Forced or coerced vaccination is a violation of:
1) Nuremberg Code
2) UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (art.6).
3) UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (art. 7).
4) UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (art. 3).
5) (UK) Public Health(Control of Disease Act) 1984 Section 45 E
6) Declaration of Helsinki (25)
1) Nuremberg Code
2) UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (art.6).
3) UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (art. 7).
4) UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (art. 3).
5) (UK) Public Health(Control of Disease Act) 1984 Section 45 E
6) Declaration of Helsinki (25)
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Right side of graphic shows unequivocal increases in anti-syncytin-1 after a mere 4 days post vaccination, a time at which antibodies to spike protein aren’t yet clearly elevated.
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Robin,
I’ve engaged in debate with a person who appears to believe “Of course the covid19 vaccines work, it’s impossible for them not to & anyone taking a contrary position is definitely wrong”.
This is my response.
Here also is the evidence underwriting my now-severe concerns on the safety side. Not only does spike protein trigger coagulation, hence by far, the adverse events reported after covid19 vaccination being explained broadly by thromboembolic disorders, but there is now sufficient evidence that any suitably qualified person would see as raising serious safety concerns in relation to reproduction.
<<A person lacking a proper perspective, then.
Conceptually, he is right, vaccines do ‘work’: but in each new example, there are many ‘ifs’!
IF an appropriate immunogenic material is given, and IF it’s an appropriate dose, and IF this leads to an effective immune response, then it will be protective.
IF the intervention is safe, then the risk / benefit typically strongly favours prophylactic use IF the recipient demographic is at notable risk if infected.
Trouble is, all of those ‘ifs’ are not met.
These gene-based products do not appear to yield strong protection. No one has studied the biodistribution of any of these products in humans, so far as we know, nor the time-course of the response to it.
The choice of immunogen is utterly reckless because coronavirus spike proteins have long been realised are biologically active structures. Not least of which, the biological effects of spike include ‘fusogenicity’, the propensity to induce cells to clump together & to trigger both blood coagulation & immune complement activation.
(By the way, the human protein essential to pregnancy, syncytin-1, is related albeit distantly to spike protein. And unsurprisingly, syncytin-1 also prompts certain cells to join together in a loose but vital arrangement termed a syncytium, a rather wonderful arrangement of anatomy which leads to formation & correct functioning of structures necessary to support implantation & gestation of the human embryo. A friend wryly observed that, had we not picked up & retained into our genomes this syncytin family of proteins, “we’d still be laying eggs”. Mammalian reproduction depends completely upon this system as well as others. Anything which prompts an immune response against the life support system for the developing embryo is an unacceptable risk. Yet we now know that at least one such product accumulates in mouse ovaries & furthermore that females vaccinated with the Pfizer agent, do raise antibodies to syncytin-1, exactly as feared by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I in our Dec 1 2020 petition to the European Medicines Agency.
So they’re not safe & don’t appear to confer robust protection, either.
Finally, in this narrow set of considerations, censorship has ensured that most people are not aware that covid19 is THE most treatable respiratory viral illness ever.
Combine the serious safety failings built in by design into every one of these products with dubious efficacy & ignoring good, safe treatments, I’m led to the firm conclusion that these ‘vaccines’ should be administered to no one.
The current policy implicitly if not explicitly is “pretty much to vaccinate everyone on the planet”.
This is undoubtedly malign. Knowing what we now know, from the US VAERS for example, it was unequivocally evident, by February 2021, a wholly dangerous policy.
It must be opposed by everybody.
A person can be pro-innovative new medical interventions, as I obviously am, being myself by training & experience a product of the pharmaceutical industry, yet being against a specific, horribly dangerous example of an intervention.
I am pro-safety, not “anti-Vax”.
Best wishes
Mike >>
I’ve engaged in debate with a person who appears to believe “Of course the covid19 vaccines work, it’s impossible for them not to & anyone taking a contrary position is definitely wrong”.
This is my response.
