Forwarded from DISASTER X (Maximilian Forte)
Incidentally, Haiti, under the just executed President, had rejected the AstraZeneca vaccine. The US and Canada, that I know of, are looking for foreign sources on which to dump AstraZeneca stockpiles. Haiti remains unvaccinated, the only such nation in the Americas.
https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/world/americas/2021-06-09-haiti-has-no-covid-19-vaccines/
#Haiti #Caribbean #covid19
https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/world/americas/2021-06-09-haiti-has-no-covid-19-vaccines/
#Haiti #Caribbean #covid19
BusinessLIVE
Haiti has no Covid-19 vaccines
Government says it declined AstraZeneca doses on fears of side-effects
Bill Gates announces donation of $2.1 billion to fund abortion and contraceptives – Daily Expose
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/07/bill-gates-announces-donation-of-2-1-billion-to-fund-abortion-and-contraceptives/
https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/07/bill-gates-announces-donation-of-2-1-billion-to-fund-abortion-and-contraceptives/
The Expose
Bill Gates announces donation of $2.1 billion to fund abortion and contraceptives
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation announced a donation of $2.1 billion to fund “family planning” that includes abortions and contraceptives.
In&n
In&n
Forwarded from Piers_Corbyn_Stopnewnormal
🎾Freedom FINALS DAY⚽️
❗️❗️Please note change of meeting places❗️❗️
The Government have said they won’t be mandating domestic passports however they are allowing organisations to implement their own system and the likes of the Premier League have already said they will. This is coercion...
Join all groups at one or more of the actions:
DISCUSSION GROUP: https://t.me/LondonRallies
❗️❗️Please note change of meeting places❗️❗️
The Government have said they won’t be mandating domestic passports however they are allowing organisations to implement their own system and the likes of the Premier League have already said they will. This is coercion...
Join all groups at one or more of the actions:
DISCUSSION GROUP: https://t.me/LondonRallies
Face masks are the contemporary blackshirts: symbols of the total & blind obedience to the biofascist totalitarian regime, responsible for the destruction of milions of lives. The first people to embrace the biofascist regime and its symbolic paraphernalia of masks and syringes, the contemporary blackshirts and fasces, were the self proclaimed "anti-fascists". Lockdowns do not save lives, they destroy the lives of the middle & the lower classes. That's why the oligarchy led by Bill Gates chose them as their preferred class war tool of societal and economic destruction.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Dear Robin,
Another description, contrasting propaganda & reality in the topic of immune recognition.
All the best,
Mike
Variants - irrelevant & being used as propaganda.
It’s true that when this virus, SARS-CoV-2, replicates inside our cells, it occasionally makes a “molecular typo” error. Instead of a letter A, for example, we might see a letter U. These letters are instructions for what the next infected cell is instructed to manufacture.
Quite commonly there are several errors made.
But it’s very important to realise that there are a LOT of letters making up the genetic code for this virus, almost 30,000 letters.
In turn this translates into almost 10,000 amino acids, the building blocks of all proteins. If a particular altered code is found often enough, it might get noticed as “a variant of interest”.
The question is, “Does it matter?”
So far, the answer is categorically NO.
If we look at the variant which is most-different, we find that no variant is more than 0.3% changed from the original Wuhan sequence. That’s right, no variant is less than 99.7% identical to the original virus.
To give an idea as to how much (or how little, really) a change of 0.3% is, I ask you to accept that the area of one palm of your hand is about 1% of your body surface area. So a visual difference of around the area of a third of one palm is what to memorise. That’s less than the visual change brought about by turning a baseball cap around, or changing the shape of the lenses in your sunglasses, and expecting not to be recognised by your partner. They won’t be fooled.
Please allow me to demonstrate that a difference of this minute amount definitely won’t fool your immune system either, into thinking “this is a new virus, not sure how I’ll cope”.
Back in 2003, there was a previous coronavirus, called SARS. It was never as widely spread out as the current virus, but plenty of people were infected. Several of these were followed up & invited to volunteer for a test on the immune cells in their blood.
The main findings were that all volunteers retained solid immunity to SARS, 17 years after being infected. That’s great & is what to expect with the present virus: robust & durable immunity.
But the second finding was astonishing to those who are unfamiliar with immunology. Every survivor of infection by SARS all those years ago also had cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2. How could this possibly be? They’d never seen the new virus.
