interferon responses and modulates several other inflammatory pathways"


https://www.embopress.org/doi/abs/10.15252/emmm.202114122

On the matter of further trials, I humbly suggest that Gates-funded trials of Ivermectin are highly unlikely to show results in favour of this safe, low cost and already proven to be effective medicine.

Like the child that pointed out that the Emperor wasn’t wearing any clothes, I would like to point out that Mr Gates is heavily invested, both financially and ideologically, in vaccinating the World. With Ivermectin vaccination is unnecessary - in fact, approval of all novel experimental therapies would have to be withdrawn. So Ivermectin is a big threat to Mr Gates’ investment.

One would not expect a philanthropist to make billions in profits at a time of human suffering. Thus, I would also like to point out that contrary to popular belief, Mr Gates cannot be a philanthropist - true philanthropists at times of tremendous suffering and loss have very little because they have given so much away. The sooner people realise that hoarding money is the same as hoarding other material possessions, the sooner people will see that Mr Gates’ Heart and Soul have been captured by his wallet, and the spell will be broken. Sadly, like any hoarder, Mr Gates needs the sort of help that money can’t buy.

We do not have to go along with his pretence anymore. It is clear that he values profit over humanity. Let’s acknowledge it and get on with getting the world healthy in spite of him. ~ Dr Tess Lawrie

There is a very well-made two part video “What’s up with the great reset?”.
This is Part 1.
Towards the end, a passionate young man stands up & argues that since economic advancement is not available to many, equality ought to be centrally provided AT THE EXPENSE OF LIBERTY.
I was an University in U.K. during a period in which it was widely understood that this debate had been had, extensively, and decided in favour of liberty with a social safety net.
The balance of freedoms vs obligations should be adjusted via the democratic process, greatly aided by electing good people & by incentivising substantial redistribution.
Obviously i was wrong & this debate is more than a live one.
But don’t be fooled by the alluring language of the great deception/ reset.
The system it will inevitably yield can only operate under conditions of totalitarian tyranny.
From 11.15, a response by a speaker.
“In my opinion, a society that aims for equality over liberty will end up with neither equality nor liberty”.

https://youtu.be/9VFXhAzYPPA

Prevention treatment from FLCC

London 26.6.21

This 100 year old who served in WW2 is at all the protests and the one at Downing Street the other Monday. I always manage to bump into him and get a picture ♥️ my hero 🇬🇧

He melts my heart ♥️ and is so sharp. He was a pilot and served in Egypt and I believe he said Africa but I missed that because people were wanting pictures of him! (I was hogging for to long).

I have an ally. I shared a summary of my response to that mendacious piece of nonsense under Reuters’ banner & overnight he’s turned it into a prelude of a formal rebuttal I may pen.
Rebuttals are tiresome, time consuming & censored.
They can issue three more smear pieces while I write my one response.
Meanwhile, no interviews.
It’s a bad deal which is why I rarely bother to respond.
But this smear piece is amateur night stuff.
Best wishes
Mike

Dear Robin,

Just got a nice message from a family in NZ.

My reply:


I know, it’s shocking how swiftly societies we thought we could depend upon have just collapsed.
I’m no psychologist so I don’t know how they’re done it.
I’ve always been resistant to adverts & the like, and maybe there’s a sceptical way of looking at the world that acts as a shield against this sort of PsyOps?
Keep strong & persuading a couple of people a day.
That’s all it takes. ‘Ro for the truth’ needs only to be persistently above 1 & we will win.
Best wishes
Mike

This needs checking as I don’t want unfairly to criticise someone.
On its face, a person in a position of trust is abusing that to others health detriment.
If correct, then need calling out.
Best wishes
Mike

Photo from .
https://www.gmc-uk.org/concerns/raise-a-concern

Complain about Dr Teresa Kelly's dangerous posts on twitter https://mobile.twitter.com/ztkelly/status/1408721156371320832

Someone famous once said that

“Those who can persuade you to believe absurdities will get you to commit atrocities”.

Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis - PubMed

"(SARS-CoV-2)-a new coronavirus that has led to a worldwide pandemic1-has a furin cleavage site (PRRAR) in its spike protein that is absent in other group-2B coronaviruses2..Together, our results demonstrate a critical role for the furin cleavage site in infection with SARS-CoV-2 and highlight the importance of this site for evaluating the neutralization activities of antibodies."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03237-4

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33494095/

It means the virus has a position on the spike protein that makes it more effective in causing disease and that this has not been identified in other related coronaviruses before. Could indicate it was designed to be this way artificially.