Here also is the evidence underwriting my now-severe concerns on the safety side. Not only does spike protein trigger coagulation, hence by far, the adverse events reported after covid19 vaccination being explained broadly by thromboembolic disorders, but there is now sufficient evidence that any suitably qualified person would see as raising serious safety concerns in relation to reproduction.
<<A person lacking a proper perspective, then.
Conceptually, he is right, vaccines do ‘work’: but in each new example, there are many ‘ifs’!
IF an appropriate immunogenic material is given, and IF it’s an appropriate dose, and IF this leads to an effective immune response, then it will be protective.
IF the intervention is safe, then the risk / benefit typically strongly favours prophylactic use IF the recipient demographic is at notable risk if infected.
Trouble is, all of those ‘ifs’ are not met.
These gene-based products do not appear to yield strong protection. No one has studied the biodistribution of any of these products in humans, so far as we know, nor the time-course of the response to it.
The choice of immunogen is utterly reckless because coronavirus spike proteins have long been realised are biologically active structures. Not least of which, the biological effects of spike include ‘fusogenicity’, the propensity to induce cells to clump together & to trigger both blood coagulation & immune complement activation.
(By the way, the human protein essential to pregnancy, syncytin-1, is related albeit distantly to spike protein. And unsurprisingly, syncytin-1 also prompts certain cells to join together in a loose but vital arrangement termed a syncytium, a rather wonderful arrangement of anatomy which leads to formation & correct functioning of structures necessary to support implantation & gestation of the human embryo. A friend wryly observed that, had we not picked up & retained into our genomes this syncytin family of proteins, “we’d still be laying eggs”. Mammalian reproduction depends completely upon this system as well as others. Anything which prompts an immune response against the life support system for the developing embryo is an unacceptable risk. Yet we now know that at least one such product accumulates in mouse ovaries & furthermore that females vaccinated with the Pfizer agent, do raise antibodies to syncytin-1, exactly as feared by Dr Wolfgang Wodarg & I in our Dec 1 2020 petition to the European Medicines Agency.
So they’re not safe & don’t appear to confer robust protection, either.
Finally, in this narrow set of considerations, censorship has ensured that most people are not aware that covid19 is THE most treatable respiratory viral illness ever.
Combine the serious safety failings built in by design into every one of these products with dubious efficacy & ignoring good, safe treatments, I’m led to the firm conclusion that these ‘vaccines’ should be administered to no one.
The current policy implicitly if not explicitly is “pretty much to vaccinate everyone on the planet”.
This is undoubtedly malign. Knowing what we now know, from the US VAERS for example, it was unequivocally evident, by February 2021, a wholly dangerous policy.
It must be opposed by everybody.
A person can be pro-innovative new medical interventions, as I obviously am, being myself by training & experience a product of the pharmaceutical industry, yet being against a specific, horribly dangerous example of an intervention.
I am pro-safety, not “anti-Vax”.
Best wishes
Mike >>
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Robin,
A candid interview with Dr Robert Malone, credited as inventor of mRNA technology.
Please share & add my strong encouragement that people watch at least the first ten minutes.
Subsequently, exhortation that people themselves SHARE this interview.
Many thanks
Mike
A candid interview with Dr Robert Malone, credited as inventor of mRNA technology.
Please share & add my strong encouragement that people watch at least the first ten minutes.
Subsequently, exhortation that people themselves SHARE this interview.
Many thanks
Mike
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
www.theepochtimes.com
Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA Vaccine Inventor, on the Bioethics of Experimental Vaccines and the ‘Ultimate Gaslighting’
“What would happen to the entire vaccine enterprise—I’m talking about pediatric vaccines, the fundamental bedrocks of public health—if ...
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
It’s literally absurd.
That’s the case for the non vulnerable to get vaccinated.
No, thanks.
Idiots.
Mike Y
That’s the case for the non vulnerable to get vaccinated.
No, thanks.
Idiots.
Mike Y
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
This is a very important statement by a person I know, Dr Stephen Frost.
Of course, his main thrust is correct. It’s long been a fraud on the people of the world.
I judge we have but two, short months at best before U.K. and many other countries commence their final glide below the water & end the era of widespread liberal democracies. These are historically rare.