The answer is in the similarity of the two viruses: they’re around 78% identical, or 22% different. The way our immune systems recognise & remember respiratory viruses is to chop it into pieces & examine all the pieces.
With a similarity as much as 78%, many of the pieces of the SARS virus which were recognised in 2003 are the same as the pieces recognised in SARS-CoV-2 now.
If our immune systems have absolutely no difficulty recognising two viruses which are 22% different, it’s literally impossible & absurd to pretend to the British people that a mere 0.3% mutation is a problem. It’s not a problem.
Anyone immune to the current virus, whether by natural infection or from vaccination, is also immune to all the variants. It’s not just me saying so. Clinical immunologists tested the blood T-cells from volunteers & showed them all the variants which they had available, and they easily recognised & responded to them all.
These mutations in SARS-CoV-2 are very common but they produce a lot of hot air. None the of these variants differ enough to represent the slightest threat to immunity already hard won. That’s the big idea, but you’re not falling for it. So you definitely do not need a booster or variant vaccine. Don’t let anyone come near you with a syringe of such a thing. They’re not honest & they’re not your friend.
Might a variant be more infectious? Sure, that’s possible - and expected. How have we ended up with around 40 different viruses able to infect human respiratory tract? We think they each had nastier origins but over time, they’ve become more infectious but a LESS dangerous.
Another description, contrasting propaganda & reality in the topic of immune recognition.
All the best,
Mike
Variants - irrelevant & being used as propaganda.
It’s true that when this virus, SARS-CoV-2, replicates inside our cells, it occasionally makes a “molecular typo” error. Instead of a letter A, for example, we might see a letter U. These letters are instructions for what the next infected cell is instructed to manufacture.
Quite commonly there are several errors made.
But it’s very important to realise that there are a LOT of letters making up the genetic code for this virus, almost 30,000 letters.
In turn this translates into almost 10,000 amino acids, the building blocks of all proteins. If a particular altered code is found often enough, it might get noticed as “a variant of interest”.
The question is, “Does it matter?”
So far, the answer is categorically NO.
If we look at the variant which is most-different, we find that no variant is more than 0.3% changed from the original Wuhan sequence. That’s right, no variant is less than 99.7% identical to the original virus.
To give an idea as to how much (or how little, really) a change of 0.3% is, I ask you to accept that the area of one palm of your hand is about 1% of your body surface area. So a visual difference of around the area of a third of one palm is what to memorise. That’s less than the visual change brought about by turning a baseball cap around, or changing the shape of the lenses in your sunglasses, and expecting not to be recognised by your partner. They won’t be fooled.
Please allow me to demonstrate that a difference of this minute amount definitely won’t fool your immune system either, into thinking “this is a new virus, not sure how I’ll cope”.
Back in 2003, there was a previous coronavirus, called SARS. It was never as widely spread out as the current virus, but plenty of people were infected. Several of these were followed up & invited to volunteer for a test on the immune cells in their blood.
The main findings were that all volunteers retained solid immunity to SARS, 17 years after being infected. That’s great & is what to expect with the present virus: robust & durable immunity.
But the second finding was astonishing to those who are unfamiliar with immunology. Every survivor of infection by SARS all those years ago also had cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2. How could this possibly be? They’d never seen the new virus.
The answer is in the similarity of the two viruses: they’re around 78% identical, or 22% different. The way our immune systems recognise & remember respiratory viruses is to chop it into pieces & examine all the pieces.
With a similarity as much as 78%, many of the pieces of the SARS virus which were recognised in 2003 are the same as the pieces recognised in SARS-CoV-2 now.
If our immune systems have absolutely no difficulty recognising two viruses which are 22% different, it’s literally impossible & absurd to pretend to the British people that a mere 0.3% mutation is a problem. It’s not a problem.
Anyone immune to the current virus, whether by natural infection or from vaccination, is also immune to all the variants. It’s not just me saying so. Clinical immunologists tested the blood T-cells from volunteers & showed them all the variants which they had available, and they easily recognised & responded to them all.
These mutations in SARS-CoV-2 are very common but they produce a lot of hot air. None the of these variants differ enough to represent the slightest threat to immunity already hard won. That’s the big idea, but you’re not falling for it. So you definitely do not need a booster or variant vaccine. Don’t let anyone come near you with a syringe of such a thing. They’re not honest & they’re not your friend.