I’ve said it before: in this world war, there are no Allies: no one is coming to save us.
It’s down to the many of us to stand up, persuade others (please use my Eight covid19 lies’ if it helps.
In some countries running on currencies with extraordinarily overvalued exchange rate, a Reset of some kind is all but inevitable.
In other places, full recovery might still be possible.
Those who’ve not yet spoken out: this is your moment if you aspire to a world fit right bequeath to your kids & grandkids.
I don’t believe there’ll be another chance.
Presciently, even Huxley observed that “once a full blown scientific tyranny exists, it is irreversible”.
Best wishes
Mike
Of course, his main thrust is correct. It’s long been a fraud on the people of the world.
I judge we have but two, short months at best before U.K. and many other countries commence their final glide below the water & end the era of widespread liberal democracies. These are historically rare.
I’ve said it before: in this world war, there are no Allies: no one is coming to save us.
It’s down to the many of us to stand up, persuade others (please use my Eight covid19 lies’ if it helps.
In some countries running on currencies with extraordinarily overvalued exchange rate, a Reset of some kind is all but inevitable.
In other places, full recovery might still be possible.
Those who’ve not yet spoken out: this is your moment if you aspire to a world fit right bequeath to your kids & grandkids.
I don’t believe there’ll be another chance.
Presciently, even Huxley observed that “once a full blown scientific tyranny exists, it is irreversible”.
Best wishes
Mike
The Responsibility of Medical Doctors: Warn the Public Worldwide of Serious State Criminality and Coverup Thereof By Dr. C. Stephen Frost
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-responsibility-of-medical-doctors-warn-the-public-worldwide-of-serious-state-criminality-and-coverup-thereof/5749626
https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-responsibility-of-medical-doctors-warn-the-public-worldwide-of-serious-state-criminality-and-coverup-thereof/5749626
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Robin, everyone:
A very important open letter from a U.K. medical doctor, who writes under a pseudonym.
Please share widely.
Thank you all 🙏
Mike
A very important open letter from a U.K. medical doctor, who writes under a pseudonym.
Please share widely.
Thank you all 🙏
Mike
COVID Vax, KIDS & CONSENT: A Red line to the Rubicon
https://tcp.art.blog/2021/07/06/covid-vax-kids-consent-a-redline-to-the-rubicon/
https://tcp.art.blog/2021/07/06/covid-vax-kids-consent-a-redline-to-the-rubicon/
The Covid Physician
COVID Vax, KIDS & CONSENT: A Red line to the Rubicon
An Open Letter of Accountability July 6th 2021 FAO: PM, CMO, SoS Health, SoS Justice, Vaccine Minister, MHRA, GMC, NMC, RCGP, RCS, RCPCH, RCN, NHSE Dear Sir/Madam, This is an open communication whi…
Forwarded from Mike Yeadon
Does anyone know what the light is that the woman shines on her skin?
Forwarded from Coronavirus Plushie
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"VARIANTS THO"
A compilation video to help people understand that there's no need to be concerned about ‘variants’, and that rather, people should be more concerned about the experimental jab.
Video in Bitchute, to share outside Telegram:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0402rJFAxOuT/
…………………………………………………………….............
A compilation video to help people understand that there's no need to be concerned about ‘variants’, and that rather, people should be more concerned about the experimental jab.
Video in Bitchute, to share outside Telegram:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0402rJFAxOuT/
…………………………………………………………….............
Trump versus Big Tech – it won’t be pretty | The Conservative Woman
"A class-action suit is an invitation for every Trump supporter with a grievance against the tech oligarchs to pile on. That’s a cohort of around 80million angry souls, which could get mortally expensive for the defendants, given the involvement of Big Tobacco-chewing legal talent that Trump claims to have on board.
In his press statement Trump, like Ayyadurai, alleges that the technology companies are acting in collusion with government, which puts them in great jeopardy. Until now these companies have claimed that, being commercial entities, they have the right to abridge speech that they deem unacceptable. Ayyadurai’s earlier revelations may have shown the way to unravel the corruption that is the secretive public/private partnership behind suppression of dissent by conservatives and Christians in the virtual world. Free speech in America is totemic as nowhere else in the world, and government suppression of same by proxy will not stand. Trump has let it be known that he doesn’t expect to settle this action out of court. He means to slay some giants.