Might a variant be more infectious? Sure, that’s possible - and expected. How have we ended up with around 40 different viruses able to infect human respiratory tract? We think they each had nastier origins but over time, they’ve become more infectious but a LESS dangerous.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Do don’t let them take away your liberty on an set of immunological lies.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
I’ve been afraid of this. Under cover of “its for your safety”, governments around the world will take powers to themselves which grant then the right to seize our private assets.
Why do I fear that?
Because it’s a necessary step on the route to the Great Reset.
Spain drafts legal reform allowing state to mobilize all adults in times of crisis
The changes to the National Security Law, which incorporates lessons from the coronavirus pandemic, would also let the government requisition private assets and suspend activity
Why do I fear that?
Because it’s a necessary step on the route to the Great Reset.
Spain drafts legal reform allowing state to mobilize all adults in times of crisis
The changes to the National Security Law, which incorporates lessons from the coronavirus pandemic, would also let the government requisition private assets and suspend activity
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
EL PAÍS English
Spain drafts legal reform allowing state to mobilize all adults in times of crisis
The changes to the National Security Law, which incorporates lessons from the coronavirus pandemic, would also let the government requisition private assets and suspend activity
In Telegram 71, of April 1945, Hitler gave the order to destroy the German people's own living conditions. Today we call it "lockdown".
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Japanese mouse study of distribution of radio labelled lipid nano particles comprising the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine. Note the time dependent INCREASE in concentrations in spleen & ovaries.
Forced or coerced vaccination is a violation of:
1) Nuremberg Code
2) UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (art.6).
3) UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (art. 7).
4) UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (art. 3).
5) (UK) Public Health(Control of Disease Act) 1984 Section 45 E
6) Declaration of Helsinki (25)
1) Nuremberg Code
2) UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (art.6).
3) UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (art. 7).
4) UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (art. 3).
5) (UK) Public Health(Control of Disease Act) 1984 Section 45 E
6) Declaration of Helsinki (25)
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Right side of graphic shows unequivocal increases in anti-syncytin-1 after a mere 4 days post vaccination, a time at which antibodies to spike protein aren’t yet clearly elevated.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Robin,
I’ve engaged in debate with a person who appears to believe “Of course the covid19 vaccines work, it’s impossible for them not to & anyone taking a contrary position is definitely wrong”.
This is my response.
Here also is the evidence underwriting my now-severe concerns on the safety side. Not only does spike protein trigger coagulation, hence by far, the adverse events reported after covid19 vaccination being explained broadly by thromboembolic disorders, but there is now sufficient evidence that any suitably qualified person would see as raising serious safety concerns in relation to reproduction.
<<A person lacking a proper perspective, then.
Conceptually, he is right, vaccines do ‘work’: but in each new example, there are many ‘ifs’!
IF an appropriate immunogenic material is given, and IF it’s an appropriate dose, and IF this leads to an effective immune response, then it will be protective.
IF the intervention is safe, then the risk / benefit typically strongly favours prophylactic use IF the recipient demographic is at notable risk if infected.
Trouble is, all of those ‘ifs’ are not met.
These gene-based products do not appear to yield strong protection. No one has studied the biodistribution of any of these products in humans, so far as we know, nor the time-course of the response to it.
The choice of immunogen is utterly reckless because coronavirus spike proteins have long been realised are biologically active structures. Not least of which, the biological effects of spike include ‘fusogenicity’, the propensity to induce cells to clump together & to trigger both blood coagulation & immune complement activation.
(By the way, the human protein essential to pregnancy, syncytin-1, is related albeit distantly to spike protein. And unsurprisingly, syncytin-1 also prompts certain cells to join together in a loose but vital arrangement termed a syncytium, a rather wonderful arrangement of anatomy which leads to formation & correct functioning of structures necessary to support implantation & gestation of the human embryo. A friend wryly observed that, had we not picked up & retained into our genomes this syncytin family of proteins, “we’d still be laying eggs”. Mammalian reproduction depends completely upon this system as well as others. Anything which prompts an immune response against the life support system for the developing embryo is an unacceptable risk. Yet we now know that at least one such product accumulates in mouse ovaries & furthermore that females vaccinated with the Pfizer agent, do raise antibodies to syncytin-1, exactly as feared by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I in our Dec 1 2020 petition to the European Medicines Agency.
So they’re not safe & don’t appear to confer robust protection, either.
Finally, in this narrow set of considerations, censorship has ensured that most people are not aware that covid19 is THE most treatable respiratory viral illness ever.
Combine the serious safety failings built in by design into every one of these products with dubious efficacy & ignoring good, safe treatments, I’m led to the firm conclusion that these ‘vaccines’ should be administered to no one.