As for the sitting administration, this attack on its apologists has come at a bad time. Audits of the 2020 election in several swing states, Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania, could end up revealing that it is a cuckoo in the nest. Its reputation in government is in tatters as the economy suffers under its policies. Its leaders, Biden and Harris, are increasingly held in contempt for their mismanagement of the southern border, law and order in the major cities and international relations.
The public laundering of dirty washing may also bring to mainstream attention how the CIA funding arm, In-Q-Tel, has had deep ties to the tech giants since their inception. Shining a light on that dark corner would certainly be a swamp-draining dividend. This case has the potential to injure the Democrats, Big Tech and the deep state. To strike those three jailbirds with one stone would be fabled marksmanship indeed.
One of Trump’s greatest assets is that people underestimate him. It’s remarkable, given his string of victories against overwhelming odds, that he is still scoffed at as if he were merely a lucky clown. Although Trump retreated quietly from the presidency to howls of his supporters’ dismay, I’d say his withdrawal was strategic. The American people had to be red-pilled by a blatant assault on the integrity of their elections, giving them a non-partisan reason to repudiate the corrupt entities in Washington. While Biden napped, Trump worked extremely hard not just to win the presidency, but by such a large margin that the cheating necessary to defeat him could not be concealed. In attempting to do so with censorship the opposition has left a vulnerable flank which Trump will now attack ruthlessly. The man is no fool."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/trump-versus-big-tech-it-wont-be-pretty/
"A class-action suit is an invitation for every Trump supporter with a grievance against the tech oligarchs to pile on. That’s a cohort of around 80million angry souls, which could get mortally expensive for the defendants, given the involvement of Big Tobacco-chewing legal talent that Trump claims to have on board.
In his press statement Trump, like Ayyadurai, alleges that the technology companies are acting in collusion with government, which puts them in great jeopardy. Until now these companies have claimed that, being commercial entities, they have the right to abridge speech that they deem unacceptable. Ayyadurai’s earlier revelations may have shown the way to unravel the corruption that is the secretive public/private partnership behind suppression of dissent by conservatives and Christians in the virtual world. Free speech in America is totemic as nowhere else in the world, and government suppression of same by proxy will not stand. Trump has let it be known that he doesn’t expect to settle this action out of court. He means to slay some giants.
As for the sitting administration, this attack on its apologists has come at a bad time. Audits of the 2020 election in several swing states, Arizona, Georgia and Pennsylvania, could end up revealing that it is a cuckoo in the nest. Its reputation in government is in tatters as the economy suffers under its policies. Its leaders, Biden and Harris, are increasingly held in contempt for their mismanagement of the southern border, law and order in the major cities and international relations.
The public laundering of dirty washing may also bring to mainstream attention how the CIA funding arm, In-Q-Tel, has had deep ties to the tech giants since their inception. Shining a light on that dark corner would certainly be a swamp-draining dividend. This case has the potential to injure the Democrats, Big Tech and the deep state. To strike those three jailbirds with one stone would be fabled marksmanship indeed.
One of Trump’s greatest assets is that people underestimate him. It’s remarkable, given his string of victories against overwhelming odds, that he is still scoffed at as if he were merely a lucky clown. Although Trump retreated quietly from the presidency to howls of his supporters’ dismay, I’d say his withdrawal was strategic. The American people had to be red-pilled by a blatant assault on the integrity of their elections, giving them a non-partisan reason to repudiate the corrupt entities in Washington. While Biden napped, Trump worked extremely hard not just to win the presidency, but by such a large margin that the cheating necessary to defeat him could not be concealed. In attempting to do so with censorship the opposition has left a vulnerable flank which Trump will now attack ruthlessly. The man is no fool."
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/trump-versus-big-tech-it-wont-be-pretty/
The Conservative Woman
Trump versus Big Tech – it won’t be pretty - The Conservative Woman