The current policy implicitly if not explicitly is “pretty much to vaccinate everyone on the planet”.
This is undoubtedly malign. Knowing what we now know, from the US VAERS for example, it was unequivocally evident, by February 2021, a wholly dangerous policy.
It must be opposed by everybody.
A person can be pro-innovative new medical interventions, as I obviously am, being myself by training & experience a product of the pharmaceutical industry, yet being against a specific, horribly dangerous example of an intervention.
I am pro-safety, not “anti-Vax”.
Best wishes
Mike >>
I’ve engaged in debate with a person who appears to believe “Of course the covid19 vaccines work, it’s impossible for them not to & anyone taking a contrary position is definitely wrong”.
This is my response.
Here also is the evidence underwriting my now-severe concerns on the safety side. Not only does spike protein trigger coagulation, hence by far, the adverse events reported after covid19 vaccination being explained broadly by thromboembolic disorders, but there is now sufficient evidence that any suitably qualified person would see as raising serious safety concerns in relation to reproduction.
<<A person lacking a proper perspective, then.
Conceptually, he is right, vaccines do ‘work’: but in each new example, there are many ‘ifs’!
IF an appropriate immunogenic material is given, and IF it’s an appropriate dose, and IF this leads to an effective immune response, then it will be protective.
IF the intervention is safe, then the risk / benefit typically strongly favours prophylactic use IF the recipient demographic is at notable risk if infected.
Trouble is, all of those ‘ifs’ are not met.
These gene-based products do not appear to yield strong protection. No one has studied the biodistribution of any of these products in humans, so far as we know, nor the time-course of the response to it.
The choice of immunogen is utterly reckless because coronavirus spike proteins have long been realised are biologically active structures. Not least of which, the biological effects of spike include ‘fusogenicity’, the propensity to induce cells to clump together & to trigger both blood coagulation & immune complement activation.
(By the way, the human protein essential to pregnancy, syncytin-1, is related albeit distantly to spike protein. And unsurprisingly, syncytin-1 also prompts certain cells to join together in a loose but vital arrangement termed a syncytium, a rather wonderful arrangement of anatomy which leads to formation & correct functioning of structures necessary to support implantation & gestation of the human embryo. A friend wryly observed that, had we not picked up & retained into our genomes this syncytin family of proteins, “we’d still be laying eggs”. Mammalian reproduction depends completely upon this system as well as others. Anything which prompts an immune response against the life support system for the developing embryo is an unacceptable risk. Yet we now know that at least one such product accumulates in mouse ovaries & furthermore that females vaccinated with the Pfizer agent, do raise antibodies to syncytin-1, exactly as feared by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I in our Dec 1 2020 petition to the European Medicines Agency.
So they’re not safe & don’t appear to confer robust protection, either.
Finally, in this narrow set of considerations, censorship has ensured that most people are not aware that covid19 is THE most treatable respiratory viral illness ever.
Combine the serious safety failings built in by design into every one of these products with dubious efficacy & ignoring good, safe treatments, I’m led to the firm conclusion that these ‘vaccines’ should be administered to no one.
The current policy implicitly if not explicitly is “pretty much to vaccinate everyone on the planet”.
This is undoubtedly malign. Knowing what we now know, from the US VAERS for example, it was unequivocally evident, by February 2021, a wholly dangerous policy.
It must be opposed by everybody.
A person can be pro-innovative new medical interventions, as I obviously am, being myself by training & experience a product of the pharmaceutical industry, yet being against a specific, horribly dangerous example of an intervention.
I am pro-safety, not “anti-Vax”.
Best wishes
Mike >>
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Robin,
A candid interview with Dr Robert Malone, credited as inventor of mRNA technology.
Please share & add my strong encouragement that people watch at least the first ten minutes.
Subsequently, exhortation that people themselves SHARE this interview.
Many thanks
Mike
A candid interview with Dr Robert Malone, credited as inventor of mRNA technology.
Please share & add my strong encouragement that people watch at least the first ten minutes.
Subsequently, exhortation that people themselves SHARE this interview.
Many thanks
Mike
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
www.theepochtimes.com
Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA Vaccine Inventor, on the Bioethics of Experimental Vaccines and the ‘Ultimate Gaslighting’
“What would happen to the entire vaccine enterprise—I’m talking about pediatric vaccines, the fundamental bedrocks of public health—if ...